logo
Footage shows prison officers laughing moments before restrained inmate's death

Footage shows prison officers laughing moments before restrained inmate's death

Yahoo22-07-2025
Bodyworn footage shows prison officers laughing and singing as an 'inappropriate and disproportionate' restraint was carried out on an inmate moments before his death.
Azroy Dawes-Clarke, 28, from Romford, east London, was an inmate at HMP Elmley on the Isle of Sheppey, Kent, when he died after suffering multiple cardiac arrests on November 10 2021.
He had tied a ligature around his neck before officers intervened and began a restraint which 'escalated unnecessarily', jurors concluded by majority at Kent and Medway Coroners Court in Maidstone.
In the record of inquest, jurors also found that officers showed a 'deeply concerning lack of care and compassion' during the incident.
The bodyworn footage, released to the PA news agency, shows officers joking about the size of the handcuffs they needed for Mr Dawes-Clarke while he groaned on the floor.
The inquest revealed the handcuffs were wrongly applied to Mr Dawes-Clarke during the restraint, and may have also played a part in his death.
In the footage the officer wearing the camera is heard singing as he fetches the cuffs before choosing a different set and saying 'no not that one, that might give him a little too much freedom'.
Jurors found: 'It was inappropriate for the paramedics to approve the handcuffing of Mr Dawes-Clarke having had no training in mechanical restraint to give such advice.
'Following on from this, it was inappropriate for Mr Dawes-Clarke to be handcuffed at all, especially with regard to his positioning and positional asphyxia.'
They added that there were 'significant shortcomings from both the paramedics and prison officers' in response to Mr Dawes-Clarke going limp and that 'leadership was lacking' throughout the restraint.
The medical cause of death was given as hypoxic ischaemic brain injury but jurors had to determine when and by whom that injury was caused.
'Throughout the restraint, the proximity of a prison officer's knee to Mr Dawes-Clarke's chest was bad practice. On top of this, leadership throughout the restraint was lacking and control of Mr Dawes-Clarke's head was not prioritised,' The inquest found.
In their record of inquest, jurors noted the initial self-ligature, the subsequent restraint, the 'poor practice' handcuffing, failing to consider Mr Dawes-Clarke's head position and 'insufficient' action taken upon realising the cardiac arrest as part of a combination of factors which led to his death.
At one point, the bodycam wearer asks 'who's actually doing the head position on this restrain here then' to a non-plussed response from the restraining officers.
When the footage cuts off, medical staff began CPR on Mr Dawes-Clarke before he was taken to hospital, he suffered two more cardiac arrests in the ambulance and a fourth on his arrival at hospital, where he died soon after.
The officer who initiated that restraint, Alexander Shaxted, denied using 'animalistic' language to describe Mr Dawes-Clarke in order to justify his choices while giving evidence.
Jurors heard that Mr Shaxted had said in his police statement that Mr Dawes-Clarke was making 'loud animal noises' and again referenced it during the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman (PPO) investigation.
'Four times you described him like an animal, animalistic, like a bucking bronco,' said Allison Munroe KC, on behalf of the family.
The officer said that he did not know why he had used those words at the time.
Jurors found: 'There is a lack of justification to suggest de-escalation of the restraint of Mr Dawes-Clarke was attempted.
'Alongside this, the inappropriate comments made by prison staff about Mr Dawes-Clarke portray a deeply concerning lack of care and compassion towards Mr Dawes-Clarke.
Father-of-four Mr Dawes-Clarke liked fantasy films and played semi-professional football. He was in the Arsenal FC academy while he was growing up.
He was recalled to HMP Elmley on April 23 2020 after breaching his licence.
After the inquest concluded, his sister, Shay Inico, said: 'My brother, Azroy Dawes-Clarke, died in the most shocking circumstances, restrained, neglected, and dehumanised while prison staff and paramedics who were trained to save lives stood by and did nothing.
'Female staff felt too intimidated to challenge male officers. Paramedics themselves were afraid to act because of the power dynamics with prison officers.
She added that this case was not just about her brother, but 'a system that allows people to die avoidably behind closed doors' and accused the prison of covering up its failures.
Assistant coroner for Kent Ian Brownhill has commissioned three separate prevention of future deaths reports as a result of this case.
After the inquest, a Prison Service spokesperson said: 'Our thoughts remain with the family and friends of Azroy Dawes-Clarke.
'Since this incident, we have taken action to improve staff training around use of force, and we will now carefully consider the inquest's findings in full.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'My son was thrown in air in crash at death trap Greenwich crossing'
'My son was thrown in air in crash at death trap Greenwich crossing'

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'My son was thrown in air in crash at death trap Greenwich crossing'

