Ronald Reagan Blvd tollway study prompts concerns from Wilco residents
The Brief
County commissioners approved resolution Tuesday for CTRMA traffic study of Ronald Reagan Boulevard
Williamson County Republican Party issued resolution opposing the study the following day
People present at Tuesday's meeting worry about a lack of public input on the study
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, Texas - Williamson County is moving forward with plans to consider building a tollway along Ronald Reagan Boulevard.
However, the plans are prompting concerns from residents and opposition from the county's Republican Party.
What we know
On Tuesday, Williamson County Commissioners unanimously approved a resolution asking the Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority to conduct a traffic study of Ronald Reagan Boulevard.
If approved, the CTRMA would pay for the construction of the tollway. It would transform Ronald Reagan into eight lanes on a 30-mile stretch. The project is broken into five segments and the county expects it to cost at least half a billion dollars.
The project would run from FM 1431 in Cedar Park to I-35 in Georgetown.
The CTRMA would also pay for construction and its upkeep, including the existing lanes on Ronald Reagan, which would remain toll-free.
Commissioners said they're considering the toll study because of growth.
What they're saying
"It is time to look for the future and acknowledging the congestion we have now and the increasing congestion we will have and ask them to begin their studies," said Williamson County's Sr. Director of Infrastructure Bob Daigh in commissioners court Tuesday.
"Because we need more information and I think this is the next step to figure out what our funding alternatives are, I will move to approve the adoption of the resolution on item number 72," said Commissioner Cynthia Long.
Dig deeper
The county also recently asked cities in the project's pathway to approve a feasibility study with the CTRMA, which will tell them if a tollway along Ronald Reagan is even possible.
Cedar Park City Council gave the county the greenlight, but Leander tabled the conversation until they could get more of their questions answered.
The other side
The day after the Commissioners Court vote, the Williamson County Republican Party issued its resolution opposing the study.
"It is a legislative priority that we want to speak out against these roads," said precinct chair Marcia Strickler Watson.
"Yes, we would have a choice not to be on the toll, we can go on the feeder road," added Strickler Watson. "We can take the red lights, we can do the things many are doing on 183-A, but why on earth would we need a whole other one less than a mile away parallel with what we already have?"
The resolution cites Gov. Greg Abbott and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who in 2017 told the state to reduce its reliance on tolls.
The resolution also took aim at CTRMA, claiming it has been "plagued with complaints from Texans about 'surprise billing,' poor customer service, and levying unsubstantiated financial penalties, including improperly billing disabled veterans and freezing their ability to renew their vehicle registration."
7 ON YOUR SIDE: Leander man's car registration blocked due to $1,600 of unpaid tolls
Read the Williamson County Republican Party's full resolution below:
Click to open this PDF in a new window.
What they're saying
However, the county says it's taking direction from the federal government.
"One of the things he emphasized in his policy was that state and local governments need to look at user-pay models," said Long. "We are following instructions from the secretary of transportation."
Local perspective
Others present at Commissioners Court on Tuesday were worried about a lack of public input on the study.
"I think a lot of us just feel like things happen without our input, and when we do give input it doesn't matter," said Angela Wetuski, who was opposed to the county moving forward with the toll road study. "All four commissioners shared that they had a lot of emails about this issue before their meeting, but they still rose their hands and voted yes for it, and so that kind of feels like a slap in the face."
During court, one Ronald Reagan driver testified to the traffic she sees regularly and encouraged the county to do the study.
"I look at the folks sitting on Ronald Reagan when I get to 2243 at Ronald Reagan, I can look up the hill and see them past Crystal Falls Parkway," said Rachel Arnold. "That is a mile and a half of traffic."
What's next
Several other speakers asked for a town hall, which was not something commissioners ruled out.
There is no funding for the construction right now, and CTRMA will be paying for the study.
Commissioners were not available for an interview because of the holiday.
