Inside one of Scotland's most controversial murder cases which split small community
One of Scotland's most notorious murder cases is once again under scrutiny, thanks to a new documentary from Prime Video, reports the Scottish Daily Express.
The Orkney Assassin delves into the chilling 1994 murder of Shamsuddin Mahmood, a waiter at the Indian restaurant Mumtaz in Kirkwall.
Mahmood, a 26 year old Bangladeshi national, was brutally shot by a masked man in front of horrified diners, including families with children.
Planning to return to Bangladesh and marry his girlfriend, Mahmood had previously worked on the island the year before his untimely death.
After the shocking crime, the gunman disappeared into the night, leaving a lasting impact on the island that still resonates today.
Michael Ross, who was just 15 at the time of the murder, was initially questioned by police but subsequently released.
However, after a lengthy 14-year investigation, ex-Black Watch soldier Ross was finally convicted for the murder in 2008.
In a dramatic turn of events, Ross attempted to flee the court following the guilty verdict, nearly making it out the door before being apprehended.
A stash of weapons and camping equipment was later discovered in a vehicle hired by Ross in a nearby supermarket car park, which he claimed was part of his plan to escape and live off the land rather than face imprisonment.
Ross is currently serving a 25-year sentence at HMP Shotts in Lanarkshire, one of Scotland's highest security prisons. He has made three escape attempts, which he claims were efforts to bring his case back into the public eye.
Despite his conviction, Ross has always maintained his innocence. His family, including father and former policeman Eddy Ross, mother Moira, and other members of the Orkney community are campaigning for his release as part of the J4MR - Justice 4 Michael Ross group.
Reach Screen Time exclusively interviewed both local newspaper reporter Ethan Flett and prosecutor Brian McConnachie KC, who provided further insights into the case that continues to divide the Orkney Island community.
Flett, who keeps a close eye on the case as new information comes to light, commented: "I think there's quite a split in the community between those that think Ross is guilty and those that think he's innocent."
Discussing why doubts persist about Ross' guilt despite the conviction, Flett observed: "There are a lot of inconsistencies and unanswered questions surrounding the case and the investigations that preceded the trial, dubious witnesses whose evidence seems to be rather important in the case, changing positions. Things like that got my interest in that."
The journalist from Orkney's longest-running newspaper The Orcadian also noted that despite the "thorough police work" in the unprecedented case, "certain things were missed that look quite important", as well as issues with how the case was managed.
Prosecutor McConnachie shared Flett's concerns about the divisions within the local community, stating: "I suspect it still does affect people."
Although McConnachie is not an Orkney resident, he noted: "I think there's always going to be two sides."
As the case took place in a relatively small community, McConnachie observed that it would inevitably impact the local atmosphere, with people holding differing views on Ross' innocence or guilt, particularly since his family still resides there.
McConnachie described the Orkney murder as a "challenging" case and his most high-profile one, saying: "The number of times I have been asked about the case is incredible by comparison to any other case I've ever been involved in."
Regarding the ongoing interest in the case, McConnachie attributed it to the fact that "I think because things keep happening" including Ross' multiple escape attempts, the most recent being in 2018.
Addressing the lingering doubts about Ross' guilt, McConnachie stated: "I certainly haven't seen anything since the trial back in 2008 that suggests to me that the jury got it wrong."
McConnachie further noted: "If you are trying to look for things that point towards guilt, then you might look at the circumstances of the last day of the trial, and the motor vehicle that he had and the things he had in them when he tried to escape from the court - never mind trying to escape from the prison. That there's something unnerving about what was contained within the car."
Touching on the unwavering campaigns for Ross's freedom, he remarked, "I think if you are a family member and somebody is convicted and they tell you there are innocent, then the likelihood is that you are going to take their position on it and perhaps try and assist them as best you can in overcoming what they see as being a miscarriage of justice."
Audiences are now able to watch The Orkney Assassin, which offers a comprehensive examination into the harrowing murder case and considers both perspectives.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
How did a new War of the Worlds movie get a 0% critical rating?
