
Starmer accepts Trump demand on defence spending rise
The increase will see a major rise what UK taxpayers spend on defence.
Sir Keir has committed to spend 2.5% of GDP on defence from April 2027, with a goal of increasing that to 3% over the next Parliament, a timetable which could stretch to 2034.
READ MORE:
The previous Conservative government had committed to increase defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2030.
But ahead of the beginning of the Nato summit, the Prime Minister said the UK must navigate "this era of radical uncertainty with agility, speed and a clear-eyed sense of the national interest" to keep people safe.
'That's why I have made the commitment to spend 5% of GDP on national security. This is an opportunity to deepen our commitment to Nato and drive greater investment in the nation's wider security and resilience.
President Trump in the White House on Saturday (Image: AP) 'After all, economic security is national security, and through this strategy we will bring the whole of society with us, creating jobs, growth and wages for working people."
The UK government expects most Nato members will agree to spend 3.5% of GDP on core defence, such as the armed forces and weapons, and 1.5% on resilience and security. Under the plan the UK expects to reach at least 4.1% of GDP in 2027.
However, Nato member Spain has not agreed after the country's Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, last week said he would not commit to the 5% figure.
It was reported on Sunday evening that Spain has reached a deal with Nato that would see it excluded from the 5% spending target.
Mr Sanchez said that Spain would be able to keep its commitments to the 32-nation military alliance by spending 2.1% of GDP on defence needs.
SNP defence spokesman Dave Doogan said the Prime Minister's announcement underlined that previous defence cuts had put UK security "at risk".
He said: "Westminster has spent decades slashing defence spending in Scotland and depleting our armed forces capabilities - cutting Scottish regiments, personnel, ships, aircraft and with it, eroding the relevance of defence within Scottish communities which is so vital to recruitment and retention.
"Today's announcement exposes that successive Westminster defence cuts represented a catastrophic false economy, which has put our security at risk. After years of neglect, it's vital that this latest UK government finally delivers a full and fair share of funding for Scotland's conventional forces to boost defences at our end of this island and deliver jobs and investment across Scotland's communities.
'It is vital that increased public funds are spent well - and our defence capabilities are reinforced wisely. Westminster's track record of illegal wars and doomed interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan coupled with Whitehall's litany of procurement disasters such as Nimrod MRA 4 and Ajax Armoured Fighting Vehicles, have put the safety of our troops at risk and wasted £Billions in taxpayers' money.
"The UK must now regroup with our European allies on defence procurement and manufacturing rather than glorying in being isolated from the EU while being dismissed by the US at the same time. The need for this strategic and pragmatic way forward, to galvanise Euro-Atlantic security, was made abundantly clear when the EU penned an €800bn defence deal with the increasingly irrelevant UK very much looking in from the outside."
Nato secretary general Mark Rutte said a defence investment plan, set to be agreed at the gathering, 'introduces a new baseline, 5% of GDP to be invested in defence'.
Speaking at a press conference ahead of the summit, the former Dutch prime minister said the move would be a 'quantum leap'.
He told reporters: 'As the world becomes more dangerous, allied leaders will take bold decisions to strengthen our collective defence, making Nato a stronger, a fairer and a more lethal alliance.
'This will include a major new defence investment plan, raising the benchmark for defence investment to 5% of GDP.'
He said the defence plan 'that allies will agree in The Hague introduces a new baseline: 5% of GDP to be invested in defence.
'This is a quantum leap that is ambitious, historic, and fundamental to securing our future.'
US President Donald Trump has previously called for nations in the 32-member bloc to commit to 5%.