The Source
Information in this report comes from reporting/interviews by FOX 7 Austin's Williamson County reporter Lauren Rangel, Williamson County and previous reporting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
2 hours ago
- Washington Post
Worker who leaked plans to build golf courses in Florida parks files whistleblower suit
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — A former worker who leaked information about plans by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis' administration to build golf courses and hotels in Florida state parks has filed a whistleblower lawsuit. James Gaddis alleges that the Florida Department of Environmental Protection retaliated against him for sharing details of the proposals, which caused bipartisan outrage and sparked protests . Ultimately the plans were scuttled.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Undocumented students ask judge to let them challenge sudden loss of in-state tuition
A group of undocumented students on Wednesday asked a judge to let them intervene in a case that revoked their access to in-state tuition, the first step in their ultimate goal of overturning the ruling. The filing comes a week after the U.S. Department of Justice sued Texas over its 24-year-old law that allowed undocumented Texans who had lived in the state for three years and graduated from a Texas high school to qualify for lower tuition rates at public universities. Texas quickly agreed with the Trump administration's claim that the law was unconstitutional and asked a judge to find the law unenforceable. The quick turnaround — the whole lawsuit was resolved in less than six hours — represents a 'contrived legal challenge designed to prevent sufficient notice and robust consideration,' lawyers for these students argued in their motion. They're asking U.S. District Judge Reed O'Connor to allow them to join the lawsuit and argue for why the statute should remain in effect. The Justice Department and the Texas attorney general's office oppose the motion on the grounds that the matter has been resolved and the case is terminated, court documents say. O'Connor, the George W. Bush appointee who blocked the law, has long been a favored judge for the Texas attorney general's office and conservative litigants. The Justice Department filed its lawsuit in the Wichita Falls division of the Northern District of Texas, where O'Connor hears all cases. The people who are most impacted by a lawsuit typically have a right to have their voices heard on a case, said David Coale, a Dallas appellate attorney. Getting O'Connor to agree to reopen might be a tough sell, he said, but if they're denied, they could appeal that ruling and the rest of the case alongside it, to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. 'The 5th Circuit's obviously a very conservative court, but part of that conservatism is a pretty limited view of the judicial role,' Coale said. 'So if they get a chance to argue their case there … they may have some luck.' The law, which has been in effect since 2001, grants in-state tuition to anyone who has been living in the state for three years and graduated from a Texas high school. All students who claim this benefit must sign an affidavit saying they intend to become U.S. citizens as soon as they are able; many of them are here as part of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. The motion lays out the human impact of the law's sudden reversal — a man who is reconsidering his plans to go to medical school in Texas; a woman who will have to drop out of her masters program, where she was studying to become a counselor; a teacher-in-training who will have to delay her plans to graduate and begin working. They are represented by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, which said in a press release that the abrupt overturning of the law has left students scrambling. 'What happened last week – the invalidation of longstanding state law in the course of one afternoon – was an abuse of our judicial system,' said MALDEF President Thomas A. Saenz. 'Those affected by the attempted invalidation have the right to be heard on the legality of the Texas Dream Act.' Big news: 20 more speakers join the TribFest lineup! New additions include Margaret Spellings, former U.S. secretary of education and CEO of the Bipartisan Policy Center; Michael Curry, former presiding bishop and primate of The Episcopal Church; Beto O'Rourke, former U.S. Representative, D-El Paso; Joe Lonsdale, entrepreneur, founder and managing partner at 8VC; and Katie Phang, journalist and trial lawyer. Get tickets. TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
New data reveals legal immigrant voters shift towards Republicans on immigration
(WTVO) — New data analyzed by CNN shows that foreign-born U.S. citizens are favoring the Republican Party on immigration policy over Democrats. CNN chief data analyst Harry Enten, legal immigrant voters have moved 40 points in favor of Republicans on immigration. 'Foreign-born voters have gone tremendously to the Right on this issue in 2024 and 2025 versus where they were in 2020,' said Enten. 'You go back to 2020, Democrats, get this, held a 32-point lead on this issue. Immigrant voters were in the Democratic camp. Jump forward to 2024, 2025. Look at that shift. A 40-point shift to the Right among immigrant voters.' According to Enten, President Donald Trump has gained 11 points among immigrant citizens. 'Look at this, 2016, he got 36 percent of the vote. You go to 2020, 39 percent of the vote. Look at this, in 2024, all the way up to 47 percent of the vote,' he said. 'Some polls I looked at had him barely losing that vote. Some polls I looked at had him barely winning that vote. Again, there is no bloc of voters that shifted more to the Right from 2020 to 2024 than immigrant voters.' Attitudes toward illegal immigrants have among legal immigrants. In 2020, foreign-born voters held a 23 point positive perception of noncitizen migrants. By 2024, that number had become a 6-point negative perception. According to a poll, 54% of Americans approve of the Trump administration's efforts to deport illegal immigrants in the United States, with 42% of respondents saying it makes the country more safe. 53% of respondents said they believed the administration is prioritizing the deportation of dangerous criminals. However, 63% said that noncitizens should get a court hearing prior to being deported. When asked if they approve of Trump's immigration goals vs his approach, 55% agreed with Trump's goals, while 56% disagreed with the administration's approach. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
