Kajal Aggarwal To Play Mandodari In Ranbir Kapoor's Ramayana: Report
New Delhi:
Kajal Aggarwal has reportedly been cast in Nitesh Tiwari's ambitious Ramayana. The film, led by Ranbir Kapoor as Lord Rama, will be released in two parts – scheduled for 2026 and 2027 respectively.
According to a report by India Today, Kajal will portray Mandodari, the wife of Ravana, who will be played by Yash.
A source close to the project shared, 'The role of Mandodari in Ramayana is incredibly crucial. Therefore, it was imperative for the makers to cast a well-established leading actress who could fully embody the complexities and significance of Ravana's wife, opposite Yash.'
The insider further added, 'The makers sought an actress with a strong presence across languages. While many actresses were considered, including those from Bollywood, Kajal Aggarwal's celebrated name in both the North and the South made her the ideal choice.'
Earlier this month, Ramayana producer Namit Malhotra shared an exciting update about the film's global vision. At the World Audio Visual Entertainment Summit, he revealed that the makers plan to 'localise' the film in multiple languages while preserving the authenticity of the characters.
Namit Malhotra said, "The way we want to go about it is to really make it feel local to people in the world. Again, with the use of some technology, we are trying to make sure that we will be able to localize the film in languages with performance, which means that it should play in English with lip sync without subtitles or dubbed versions, because it should be in English. It should be in Spanish; it should be in Japanese in Japan."
The producer acknowledged that reaching a wider audience is a tough task, as not many South Indian films manage to click in the North, and vice versa. Connecting across different regions and languages remains a major challenge, but the goal is to bridge this gap and make the film relatable to audiences everywhere.
Ramayana features Sai Pallavi in the role of Goddess Sita. Lara Dutta, Sunny Deol and Indira Krishna are also part of the project.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Blake Lively WITHDRAWS 'emotional distress' claims against Justin Baldoni in 'It Ends With Us' legal battle
Blake Lively has formally withdrawn two claims against actor and director Justin Baldoni in their ongoing legal battle following their collaboration on the 2024 romantic drama It Ends With Us. The withdrawn claims specifically related to allegations of "emotional distress", in the actress' lawsuit against her director filed in December 2024. According to Variety, Judge Lewis Liman, who is overseeing the case in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, confirmed that Lively's claims for emotional distress would be thrown out. The judge noted that the withdrawal was based on 'the plaintiff's representation that the relevant claims will be withdrawn,' and as a result, the director's motion to compel Lively to release her medical and therapy records was denied. Lively initially filed a lawsuit, accusing Baldoni of sexual harassment and orchestrating a public smear campaign. In response, Baldoni's team moved to access Lively's mental health records, arguing that such evidence was essential to counter her claims of 'severe emotional distress and pain, humiliation, embarrassment, belittlement, frustration and mental anguish'. However, the court noted that without the emotional distress claims, those records were no longer relevant. Judge Liman instructed both parties to decide whether the dismissal of these claims would be permanent (with prejudice) or temporary (without prejudice), and offered the actress the opportunity to choose to try to reach an agreement with Baldoni. If no formal dismissal is made, Lively will be barred from introducing any related evidence. Lively's attorneys, Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb, criticised Baldoni's legal team for their approach which they claim is 'a press stunt'. In a statement to the media, her lawyers said, 'Ms. Lively has offered to dismiss those claims because they are no longer necessary and she will continue to pursue emotional distress damages through other active claims in her lawsuit, including sexual harassment and retaliation. ' Meanwhile, Baldoni is suing both Lively and her husband Ryan Reynolds for $400 million. He alleges the actress attempted to extort him and later defamed him through statements published in The New York Times. The legal battle now involves six separate lawsuits in various courts. Check out our list of the latest Hindi , English , Tamil , Telugu , Malayalam , and Kannada movies . Don't miss our picks for the best Hindi movies , best Tamil movies, and best Telugu films .