A father has described a zebra crossing near a Greenwich school where his 11-year-old son was flung into the air after a crash as a 'death-trap'. Edson Kuhn was injured alongside his son in the incident on the evening of July 2 in Shooters Hill Road. Both were taken to hospital by London Ambulance Service after the crash on the zebra crossing near Ark Greenwich Free School. Metropolitan Police also attended the scene, but no arrests have been made. READ MORE - Mr Kuhn told the News Shopper that he is still recovering from a broken shoulder and that his son has 'severe shock' after being 'thrown four metres' in the crash. "The aftermath was the most harrowing experience of my life,' he said. 'To see my child lying motionless on the road is a nightmare no parent should ever face. He is now terrified of even walking down the street." The father added that he had written to Greenwich Council in the aftermath of the crash asking for safety improvements to be made to the road but claimed the response he received 'lacked urgency'. Mr Kuhn raised concerns that the speed limit switches from 20mph to 30mph on the approach to the zebra crossing, which he described as a 'death trap', increasing the chance of an accident. The crash took place on a zebra crossing near Ark Greenwich Free School (Image: Google) He has asked the local authority to reduce the speed limit and upgrade the zebra crossing to a lights-controlled pelican crossing, as well as to install speed bumps and signs warning drivers that a school is nearby. "The council has been warned, but nothing has been done," Mr. Kuhn explained. "Are they waiting for a child to be killed before they act? This isn't just an accident – it's the result of negligence." A council spokesperson told the News Shopper that their thoughts were with Mr Kuhn and his son 'following this distressing incident". READ MORE - They said: 'We roll out road safety improvements in areas where they're most urgently needed, based on data and evidence which shows where the highest number of collisions and injuries occur. 'This data is regularly reviewed to make sure we are responding to any increased risks. 'In addition, we carry out three-monthly highways inspections to check for any defects in signs and road markings, especially at the zebra crossings. 'The council is also proposing to introduce a boroughwide 20mph speed limit on all residential roads and suitable non-residential roads, which is a big part of making our roads safer for everyone.'

Why do we only call out crimes when it is committed by a foreigner?
Why do we only call out crimes when it is committed by a foreigner?

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why do we only call out crimes when it is committed by a foreigner?

This summer, we have seen sporadic demonstrations outside hotels and places where asylum seekers are being housed. Protesters gathered outside a hotel believed to be housing asylum seekers in Diss, Norfolk. There was also a demonstration outside the Britannia Hotel in Canary Wharf. Then this week, the Home Secretary said 'more transparency was needed' in the information given by police. We had calls from some quarters that the ethnicity of the suspect should be revealed when a crime is committed. Most of us cannot understand the fascination with this. Yes, I agree that we want to be able to control our borders, and we want to be able to stop criminals from coming into the country. But I do sense a lot of this has nothing to do with criminals at all. If it did, then we would do the exact same thing every time a crime is committed by an individual and they just happen to be residing nearby. Or do we only reserve this anger for people of a different faith or culture? On the same premise, demonstrators should be outside a court or the residence of anyone who is accused of committing a heinous crime, regardless of their colour. I mean, it makes sense, doesn't it? The reason some of these people, not all, may I add, are outside these residences is simply to let out their frustrations on asylum seekers and people of a different colour. Regardless of the intentions of some decent folk, these events get swamped by people who just want to vent their anger at foreigners. This 'saving the nation' idea is the oldest trick in the book, played out every so often when nothing else is on the table. It has become a bit of a farce, really. We are told that the foreigners are doing these crimes. They get us all angry. It proves our country was safe from such crimes before people from elsewhere came here. We gather a posse and head to the nearest place we can find them. But we are only angry at a certain group. Everyone else can carry on as normal because they are 'proper British'. Because they appear to have a 'right' to carry out any crimes they want. Almost by being born in Britain, you have a licence to commit crime - it is only the crimes committed by foreigners that matter. To tackle that issue means taking a long, hard look at ourselves. You know what most people want? We want the same attention to be given to all crimes. Their background should not matter. All treated with the same disdain. Even more despicable is how we have national news sites almost baiting people and blaming the police for siding with the people who don't want to hurl a brick at another human being. The same police we want to protect us when it comes to other crimes are enemies for just doing their jobs. Last month we had thugs smashing up a police van. Anywhere else, they would be on the front page,s and we would be shaming them. But not here. Because they have a 'genuine grievance' it appears. Yes, that makes it alright then.

Southampton Itchen MP joins police on Friday night walkabout
Southampton Itchen MP joins police on Friday night walkabout

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Southampton Itchen MP joins police on Friday night walkabout

A Friday night walkabout gave a Hampshire MP a first-hand look at the demands of keeping a city centre safe. Darren Paffey, Labour MP for Southampton Itchen, joined officers from Southampton Central police station for a night shift in the city centre last month, observing their work to keep the public safe during one of the busiest times for nightlife. Read More 'Reckless' man dumped drugs in shop after trying to flee from policeMan in his 90s hospitalised after hit and run, police saySouthampton taxi driver caught on phone and without seatbelt by police Mr Paffey observed the officers' work to keep the public safe during one of the busiest times for nightlife (Image: Supplied) Mr Paffey said: "Our city has a fantastic nightlife and it was really impressive to see how much hard work goes into making sure that people can enjoy it safely and trouble-free. "I'm really grateful to police for taking me round in one of their patrol vans and on foot – and for everything they and others do to keep us safe on our evenings out." The activity was part of Operation Defender, a partnership scheme involving police, venue security, GO! Southampton, Southampton City Council, and community volunteers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store