
Urgent recall issued for vegetables sold at Lidl due to deadly listeria outbreak
A product recall has been announced for spinach and mixed leaves in Northern Ireland from a local producer. The recall of spinach and mixed leaves products comes after listeria was detected in the region.
The outbreak, which has been linked to ready meals sold at major supermarkets, has resulted in at least one fatality. McCormack Family Farms, suppliers to Lidl, Dunnes Stores, and Musgrave Ltd in Northern Ireland, have now recalled their spinach and mixed leaves products.
The Food Standards Agency (FSA) has stated that it is "working closely" with the Food Safety Authority of Ireland (FSAI) and local retailers to determine the distribution of these products in Northern Ireland.
Retailers have been instructed to display point of sale notices explaining the reason for the recall and advising customers on what action to take if they have purchased the affected products.
On its website, the Food Standards Agency further explained: "Symptoms caused by Listeria monocytogenes can be similar to flu and include high temperature, muscle ache or pain, chills, feeling or being sick and diarrhoea.
"However, in rare cases, the infection can be more severe, causing serious complications such as meningitis.
"Some people are more vulnerable to listeria infections, including those over 65 years of age, pregnant women and their unborn babies, babies less than one month old and people with weakened immune systems."
The food safety body has urged shoppers who have bought the products not to consume them, and they can receive a full refund by returning them to the shop, reports the Mirror.
Last week's ready meals recall was connected to one fatality and nine listeriosis cases.
The adult died just days after becoming ill from consuming a contaminated ready meal, as supermarket chiefs rushed to withdraw at-risk dishes from shop shelves amid mounting public safety fears.
A selection of ready meals by the brand Ballymaguire Foods, which supplies products to both Aldi and Tesco in Ireland, was impacted.
It remains unclear which ready meal the individual consumed before they tragically passed away. Scores of products by the food manufacturer have been included in an extensive list of recalled items.
A spokesperson for Lidl, which operates 43 stores across Northern Ireland, said: "At Lidl, your safety is important to us, which is why we have strict procedures in place to ensure the highest quality and safety of all our products.
"Affected products can be returned to store for a full refund, with or without a receipt."
Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community!
Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today.
You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland.
No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team.
All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in!
If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'.
We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like.
To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.
The Health Service Executive (HSE) confirmed this death is presently under investigation but additional details cannot be disclosed due to patient confidentiality.
In a statement, The HSE announced: "A voluntary precautionary food recall of ready-to-heat meals is underway due to a link with the outbreak.
"The HSE Health Protection Surveillance Centre has been notified of and is investigating the death of an adult with confirmed listeriosis. To ensure medical confidentiality, no further information on this patient can be disclosed."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Record
16 hours ago
- Daily Record
Tesco recalls popular beauty and skincare product over nasty infection risk
The item could contain bacterium linked to respiratory diseases, urinary tract infections, eye infections, and even sepsis Supermarkets are fast becoming front-runners when it comes to beauty and skincare. Scots who previously went to drugstores and make-up countries for their facial bits may now be picking up dupes on their weekly food shop. However, one product from a major retailer is being whipped from shelves after being found to pose a potential infection risk, with bacterium linked to respiratory diseases, urinary tract infections, eye infections, and even sepsis. Tesco is recalling various Tesco Kind & Pure Facial Cleansing Wipes due to unsatisfactory microbiological testing and detecting the presence of a bacterium, Pluralibacter gergoviae, making products potentially unsafe for use. The item was swiped on Tuesday, July 29 as a "precautionary measure". The bacterium is "becoming a real concern in the cosmetics and personal care industry," according to Melbec Microbiology, one of Britain's leading UKAS accredited testing laboratories, "due to its resistance to many common preservatives and its potential to cause infections, particularly in immunocompromised individuals". Products affected Tesco Kind & Pure 25 Facial Cleansing Wipes 163g Affected batch codes: 5128723, 5129723, 5130723, 5123723, 5144723, 5145723, 5146723, 5163723, 5164723, 5168723, 5169723, 5188723, 5176715, 5177715 Tesco Kind & Pure Radiant Facial Cleansing Wipes Vitamin C 25 Pack 159g Affected batch codes: 5187723, 5186723, 5188723, 5154715, 5155715, 5156715 Melbec Micriology's website states: "Although infections in healthy individuals are rare, P. gergoviae can cause severe infections in people with weakened immune systems, chronic illnesses, or those undergoing surgery. The bacterium has been linked to respiratory diseases, urinary tract infections, eye infections, and sepsis." The contamination of cosmetic products with P. gergoviae has led to several product recalls in Europe. Cosmetic products should really be entirely free from this bacterium, the lab added. Thankfully, no other Tesco products are affected by this recall. If you have purchased an affected product, Tesco are urging you not to use it. Instead, customers can return it in-store where a full refund will be given. No receipt is required. For more information, visit Tesco's contact page. Alternatively, you can also contact Tesco Customer Services on 0800 505 555. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Elsewhere, Waitrose shoppers are being urged to look through their shopping and check the dates on any Waitrose and Partners Egg and Spinach Protein Pots they have recently purchased after a separate recall was issued. The supermarket has released an important safety warning for anyone who has bought the protein pot with the use by dates of July 31 and August 1. This is due to the potential presence of Salmonella, which could cause shoppers to become ill if they consume the product. If shoppers have bought the 90g Egg and Spinach Protein Pot with the mentioned dates, they are being urged to not consume the product, package up the item and return the product to their local Waitrose branch for a a refund.


