
Could an obscure US law save the UK film industry from Donald Trump's tariffs? Long-standing protection for 'information' from abroad set to thwart US President's latest trade attack
The UK film industry could be saved from Donald Trump 's latest trade attack by an obscure US law, experts have claimed.
The US President has announced plans to impose a 100 per cent tariff on movies made outside America.
Mr Trump said he had authorised US government departments to impose the tariff 'on any and all movies coming into our country that are produced in foreign lands'.
Industry figures warned it 'could deal a knock-out' blow to the UK film sector, which is only just recovering from the Covid crisis when many productions were delayed or cancelled.
But legal experts have now said the US President could be on shaky legal ground if he follows through with his plans.
Mr Trump has relied on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 for his global tariff spree.
But the law includes specific allowances, known as the Berman amendments, for the free flow of informational materials, including films.
Anupam Chander, a Georgetown University law professor, told trade magazine Variety: 'The 1994 amendment made crystal clear that the president did not have the power under [IEEPA] to stop the flow of foreign audiovisual media.'
The US President posted on his Truth Social site to announce plans to impose a 100 per cent tariff on movies made outside America
Mr Trump previously came up against the issue in 2020 when he sought to ban TikTok using IEEPA.
A federal judge granted an injunction, finding that the ban violated the Berman amendments. Congress had to pass a separate law explicitly authorising the TikTok ban.
Professor Chander added: 'There's nothing in the law that allows him to bar movies instead of short videos.'
Schuyler Moore, a partner at LA-based law firm Greenberg Glusker, said: 'How on earth are they going to enforce this? The whole thing is a goofball — I can't imagine how they're going to do this in practice.'
Emily Kilcrease, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security think tank, said Mr Trump could use other legal means to push through his film tariffs. But she noted it could take several months to do so.
Mr Trump's latest announcement is part of an ongoing trade war. Tariffs are taxes charged on goods imported from other countries.
It is not clear how a tariff on international productions could be implemented. Many films are shot across numerous countries, including the US and UK.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has been attempting to negotiate a UK-US trade deal with the White House in order to reduce the impact of Mr Trump's eye-watering 25 per cent levies on car and steep imports.
The UK is also hoping to head off the prospect of an assault on the pharma sector with agreements on quotas.
Tory MP Stuart Andrew, the shadow culture secretary, said tariffs 'could have a significant impact on the UK's world-renowned film industry'.
He added: 'The Labour Government must get a grip now, work with our American allies to secure a trade deal with the USA.
'And take decisive action to strengthen and protect the UK film industry, otherwise we risk seeing long-term damage to a sector that is a global success.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Andrew Malkinson says fight will continue for justice system reform
Andrew Malkinson, who spent 17 years in prison for a rape he did not commit, says his fight to reform the legal system's handling of miscarriages of justice is far from over. The 59-year-old had his conviction overturned in 2023 after years spent protesting his innocence. Malkinson has told the Sunday Times his 'life was desolated' by the wrongful conviction and he is determined to change the justice system, starting with the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC). 'I haven't finished. I want to change a lot more,' he said. 'It's a good feeling that something so dreadful and tragic is leading to real change.' It comes amid news Dame Vera Baird KC will become the interim chair of the CCRC. The barrister will take up the post from 9 June until 8 December next year, and is tasked with carrying out an urgent review into the running of the independent body and making sure lessons have been learned from previous cases. Malkinson said he remained 'incandescent' at the CCRC, as well as the government's compensation scheme, which makes it difficult for wrongly convicted people to receive payouts. 'This is an assault on innocent people,' he said. 'It's an assault on the public, because any member of the public could end up where I was. Anybody could be the next victim, because there will be more.' Despite having his conviction quashed in 2023, he had to wait until February to get his first compensation payment. Malkinson had been living on benefits and food banks from his release until then. Under the 2014 Antisocial Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act, payments are only awarded to people who can prove innocence beyond a reasonable doubt. Ministry of Justice data showed that only 6.5% of people who had applied for compensation due to a miscarriage of justice between April 2016 and March 2024 were awarded payouts. Of 591 people who applied, 39 were granted compensation. Figures showed that 35 have since received money, with average amounts totalling £68,000. In a statement in February, lawyer Toby Wilton welcomed the payment, but said the £1m cap on compensation payouts should be lifted. This is currently the maximum amount that can be paid to victims of miscarriages of justice who are wrongly jailed for at least 10 years.


