Fort Benning takes back its old name, but to honor a different soldier
The Army is restoring the name Fort Benning to its storied training post in Georgia, only this time to honor an 18-year-old corporal who fought in World War I rather than a Confederate general.
A ceremony to make the name change official was scheduled Wednesday at the base just outside Columbus. Roughly 70,000 soldiers, civilian workers and military family members are stationed at Fort Benning, which trains infantry troops and tank crews and is home to the elite Army Ranger School.
It's the second time in less than two years that Fort Benning commanders have been tasked with swapping out the post's name on everything from signs marking gates, streets and buildings to official stationery and websites.
The last name change in 2023 redesignated the post as Fort Moore as part of a move started by Congress in 2020 and completed during President Joe Biden's administration to remove names that honored Confederate leaders, including from nine Army posts.
The name of Henry L. Benning, a former Georgia Supreme Court justice who vocally supported secession and served as a Confederate brigadier general in the Civil War, had adorned the base since it opened as Camp Benning in 1918.
Federal law now prohibits naming military bases for Confederates. The Pentagon under President Donald Trump has found a workaround for reverting bases back to what they were formerly called, by finding new soldiers to honor with the same last name.
[DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks]
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth last month ordered the change back to Fort Benning to honor Fred Benning, who was awarded the nation's second-highest honor for battlefield bravery as an 18-year-old corporal in 1918.
Fred Benning received his Distinguished Service Cross after returning home to Nebraska, where he started a bakery and served as mayor of the small town of Neligh. He died in 1974.
During its short time as Fort Moore, the Georgia post became the first in the Army named for a couple: the late Lt. Gen. Hal Moore and his wife, Julia Moore.
Hal Moore served in Vietnam as commander of a cavalry battalion based at Fort Benning and was also a Distinguished Service Cross recipient. Julia Moore successfully lobbied the Pentagon to adopt a policy that military families would be notified of war casualties in person rather than by telegram.
In his March 3 memo ordering the return to the name Fort Benning, Hegseth directed the Army to find a new way to honor the Moores 'in a manner that celebrates their significant contributions to the local community and the Army.'
The Army hasn't said how much the switch back to Fort Benning will cost. An Army commission in 2022 estimated the change to Fort Moore would cost at least $4.9 million.
Fort Benning is the second U.S. military base to have its 2023 name change reversed. The nation's largest Army installation was rechristened Fort Bragg in North Carolina last month, following a brief two years as Fort Liberty.
TRENDING STORIES:
3 arrested as protestors disrupt Marjorie Taylor Greene town hall
Little Caesars' attack leads to police raid at suspect's home, uncovers fentanyl and guns
Witnesses say driver celebrated after chase, crash that killed 19-year-old innocent driver
[SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Transgender troops face ‘crushing' decision as Trump ban deadline looms
Transgender active-duty service members must decide whether to leave the military on their own or be forced out by Friday under the 30-day deadline announced last month by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, a life-altering decision that those interviewed by The Hill said is nearly impossible to make. 'It's crushing,' said Cmdr. Emily 'Hawking' Shilling, who has served in the Navy for almost two decades. 'It's heartbreaking.' A naval aviator with 60 combat missions under her belt, Shilling oversaw a staff of about 200 people before she requested voluntary separation last month and was placed on administrative leave. In her latest fitness report, Shilling's commander described her as an 'inspiring leader' with 'boundless energy' and 'unmatched enthusiasm.' 'People excel under Hawking's leadership,' they wrote, referring to Shilling by her callsign. The report and Shilling's own experiences contradict how President Trump and administration officials have sought to frame her and other transgender troops' service. Trump's Jan. 27 executive order to boot transgender people from the military states they cannot satisfy the 'rigorous standards' needed to serve, and that allowing their participation threatens military readiness and unit cohesion, an argument long used to keep marginalized groups — including Black, gay or female Americans — from serving. A 2016 RAND Corp. study commissioned by the Pentagon found that allowing trans people to serve had no negative impact on unit cohesion, operational effectiveness or readiness. Shilling, who currently serves as president of SPARTA Pride, an advocacy group for transgender service members, said she is complying with the Trump administration's policy despite believing it to be unlawful and challenging it in court. She stressed that her views do not reflect those of the Department of Defense or the Navy. Shilling's lawsuit, filed in February with six other trans service members, argues that 'banning ready, willing, and able service members does not further the objectives of the United States Armed Forces.' A federal judge in Washington state, where the suit was filed, sided with the service members in a March ruling that temporarily blocked the administration from enforcing Trump's order. But after an emergency application from the Justice Department, the Supreme Court ruled in May that the Trump administration could begin enforcing its ban on trans military service. 'My oath is to the Constitution and to obey all lawful orders,' Shilling said in an interview. 'The only way that I can challenge whether or not something is lawful is through the courts, and so I actually see this as an extension of my duty, of my oath.' 