Just over 20 years ago, Steven Spielberg released War of the Worlds, a remake of the HG Wells classic updated for then modern day, capturing an era of post-9/11 anxiety filtered through the prism of late-90s disaster movies. That movie's reputation has only grown over the years – it's basically the thinking and anxious person's Independence Day – but the Wells text has been revisited repeatedly since its publication at the tail end of the 19th century. 2025 seems as good a time as any for another update. And if ever any viewers yearned to see a new War of the Worlds beset with the constant pinging of a Microsoft Teams chat, Prime Video has a real treat in store. Yes, hovering towards the top of Prime Video's movie charts is a new War of the Worlds, which arrived with little fanfare on the service at the end of July. In it, Ice Cube plays Will Radford, a Department of Homeland Security official who monitors an array of feeds for terrorist threats. Despite a belated heads-up from his Nasa pal Dr Sandra Salas (Eva Longoria), he (somewhat bafflingly) fails to pay much mind to a series of mysterious gathering storms, until it's too late: meteor strikes occur worldwide, and from the meteors emerge alien tripods that quickly lay waste to buildings and people everywhere. Will has been distracted by the hunt for a hacker called 'Disruptor', as well as by spying on his grown-ish kids Faith (Iman Benson), who is expecting her first child, and Dave (Henry Hunter Hall), a gamer Will thinks is wasting his life. In a novelty that turns into a hindrance almost immediately, most of this unfolds on Will's computer screen at his mostly empty office, where he's working what's described as a 'graveyard' shift despite it being, you know, daytime. Actually, it's more accurate to say that it unfolds near Will's computer screen. Unlike past 'screenlife' movies like Unfriended, War of the Worlds is not exactly rigorous about adhering to its self-imposed limitations. Though Will's face is often display on screen as part of various video calls (which is how Unfriended and others have worked actors' faces into a screen-only framework), the movie also flat-out cuts away to traditional shots of Will that are framed vaguely like a Zoom call but clearly take place outside of Will's computer. This makes sense. After all, when you've got an actor as expressive as Ice Cube, you want unmotivated closeups that can capture every single cocked-eyebrow scowl. How will the audience know how to feel if they can't see Ice Cube scowling at his computer screen? That's probably not fair to Cube, who has been quite good in plenty of other movies. The man has presence. What he does not have is the kind of subtlety or emotional range that benefits from de facto solo occupation of the screen. Really, every actor in War of the Worlds feels like they're performing in a Zoom-style vacuum – and seemingly not as a commentary on the coldly disconnected world of digital communication. In fact, quite the opposite: in this movie, everyone video-calls everyone all the time, to better show off some of the worst visual effects ever seen in a movie bearing the Universal Pictures logo out front. No amount of handheld phone-camera or grainy news footage can disguise how terrible the alien ships look. They wouldn't pass muster on a whimsical Snickers ad. So how did this happen? How did this D-grade reimagining of a public-domain property wind up going from major studio to major streaming service to the top of the charts? It should have been a fortuitous confluence of events. Film-maker Timur Bekmambetov remains high on the screenlife format, a variation on found footage, where stories are told entirely through activity on device screens. He's produced several successful film series based on that tech: the aforementioned horror film Unfriended and its sequel, and a pair of less bloody companion thrillers, Searching and Missing. All of these movies make innovative use of their central gimmick, and War of the Worlds came out as a pandemic-inspired variation. It was announced in the fall of 2020 as a spectacle-driven sci-fi movie that could nonetheless unfold in a series of contained environments, with actors all filming their parts separately. So the reason War of the Worlds feels not just like eavesdropping on a Zoom call but like a movie pieced together through Zoom is that it more or less was. More technology was involved, but that's barely clear from the final product, which has the rushed jankiness of something that should have come out a month or two after filming and been marketed as a quickie experiment. Instead, the movie seems to have sat on a shelf for literally years before it was sold off to a streaming service. Weirdly, it's not the only 2020-shot Universal-produced sci-fi movie to get that treatment: Long Distance, a space survival movie starring Anthony Ramos, recently debuted on Hulu despite filming wrapping before the end of 2020. Even a lengthy post-production would mean that it spent three years on the shelf, and couldn't even rate a release in the aftermath of the 2023 strikes. (Long Distance looks and acts more like a real movie compared with War of the Worlds. This is also true of many network TV shows and some big-budget ads.) The simplest answer to why the hell these movies have remained in limbo, then, seems to be Covid-era buyer's remorse. Studios were panicking about how to keep their pipelines moving during an unprecedented disruption, and didn't wind up having room on the release schedule for these smaller projects. The real question is how audiences have made it through an unconvincing cheapie like War of the Worlds – a sci-fi epic that seems to take place in real time yet features a vast and coordinated worldwide mobilization of multiple armed forces – without shutting it off in disgust (it boasts a rare 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes). Maybe they haven't. Streaming viewership is notoriously sketchy to measure, and most services rely on total minutes watched, which means watching five minutes of an awful movie and then flipping to something else can add to its total. War of the Worlds seems to have been made for its Covid-era convenience, and cynically capitalizes on surveillance paranoia and government secrets without actually saying anything coherent about, well, anything. But Amazon – which figures into the plot so embarrassingly that it seems like a plea for a Prime Video pick-up – stumbled upon the perfect streaming product: a cheap piece of junk with a recognizable title and stars, just enough for millions of people to hit play. Maybe some of them even watched through the end; the movie certainly doesn't compete with second-screen phone-scrolling, in the sense that your scroll is likely to eventually hit upon something vastly better than the movie's own toggling between chat windows. Amazon has plenty of experience helping consumers find junk, so War of the Worlds wound up in a fitting home – at least until Temu starts its own streaming service.
