Users aghast as CalMac gets uncontested ferries contract 'by default'
He said he was not convinced that changes that need to be made within CalMac had been made.
He gave the example of the Cumbrae Ferry Users Group which has currently lodged a protest with the transport secretary Fiona Hyslop about a sudden 20% reduction in services to and from Great Cumbrae brought in by CalMac.
He said of the move: "We urge decision-makers to listen to the views of islanders before irreparable harm is done.'
The Ferries Community Board - formed as part of CalMac's previous franchise bid for the contract to be the voice of the communities - told ministers before the award was made that the "majority" view was that the contract should go out to tender to "test the market for best value and encourage innovation and best practice".
It said that the response was "very much in the context of real anger and disappointment at how the existing contract was managed and also the decision making at senior management level both at CalMac and Transport Scotland".
READ MORE by Martin Williams:
And Mr Campbell said he believed the position had not changed.
The Community Board raised concerns in December that it "feels very much like business as usual" and that "work has stalled on the accountability to communities, both in the measuring of 'success' for a lifeline service but also in how communities can contribute to and influence decision making.
John Daniel Peteranna, of the South Uist Business Impact Group which began a major public protest, in June, 2023, after years of frustration at the islands being impacted by major ferry cancellations said it was time the Scottish Government delivered on making CalMac more accountable.
John Daniel Peteranna (Image: NQ) "We believed that the direct award would be made by Fiona Hyslop. What was said that there would also be greater accountability to the people that they are serving. And we are yet to see that.
"So how can she do one part without the other part."
The group had said a complete root and branch revamp of the services was required with islanders served by CalMac and the ferry operator's staff driving the standards.
It has been estimated that the subsidy for the running of over 30 lifeline ferry routes over a new ten-year period would soar to £370m-a-year from just over £120m a year in the last eight-year contract period.
CalMac's £975m eight-year contract expired in September 2024 but it was given an extension last year while ministers consider the legal implications over the direction in which it wants to go over the running of lifeline services.
The Scottish Government had said that a direct award with no contest from other potential bidders is the preferred option – closing the door on opening routes up to private operators.
A final decision after a due diligence process was expected by the summer of last year with an aim to have the new arrangement in place by the following October.
The Scottish Government which has been carrying out due diligence over whether it can go ahead with awarding a long term contract to the under-fire ferry operator says that considerable work has been involved in putting arrangements in place for the direct award of the new Clyde and Hebrides Ferry Service contract to CalMac.
Another ferry user group official said: "There is a wide belief that the contract for ferry services should be put out to competitive tender, but there has been a fear gathering that the future of lifeline services could be plunged into limbo if firm decisions were not made now. That doesn't mean just giving the contract to CalMac by default.
(Image: Newsquest)
"Right now we continue to see complaints about service cuts, particularly on South Uist and higher standards have to be reached."
CallMac had said it was "confident" that the contract will be extended or renewed under a direct award from October this year.
On direct award, a source from the Scottish Government's Transport Scotland agency said: "Such a significant decision requires an appropriate level of governance to allow ministers to be in a position to make that decision formally. As we have made clear with stakeholders during recent engagements - none of the due diligence has highlighted any issue that would prevent a direct award from proceeding."
Now Ms Hyslop has said: 'I am pleased to announce that Scottish ministers have confirmed that a direct award of the Clyde and Hebrides Ferry Services contract should be made to CalMac Ferries Limited. This direct award fundamentally changes the ethos of the service by shifting from a commercial arrangement to a model more focused on the delivery of a public service engaged on the particular needs of the communities it serves.
'I fully expect the direct award to be a catalyst for positive change across the Clyde and Hebrides network, based on a more efficient, flexible model of delivery that fully reflects community interests. Discussions will continue with staff, island residents, businesses and communities and trade unions on the arrangements to ensure the services can best meet local needs and wants."
Ministers have been contemplating the feasibility of the direct award approach from a financial, operational and legal perspective, and it has been confirmed that the due diligence has not highlighted any issue that would prevent the direct award happening.
That's despite the UK government business regulator telling Scots ministers to clearly explain how its refusal to privatise lifeline ferry routes would not result in cheaper costs to the taxpayer as it emerged costs are set to treble.
One advantage cited for a direct contract is a saving on the tender process. The Scottish Government has estimated that the costs of tendering the 2016 to 2024 contract was £1.1m. But that included a £439,000 bill for consultancy support.
