logo
‘Extinction crisis' could see 500 bird species vanish within a century

‘Extinction crisis' could see 500 bird species vanish within a century

More than 500 bird species could vanish within the next century, researchers have found, calling for urgent 'special recovery programmes' such as captive breeding and habitat restoration to rescue unique species.
Birds such as the puffin, European turtle dove, and great bustard will be among those to disappear from our skies if trends continue, according to the paper. Their loss threatens to unravel ecosystems across the globe.
'We face a bird extinction crisis unprecedented in modern times,' said Kerry Stewart, lead author of the research from England's University of Reading, who described the headline finding of the paper as a 'shocking statistic'. It is triple the number of birds that went extinct in the previous 500 years.
The paper, published in the journal Nature Ecology and Evolution, examined data from nearly 10,000 birds (almost all of those known to exist) and used International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) data to predict extinction risk.
Habitat loss – driven mainly by the expansion and intensification of agriculture – emerged as the most significant driver of species extinction.
But even if habitat loss, hunting and climate breakdown stopped today, about 250 species could still die out, as they are already teetering on the brink of extinction. Local conservation efforts may feel small but they are essential to save a species from going extinct, the researchers found.
Ms Stewart said:
Many birds are already so threatened that reducing human impacts alone won't save them.
"These species need special recovery programmes, like breeding projects and habitat restoration, to survive.'
Conservation success stories show it is possible to bring species back from the brink of extinction.
By 1987, the California condor – North America's largest bird – had gone extinct in the wild. There were about 22 birds in captivity, which were then bred and released; now there is a population of 350 in the wild.
Professor Manuela González-Suárez, senior author of the study at the University of Reading, said: 'Stopping threats is not enough. As many as 250-350 species will require complementary conservation measures … to survive the next century.'
The latest State of the World's Birds report found nearly half of the planet's bird species are in decline. Habitat loss, logging, invasive species, exploitation of natural resources and climate breakdown were highlighted as the main threats.
'There is no magic bullet for solving the extinction crisis,' said Stuart Butchart, chief scientist at BirdLife International, who was not involved in the research.
'Protected areas can play a key role, while abating threats from agriculture, logging, fisheries, hunting and other sources is essential. However, some species require targeted recovery efforts, involving interventions like captive breeding and release, translocation, or supplementary feeding, to overcome barriers to recovery."
- The Guardian

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GOP megabill takes aim at universities — except for this conservative Christian college
GOP megabill takes aim at universities — except for this conservative Christian college

Politico

time29 minutes ago

  • Politico

GOP megabill takes aim at universities — except for this conservative Christian college

President Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress are angling to use their megabill to turn the screws on elite liberal colleges that take millions in taxpayer funds while sitting on endowments worth tens of billions of dollars. But a single college that's a paragon of conservative higher education has managed to secure a carveout after finding itself in the crossfire. Hillsdale College, a Christian liberal arts school of fewer than 2,000 students located in southern Michigan, is one of a slew of smaller institutions that had been working to avoid being swept up in the GOP effort to raise taxes on the seemingly bottomless endowments of household names like Harvard, Princeton and Yale. But Hillsdale stands apart from those schools: For one, it's a rare institution of higher learning that the modern Republican Party applauds. Just as uncommon, Hillsdale accepts no funding from the federal government: 'The founders of our nation chose independence. As do we,' the college boasts in advertisements. That formed the crux of its argument that, on principle, Hillsdale and schools like it should not be subject to a federal tax on endowments. Senate Republicans heeded that logic in their version of the reconciliation bill that the party hopes to send to Trump's desk next week by including an exemption for schools that fit Hillsdale's profile. The reprieve is by no means guaranteed, as Hillsdale found out eight years ago. Democrats that year seized on the university's unique position, branding the exemption as an earmark for a political ally and ultimately getting it stripped from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act with the help of a handful of Republican senators. That's why Hillsdale turned earlier this year to professional advocates for help with the latest endowment tax proposal. In April, the college retained Williams and Jensen to lobby on 'specific threats to the institutional and financial independence of the college, primarily related to the higher education endowment tax,' according to a disclosure filing. The team of lobbyists working on the account includes Dan Ziegler, who served as House Speaker Mike Johnson's top policy aide before returning to the lobbying firm in March, and who previously served as executive director of the conservative Republican Study Committee. In its meetings with policymakers, Hillsdale has reiterated its general opposition to using the tax code as a blunt force object — reaching often for the declaration from former Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall that 'the power to tax involves the power to destroy.' Beyond that, it has stuck to its insistence that schools that have sworn off taxpayer money should be left out of the endowment tax scheme altogether. That could end up incentivizing more institutions to follow in Hillsdale's footsteps — especially with the Trump administration taking aim at colleges' federal funding — whereas a tax hike might throw up financial roadblocks for schools who might be eyeing a move toward independence. Hillsdale's message has landed favorably on the Hill, according to a person familiar with those discussions who was granted anonymity to discuss sensitive deliberations. The person noted that the school hadn't encountered much opposition to its position on principle. Failing to exempt schools that don't accept federal funds 'penalizes most severely those institutions that have chosen the harder path of independence' from the federal government and the conditions of accepting that money, Hillsdale President Larry Arnn wrote in an op-ed in May. 'Worse still,' he added, 'this tax turns the incentives backward; it rewards dependence and punishes self-reliance. It encourages institutions to seek the shelter of government aid, where subsidies can offset tax burdens.' Hillsdale declined to comment on the record. Hillsdale has proudly touted its independence for refusing direct government funds since its founding by abolitionists in 1844. In the 1980s, Hillsdale was faced with a Supreme Court civil rights ruling that would've required universities to track admissions by race and bar sex-based discrimination in order to accept federal financial aid from students. In response, the school declared that it would no longer accept such assistance. Hillsdale's break from what it calls governmental overreach has made it at home with the right. Conservative luminary William Buckley donated much of his lifetime of writings to the school in the early 2000s. In 2016, Hillsdale hosted Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas as its commencement speaker. More recently, Republican leaders like Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis have sought to recreate versions of Hillsdale in their home states and to integrate its curriculum in K-12 classrooms. Hillsdale graduates are scattered throughout Washington, including in the offices of the top Republicans in Congress. Michael Anton, who joined Hillsdale's D.C. outpost after working in the first Trump administration (though he's not a Hillsdale grad himself), was tapped in April to lead the U.S. technical team in nuclear negotiations with Iran. The university regularly advertises its free online courses on subjects like ancient Christianity and the Biblical book of Genesis on Fox News, and rents various conservative email lists. Arnn, a co-founder of the conservative think tank the Claremont Institute, was even considered for Education secretary in Trump's first administration. Trump's eventual Education secretary, Betsy DeVos, has her own familial and financial ties to Hillsdale. In Trump 2.0, the universityhas partnered with the White House and the Education Department on an educational video series to promote the 250th anniversary of America's founding. The most recent installment, focused on the founding of the U.S. Army, featured Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Even with those credentials, as the GOP continues tinkering with the bill ahead of final passage, there's one hitch that could complicate things: At least right now, there aren't believed to be any other schools besides Hillsdale that don't accept federal cash and have large enough endowments that they're at risk of being hit by the endowment tax. Wealthy universities were first hit with a 1.4 percent excise on their endowments as part of the 2017 GOP tax bill. Given that the relationship between Republicans and higher education has only crumbled in the years since, colleges across the country had already been bracing for Republicans to take another swing at the excise tax in negotiations to renew expiring provisions in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. There's a tranche of smaller colleges that would be hit hard by an endowment tax hike and are trying to distance themselves from the Ivies in conservatives' crosshairs. But even though Hillsdale would likely benefit from some of the endowment tax changes those schools have pitched lawmakers on, including sparing schools smaller student bodies, the college has thus far declined to take other schools up on overtures to join their coalitions as it leaned on its more unique messaging. Hillsdale isn't in the clear yet. There are questions about whether several of Republicans' changes to the endowment tax are allowed under the arcane procedural rules of the reconciliation process. The exclusion was not included in the House version of the bill, and not much is set in stone amid horsetrading within the conference. The specter of the last Republican tax debate also looms large given Hillsdale's distinctive position. Earlier versions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act would have subjected schools with endowments of at least $250,000 per student to the excise tax. But during floor debate in the Senate, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) — who received an honorary degree from Hillsdale in 2013 — and then-Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) introduced an amendment that would have exempted from the tax any otherwise-eligible schools that don't take federal funding. The amendment triggered an outcry from Senate Democrats, who pointed out that the only university that would apply to was Hillsdale. Four Republican senators ended up voting with all Democrats to sink the amendment. Hillsdale still managed to luck out, but only temporarily, thanks to language in the final bill that raised the threshold for the tax to $500,000. The House reconciliation bill retains that threshold for the 1.4 percent tax, but neither measure indexes it to inflation, effectively lowering the threshold as time goes on. Hillsdale's endowment finally reached eligibility a few years ago, and much further down the line, other schools that have sworn off federal funding may eventually join it. If the Senate version prevails, however, Hillsdale would pay nothing. In Arnn's May op-ed, he wrote that the House-passed reconciliation bill leaves 'untouched the vast web of colleges and universities sustained by taxpayer dollars, often bloated with bureaucracies committed to fashionable ideas, far removed from the purposes of education.' Ironically, some of the biggest winners out of the Senate's version of the endowment tax — aside from Hillsdale — were schools with the biggest endowments, like Harvard, that would have seen their tax rate soar to 21 percent under the House bill. Senate Republicans softened the tax hike to less than 10 percent for the wealthiest universities.

