logo
DOJ seeks 1-day sentence for officer in Breonna Taylor killing. It's an insult.

DOJ seeks 1-day sentence for officer in Breonna Taylor killing. It's an insult.

USA Today20-07-2025
DOJ's one-day sentencing recommendation sends a chilling message. Across America, Black women disproportionately suffer police violence – and all too often their deaths are brushed aside.
On Monday, July 21, a federal judge will sentence former Louisville police officer Brett Hankison for violating the civil rights of Breonna Taylor. And yet the Department of Justice, under Trump‑appointed leadership, has recommended just one day in prison, which Hankison may never serve due to time already credited. That recommendation is woefully inadequate and a profound insult to Breonna, her family – whom I represent – and to the Constitution's promise of 'equal protection of the laws.'
Across America, Black women disproportionately suffer police violence, and all too often their deaths are brushed aside. According to a 2024 study, Black women and girls are 40% more likely to be killed by police than White women, despite comprising just 15% of the female U.S. population. More than half of these deaths were callously classified as 'collateral damage,' meaning the women were not even the intended targets of the police action that took their lives.
Adding insult to tragedy, convictions in these cases are nearly nonexistent. While fewer than 3% of police killings ever result in criminal charges, even fewer lead to convictions, especially for Black women. Our legal team has found no record of an on-duty police officer ever being convicted for killing a Black woman.
Breonna Taylor was killed in her own home during a no-knock raid that never should have happened. Hankison fired 10 shots blindly through a covered window and door. The fact that none of those bullets struck Breonna was chance, not restraint. A federal jury rightly found his actions violated her civil rights. The law says that matters, but the DOJ wants you to believe it doesn't.
This is not about vengeance. It's about accountability.
This one-day sentencing recommendation sends a chilling message that even when an officer is convicted of violating a citizen's constitutional rights in a violent, deadly act, the penalty is little more than symbolic. It signals to police across the country that civil rights violations may come with no meaningful accountability, as long as the victim is Black.
Let's be clear: this is not about vengeance. It's about justice. It's about enforcing the Constitution's protections for all Americans, regardless of race, gender, income or zip code.
When federal prosecutors break from precedent to recommend an outrageously lenient sentence in a high-profile civil rights case, they undermine the very principles they're sworn to uphold. It tells families like Breonna's that even a conviction is not enough. It tells Black women that their lives, their rights and their humanity hold less value. And it tells the entire nation that the Constitution is negotiable.
Opinion: US leads the world in deadly force by police. Why?
Sadly, this goes beyond Breonna Taylor. It's about Pamela Turner, a Black woman with a mental illness who was killed by police in Texas. It's about Sonya Massey, a young Black woman in Illinois recently shot and killed by a sheriff's deputy after calling 911 for help. Massey's case hasn't yet gone to trial, but how that case is handled will be another test of whether our justice system truly sees Black women as worthy of equal protection.
Again and again, Black women's lives are devalued, their suffering dismissed, and their deaths met with silence or slaps on the wrist. These names are not footnotes. They are evidence that the system sees Black women as disposable, and it's long past time for that to change.
Breonna Taylor's mother is heartbroken, but she has hope for justice
The 14th Amendment doesn't say 'equal protection, unless you're a Black woman.' It promises justice under the law for all. And yet, time and time again, the system refuses to extend that promise to Black women.
Breonna Taylor's death was a preventable tragedy. And the lack of meaningful accountability for those involved is a national disgrace.
The judicial system must send a clear message: when police officers violate civil rights, they will be held accountable. The federal sentencing guidelines exist for a reason. They must be applied fairly, including when the victim is a Black woman.
Opinion: Juneteenth marks end of slavery, but not the start of equality. We can change that.
Breonna's mother, Tamika Palmer, is heartbroken and angry. Once again. The fact that neither of the officers who shot her daughter – Jonathan Mattingly and Myles Cosgrove – were charged with her killing, is a heartbreak that will never go away.
But she still holds out hope that the judge will reject this recommendation and do what the DOJ has refused to: honor the jury's verdict, respect the law and the guidelines and recognize the value of her daughter's life.
If we want to build an America that truly lives up to its ideals, we must start by valuing Black women in our communities and in our courtrooms. That means listening to their voices, protecting their rights, and delivering real consequences when those rights are violated. Anything less is not justice, it's complicity.
Ben Crump is a nationally renowned civil rights attorney and founder of Ben Crump Law. Known as 'Black America's attorney general,' he has represented families in some of the most high-profile civil rights cases of our time, including those of Breonna Taylor, George Floyd, Tyre Nichols and Ahmaud Arbery.
You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal authorities investigating former special counsel Jack Smith, who indicted Trump
Federal authorities investigating former special counsel Jack Smith, who indicted Trump

Los Angeles Times

time5 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Federal authorities investigating former special counsel Jack Smith, who indicted Trump