Mint
36 minutes ago
- Mint
Nintendo Can't Afford a Slip Up With Switch 2
(Bloomberg) -- Never miss an episode. Follow The Big Take daily podcast today. The Nintendo Switch has generated some $100 billion in sales for the Japanese gaming giant since its launch in 2017, propelling the company's shares to record highs. Now the game-maker is under pressure to do even better with the new Switch 2, out this week. On today's Big Take Asia Podcast, Bloomberg Opinion's Gearoid Reidy joins host K. Oanh Ha to talk about why the Switch 2 is so important to Nintendo's business and whether it can live up to the hype. Listen and follow The Big Take on Apple Podcasts , Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Terminal clients: click here to subscribe. Here is a lightly edited transcript of the conversation: K. Oanh Ha: Gamers, start your engines. Mario: Let's-a-go! Yahoo! Ha: If that sound brings back memories, you're likely one of the hundreds of millions of people who's owned or currently owns a Nintendo gaming device. And this week the company is hoping to add to that number, when it releases the next generation of its most popular console, the Switch 2. Nintendo Ad: Nintendo Switch, two JoyCon, two controllers that attach in a snap… Gearoid Reidy: The Switch has been a massive hit for Nintendo. Ha: Gearoid Reidy is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist based in Tokyo. Reidy: Nintendo have made about a hundred billion dollars in revenue over the lifetime of the Switch. It's sold over 150 million units worldwide. And it has absolutely juiced Nintendo's stock price. Ha: The Switch launched back in 2017 and it's on track to become Nintendo's most successful device ever. Eight years later, the company is hoping to recreate some of that magic by dropping a new, premium product. Ha : Gearoid, what's new about the Switch 2? Reidy: It is everything that you loved about the Switch One powered up. It has a much better and larger screen than the original Switch. I've seen it myself. It looks fantastic. It's gonna have a whole host of new games starting with Mario Kart World. It's only gonna be available on the Switch 2. Ha: To outsiders, it may seem like Nintendo is riding high. But Gearoid says this is actually a risky period for the company. That's because Nintendo's business is almost entirely reliant on this one device, unlike its closest competitors, Sony, who makes the PlayStation and Microsoft, with the Xbox Reidy: Nintendo right now would seem to be at the top of the world. Their stock is just off an all time high. This is also the riskiest time for Nintendo. They really need to make a success out of this, right? If they don't, they don't have something else to fall back on, like Sony or Microsoft. Ha: This is the Big Take Asia from Bloomberg News. I'm Oanh Ha. Every week, we take you inside some of the world's biggest and most powerful economies, and the markets, tycoons and businesses that drive this ever-shifting region. Today on the show — Nintendo's big bet on the Switch 2 and why it can't afford any missteps this time around. Ha: Gearoid, did you grow up playing video games? Do you remember your first video console? Reidy: Absolutely. I've been playing video games almost for as long as I can remember. The first Nintendo console that I remember having was the the NES, Nintendo's first console and the first game that I remember playing on that was the original Super Mario Brothers. Ha: We were actually the first kids on the block who also had the original NES. This was the one that came with the robot. Maybe it was the second edition for the American market. Reidy: Oh, wow you had the robot, R.O.B. the robot. Yeah Ha: It was so cool. All the kids came to our house and I remember we were all dazzled by the robot. Ha: When I first heard about Nintendo in the early '80s, its products were cool and cutting edge. Nintendo ad: Will you be the one to witness the birth of the incredible Nintendo Entertainment System? The one to play with R.O.B, the extraordinary video robot. Batteries not included... Ha: We are talking about Nintendo's launch of the Switch 2 today, and I wonder, as we're talking, how much of its success is really about nostalgia? Reidy: I'm not sure if nostalgia is really the right word so much as connection to those characters. Nintendo, I think, has been uniquely good at being able to create characters and maintain them over the course of so many years. It's almost like a timeless quality to these characters. Just as, you know, Disney has been able to do with Mickey Mouse, Nintendo has been able to do with Mario, Zelda and so on across these franchises. Ha: In the fiscal year of 2024, Nintendo sold more than 8 million units of Mario Kart 8 Deluxe, a game first released more than a decade ago. And all together, the company has sold more than 