Sky News
44 minutes ago
- Sky News
Trump deploys National Guard to LA immigration 'riots' after claiming state officials 'can't do their jobs'
The National Guard will be deployed to Los Angeles after protests in response to immigration raids extended into a second day. California Governor Gavin Newsom confirmed that the Trump administration is deploying "2,000 soldiers" to Los Angeles after local police used tear gas, stun guns, and riot shields to push back immigration protesters on Saturday. Demonstrations began outside the Los Angeles Federal Building in the downtown area of LA on Friday after officials from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) carried out raids in the area. On Saturday, several dozen protesters were involved in police standoffs in Paramount, a city south of LA. Mr Newsom warned in a post on X: "The federal government is sowing chaos so they can have an excuse to escalate. That is not the way any civilized country behaves." He described the deployment as "purposefully inflammatory" and claimed it will "only escalate tensions". "If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!," he wrote. Mr Trump's defence secretary Pete Hegseth claimed that active duty marines would also be mobilised if "violence continues". LA mayor Karen Bass said that amid the recovery from this year's wildfires, "many in our community are feeling fear" following "recent federal immigration enforcement actions" across LA County. "We've been in direct contact with officials in Washington, D.C., and are working closely with law enforcement to find the best path forward," she said. "Everyone has the right to peacefully protest, but let me be clear: violence and destruction are unacceptable, and those responsible will be held accountable." The Los Angeles Police Department said protests across the city had remained peaceful and commended "all those who exercised their First Amendment rights responsibly". It added: "Our commitment to safeguarding the rights, safety, and wellbeing of all Angelenos continues - day and night. We will maintain a heightened readiness posture and remain ready to ensure the continued safety of our communities." Reports the guard would be deployed to LA came earlier on Saturday, from Mr Trump's border tsar Tom Homan on Fox News. More than 40 arrested in Friday raids At least 44 people were arrested on suspicion of immigration violations during raids on Friday, with crowds of around "1,000 rioters" forming around the building before some "assaulted law enforcement officers, slashed tires, and defaced taxpayer-funded property", according to the Department of Homeland Security. The raids saw street vendors and day workers rounded up across Home Depots, a clothing factory, and a warehouse, Salas of Chirla (The Coalition for Humane Immigration Rights of Los Angeles) said. 👉 Follow Trump100 on your podcast app 👈 In a statement on Saturday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said "violent mobs" had "attacked ICE officers and federal law enforcement agents carrying out basic deportation operations". She described such activity as "essential to halting and reversing the invasion of illegal criminals into the United States". Ms Leavitt said Californian politicians were "feckless" and had "completely abdicated their responsibility to protect their citizens", prompting Mr Trump's order to send in the guard. Protests spread to second city On Saturday, protests spread to the Paramount area, where there is a significant Latino population, after demonstrators spotted ICE employees in a Home Depot car park they appeared to be using as a base. Law enforcement officers faced off protesters at a road junction at around 5pm where a car had been set on fire earlier in the day. The roads were pictured strewn with trolleys and rubbish bins set on fire, as gas canisters and fireworks were also set off. Commenting on Saturday's protests, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Office said: "It appeared that federal law enforcement officers were in the area, and that members of the public were gathering to protest." Vice president JD Vance claimed that "insurrectionists" were seen "carrying foreign flags" and "attacking immigration enforcement officers" in Paramount. "One half of America's political leadership has decided that border enforcement is evil," he posted on X. "Time to pass President Trump's beautiful bill and further secure the border." The clashes come amid Trump's nationwide crackdown on illegal migration. As soon as he was re-elected in January he set a target of arresting 3,000 suspected illegal migrants per day - and promised to lock down the US-Mexico border.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Obama's doctor makes candid confession about Biden's mental decline while in office