Metro
13 hours ago
- Metro
Amazon Prime's new 'ridiculously stupid' action comedy attacked by fans
The latest film to hit streaming platform Amazon Prime Video has received a rocky reception from critics and fans alike, despite starring a true Hollywood heavyweight. Described as 'an embarrassing, ridiculous waste of time' and 'unadulterated garbage', the buddy comedy and action heist movie will have had lofty goals in mind with its cast. Starring Oscar-nominated movie icon Eddie Murphy and former Saturday Night Live breakout Pete Davidson, The Pickup follows their mismatched armoured truck driver characters after they're ambushed while on shift by criminals led by a savvy mastermind, Zoe (Keke Palmer). But Zoe's plans go way beyond the cash cargo Russell and Travis are carrying, and the unlikely duo is forced to navigate the chaos and high-risk danger as their very bad day keeps getting worse. The action flick was released on Prime Video yesterday for fans just two days after critics were able to deliver their verdict – which was overwhelmingly unimpressed to say the least, with one review describing it as 'one of the year's worst movies'. On review aggregator site Rotten Tomatoes, The Pickup has a miserable 33% score from critics – and while fans have been more generous, it's still a rotten reaction from then with a limp, and still officially rotten, 47%. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video 'I like Eddie Murphy, but why does he always choose the worst movies to star in?' asked disappointed viewer Michael G on the platform, while Commin C wrote next to their half-star reaction: 'I don't know how this movie got rated so highly. Yes, this score is high for this movie.' 'Ridiculously stupid and painful to watch. I had to stop,' complained Cork B. 'That Eddie Murphy went along with this was a shame. While he has made some stinkers in his time, this is for sure near the top.' 'Five minutes in and I'm outta here,' agreed Peter M after giving up on The Pickup, while David F decided to address the Beverly Hills cop star directly, insisting: 'Eddie you are better than this. Stop taking the streaming pay checks and get back to theatrical releases with real comedy writer.' Another fan noted that it was the second recent Amazon movie she'd had 'a hard time getting through and will probably abandon' after Heads of State. Lis W added: 'I don't get Eddie Murphy. Is he just churning out movies for the studio and taking the money, and not caring about his filmography reputation?' 'So tired of this garbage. Eddie Murphy, Pete Davidson, the writing, the acting, the story = just plain awful. Baffling that these movies get made. Even odder is that positive reviews exist,' chimed in Drew D. But some fans were still delighted indeed, with Adam R enthusing: 'A comedy masterpiece! I laughed out loud on repeat. Job well done to everyone: director, actors, writers! Do yourself a favour and watch this movie.' Another viewer, Lindsey V, even claimed it was 'the best Eddie movie I have seen in ages'. It currently sits at the top of Prime Video's streaming charts in the UK as the number one film and also the number three title overall. However, critics strongly disagreed, with The Guardian's Andrew Laurence branding The Pickup 'heinous' and 'worse than Norbit', often considered the nadir of Murphy's career. 'The Pickup is easily the worst Eddie Murphy movie in recent memory. That's right: worse than A Thousand Words, the Liar Liar rip-off so underwhelming that Murphy had to take a break from making comedies. And worse than Norbit, the Nutty Professor ersatz probably costing him the Oscar for Dreamgirls,' he wrote in a one-star review. 'It is as generic and forgettable as its title suggests: a bland action-comedy that will surely end up being one of the year's worst movies, if only for the egregious way it squanders its talented cast,' agreed Christy Lemire for in a similarly scored review. 