75 million units — without giving any discounts. On top of that, the majority of the games sold on the Switch are created by Nintendo and played exclusively on the device. Reidy: Nintendo's secret sauce is the intellectual property that they've built. That's a cold way to describe what is a very warm collection of different franchises and different characters that so many people across different generations love. These are characters that, in this case, something like Mario or Zelda, several generations have now grown up with. And that, I think, is really the thing that separates Nintendo from its competitors, is that they're almost stewards now, of these characters, of these franchises that are so beloved across the world. Ha: Besides the games, Nintendo is also famous for its unique hardware designed to create new experiences – rather than just upgrading existing hardware with flashier graphics – something its competitors like Sony has done with the popular PlayStation. Reidy: With the PlayStation, you know, we went from the PlayStation 1, PlayStation 2, PlayStation 3. Each generation is broadly similar to the previous one. Of course, the hardware inside is very different and much improved from one generation to the next. But the main focus of the style of playing doesn't really change that much. The name doesn't really change that much. Nintendo withdrew from that kind of way of doing things quite a long time ago and decided to focus more on play experiences. They have generally gone into each new generation of product trying to do something new. From the Super Nintendo to the Nintendo 64, it has a different way of playing. They go from the Nintendo 64 to the Game Cube. They went from the Game Cube then to the Wii. And yet, with each one of these, you're seeing, the name changes, the philosophy changes, what they want to do with it changes. And oftentimes, they have a hardware innovation that keeps users coming back for a new experience. Ha: That's why Nintendo takes its time with research and development – meaning fans often have to wait years for new products. Reidy: The late president Satoru Iwata talked about the need to surprise gamers and to give them something new. Much to the chagrin of shareholders over the years, they're not focused on extracting as much profit from their business as they possibly can. They're very much focused on the player. Ha: And for the most part, Nintendo's player-focused strategy has paid off. One of its most successful breakthroughs was the Wii console in 2006. It was an instant success and Nintendo's bestselling game system for 15 years. Reidy: It was on every late night talk show. South Park had a whole, had a whole episode around the kids trying to get it. Liane Cartman: There you are Eric, what are you doing here? Eric Cartman: I'm waiting for the new Nintendo Wii to come out. Reidy : The controller did not look like anything that a traditional controller looked at the time. A lot of the games involved, you know, using motion sensing technology, and the idea was that they could bring in people who were intimidated by traditional sort of like game controller, which has lots of buttons and knobs and dials and stuff like that can be quite intimidating to people who don't know what's going on. Ha: I remember having dance parties with the kids using, using the Wii after it launched. It was fun. Reidy: Absolutely. It really broke the mold and it pushed Nintendo back into the mainstream, and for a while it was one of the most desirable products in the world. Ha: The Wii was a hit. But when Nintendo attempted to follow up with the Wii U six years later, it stumbled – big time. Reidy: People didn't actually know it was a new console. People thought that it was maybe just an add-on for the Wii. Nintendo had three straight years of operating losses. Their stock was absolutely tanked basically by this. Ha: After its failure with the Wii U, Nintendo spent five years making the Switch. That combined two different lines of hardware, the home console – the controller that you play while sitting in front of the TV – and the handheld – like the Game Boy – into one device. Reidy: The Switch could do everything, right? If you wanna have it as a home console, if you just wanna have it under your TV, you can do that. If you wanna take it out, play it in the park, bring it on a plane, you can do that as well. You're not really compromising on either one of those things. It's the same games, it's the same data, it's exactly the same device. And no one had really, to the best of my knowledge, thought of trying that. There's no device in the world basically that functions like a Switch does. Ha: The Switch generated some $100 billion in sales and propelled Nintendo's shares to record highs. It's one of the highest selling consoles of all time, coming