Man accused of using AI images of women for sextortion
A man accused of threatening to post AI-manipulated images online in the sextortion of three women has appeared in court for the first time.
Benjamin Michael Jomaa is accused of sending sexual material to the women without their consent on Facebook messenger and threatening to distribute AI-manipulated images of them online.
The 31-year-old allegedly demanded to be sent more intimate pictures and encouraged one of the women to participate in a sexual act without her consent.
Sexual extortion or 'sextortion' is a form of blackmail where a person threatens to share a nude or sexual image or video unless their victim gives in to their demands.
Police searched Jomaa's home on May 28 at Ettalong Beach on the NSW Central Coast and seized several electronic devices.
He was arrested and charged with 13 offences.
The three women, all aged in their 20s, were allegedly abused by Jomaa online between October 2024 and April 2025.
Jomaa was granted bail after the arrest.
He appeared briefly in Gosford Local Court for the first time on Wednesday, represented by his lawyer Jessica Tohi.
Supported by two people, Jomaa walked out of the court building hidden underneath a coat.
He has been excused from attending court when the matter returns in two weeks and will remain on bail.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Patterson reveals mushroom lies she cooked up after lunch
Ms Patterson says she was 'disappointed' that her ex said he wouldn't come to lunch. 'You wanted him to come to lunch so you could feed him part of a poisoned beef Wellington lunch,' the Crown prosecution said. 'No,' Ms Patterson replied. Ms Patterson then agreed she scraped the mushrooms and pastry off the sixth beef Wellington later into her rubbish bin. Erin Patterson has now agreed that she told her ex-partner on June 16 that she had 'medical issues' she wanted to discuss, but is still disputing that she said she wanted 'advice', including how to break it to the kids. When Mr Patterson told Ms Patterson he was 'too uncomfortable' to attend lunch, he said he was 'happy to talk about health' issues at another time. 'That's really disappointing. I have spent many hours preparing lunch,' Ms Patterson replied to Mr Patterson. 'I wanted it to be a special meal because I might not be able to host a lunch like this again. 'I hope to see you there.' Ms Patterson said the 'medical issues' were not 'why' she invited people. 'My memory is that I said to him something like, 'there's some medical stuff that I'll talk to you about then'.' She says, 'that wasn't a lie' as she had an appointment booked for a 'pre-surgery appointment' for a gastric bypass. Simon Patterson previously gave evidence claiming that the accused invited Don and Gail Patterson and Heather and Ian Wilkinson to lunch to discuss 'important medical news' and that she wanted advice on how to break it to the children. He has also given evidence claiming the accused wanted the children not to attend the lunch. Ms Patterson disputed that evidence, claiming she just invited everyone to lunch and has not asked guests to come to discuss 'medical news'. She accepted that she had invited Don, Gail, Heather and Ian before Simon. Ms Patterson 'disagreed' that she told the wider family before her ex-partner so that he would feel more inclined to come. Erin Patterson took to Facebook to 'vent' to her friends about her 'frustration' over Don and Gail Patterson. Her messages were read to the court, where she said she wanted 'nothing to do with' the Patterson family due to their lack of involvement in mediation. 'Nobody listens to me. At least I know they're a lost cause,' Ms Patterson wrote. 'So, f..k em',' the message continued. 'I wrote that. I was venting. I was frustrated,' Ms Patterson said, explaining her comments. Ms Patterson denied that she was telling her friends about her true feelings, claiming she was not angry, just 'frustrated'. Ms Patterson accepted that she also wrote a message ahead of lunch, where she called Simon Patterson a 'deadbeat'. 'Her (Gail) son is such a deadbeat.' Ms Patterson admitted to sending a message to her Facebook friends, where she vented about a 'dispute' over child support and school fees. 'Simon wants to walk away from his responsibilities,' she said. She went on to say that it might be a good thing as Ms Patterson could now put her children in whatever school she wanted. She added that if her ex-partner wanted the kids to attend a Christian school, he could pay half. 'A blessing in disguise,' she told her friends. Ms Patterson says she told her partner about changing which school her child attended, something the Crown disputes. Erin Patterson was asked to read a message she sent in a group chat that Don and Gail Patterson were in. In her message, she said: 'Simon needs accountability for the difficulty he is causing me.' The message continued, with Ms Patterson mentioning school fees and how much her ex-partner was paying. Ms Patterson denied she was trying to get Don and Gail to influence Simon's contribution to school fees but accepted that Don made clear he wasn't going to get involved. 'I wasn't angry,' Ms Patterson said. Erin Patterson, 50, stands accused of murdering her in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, as well as the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson by serving them beef Wellington containing poisonous mushrooms at a lunch at her Leongatha home on July 29, 2023. Alleged mushroom killer Erin Patterson is under intense cross examination at her triple murder trial, spilling confessions on the lies she told police and health authorities about mushrooms. She is returning to the witness box now.