'I believe this is unlawful, and in the meantime, while I challenge it, I'm going to obey the orders,' she added. 'I'm out-processing; I'm doing all my paperwork; I'm doing everything I'm being told to do, and I'm also challenging it, saying, 'I don't think that this is lawful. Courts, please make a verdict on it.' And I will honor whatever they decide.' Cmdr. Blake Dremann, another plaintiff in Shilling's lawsuit, has also begun the voluntary separation process, though he said it hasn't felt like much of a choice. He requested his separation start at the end of December, when he will hit 20 years of service and be eligible for regular retirement. 'As far as navigating anything else, it has been really just trying to figure out, 'OK, where do I want to live? What do I want to do? How am I going to handle this?'' said Dremann, a naval supply officer. 'I thought I had another 10 years to figure out what I was going to do afterwards.' Dremann recently returned to the U.S. from Guam, where he had supervised a team of sailors and junior officers repairing submarines for forward deployment on the USS Frank Cable. The assignment, he said, was part of a milestone tour that would have set him on a path to becoming a Navy captain. Under the Trump administration's new policy, 'That's been taken away from me,' he said. A member of the Navy since the early aughts, Dremann served under the Pentagon's long-standing ban on trans service members that was lifted in 2016 under former President Obama, as well as under 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell,' which prevented gays, lesbians and bisexuals from openly serving, Trump's 2017 trans military restrictions and now, the more stringent 2025 ban. 'This is the fourth time the military has had a policy that requires me to leave the service,' he said. 'This will probably be the one that gets me.' Dremann said he would be open to returning to the Navy once he separates if the Trump administration's policy were reversed in the near future. 'I even took my physical readiness test for the year,' he said. Others hesitated to say whether they would return. 'Unless there were specific policies put in place to prevent, like, what's going on now from happening in the future, having that being a case where let's say, everyone's offered a way back through the next administration, four to eight years later, you can run into this entire situation again,' said Abi, a member of the Air Force based in Alaska who asked that her last name be withheld over privacy and safety concerns. Her wife, Elizabeth, said she would be similarly uneasy with Abi someday returning to the military. The Trump administration's policy, she said, had betrayed their trust. Trump's 2017 policy barring transgender troops from serving made an exception for some who had already started to transition. The latest policy makes no such exception, deeming any service member with a current diagnosis, history or symptoms of gender dysphoria unfit for military service. 'To turn around and say, 'I know we said that you could do that, but now that you have, we are choosing to punish you for it.' It's like, what else could they do that with?' Elizabeth asked. With just under five years of service, Abi said there is no real incentive to opt for voluntary separation. A Pentagon memo issued in February said some trans service members could receive separation pay at double the rate of those who were involuntarily removed, but eligibility requires at least five years of continuous active-duty service. For now, Abi and Elizabeth are biding their time. They are looking to relocate, possibly to California, where Elizabeth has family, but cannot make concrete plans — including finding work — until they know when Abi will be discharged. 'It's very scary to be in such an unknown position,' Abi said. Army Reserve 2nd Lt. Nicolas Talbott said he similarly has no plans to voluntarily separate, a decision that, as a reservist, he must make by July 6. 'Most of the incentives for voluntary separation are geared toward folks who have more time and service than I do,' he said. 'So, for me personally, I'm watching to see if any new guidance or any new policies come out. But really, we're just kind of preparing to see what the involuntary separation process is going to look like.' 'I hate the verbiage being used as voluntary versus involuntary,' he added, 'because this isn't really voluntary for any of us. This is not what we wanted.' Talbott said he's hopeful the policy will again be blocked in court. Like Shilling, he is the lead plaintiff in a challenge to Trump's executive order. A district judge sided with Talbott and more than a dozen other plaintiffs in March, blocking the administration from implementing Trump's order, describing it as 'soaked in animus.' An appeals court temporarily halted the order as it weighs whether to grant a longer pause. 'I'm kind of trying to do my best to hold down the fort for everyone,' Talbott said. 'That's what I try to stay focused on. I have a job in the military, I have my civilian job as well, and things need to get done. You know, the world does not revolve around this case; the world does not revolve around me by any shape of the imagination, and I have jobs to do, and I have responsibilities, and that's what I try to stay focused on.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
CNBC
4 hours ago
- CNBC
DHS wants National Guard to search for and transport unaccompanied migrant children