in a close second to the PlayStation 2. With the runaway success of the Switch, Nintendo has been feeling the pressure to come up with an even better console with the Switch 2. And this time, Gearoid says the company's trying to learn from its past mistakes: It's deviating from its traditional approach of delivering something completely new. Reidy: This is the first time they've just basically taken the same concept and souped it up, put a '2' at the end of it and said, it's everything that you love about the original device, but more. Ha: After the break: The Switch 2 comes to market – will the change in strategy work? Ha: Nintendo's Switch 2 officially hits stores on June 5. But preorders for the console have already sold out, despite the jaw-dropping price tag. At $450, the Switch 2 lands on the expensive end of what most analysts expected. But the real jolt is the price of the games: It'll cost $70 to get Donkey Kong Bananza and $80 for Mario Kart World – That's a hike of as much as 30%. And gamers are up in arms. Gamer: Nooo!Gamer: Price dropped 450. That is not good. No, not Charging $80 for a video game isn't just ridiculous, it's That's too expensive 400 and 49 dollars is more… Ha: Adding to the challenge on pricing is President Trump's tariffs. Hours after Nintendo revealed the price for the new Switch, Trump announced sweeping tariffs on countries around the world – including China and Vietnam, where Nintendo produces most of their devices . Ha: Gearoid, the US is the biggest market for Nintendo. How's that going to impact Switch 2 sales? Reidy: It is impossible to tell right now what that actual impact is going to be. China and Vietnam obviously both of those countries are potentially in the line for tariffs or potentially not. However, I think it's very hard to believe that they would be able to sell the Switch 2 for much more than it's going to retail for, at $450, in the US. It's hard to see how they would, you know, be able to have a device. As much as I am looking forward to the Switch 2, I don't think it's a $600 device, which some estimates say that it would cost if, if the tariffs go in the worst case scenario Ha: What's for sure is that Nintendo needs to sell its latest console…and LOTS of it – because.. it has no plan B. Reidy: In a typical year, anything from 93 to 95% of their revenue is coming directly from their video game business. They've had other successes over the past couple of years. They had the the Mario movie They have Nintendo stores in an increasing number of cities. They have theme parks these days in collaboration with Universal Studios. They really need this to be a success and that primes them for success going forward. Ha: That's a big reason why Nintendo is shifting its strategy this time around – building on what's worked so well with the Switch and avoiding a repeat of what happened with the follow up to the Wii. Reidy: I think they definitely learned the lesson of the marketing of the Wii U. The Wii U was a very confusing proposition. So I think that's why they've gone this time with quite a conservative, by their approach, take on the Switch 2. It started with the name, you know, there was a lot of speculation over, you know, what were they gonna call it? What was it going to look like? They've decided to keep the same, basic form factor of the Switch. It has the monitor, it has the two controllers. Now this time, instead of clipping on, they go on via magnets, but you can look at it and you just immediately know that is a Switch. And I think they are banking on that to avoid the confusion that they had with the Wii U Ha: Gearoid, it seems like there really isn't another hybrid machine on the market that can really compete with the Switch. Is that going to change anytime soon? Reidy: There are rumors that both Microsoft and Sony are looking at doing some sort of portable device. I wouldn't be surprised to see one or either of those companies come out with a device that was a portable. However, what I would say there is that Nintendo has a moat that is very hard for any competitor to copy. It's not the unique design of the Switch, which, you know, at this stage is nearly a decade since it was first announced. It is their incredible range of intellectual property. And I think any competitor who tried to go against Nintendo, even with something similar, does not have that range of games and experience to fall back on. Ha: And that's what investors and diehard Nintendo fans are banking on… Linus Tech Tip: Nintendo spends a shocking amount of time and energy antagonizing the gaming community. And yet I bought a Wii. I bought a Wii U, I bought a Switch. I bought an OLED Switch, and I'm gonna buy a Switch 2. Why? Because nobody does what Nintendo. More stories like this are available on