The former White House physician to President Barack Obama has broken his silence, candidly admitting that President Joe Biden should have undergone rigorous cognitive testing throughout all four years of his presidency. Dr. Jeffrey Kuhlman, who served as Obama's doctor from 2009 to 2013, didn't mince words warning that Biden should have been subjected to extensive annual neurocognitive exams and that the results should be made public. 'My position is that a 78-year-old candidate, Trump at the time, an 82-year-old president [Biden], would both benefit from neurocognitive testing,' Kuhlman stated, noting how age-related decline is inevitable. 'Any politician over the age of 70 has normal age-related cognitive decline.' Kuhlman, the author of Transforming Presidential Healthcare, has been making these recommendations for nearly a year - notably publishing them in a New York Times op-ed on the very day Biden bowed out of the 2024 race. Despite multiple detailed physicals during Biden's time in office, Kuhlman pointed out that none included neurocognitive assessments like the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) - a basic test famously taken and 'aced' by President Trump. 'I have no doubt that President Trump aced it,' Kuhlman remarked. Yet Biden's evaluations, spanning five to six single-spaced pages and referencing 10 to 20 specialists, conspicuously omitted any serious cognitive screening. Biden's physician, Dr. Kevin O'Connor who also treated Biden during his vice presidency never subjected him to a formal cognitive battery or even the routine MoCA test. Such an omission has become more glaring given the president's visible struggles, culminating in his disastrous debate performance in June 2024 that effectively ended his reelection bid. 'Sometimes those closest to the tree miss the forest,' Kuhlman said to the New York Post acknowledging his respect for O'Connor's medical judgment but hinting at blind spots that may have endangered the presidency itself. Kuhlman also emphasized that simple cognitive screens like the MoCA are not enough to fully assess deeper mental deterioration. True evaluation requires extensive testing for memory, reasoning, processing speed, and spatial visualization. Such faculties begin to decline starting around age 60. The White House had long insisted Biden was 'fit for duty,' yet Kuhlman's remarks cast fresh doubts on those assurances. White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre brushed aside concerns at a February 2024 briefing declaring, 'The president doesn't need a cognitive test. He passes a cognitive test every day.' But the former presidential physician's comments now suggest that claim was complacent. Adding fuel to the fire, White House logs revealed Biden met with Dr. Kevin Cannard, a Parkinson's specialist from Walter Reed, as part of his annual physical in January 2024. While O'Connor insisted the meeting was routine, other medical professionals weren't convinced. 'If somebody turns up a report that Kevin Cannard said he has Parkinson's then that's a completely different story,' Kuhlman said. He did, however, express trust in Cannard's evaluation based on their long-standing professional history. In the past, critics pointed to Biden's stiff gait, slow movement, and shuffling walk as signs of something deeper. 'I could've diagnosed him from across the Mall,' neurologist Dr. Tom Pitts bluntly told NBC in July 2024. In one final blow, Special Counsel Robert Hur's bombshell decision not to indict Biden over his handling of classified documents cited that a jury would likely view the president as 'a sympathetic, well-meaning elderly man with a poor memory.' The Republican-led House Oversight Committee is now turning up the heat. Chairman James Comer (R-Kentucky) has subpoenaed O'Connor to testify under oath on June 27 about Biden's mental fitness. In a pointed letter, Comer raised concerns about O'Connor's 'financial relationship with the Biden family' and suggested there may have been a cover-up to conceal the president's cognitive decline from the American public. Jean-Pierre who has since left the Democratic Party and is preparing to release a scathing tell-all book about the 'broken' Biden administration is also expected to testify. Last month, a new book titled Original Sin by CNN's Jake Tapper and Axios' Alex Thompson hit the shelves with allegations of a vast cover-up of Biden's final years in office. According to the book's authors, O'Connor resisted administering a cognitive test during Biden's last two years. Days before the book's released Biden revealed he had been diagnosed with prostate cancer with the cells having spread to the bone. Kuhlman emphasized that cancer testing protocols should have been maintained after 2014, but hinted that Biden may have been let down even in that regard. 'I hope that Kevin O'Connor had that conversation every year with his patient, Joe Biden, and documented that in the medical record,' he said. 'If he did the PSA and chose not to release it, I don't agree with that.'