Defence was one of the areas that benefited at the spending review earlier this month, when figures published by the Treasury showed that average annual real-terms growth for defence between the 2023-24 and 2028-29 financial year is 3.6%.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
25 minutes ago
- Sky News
PM warns of 'era of radical uncertainty' - and says UK will increase defence spending
Sir Keir Starmer said the UK is set to increase spending on defence, security and resilience to 5% of GDP by 2035 to meet an "era of radical uncertainty" - but without promising any additional cash. The move - part of a new spending pledge by the NATO alliance - was panned as deceptive "smoke and mirrors" by critics, who pointed to the very real risk of escalating conflict between Iran, the US and Israel, as well as Russia's full-scale war in Ukraine. Volodymyr Zelenskyy told Sky News the timeline for the increase was "very slow" and warned Russia could attack a NATO country within five years. "In my view, this is slow because we believe that starting from 2030, Putin can have significantly greater capabilities," he told chief presenter Mark Austin. 1:32 The prime minister, Donald Trump and the other leaders of NATO's 32 member states are expected to approve the investment goal when they meet at a summit in The Hague, which opens later today. It replaces a previous target to spend 2% of GDP purely on defence. The announcement will be celebrated as a win for the US president, who has been demanding his allies spend more on their own defences instead of relying on American firepower. Overnight, he claimed to have secured another success, declaring that Iran and Israel have agreed to a ceasefire - just hours after Iran launched missiles against two American military bases in retaliation to a US decision to attack three Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend. Perhaps it will mean he will switch attention back to achieving a goal to end Russia's war in Ukraine, which will be another key focus of the gathering in the Dutch capital. NATO planners have crunched the summit down to a short main session tomorrow, with a final communique much briefer than usual - all steps designed to reduce the chance of the US president leaving early. He is already scheduled to arrive late and last this evening, provided he turns up. There is huge nervousness about Mr Trump's commitment to an alliance that has been the bedrock of European security since it was founded more than 75 years ago. He is not a fan though, and has previously accused Europe and Canada of an overreliance on American firepower for their own security, calling for them to do more to defend themselves. This pressure has arguably been a bigger motivator in prompting certain allies to agree to spend more on their militaries than the threat they say is posed by Russia, Iran, China and North Korea. Spain's position could create friction this week. The Spanish prime minister, while agreeing to the new investment goal, has said his country is not obliged to meet it. The UK was also slow to say yes - a stance that was at odds with a defence review endorsed by Sir Keir that was centred around a "NATO-first" policy. As well as agreeing to the defence and security investment goal, the British government is also publishing a new national security strategy on Tuesday that will highlight the importance of a wider definition of what constitutes security, including energy, food and borders. There will also be a focus on a whole-of-society approach to resilience in an echo of the UK's Cold War past. It described the commitment to invest in defence, security and national resilience as an aligning of "national security objectives and plans for economic growth in a way not seen since 1945". Sir Keir said: "We must navigate this era of radical uncertainty with agility, speed and a clear-eyed sense of the national interest to deliver security for working people and keep them safe. "That's why I have made the commitment to spend 5% of GDP on national security. This is an opportunity to deepen our commitment to NATO and drive greater investment in the nation's wider security and resilience." The funding will be split, with 3.5% of GDP going on core defence and 1.5% on homeland security and national resilience - a new and so far less clearly defined criteria. Progress on investment will be reviewed in 2029. The defence goal is higher than the government's current ambition to lift defence expenditure to 3% of GDP by 2034, from 2.3% currently. The only solid commitment is to spend 2.6% on defence by 2027 - a figure that has been boosted by the addition of the whole of the budget for the intelligence agencies. This level of intelligence spending had not previously been included and has drawn criticism from defence experts because it is not the same as tanks, artillery and troops. The government, in its statement, is now focusing on an even higher-sounding number, claiming that it will hit 4.1% of the new NATO target by 2027. However, this is merely based on adding the new 1.5% spending goal for "resilience and security" to the already stated 2.6% defence spending pledge. A Downing Street spokesperson was unable immediately to say how much of GDP is currently spent on whatever is included in the new resilience category. It could include pre-announced investment in civil nuclear energy as well as infrastructure projects such as roads and railways. For the UK, 1.5% of GDP is about £40bn - a significant chunk of national income. Sir Ben Wallace, a former Conservative defence secretary, accused the government of "spin" over its spending pledge because it does not include any new money anytime soon. "The threat to our country is real not spin," he told Sky News. "This government thinks it can use smoke and mirrors to deceive the public and Donald Trump. This is an insult to our troops who will see no significant new money. It fools no one."


