
I'm Gen Z – would I sign up to defend my country? Yes, but on one condition…
But that experience, valuable as it was, is still a far step from being willing to fight, kill – or die – for your country. That's a different kind of commitment altogether.
And yet – as Keir Starmer unveils the new defence review, which, among other recommendations, suggests military-style 'gap years' to get Britain 'war-ready' and to tackle recruitment shortfalls in the Armed Forces – it is a prospect that many may face – whether they like it or not.
As for me, would I sign up to defend Britain? My answer is yes – but on one condition: that it's not just some of us who are expected to serve.
The state we are currently in is far from equal. Military service in the UK disproportionately appeals to, and is marketed toward, those from less privileged backgrounds who are struggling to find purpose – for those who see it as a ticket to training, income, or direction. Research from the Child Rights International Network (CRIN) speaks to this, finding that between 2013-2018, army recruitment of 16- and 17-year-olds in England was 57 per cent higher in the poorest fifth of constituencies than the richest fifth.
Add to that the recent proposals to enlist prisoners to ease overcrowding, and it's hard not to associate service with punishment – there's a quiet suggestion of it becoming a sentence for the disadvantaged, rather than a civic duty shared by all.
Should young people, particularly young men, prosper under the touch of a little agility and discipline? Honestly, yes. I think many would. The world's gone a bit topsy-turvy, and real grit, resilience – even something as old-fashioned as honour – feels harder to come by these days. A universal national service model, military or civil, could give structure and purpose where it's clearly sorely lacking.
But, as much as I see the benefits in service, I can also empathise with my peers who flat-out reject the idea of defending a country they feel has neglected – and continues to punish – them. Between the period of January-March 2025, there were 620,000 young people aged 16 to 24 who were unemployed, per the ONS. So, too, are Gen Z still recovering from the impact of Covid – and that's before we even get to the cost of living crisis, rentlflation and the increasingly impossible prospect of property ownership.
Still, if implemented correctly – and fairly – military service may actually be a good thing for them, offering a steady income, life skills and a sense of purpose.
It's also important to note that many countries around the world have successfully introduced conscription models over the years – as did Britain during the First World War.
In Switzerland, for example, conscription isn't controversial, but compulsory – even to this day. Every Swiss male citizen is required to undergo 18 to 21 weeks of basic military training around the age of 18, followed by mandatory reservist service, which includes returning for three-week refresher courses every year for the next decade.
It's an intense commitment, but what it creates is a nation where military preparedness is normalised – not politicised. Young people leave with a sense of discipline, shared national identity, and, crucially, the knowledge that in times of crisis, they are ready to defend their country. There's no scramble to fill the ranks and no over-reliance on one socioeconomic group, because the responsibility is shared. Have the Swiss got it right? In a world as unstable as ours, their model begins to look less like a relic and more like foresight.
I got my own taste of military discipline at school, where we were required to do a year of CCF – the Combined Cadet Force – every Wednesday afternoon. What I remember most wasn't the boat days or the camping under a sheet, but the male teachers barking orders at 13-year-old girls as we stood shivering through gun drills and formation practice. At the time, it felt absurd – even intimidating. But looking back, it taught me something I didn't expect: how to 'man up', as it were to dig in, stay calm, and carry on.