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Virat Kohli and RCB win IPL, achieve grand breakthrough
Ahmedabad: Outclassed in 2011, falling agonisingly short by six runs in 2009, losing by eight runs in 2016, 2025 was finally their time. In front of a 91,419-strong crowd in Ahmedabad, predominantly supporting their franchise, Royal Challengers Bengaluru pulled off a thrifty bowling performance to successfully defend 190 and end a 17-year wait for an Indian Premier League (IPL) title. Much like English football fans stay wedded to the catchphrase 'It's coming home' in the hope of a Cup win, RCB supporters have had 'Ee Sala Cup Namade' as their battle cry, which was finally answered on Tuesday night against Punjab Kings. No longer will Virat Kohli remain a king without the crown. He was shedding tears of joy by the time Josh Hazlewood successfully defended 29 runs in the final over. The victory margin was only six runs, but those boundaries at the end didn't matter. He had a title to show after 17 years of perspiration. It's only fair that AB de Villiers and Chris Gayle were watching from the stands and later celebrated with the RCB players. Both were leading architects of RCB's fandom. Finals are cruel. Ecstasy to one side leaves the other team in agony. In a tournament like IPL, ten weeks of blood, sweat and tears count for nothing once the final is lost. It was PBKS' turn to be left agonising. This was only their second final in IPL history, and they will have to wait longer to lay hands on the trophy. Approaching the halfway mark in Punjab's run chase, with Shreyas Iyer having joined Josh Inglis, the asking rate was still in check. There were anxious faces in the RCB dug out. Suyash Sharma, their wrist spinner, had been unexpectedly taken down for an expensive first over. Just then, Romario Shepherd was introduced to prevent Iyer from teeing off against spin, and the West Indies was the one to provide the most important breakthrough. Iyer (1), the man in form and RCB's biggest threat, had edged one to the 'keeper. In matches of reckoning, with legacies to be made, destinies on the line, you can never safely predict who in the park is experiencing jangling nerves. Nehal Wadhera, who had shown he had all the strokes, was suddenly unable to hit the ball past the circle. The experienced Krunal Pandya was all over him. In the bargain, Krunal would force Inglis to take extra risk, and the Australian would have to depart on 39 (23b). In delight, Kohli was leaping in the air while the rest of his RCB teammates mobbed Krunal with high-fives and fist pumps. Krunal, who had tasted success with MI in 2017 would finish with figures of 4-0-17-2, gold dust in a match where the rest of the bowlers had gone for plenty. PBKS openers rode their luck in the Powerplay. Prabhsimran Singh's catch was spilled in the deep by Shepherd. Hazlewood went with hard length and high pace in the early overs. Priyansh Arya didn't look in control against the Aussie speedster and was ultimately caught on 17 at the deep square leg fence by Phil Salt in spectacular fashion. At 52/1 it wasn't the usual forceful Powerplay for PBKS. Then again, this wasn't your usual league match. When RCB came out to bat, it was Kohli's responsibility to force the issue as much it was the aggressive Salt's. PBKS inflicted a blow to RCB by sending back the big-hitting opener in the second over. Salt, who had flown in early morning after becoming a father, had begun without a trace of nerves as he went after Arshdeep Singh in the first over. It took the calm of Iyer to catch a Salt skier on 16. Salt's early wicket meant that despite Mayank Agarwal's constant show of intent, RCB only managed 55/1 in the Powerplay. After Agarwal's dismissal, RCB tried to keep the boundary flow going in the form of Rajat Patidar. The RCB captain was able to attack Yuzvendra Chahal in his early overs, but he too fell at an inopportune time for the team, trapped in front by Kyle Jamieson in an over full of slower balls. At the back end of the tournament, slower balls had been doing magic, in producing wickets as well as keeping a check on scoring. Although Kohli's play has improved against slow bowling in the middle overs, he's still not very good at it. In a pressure game, was there a case for Kohli to try and bat deep? Somewhere in that conundrum, PBKS were able to push through many inexpensive overs. From the time Patidar (26 -16b) was dismissed in the 11th over to Kohli's dismissal on 43 (35b) in the 15th, RCB managed only 35 runs in 19 balls. A proper middle overs slowdown inflicted by PBKS pacers. RCB batters freed up to go on the attack after Kohli's fall. The 17th over went for 22 runs. But PBKS would wrest some of the initiative back with four wickets in the final two overs. Though 190 was not a total to put the outcome beyond doubt, it proved sufficient in the end.