Scottish Sun
34 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Trump says ‘total' ceasefire to start within hours agreed between Iran and Israel – and reveals how peace deal will work
WAR IS OVER Trump says 'total' ceasefire to start within hours agreed between Iran and Israel – and reveals how peace deal will work DONALD Trump has said that a "complete and total ceasefire" has been agreed between Iran and Israel after 12 days of intense bombing. The president added that the deal was "fully agreed upon between Israel and Iran" and will take place in a phased 24-hour process. 4 Trump says a ceasefire has been agreed between Israel and Iran Credit: AFP 4 4 Several missile interceptions by air defence systems seen in Doha 4 Footage shared by Iranian state media appears to show a missile being launched at Qatar targeting a US military base Credit: IRNA News Agency Trump made the announcement just hours after Iran dramatically attacked a US military base in Qatar. He wrote on Truth Social: It has been fully agreed by and between Israel and Iran that there will be a Complete and Total CEASEFIRE." Don said this is a war that "could have gone on for years, and destroyed the entire Middle East", but it "didn't, and never will". He dubbed the conflict "THE 12 DAY WAR", before adding: "This is a War that could have gone on for years, and destroyed the entire Middle East, but it didn't, and never will!" Trump said the ceasefire would begin at 5am (UK time) on Tuesday, with Iran unilaterally halting all operations. Israel would follow suit 12 hours later. The war will then be considered over after 12 more hours, he added. A White House official said that Israel agreed to the US-proposed ceasefire as long as Iran does not carry out more attacks. Iran also agreed to the peace deal, adding that no further attacks will take place against Israel, the White House official added. During a phone call with Tehran, Qatar's Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, Mohammed bin Al-Thani, secured Iran's agreement to a US ceasefire proposal. It came just minutes after several explosions were heard in Tehran from apparent Israeli airstrikes. In an interview on Fox News that began moments after the president's announcement, Vice President JD Vance praised Trump for getting the deal 'across the finish line.' He said: 'We were actually working on that just as I left the White House to come over here. So that's good news, that the president was able to get that across the finish line." He added that Iran is no more capable of building a nuclear weapon "because we destroyed it." Earlier, Trump dismissed the Iranian missile strike targeting the Al Udaid US air base - which houses 10,000 American troops - as "very weak". All the Iranian missiles were shot down, and no casualties were reported. But Iran vowed to continue the retaliation after launching a salvo of ballistic missiles targeting the military base in Doha. Trump said Iran gave the US advanced warning of attacks on their military base in Qatar "I want to thank Iran for giving us early notice, which made it possible for no lives to be lost, and nobody to be injured," Trump wrote on social media. The president expressed hope that the missile would be the end of Iranian retaliation for US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araqchi said that Tehran will be ready to respond again in case of further action by the US, indicating the regime is not interested in striking American targets again. Stay up to date with the latest on Israel vs Iran with The Sun's live blog below...