Energy Efficiency and Design Flexibility Drive LED Strip Light Adoption in Commercial Spaces
Energy Efficiency and Design Flexibility Drive LED Strip Light Adoption in Commercial Spaces

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Energy Efficiency and Design Flexibility Drive LED Strip Light Adoption in Commercial Spaces

The Global Commercial LED Strip Light Market is projected to grow from USD 3.1 billion in 2025 to USD 4.8 billion by 2034, at a 6.5% CAGR. The increasing demand stems from energy efficiency, flexibility, and modern aesthetics across retail, hospitality, and industrial spaces. With advancements in smart lighting and sustainability initiatives, LED strip lights are a preferred choice for commercial projects. However, challenges include installation costs and compatibility. Market leaders are countering these with certified, scalable solutions, ensuring steady growth and leveraging opportunities in expanding urban developments. Commercial LED Strip Light Market Dublin, June 25, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Commercial LED Strip Light Market Size, Share, Trends, Analysis, and Forecast 2025-2034 | Global Industry Growth, Competitive Landscape, Opportunities, and Challenges" has been added to offering. The Global Commercial LED Strip Light Market is projected to reach a value of USD 3.1 billion by 2025. With a robust compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.5%, the market is expected to expand to USD 4.8 billion by 2034 The demand for commercial LED strip lights is propelled by the need for energy-efficient, flexible, and visually appealing lighting solutions across various sectors, including retail, hospitality, office, and industrial spaces. LED strip lights are celebrated for their advantages over traditional lighting, featuring lower power consumption, prolonged lifespan, and adaptable installation processes. These lights are increasingly used for functional illumination, accent lighting, and modern design enhancements, both indoors and outdoors. As sustainability becomes central to commercial infrastructures, LED strip lighting adoption has surged in green building projects and retrofitting initiatives aimed at curtailing energy expenditure and minimizing environmental footprints. The advent of smart lighting technologies and the heightened awareness of energy-efficient alternatives have further accelerated the shift to LED strip lights within commercial realms. Recent technological advancements have enhanced the brightness, color rendering, waterproofing, and connectivity of LED strip lights, catering to a broader spectrum of commercial needs. Smart controls, inclusive of dimming features and IoT platform integration, bolster user customization and enhance operational efficiency. However, the market contends with challenges such as high initial installation costs, compatibility with existing systems, and issues related to counterfeit products. Manufacturers are addressing these challenges by offering modular, scalable systems and prioritizing product quality certifications and after-sales support. The focus on ambiance, energy conservation, and design versatility is expected to sustain market growth, fueled by innovations in lighting control systems, rapid urbanization, and the proliferation of commercial real estate globally. Key Takeaways LED strip lights provide flexible, energy-saving lighting solutions for varied commercial environments. They serve multiple purposes: functional lighting, aesthetic application in retail, hospitality, offices, and industries. Energy efficiency new imperative in green building and retrofitting projects. Smart lighting integration enhances remote management, automation, and customization. Improvements in durability expand their usage in outdoor and industrial scenarios. High initial costs and compatibility issues remain market challenges. Urbanization and commercial property growth aid market expansion. Manufacturers focus on quality assurance and post-sale service enhancements. Versatile applications include ambient, task, and signage lighting. Asia-Pacific dominates the market through manufacturing strength and commercial infrastructure expansion. Strong demand persists in North America and Europe, driven by stringent energy standards. Scalable, modular systems offer cost efficiency for large-scale installations. Designers and architects favor LED strip lights for their modern aesthetic appeal. Online distribution boosts market access and simplifies procurement. Continuous LED chip and smart feature innovations ensure market longevity. Market Scope Base Year: 2024 Estimated Year: 2025 Forecast Period: 2026-2034 Market Size-Units: USD billion Market Splits Covered: By Product Type, By Application, By End User, By Technology, By Distribution Channel Countries Covered: North America (USA, Canada, Mexico) Europe (Germany, UK, France, Spain, Italy, Rest of Europe) Asia-Pacific (China, India, Japan, Australia, Rest of APAC) The Middle East and Africa (Middle East, Africa) South and Central America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of SCA) Analysis Covered Market Dynamics: Latest Trends, Driving Factors, Challenges, Trade Analysis, Price Analysis, Supply-Chain Analysis, Competitive Landscape, Company Strategies Customization: 10% free customization (up to 10 analyst hours) to modify segments, geographies, and companies analyzed Post-Sale Support: 4 analyst hours, available up to 4 weeks Delivery Format: The Latest Updated PDF and Excel Datafile Key Attributes: Report Attribute Details No. of Pages 150 Forecast Period 2025 - 2034 Estimated Market Value (USD) in 2025 $3.1 Billion Forecasted Market Value (USD) by 2034 $5.46 Billion Compound Annual Growth Rate 6.5% Regions Covered Global Companies Featured Signify (Philips Lighting) Osram Licht AG GE Current Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. Schneider Electric WAC Lighting Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc. LEDVANCE GmbH Hubbell Incorporated Cree Lighting (IDEAL Industries) MaxLite Lutron Electronics Co., Inc. TCP Lighting Jesco Lighting Group American Lighting, Inc. For more information about this report visit About is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends. Attachment Commercial LED Strip Light Market CONTACT: CONTACT: Laura Wood,Senior Press Manager press@ For E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470 For U.S./ CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900Sign in to access your portfolio