A Department of Homeland Security request for 21,000 National Guard troops to support "expansive interior immigration enforcement operations" includes a call for troops to search for unaccompanied children in some cases and transport them between states, three sources briefed on the plan told NBC News. Having National Guard troops perform such tasks, which are not explained in detail in the DHS request, has prompted concern among Democrats in Congress and some military and law enforcement officials. The tasks are laid out in a May 9 request for assistance from the Department of Homeland Security to the Pentagon. The document states that "this represents the first formal request by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for the deployment of National Guard personnel in support of interior immigration enforcement operations." The request calls for National Guard troops to be used for "Search and Rescue for UACs [Unaccompanied Alien Children] in remote or hostile terrain," and "Intra- and inter-state transport of detainees/ unaccompanied alien children (UACs)," without clearly explaining what that would entail. Most of the troops, about 10,000, would be used for transporting detained individuals, DHS said. Roughly 2,500 troops would be used for detention support, but the document does not specify where. Another 1,000 troops would be assigned to administrative support, such as processing detainees. The request also asks for up to 3,500 troops to "Attempt to Locate — Fugitives" and to conduct "surveillance and canvassing missions," as well as "night operations and rural interdictions." It also asks for support for ICE in "joint task force operations for absconder/fugitive tracking," according to the three sources familiar with the plans. NPR first reported the details of the DHS request. Democrats in Congress and military and law enforcement officials have expressed concern about the use of National Guard troops to perform what they say are civilian law enforcement duties. One characterized the plan as the Trump administration "finding a way to get the National Guard into the streets and into American homes," saying, "I fear it's going to look like a police state." A second source said, "Trump has said he wants to use the National Guard for law enforcement, and the Pentagon and other entities have always said, 'Oh, don't worry, it will never come to that.' But this is it." Pentagon officials did not respond to a request for comment. Defense officials who spoke on condition of anonymity said the request has not been approved and is being evaluated by Pentagon policy officials, the general counsel's office and other Pentagon leadership. The officials say the most likely course of action would be for some parts of the request to be approved and others rejected. But one source briefed on the plans said that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is close to approving some elements of the request and is considering which state governors to approach first regarding National Guard units. "We are so much closer to this being real," said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity. DHS is requesting the National Guard troops under Title 32 status, which means they would remain on state active duty under the command of their governor but would be federally funded. Title 32 status generally allows National Guard troops to conduct law enforcement activities without violating the Posse Comitatus Act, an 1878 law that bars the use of federal troops in law enforcement operations. A National Guard member who opposes troops performing such tasks told NBC News, "I plan to leave the National Guard soon over this." The Pentagon is also being asked by DHS to pay the full cost of deploying the 21,000 National Guard troops. That comes amid growing tension between the Pentagon and DHS over the cost of border and other immigrant-related operations. The DHS request for National Guard troops arrives when the Pentagon is already footing a $23 million-a-month bill to hold as many as 2,500 undocumented immigrants in a military facility in Texas. Defense officials say they are frustrated that the camp is holding far fewer individuals than they were told to expect, and they would like a reprieve. The Defense Department is in a contract with DHS to help support DHS and ICE officers who are under pressure from deputy White House chief of staff Stephen Miller to arrest 3,000 undocumented immigrants a day. But it has been slow going for ICE agents, resulting in fewer arrests across the country. That has resulted in many empty beds at facilities like the one in El Paso, owned and operated by the Defense Department. Military officials say the facility has been holding an average of 150 undocumented immigrants each day over the last several weeks — a fraction of its 2,500 beds. On one recent day, they said, the facility housed fewer than 80 people. Pentagon officials are asking to cut the number of beds in the facility from 2,500 to about 1,000, which they say would save $12 million per month. It is not clear if the DHS request for National Guard troops will increase the need for beds in the El Paso facility. The DHS request also comes as the Pentagon is struggling to fund critical projects to support U.S. troops. "Congress is aware that the department is redirecting funds from existing military construction projects like barracks improvements for lower enlisted personnel and long-standing infrastructure projects elsewhere in the world in favor of southwest border missions," a Senate aide who spoke on condition of anonymity told NBC News. "They are pretty frustrated with the way that the department is ordering them to support DHS out of their own pockets for a grossly disproportionate cost compared to what ICE facilities would cost the government," added the aide, referring to military officials. Last month, the Pentagon notified Congress that it planned to transfer more than $1.74 million in the current DOD budget to the southwest border mission, a step that will take money away from renovating barracks and base facilities. Service member advocacy groups have criticized the move. Rob Evans, the founder of Hots&Cots, where service members can post reviews of barracks, dining areas and other facilities, says he sees evidence daily of barracks with sewage leaks, mold, failing HVAC systems and more. "When funding is pulled from this line, troops pay the price in real ways: delayed repairs, worsening conditions, and a growing sense that their well-being comes second to optics and operations," Evans said. "Service members deserve clean, safe, and dignified living conditions. They've earned at least that much."