BRIDGEWATER, N.J. — Federal officials have opened an investigation into Jack Smith, the former special counsel who indicted then-candidate Donald Trump on felony charges before his election to a second term. The current Office of Special Counsel, traditionally an independent federal agency, on Saturday confirmed the investigation after reporting by other news organizations. Smith was named special counsel by then-Atty. Gen. Merrick Garland to investigate Trump in November 2022 for his actions related to trying to overturn his 2020 election loss to Joe Biden and his hoarding of classified documents at his home in Florida. Trump and his Republican allies, including Sen. Tom Cotton, have — without offering evidence of wrongdoing — accused Smith of violating the Hatch Act, a federal law that bans certain public officials from engaging in political activity. Smith prosecuted two federal cases against Trump and indicted him on multiple felony charges in both. He dropped both cases after Trump won the election in November, as a sitting president is shielded from prosecution according to long-standing Justice Department practice. Smith then subsequently resigned as special counsel. Cotton (R-Ark.) on Wednesday asked the Office of Special Counsel to investigate Smith, alleging that his conduct was designed to help then-President Biden and then-Vice Presiedent Kamala Harris, who became the Democratic nominee in last year's race against Trump. Trump is the only felon to ever occupy the White House, having been convicted in May 2024 on 34 criminal counts for fraud related to a hush-money payment to a porn star before the 2016 election, which he also won. The New York Post was first to report on the investigation into Smith. Superville writes for the Associated Press.

Secret Service halts ex-director Kimberley Cheatle's security clearance renewal
Secret Service halts ex-director Kimberley Cheatle's security clearance renewal

New York Post

time5 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Secret Service halts ex-director Kimberley Cheatle's security clearance renewal

Former Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle — under fire over the Pennsylvania assassination attempt against President Trump — won't have her top-level security clearance renewed, The Post has learned. The Secret Service decided not to extend Chealte's clearance after opposition from Republicans in Congress, namely Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.). 'Director [Sean] Curran has been modernizing the intelligence apparatus within the agency,' a spokesperson told The Post. 'During that process, he has determined that not all former directors will have their clearances renewed.' Advertisement The decision to end Cheatle's security clearance came after RealClearPolitics inquired about Johnson's opposition to renewal, claimed the outlet, which was the first to report the change. Johnson, who helms the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, had probed the Secret Service's failures leading up to the Trump assassination attempt in Butler, Pa. 3 Former Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle was at the center of controversy over the security failures preceding the assassination attempt against President Trump. The Washington Post via Getty Images Advertisement 3 Sen. Ron Johnson had opposed Kimberly Cheatle getting her security clearance renewed. AP He had been fiercely critical of Cheatle, who led the agency from 2022 to 2024, before resigning about 10 days after a bullet grazed the president's right ear during a rally in July of last year. 'The U.S. Secret Service sponsors security clearances for all the former directors for their knowledge of operational and national security matters,' a Secret Service spokesperson explained. 'The purpose for this was so the agency could maintain formal and protected communication, including potentially sensitive and classified matters with former officials.' Advertisement Trump later tapped Curran, who previously led his detail, to helm the agency. Cheatle, who was picked by former first lady Jill Biden, has taken heat for a variety of security failures leading up to the chilling attempt on Trump's life. Multiple GOP-led probes into the assassination attempt cited sources who alleged Cheatle's team had turned down Curran's petitions for more security assets during the 2024 cycle. Last month, on the first anniversary of the July 13, 2024, assassination attempt, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) accused her of lying to Congress when she denied accusations she turned down requests for more resources for Trump's security. Advertisement 'Any assertion or implication that I provided misleading testimony is patently false and does a disservice to those men and women on the front lines who have been unfairly disciplined for a team, rather than individual, failure,' she fired back in a statement provided by her attorney. During his second term, Trump has repeatedly moved to ax security clearances for former officials in key posts. In most cases, he's gone further than Curran and outright revoked access. This includes his January executive order to revoke clearances for the infamous 'spies who lied' — the 51 intelligence officials who signed onto a letter claiming The Post's bombshell story on Hunter Biden's laptop had the 'classic earmarks of Russian disinformation.' 3 The Butler, Pa., rally attack marked the closest a gunman had gotten to killing a US president since 1981. AP Despite his terrifying brush with death, Trump has taken a charitable approach to the Secret Service. 'They should have had communications with the local police, they weren't tied in, and they should have been tied in. So there were mistakes made,' Trump told his daughter-in-law Lara Trump on Fox News' 'My View' last month. 'But I was satisfied in terms of the bigger plot, the larger plot, I was satisfied,' he added. 'And I have great confidence in these people. I know the people. And they're very talented, very capable.' Advertisement 'But they had a bad day. And I think they'll admit that. They had a rough day.' Last month, the Secret Service faced another security snafu when an agent attempted to sneak his wife onto an Air Force One jet during Trump's trip to Scotland.

Authorities investigating ex-Trump prosecutor Jack Smith for alleged illegal political activity
Authorities investigating ex-Trump prosecutor Jack Smith for alleged illegal political activity

Boston Globe

time5 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Authorities investigating ex-Trump prosecutor Jack Smith for alleged illegal political activity

Smith prosecuted two federal cases against Republican candidate Trump in the lead-up to the November 2024 presidential election. Smith ultimately dropped the cases — neither one had gone to trial — after Trump was reelected, which would have shielded him from prosecution according to longstanding Justice Department practice. Smith Advertisement Cotton, R-Ark., on Wednesday asked the Office of Special Counsel to investigate Smith, alleging that his conduct was designed to help then-President Joe Biden and his vice president, Kamala Harris, both Democrats. Biden had dropped his own bid for reelection following his disastrous performance in a campaign debate against Trump and tapped Harris to succeed him on the ticket. Trump won the election. The White House had no immediate comment on the investigation. The New York Post was first to report on the investigation into Smith.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store