Daily Mail
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Furious Marjorie Taylor Greene slams 'dirty rumors' about her and Donald Trump, calling them 'nasty lies'
Marjorie Taylor Greene clapped back at anyone suggesting she was breaking from Donald Trump. Her remarks come after the firebrand conservative - and one of Trump's closest allies in Washington - shocked many by opposing Trump's strikes on Iran Saturday. 'The press and some other nasty people would love to write lying headlines and create dirty rumors that there's a break between me and President Trump. WRONG,' she said. Greene then spelled out both their initials and place a heart emoji between them, with an American flag afterward. She later posted a video of herself talking on the phone to an unknown reporter, explaining further that there was 'no break' before becoming fed up with him and hanging up. After the reporter asked if she's spoken to Trump, she bluntly stated: 'I don't have to answer any more of your questions because I am sick and tired of your narrative, because it's complete and total bulls***. We're done.' The Georgia Congresswoman, in a rare move, appeared to distance herself from Trump in a heated social media post where she argued America has gone to war with the wrong enemy. 'I don't know anyone in America who has been the victim of a crime or killed by Iran, but I know many people who have been victims of crime committed by criminal illegal aliens or murdered by Cartel and Chinese fentanyl/drugs,' she wrote. 'However America has not dropped bunker busters on the Cartel's sophisticated drug tunnels, launched tomahawks on massive cartel poisonous drug operations, or gone to war against the cartels international terrorists networks.' Greene, 51, argued taxpayer funds should not be spent on foreign conflicts, but instead to fund 'American interests and issues', which she notes includes the illegal migrant crisis. 'American troops have been killed and forever torn apart physically and mentally for regime change, foreign wars, and for military industrial base profits. 'I'm sick of it,' the Georgia Republican continued. 'I can easily say I support nuclear armed Israel 's right to defend themselves and also say at the same time I don't want to fight or fund nuclear armed Israel's wars. Nor any other country for that matter.' She also insisted that although she does not support Trump's decision, she is not being disloyal, adding that 'having my own opinions is the most American thing ever'. The controversial MAGA firebrand has seen a wave of support from liberals after she took to social media to call for 'an end to the constant demand for America to go to war'. Greene, who claimed she has spent her entire life watching 'our country go to war in foreign lands for foreign causes on behalf of foreign interests', said she wants to see the US focused on domestic issues. She wants the White House to negotiate 'great trade deals' so that American businesses and manufacturing can boom. She also for low inflation, low interest rates and a solution to the crippling cost-of-living crisis that impacts every American daily. 'I want Americans to be rich and have security in their future. I want my children's generation to have a great future!' she continued. 'My kids are 22, 25, and 27. It pisses me off beyond comprehension that my children's generation can't afford to buy a house, can't afford insurance, and have little hope for their future! 'Americans are exhausted by all of this and rightfully so.' Greene's post received a outpour of support liberals shocked by her response, with Pod Save America co-host Tommy Vietor questioning how she has become a 'voice of reason on this issue'. 'How is it that Matt Gaetz and Marjorie Taylor Greene and Tucker Carlson and Steven Bannon are... talking about the Iranian people, like they're human beings, with empathy?' Vietor said during a panel discussion on Iran with Zeteo founder Mehdi Hasan and Reza Aslan, an Iranian-American author and academic. He added that 'the Democratic Party has lost the mantle of being the anti-war party', citing Israel's ongoing war in Gaza and previous conflicts, including the war in Iraq. Vietor claimed there are 'some principled Democrats speaking out' about Iran, but others who are 'sitting around thinking 'f***, what if it goes well? I don't want to look stupid. I don't want to be the guy who opposed Gulf War I'.' On Monday, Trump announced that Iran and Israel have agreed to a ceasefire, two weeks after they started exchanging missile strikes and two days after he bombed the Islamic Republic's nuclear labs. The president said the '12 day war' will 'end' in 24 hours, despite both nations warning of future strikes and just hours after Tehran attacked America's largest military base in the Middle East. He announced the ceasefire deal in a Truth Social post, claiming it is set to go into effect into six hours. While Israel and Iran have not confirmed if there is a deal, Trump congratulated everyone involved and said the ceasefire will begin once in-progress missions are completed. Trump broke his silence on Iran's retaliatory strikes on Monday by demanding the end of the conflict in the Middle East and taunting the Ayatollah for his 'very weak response.' The president said on Truth Social that US forces 'effectively countered' Iran's targeting of the Al Udeid Air Base in Doha, Qatar, two days after he bombed three Iranian nuclear sites. Trump said that no Americans were harmed in Iran's retaliatory strikes on Monday and declared, 'they've got it all out of their system', as he thanked Iran for giving early notice to allow the US to evacuate the base beforehand.