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Six months after al-Assad's fall: Syria's tightrope walk to unity
Six months ago, the once seemingly impossible became reality: Syria's long-time ruler Bashar al-Assad was overthrown after years of brutal civil war. More than five decades of authoritarian rule by the al-Assad family came to an end. What remained was a fractured society - scarred by violence, riddled with mistrust, but also carrying a fragile hope for a new beginning. Today, the nation of roughly 23 million people is governed by a transitional administration led by interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa, while al-Assad has fled to Moscow. A former leader of the Islamist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), al-Sharaa and his alliance played a central role in toppling al-Assad on December 8. Upon assuming office, the new leadership promised "a Syria for all." But six months on, has that promise been kept? Minorities under pressure: fear and uncertainty Internationally, the treatment of minorities in the new Syria is being viewed with particular scepticism. Like al-Sharaa and his companions, the majority of Syrians are Sunni Muslims. However, recurring outbreaks of partly sectarian violence in recent months have fuelled fears among Druze, Alawites and Christians, for example. As recently as early May, Sunni fighters aligned with the transitional government launched attacks on members of the Druze community, resulting in dozens of deaths. Observers reported what they described as "massacres" in the coastal region as early as March. In response to assaults by Assad loyalists, the transitional government launched a military operation, during which hundreds of Alawites - al-Assad's own minority sect - were killed in the fighting. "There is fear, not only in the Druze community, but also among other minorities," Hammud al-Hinawi, a Druze sheikh and one of the top leaders of the religious community, told dpa. "If we don't learn to accept one another, regardless of our religion, we can never build a nation," said al-Hinawi. This is precisely what interim President al-Sharaa promised the population when he took power: a united Syria. "But one must always keep in mind that Syria was divided by the old regime," emphasized the Druze leader. Only "hand in hand" and without extremism from any side can a united country be built, he added. This includes the Kurds in the north-east, who had previously governed their region with a high degree of autonomy. A key step toward national unity came with an agreement between Kurdish leaders and the transitional government to fully integrate into state institutions. This would, in theory, grant al-Sharaa's administration authority over both civil and military structures in the north-east. However, key details of the deal remain unresolved. Kurdish representatives expressed cautious optimism: "Like other communities, we are concerned, but we will see whether the new rulers will keep their promises and give every Syrian - regardless of their origin - their homeland back." Back on the international stage The new leadership in Damascus has also made it a priority to distance itself from the legacy of the al-Assad regime and to rebuild international relations. Al-Assad had been largely isolated following the outbreak of civil war, with his government facing severe sanctions from much of the global community. The conflict began in 2011 with anti-government protests that were violently suppressed. It escalated into a full-scale civil war with international involvement, displacing some 14 million people and killing more than 300,000 civilians, according to UN estimates. Nearly six months after al-Assad's fall, his successor al-Sharaa - a former rebel commander and ex-member of the terrorist organization al-Qaeda - has already met with several world leaders, including US President Donald Trump. In Europe, he was received by French President Emmanuel Macron. In September, al-Sharaa is scheduled to address the United Nations General Assembly in New York. Reconnecting to global financial networks Damascus has recently scored significant gains on the international stage, particularly in the area of sanctions relief. In mid-May, Syrians flooded the streets in celebration after Trump unexpectedly announced the complete lifting of US sanctions against the country. Just days later, the European Union followed suit. The Syrian Foreign Ministry hailed the move as another "historic step" for the new Syria. During the war, essential goods - ranging from medicine to fuel - were scarce, with imports nearly impossible under the weight of international sanctions. The country was also largely cut off from the global financial system, making money transfers to and from Syria virtually impossible. Observers say lifting the sanctions could gradually lower prices and allow urgently needed foreign capital to flow into the country - critical for both economic recovery and long-term reconstruction efforts. 90% of Syrians still dependent on aid Even six months after the ousting of al-Assad, Syria remains far from stable. According to UN data from April, around 400,000 Syrian refugees from neighbouring countries - and over one million internally displaced persons - have returned to their homes. The humanitarian situation remains dire. The UN estimates that around 90% of the population still relies on some form of humanitarian aid. After more than a decade of conflict, widespread poverty persists. Many Syrians say they continue to wrestle with uncertainty about their country's future. "There are days when we question whether this new Syria is any different," one returnee said. "But there are also days when we believe - step by step - we're moving in the right direction. Hope is still alive."