Time Out
17 hours ago
- Time Out
London is officially the worst region in the UK for food hygiene, according to recent statistics
A long brown hair in your spaghetti, a plate of pink, undercooked chicken, a smear of old encrusted sauce on the table – the thought of low hygiene standards at a restaurant is enough to make a person retch. And in some unfortunate news for the foodies of London, its been revealed that eateries in the capital have the worst food hygiene ratings in the whole UK. High Speed Training (HST) is one of the UK's biggest providers of food hygiene courses, so it knows its stuff. Every year it crunches Food Standards Agency (FSA) data for more than 240,000 food business (restaurants, canteens, takeaways, bars, pubs, hotels, etc.) across the UK to rank each region based on their level of food hygiene. Before you spit out your food, London's food hygiene score isn't actually that bad. Although it does sit at the bottom of the pack, its average food hygiene score is 4.38 out of five, which means that the hygiene at most of our eateries sits between 'good' and 'very good'. The rating takes into account the handling of food, how food is stored, how it's prepared, the cleanliness of the facilities and how food safety is managed. When we break it down by borough, Kensington and Chelsea is the most hygienic place in the city with an average rating of 4.79. London's lowest rating went to Waltham Forest, with an average of 3.89 out of five. To Waltham's credit, that is an ever-so-slight improvement on last year's score of 3.74. Of the city's 36,383 premises, 149 were slapped with a big fat zero from the FSA this year, indicating 'urgent improvement needed' and 774 scored one, meaning that there is 'major improvement needed'. Yuck. Rest assured that you are largely in safe hands when you eat out in the capital, though. HST's report found that 83.1 percent of London's premises have a food hygiene rating of four or five. Dr Richard Anderson, the head of learning and development at High Speed Training, said: 'Our report shows that, on average, standards remain high across the UK, and have improved from 2024. This commitment to correct food hygiene training for staff, alongside robust food management procedures and everyday good practices are crucial to keep performing at high standards. 'We would also urge customers to check the food hygiene ratings of establishments they wish to dine at, so that an informed call as to whether you eat there can be made.'


Daily Record
19 hours ago
- Daily Record
Lung cancer warning as one food type linked to higher chance of deadly disease - even in non-smokers
Lung cancer is the most common cancer in Scotland It is a well known fact that what we put into our bodies affects our long-term health. Binging on fast food and slurping high-sugar drinks beyond moderation can lead to issues such as high cholesterol, obesity, and more. Not being diet-conscious can contribute to our chances of being diagnosed with cancer, too. And academics have now found a link between consuming high levels of ultra processed foods (UPFs) and lung cancer in particular. It comes after an international team of researchers tracked the health and food habits of more than 100,000 US adults, with an average age of 63. After an average of 12 years, the team identified 1,706 cases of lung cancer. Lung cancer is the most common cancer in Scotland, with 5,476 cases diagnosed in 2021, accounting for 15.5 per cent of all cancers in the country, according to Public Health Scotland. Food survey questionnaires revealed these people ate UPFs, including ice cream, hamburgers, hot dogs, pizza, bread, cakes, pastries, breakfast cereals, instant noodles and soups, margarine, confectionery, and soft drinks. The research team, led by academics in China, found that average UPF consumption was nearly three servings a day, but ranged from 0.5 to six. The three types of food that featured the most were lunch meat and soft drinks. "These findings suggest the healthy benefits of limiting UPF," the authors said. "Limiting trends of UPF intake globally could contribute to reducing the burden of lung cancer." The academics shared some shocking statics. People who consumed the highest amounts of UPFs were 41 per cent more likely to develop lung cancer compared with those who consumed the least amount, they wrote. The authors adjusted their findings based on whether or not people smoked, but they did not make adjustments for smoking intensity, which may have an impact. In any case, they stressed the data should be read with caution. "A quarter of lung cancer cases occur in non-smokers so we do need research exploring whether other factors are associated with lung cancer," Professor Sam Hare, consultant chest radiologist at Royal Free London NHS Trust, said. "We also know immunity is linked to cancer biology so it is a good idea to do research into factors like diet." Professor Hare highlighted that people's diets can also change a lot over the course of such long-term studies. For this reason, it is "difficult to directly conclude" that lung cancer is related to the level of UPF consumption alone, given it was only declared at the start of the study. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. "That said, given the relative dearth of information on non-smoking related risk factors in lung cancer, it is important that the scientific community conducts more studies like this," the expert concluded. "We need genuine evidence-based advancement in the early diagnosis of lung cancer in non-smokers, but this study isn't quite able to give us the answers yet."