Conscription is nothing new. But whether it still has a place in modern Britain is the question we now have to ask. And if you think its archaic, just ask yourself this: if we were to go to war tomorrow, would we be prepared?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Phillipson: Teachers cannot insist on gender-neutral Mx title
Teachers can ask to be addressed as Mx instead of Mr or Mrs but they cannot insist on people using the gender-neutral title, the Education Secretary has said. Bridget Phillipson said schools have a responsibility to make sure teachers are treated with respect, but also that people 'with a range of viewpoints' on transgender issues are also treated with respect. Ms Phillipson was pressed further on Thursday on comments she made earlier this week about the right of teachers to make such a request. The Telegraph reported recently that a primary school in the south-east of England had listed a new teacher, who the newspaper said was male according to their biological sex, as Mx in a list of staff members. Mx is described as a gender-neutral title for those who do not identify as being of a particular gender or do not wish to be identified by gender. Speaking on Times Radio, Ms Phillipson said: 'A teacher can, of course, make that request, but you can't insist that it's followed.' Asked whether she would call someone Mx, Ms Phillipson said: 'I think that's a hypothetical situation. I've never been asked to do that. 'As a matter of principle, on a wider point, I would usually seek to respond to someone in a way that they would prefer, but there is no obligation for people to do that.' Asked by Nick Ferrari on LBC whether the issue will cause confusion, she said: ' Schools, as employers, have responsibilities for managing this, in that they have a responsibility to ensure that staff are treated with respect, but also that people with a range of viewpoints are also able to express their views and are treated with respect as well.' Ms Phillipson also said she 'can't put a timescale' on when long-awaited guidance for schools on gender-questioning children will be published. The Government has previously said it will not be hurried into publishing guidance for schools, amid calls which came after the Supreme Court ruling on the legal definition of a woman in April. Draft guidance for schools and colleges on how best to support pupils has been on hold since Labour entered Government. It was published by the Conservative government in December 2023, and a consultation ended in March last year. On Thursday Ms Phillipson, who has previously said guidance would be issued later this year, said the priority is getting the guidance right. She told LBC: 'I think it's more important that we get it right than we rush it, because these are serious and quite sensitive issues about children and young people and their wellbeing. 'I do know that schools are asking for guidance. 'We want to make sure they've got that guidance, but what matters most is that the guidance they get is workable and they find it practical and helpful in responding to what can be quite challenging issues for schools, when they're supporting young people who might be experiencing questions around distress or their wellbeing.'


The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer welcomes Zelensky to Downing Street ahead of Putin-Trump meeting
Sir Keir Starmer has welcomed Volodymyr Zelensky to Downing Street as Europe braces for Donald Trump's face-to-face discussions with Vladimir Putin on Friday. The Ukrainian president and Prime Minister embraced and posed for the cameras in front of Number 10 with a handshake as he arrived in Westminster on Thursday morning while gathered media in Downing Street shouted questions. A red carpet had been rolled out for his arrival. The Prime Minister's meeting with Mr Zelensky comes after he said Britain stands ready to 'increase pressure' on Russia if necessary. During a call with the US president and European allies on Wednesday, Sir Keir praised Mr Trump for his work to bring forward a 'viable' chance of an end to the war ahead of his scheduled meeting with the Russian leader. Concerns have been raised over Mr Zelensky's exclusion from the discussions between Mr Trump and Mr Putin, which are set to take place in Alaska on Friday. Speaking on Wednesday, Sir Keir said: 'This meeting on Friday that President Trump is attending is hugely important. 'As I've said personally to President Trump for the three-and-a-bit years this conflict has been going on, we haven't got anywhere near a prospect of actually a viable solution, a viable way of bringing it to a ceasefire. 'And now we do have that chance, because of the work of that the president has put in.' Further sanctions could be imposed on Russia should the Kremlin fail to engage and the UK is already working on its next package of measures targeting Moscow, he said. 'We're ready to support this, including from the plans we've already drawn up to deploy a reassurance force once hostilities have ceased,' he told allies. 'It is important to remind colleagues that we do stand ready also to increase pressure on Russia, particularly the economy, with sanctions and wider measures as may be necessary.' Sir Keir and European leaders have repeatedly said discussions about Ukraine should not happen without it amid concerns the country is being sidelined in negotiations about its own future.


Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
A-level results day 2025: Map and charts reveal A* hotspots, the toughest subjects and the huge gap between private and state schools
View the full A-level results day 2025 statistics with the Daily Mail's collection of graphics. A-level A* and A rate by county and subject: 2025 This map shows the percentage of pupils who earned the top A* or A grades at A-level in every county in England. You can chose a county by hovering over it or using the search bar. The map's default view is for all subjects, but it can be filtered by individual subject. For a more detailed breakdown, including historic results by county and your chosen tap or click on a map area, or type in the 'Search county...' box. A-level results by subject: 2008–25 The chart below shows the the percentage of pupils who achieved each grade – A* to U – in England for each year between 2008 and 2025. You can select the results for each subject, such as maths, English or physics, to see how well students did. A-level results by gender: 2008–25 The below line graphs show what percentage of male and female pupils earned an A or above and C or above from 2008 to 2025. As with all of our charts, it can be filtered by subject. A-level subject popularity: 2008–25 The graph below shows how many entries there have been into each A-level subject from 2008 to 2025. You can select up to five subjects at once to compare which ones are the most popular and how they have changed over time. More A-level results day charts We have a selection of more charts below, including the results this year vs last, how results compare across the UK nations (excluding Scotland where pupils sit Highers, not A-levels), and the number of pupils accepted onto their first choice university course.