Political polarisation is rising globally and posing new challenges for businesses, according to Willis latest report
Political polarisation is rising globally and posing new challenges for businesses, according to Willis latest report

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Political polarisation is rising globally and posing new challenges for businesses, according to Willis latest report

LONDON, June 25, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Rising political polarisation is associated with increased political violence and unpredictable oscillations in government policies, according to the latest Political Risk Index by Willis (NASDAQ: WTW), a leading global advisory, broking, and solutions company. This edition of the Index focusses on political polarisation in countries worldwide and its main drivers and consequences. Findings from the index reveal affective polarisation* is at a historic high, on a global average basis. This suggests that people are increasingly likely to perceive supporters of opposing political parties as hostile. Countries enduring violent political conflicts tend to be the most polarised, but on average, affective polarisation is rising fastest in democracies like the US, Germany, India, Brazil and Bulgaria. The index also covers ideological polarisation** (the degree to which people agree on core policy issues) and elite polarisation*** (the degree to which political rivals consider each other as legitimate). The US is the only country globally where affective, ideological and elite polarisation have all increased at a rapid pace over the past 15 years. After reviewing over a century's worth of data from more than 200 countries, Willis found that in democracies, surges in polarisation tended to follow economic crises or corruption scandals, which appeared to discredit traditional political leaders. These surges were often accompanied by the growth of populist political movements and an increased frequency of political violence events. Other key findings include: The highest levels of affective polarisation globally are in countries where political competition happens along ethnic or religious lines. Long-serving political leaders and controversial populists are a polarising force in several countries. Geopolitical and foreign policy divides can also lead to polarisation of societies. Polarisation and populism are rising both in the US and Europe and in the emerging world. The research also identifies some hopeful trends. Truth and reconciliation processes, cross-party coalitions, and open and transparent investigations in cases of corruption or other crises have been accompanied by rapid reductions in political polarisation in the past. There is reason to believe that lessons from these examples could be applied to current challenges. Sam Wilkin, director of political risk analytics at Willis, said: 'There is a well-established correlation between polarisation and political violence. But polarisation is also being felt on a more personal basis, such as how we perceive our friends and colleagues. Businesses face growing challenges from operating in increasingly polarised societies.' The complete report can be downloaded here. *Affective polarisation refers to the phenomenon of individuals developing strong positive feelings toward members of their own group (in-group) and negative feelings towards members of opposing groups (out-groups), particularly in a political context. It involves a difference between how people feel about their own party or group and how they feel about those who support opposing parties or groups. This can lead to increased hostility, reduced willingness to compromise, and a lack of empathy for those with different political views. **Ideological polarisation refers to the extent to which political attitudes become more divided and extreme, often along partisan lines. This can manifest as individuals and groups holding increasingly divergent views on issues, and a greater emphasis on partisan identity over shared values or common ground. ***Elite polarisation refers to the ideological divide and political disagreement among elites—such as elected officials, party leaders, policymakers, and influential media figures—typically along partisan lines. About WTW At WTW (NASDAQ: WTW), we provide data-driven, insight-led solutions in the areas of people, risk and capital. Leveraging the global view and local expertise of our colleagues serving 140 countries and markets, we help organizations sharpen their strategy, enhance organizational resilience, motivate their workforce and maximize performance. Working shoulder to shoulder with our clients, we uncover opportunities for sustainable success—and provide perspective that moves you. Learn more at Media contact Lauren David: / +44 7385947619 Candela Farroni: / +44 7795 155654Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store