Saudi Arabia's net FDI fall 7pc in Q1
RIYADH: Saudi Arabia's net foreign direct investment (FDI) fell 7% in the first quarter of 2025 compared to the previous quarter, government data showed on Sunday, as the kingdom continues to lag behind its ambitious FDI goals.
The kingdom drew 22.2 billion riyals ($5.92 billion) in FDI in the three months ended March 31 from 24 billion riyals ($6.40 billion) in the last three months of 2024.
Net FDI rose 44% compared to the same quarter the previous year when the kingdom drew 15.5 billion riyals ($4.13 billion), the General Authority of Statistics data showed.
Raising FDI is a key element of the kingdom's Vision 2030 economic transformation programme, which aims to lower the country's dependence on oil, expand the private sector, and create jobs.
Saudi Arabia has set a goal of attracting $100 billion in FDI by 2030, spending massively on huge development projects known as 'giga projects' and expanding sectors like sports, tourism, and entertainment.
But FDI numbers remain far from that target.
Saudi Arabia has been seen as a source of capital rather than a home for investment, and foreign investors can find it difficult to navigate the kingdom's business environment, sources told Reuters when the FDI goal was first announced in 2021.
The kingdom is projected to post a fiscal deficit of around $27 billion this year, which will largely be financed by borrowing, said a recent report by the International Monetary Fund.
Saudi Arabia was the largest emerging market dollar debt issuer last year, but the IMF says the country has room to continue borrowing, with its net debt around 17% of GDP making it one of the least indebted nations globally.
Riyadh has taken steps to encourage foreign firms to invest more in the country.
Since 2021 companies seeking to secure state contracts have been required to set up their regional headquarters in Saudi Arabia.
The government has also said it would update existing investment laws to boost transparency and promote equal treatment of local and foreign investors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Asian currencies: Taiwan dollar drops sharply
BENGALURU: Taiwan dollar fell sharply on Monday after a month of strong gains, stoking market talk about intervention by the central bank, while other regional peers edged higher, topping off a June shaped by geopolitical uncertainty and a softer dollar. The Taiwan dollar fell 2.4% to 29.902 per US dollar towards the end of the trading day after surging last week to its highest level since April 2022. The central bank aggressively intervened to sell the Taiwan dollar at the end of the second quarter, three bank traders told Reuters. 'TWD rally was a function of Taiwan lifers adding FX hedges, carry trade unwinding and strong equity inflows,' said Lemon Zhang, FX & EM macro strategist at Barclays, noting the move higher for the Taiwan dollar had been fast. 'We think near-term USDTWD should see limited downside, unless (there is a) substantial DXY move lower from here.' Other regional currencies were supported on Monday by a subdued dollar index, with markets watching US President Donald Trump's massive tax-cut and spending bill, now before the Senate. Among the gainers, the Malaysian ringgit rose 0.3%, while the Philippine peso and Thai baht gained 0.4% each. The South Korean won climbed 0.6%. Most Asian currencies held up despite global headwinds. In the first half of 2025, markets were jolted by Trump's sweeping tariffs on April 2 and the tariff policy flip-flops thereafter. An escalating US-China trade war also roiled markets, before the trade rivals struck a deal that lowered duties sharply and opened up rare earth exports from China. In June, a 12-day war between Israel and Iran sent oil prices higher, even as renewed concerns over the Federal Reserve's independence kept markets on edge.
Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
G7 risks disappearing into oblivion
The Western efforts to display cohesion on global challenges collapsed after US President Donald Trump left the G7 summit in the middle and embarrassed other member states by accusing them of not offering a fair trade deal. The widening cracks imply that G7 has effectively regressed into G6 with the future of the alliance entering an uncharted territory. G7 was originally established to cope with economic challenges but it broadened its scope in the 1980s to foreign and security policy issues. In the coming years, this seismic shift aggravated conflicts and hampered peace and prosperity the world over, weighing upon credibility of an alliance whose approach was replete with risks and relevance marred by internal differences. Beneath G7 downfall, there lies aggrandisement of threats and advancement of self-seeking interests. These narcissistic cravings drove the bloc to impose the US-led international order on the rest of the world, preventing greater involvement of major international players and shunning collaboration on pressing global challenges. Yet once Trump returned with all his bully and bluster, the G7 member states began to feel the pinch of venturing recklessly with Washington. As a result, they are seeking "independence" from America's security guarantees, declaring US tariffs as "brutal and unfounded" and recalibrating ties with China to diversify their trade away from the US. Trump believes that the European Union was formed to "screw" the US. In his first term too, he had launched a scathing criticism of the bloc. This prodded then-German Chancellor Angela Merkel to rely less on Washington and "take our fate into our own hands". While factors such as lack of follow-through and Trump's acrimony have the bloc's unity to test, middle powers' exclusion has contributed to a sharp decline in G7 international prominence. The alliance's waning economic heft is another rationale behind its declining significance. G7 share in global GDP on purchasing power parity, per International Monetary Fund, is set to contract from 51.8% in 1980 to 28.4% in 2025. With emerging and developing countries accounting for almost 61% of global economic output, the North can more stifle the rise of the Global South or strip it of its legitimate right of having a greater role in the global governance system. In order to prevent it from fading into triviality, G7 posed itself as an inclusive organisation by inviting leaders of emerging economies such as Brazil, India and South Africa that are part of the China-led BRICS, a multilateral alliance seeking to strengthen economic, political and social cooperation and increase influence of the South. But G7 is unlikely to catch the South's attention because it has for decades denied accession to the emerging economies and remained narrowly focused on interests of a handful of advanced industrial economies. A literal exclusion of South suggests that the bloc pursues to leverage its economic relationship to achieve its own mercenary goals. Its spending cuts, leaving developing countries exposed to poverty, hunger, conflicts and climate disasters, debunk its commitment with the South. The BRICS is being accused of diminishing the role of West-dominated institutions. Its long-term priorities have been to reform and strengthen these very multilateral bodies with the aim of enhancing representation of marginalised countries. The notion of a reimagined G7 to resolve the global governance crisis is doomed from the outset given it will just be an extension of an elite club, constraining the involvement of the South as a bystander. Even proponents of the concept have acknowledged the South would find a little appeal in it as they will still be excluded from the alliance. The Western double standards are the biggest obstacle to G7 drive of tantalising the South into its camp. For instance, the US and allies have been framing Russia's invasion of Ukraine as a struggle for democracy, supporting its right to defend itself and its sovereignty under Article 51 of the UN Charter. Yet when it came to Gaza and now Iran, the rich nations extended full-throated support to Israel, disregarding the latter's violations of international law and the UN Charter. This powerful display of the Western hypocrisy - as Trump dismissed his own intelligence community's assessment that Tehran wasn't building nuclear weapons - would further alienate the North from the South. The West's violent strategy, inflated threat perception and hypocrisy on climate change - as well-heeled countries historically accounted for most of the carbon emissions but shifted the responsibility of the green transition on the South that contributed the least to triple planetary crisis of climate change, biodiversity loss and pollution yet suffered the most - have triggered resentments in the South and would continue to blight the G7 ambition of carving out developing world from China's influence into its orbit. For decades, G7's delusion of grandeur has precluded it from authorising entry of developing economies to the forum, ensuring it remains an exclusive club of wealthy-only nations. This stubbornly arrogant posture accompanying a marked propensity to spark conflicts has faced a pushback from the South, dishing out a beatdown to the alliance's significance. The bloc is at a crossroads, ergo: mend its hypocritical approach or risk disappearing into oblivion.
Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
US approves $510m sale of bomb guidance kits to Israel following Iran conflict
US President Donald Trump speaks as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu waves following a meeting in the White House, in Washington, US, April 7, 2025. PHOTO: REUTERS Listen to article The United States on Monday announced the approval of a $510 million sale to Israel of bomb guidance kits and related support, after Israel expended significant munitions in its recent conflict with Iran. 'The proposed sale will enhance Israel's capability to meet current and future threats by improving its ability to defend Israel's borders, vital infrastructure, and population centers,' the US Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) said in a statement. 'The United States is committed to the security of Israel, and it is vital to US national interests to assist Israel to develop and maintain a strong and ready self-defense capability,' it added. The State Department approved the possible sale and the DSCA has provided the required notification to the US Congress, which still needs to sign off on the transaction. Israel launched an unprecedented air campaign on June 13 targeting Iranian nuclear sites, scientists and top military brass in a bid to end the country's nuclear program, which Tehran says is for civilian purposes but Washington and other powers insist is aimed at acquiring atomic weapons. Trump had spent weeks pursuing a diplomatic path to replace the nuclear deal with Tehran that he tore up in 2018 during his first term, but he ultimately decided to take military action, ordering US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. A ceasefire brought the war to a halt last week, but Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed to prevent Tehran from ever rebuilding its nuclear facilities, raising the prospect of a future conflict.