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Erin Patterson live trial updates: Alleged mushroom killer denies picking death cap mushrooms for fatal lunch
Scroll down for the latest updates from Erin Patterson's triple murder trial. Simon Patterson previously gave evidence claiming that the accused invited Don and Gail Patterson and Heather and Ian Wilkinson to lunch to discuss 'important medical news' and that she wanted advice on how to break it to the children. He has also given evidence claiming the accused wanted the children not to attend the lunch. Ms Patterson disputed that evidence, claiming she just invited everyone to lunch and has not asked guests to come to discuss 'medical news'. She accepted that she had invited Don, Gail, Heather and Ian before Simon. Ms Patterson 'disagreed' that she told the wider family before her ex-partner so that he would feel more inclined to come. Erin Patterson took to Facebook to 'vent' to her friends about her 'frustration' over Don and Gail Patterson. Her messages were read to the court, where she said she wanted 'nothing to do with' the Patterson family due to their lack of involvement in mediation. 'Nobody listens to me. At least I know they're a lost cause,' Ms Patterson wrote. 'So, f..k em',' the message continued. 'I wrote that. I was venting. I was frustrated,' Ms Patterson said, explaining her comments. Ms Patterson denied that she was telling her friends about her true feelings, claiming she was not angry, just 'frustrated'. Ms Patterson accepted that she also wrote a message ahead of lunch, where she called Simon Patterson a 'deadbeat'. 'Her (Gail) son is such a deadbeat.' Ms Patterson admitted to sending a message to her Facebook friends, where she vented about a 'dispute' over child support and school fees. 'Simon wants to walk away from his responsibilities,' she said. She went on to say that it might be a good thing as Ms Patterson could now put her children in whatever school she wanted. She added that if her ex-partner wanted the kids to attend a Christian school, he could pay half. 'A blessing in disguise,' she told her friends. Ms Patterson says she told her partner about changing which school her child attended, something the Crown disputes. Erin Patterson was asked to read a message she sent in a group chat that Don and Gail Patterson were in. In her message, she said: 'Simon needs accountability for the difficulty he is causing me.' The message continued, with Ms Patterson mentioning school fees and how much her ex-partner was paying. Ms Patterson denied she was trying to get Don and Gail to influence Simon's contribution to school fees but accepted that Don made clear he wasn't going to get involved. 'I wasn't angry,' Ms Patterson said. Erin Patterson, 50, stands accused of murdering her in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, as well as the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson by serving them beef Wellington containing poisonous mushrooms at a lunch at her Leongatha home on July 29, 2023. Alleged mushroom killer Erin Patterson is under intense cross examination at her triple murder trial, spilling confessions on the lies she told police and health authorities about mushrooms. She is returning to the witness box now.
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
King of the Hill star Jonathan Joss fought 'so hard to stay alive' after he had been shot
Jonathan Joss "struggled so hard to stay alive" after he had been shot. The actor - who was best known for voicing the part of John Redcorn on the animated TV series King of the Hill - was killed in a shooting on Saturday (31.05.25) in San Antonio, and now his husband Tristan Kern de Gonzales has recalled his last few moments. He told People: "Everything happened so quickly. Everything was very close range and due to the severity and the trauma of the various head wounds, I knew that there was no hope of saving Jonathan's physical form, and he was struggling so hard, trying to stay alive. It was just really, really close range." Tristan urged Jonathan that he "didn't need to keep fighting" as he lay dying, but claimed that the alleged gunman Sigfredo Alvarez Ceja was just "laughing" at them throughout the ordeal. He said: "I held my husband's face together as best I could, and I told him how much I loved him, and that none of this was his fault. I told him he needed to cross over easy. He didn't need to keep fighting. "I told him that no matter what, and in some way, shape, or form, we'll always be together, and he'll always be my husband. "[The alleged gunman] was laughing. He mocked me for telling my husband that I loved him and used the same homophobic slurs. "The flashbacks are very, very intense, and they affect my whole body." Police have said that Alvarez, 56, admitted to shooting and killing the Parks and Recreation actor and he was released on a $200,000 bond on Monday. Just days ago, Tristan revealed that the whole incident had taken place at the site of their former home, which burned down earlier this year. In a Facebook post, he explained: "My husband Jonathan Joss and I were involved in a shooting while checking the mail at the site of our former home. That home was burned down after over two years of threats from people in the area who repeatedly told us they would set it on fire. We reported these threats to law enforcement multiple times and nothing was done. "Throughout that time we were harassed regularly by individuals who made it clear they did not accept our relationship. Much of the harassment was openly homophobic. "When we returned to the site to check our mail we discovered the skull of one of our dogs and its harness placed in clear view. This caused both of us severe emotional distress. We began yelling and crying in response to the pain of what we saw. "While we were doing this a man approached us. He started yelling violent homophobic slurs at us. He then raised a gun from his lap and fired. "Jonathan and I had no weapons. We were not threatening anyone. We were grieving. We were standing side by side. When the man fired Jonathan pushed me out of the way. He saved my life. "Jonathan is my husband. He gave me more love in our time together than most people ever get. We were newlyweds. We picked Valentines Day. We were in the process of looking for a trailer and planning our future. "He was murdered by someone who could not stand the sight of two men loving each other. "I was with him when he passed. I told him how much he was loved. (sic)"