'In a movie with Eddie Murphy, Pete Davidson, and Keke Palmer, I laughed the hardest at snap-zooms. That's a problem – for some, probably an unforgivable one,' admitted ScreenRant's Alex Harrison. Meanwhile, The Upcoming dammed the film with faint praise, writing: 'The Pickup is not the worst film that either Murphy or Davidson has starred in. However, it may be their most unremarkable.' More Trending Murphy's last film attracted millions of views for Netflix after he starred in a continuation of one of his most popular franchises with Beverly Hills Cop: Axel F, while he previously attracted critical acclaim for 2019's Dolemite Is My Name, landing a Golden Globe nomination. He has also recently thrilled fans with the announcement that he will be reprising his beloved voice acting role of Donkey in Shrek 5 as well as a spin-off movie focused on the sidekick character and his dragon wife. The Pickup is streaming exclusively now on Prime Video. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: I saw the 'perfect' horror movie getting rave reviews and was left baffled MORE: 'Most harrowing film ever made' still available to stream as Netflix pulls it MORE: Horror movie with perfect Rotten Tomatoes score hailed as 'craziest movie of the year'
The Review Geek
14 hours ago
- The Review Geek
Taurasi (2025) Season 1 Review – The best of the WNBA
Season 1 Episode Guide Episode 1 Episode 2 Episode 3 Few sports leagues stir online debates about pay and working conditions quite like the WNBA. Despite showcasing some great talent, including Diana Taurasi (the subject of this docu-series), the players feel like they're not getting the recognition or the pay to back up their talent. This is something touched on in detail during episode 2, with players bemoaning that the Russians are paying millions while the US are falling behind. 'They're just chasing their value,' one voice says bluntly. And another quote (the classic blame-the-fans tactic that's worked so well in the past) 'the culture at that time was not in support of women's sports.' Regardless of your feelings on the topic, the truth is the WNBA is a business. And businesses are driven by profit. In its 28 year tenure as a league, the WNBA has never turned a profit – but could that be about to change? Funded by the NBA, the WNBA right now brings in sizably less revenue compared to the NBA, so of course the league is going to come under scrutiny. It's important to emphasize the WNBA is only starting its 28th season, but the future certainly looks bright for these women – if they can keep audiences sticking round. However, it's not the future that we focus on here in Prime Video's latest docu-series, but actually its past. Specifically, the life and career of one of the WNBA's best players, Diana Taurasi. A big personality in the game, and nicknamed the 'White Mamba' by Kobe Bryant himself, Taurasi's career is the stuff of legend. She dominated at UConn, winning three straight NCAA championships and earning back-to-back 'Most Outstanding Player' awards in 2003 and 2004. She's racked up three WNBA titles, a league MVP, 10 All-Star appearances, five scoring titles, and holds the record as the WNBA's all-time leading scorer — the first player to break 10,000 points. Off-season, Diana also made a pretty penny playing in Russia, Honing her fiery attitude and sharp tongue, all whilst continuing to raise questions about pay discrepancies in the leagues. However, Diana certainly puts her money where her mouth is, showing just how decorated a star she is. The three episodes work well to showcase all of this in detail, along with diving into Diana's mindset at the time, including her feelings toward the shocking death of Shabtai Kalmanovich, the coaching style of Geno Auriemma, and what she thinks about fellow players on the court. This is very much a gloves-off docu-series and for the most part, this unfiltered deep dive into Diana's mindset works really well. The episodes feature a mix of archival footage from the court and behind the scenes, stitched together with news reports and home videos too. There's an array of different voices brought in for the interviews, with former players including Penny Taylor and Sue Bird, giving their thoughts on Diana and the culture of the game at that time. Overall, this is a solid docu-series, even if it does skirt over the obvious differences between the NBA and WNBA. But at its core, this is a celebration of Diana Taurasi's career — and on that front, it more than delivers.