Ms Hyslop added: "The CHFS3 arrangements include improvements, such as a new Benefits Realisation Plan, new and revised Key Performance Indicators, enhanced monitoring and reporting, greater regionalisation through dedicated Area Managers and increased stakeholder engagement. Ongoing collaboration with key stakeholders will be essential in supporting us to achieve a more reliable and robust service.
'Alongside our ongoing investment in infrastructure and an additional twelve new vessels for the network this will improve the overall resilience and capacity of these services, as set out in the recently published Islands Connectivity Plan.
'Transport Scotland is now working closely with CalMac Ferries Limited on the necessary arrangements for the commencement of the new contract on 1 October 2025. I will ensure that Parliament is kept up to date on progress with those new arrangements.'
Former First Minister Humza Yousaf, when he was transport minister, indicated in 2017, the year after CalMac was last awarded the Clyde and Hebrides Ferry Services contract that CalMac should get a direct award.
Duncan Mackison, CalMac's chief executive said: "Everyone at CalMac is committed to delivering a resilient, flexible ferry service which is tailored to the needs of the diverse and vibrant island communities we serve. We will play a leading role in contributing to the prosperity of islands on Scotland's west coast, with the approach of delivering a public service rather than a commercial contract.
'During the extension period for the current contract, we recognised the need for change and are already driving change through the expansion of local teams, enhanced community engagement and improved responsiveness to local requirements.
'This work will allow us to hit the ground running when the new contract starts and, with six major and seven small vessels joining the fleet between 2025 and 2029, our capability to deliver a resilient, reliable service for all across the Clyde and Hebrides will grow.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
STV News
5 hours ago
- STV News
Report finds top 2% of households have 18% of wealth in Scotland
The wealthiest households in Scotland have on average £1.7m in total wealth, while in comparison the least wealthy had just £7,600, a new report has revealed. With the figures showing the wealthiest 2% of households have almost a fifth (18%) of wealth in Scotland, campaigners said the data highlighted 'the vast scale of unfairness in Scotland today'. The report looked at wealth in Scotland – which includes the physical wealth of households' belongings, as well as savings and investment, property and pension wealth. The latest data, for the period 2018 to 2020, showed median household wealth in Scotland stood at £214,000 – with this down from £242,700 in 2016 to 2018 and £250,700 in 2014 to 2016. The report, which was published by the Scottish Government, noted: 'A typical household in the wealthiest 10% of households had £1.7m in total wealth, whereas a typical household in the least wealthy 10% of households had £7,600.' It added: 'The least wealthy households rarely own property or have any private pension savings. Their wealth is mainly made up of the value of their possessions such as cars, furniture and clothing.' The report also noted that wealth can 'vary a lot by age', saying that 'younger households are less likely to have much or even any pension or property wealth, and most of their wealth is made up of the value of their belongings (physical wealth)'. It added: 'In general, people start building up wealth once they start receiving a salary, buy some goods, maybe save some money, and pay into a private pension scheme such as a workplace pension. 'Many buy a home, and through paying off their mortgage they build property wealth.' Meanwhile when people retire, the report said that 'pension wealth gets drawn upon and used up, while some people also downsize their homes and reduce their property wealth'. However campaigners at Tax Justice Scotland – which wants Holyrood's powers to be used to deliver greater equality – insisted changes are needed to 'share wealth more fairly'. Speaking on behalf of the group Scottish Trades Union Congress, general secretary Roz Foyer said: 'These figures show the vast scale of unfairness in Scotland today. 'Whilst those at the top accumulate more wealth, more than one in five children grow up in poverty and our public services are starved of the investment they urgently need. This cannot go on.' Ms Foyer demanded: 'We need urgent tax reform to help share wealth more fairly and to distribute resources right across the country. 'Over time, public finance pressures mean that most of us may need to pay a bit more, but this data makes clear this must start with those at the very top. 'In Scotland, that means parties must set out clear plans to scrap Council Tax and replace it with a fairer, modern property tax. 'At the UK level, we also need common sense wealth taxes that ensure the richest pay their fair share.' She insisted: 'It's time for our political leaders to step up with serious tax plans to help close this growing wealth gap and to invest in creating a fairer, more prosperous future for all of us.' Scottish Green equalities spokeswoman Maggie Chapman criticised the 'obscene inequality in these statistics', adding: 'There is a small number of people who are very well off, and a far greater number who have very little.' She added: 'Scotland has a very long way to go if we are to build a fairer society, and this must be a clarion call for change.' Meanwhile, Liberal Democrat MSP Willie Rennie said that 'so many people are finding that there is nothing left at the end of the month'. He said: 'People are paying the price for the SNP's incompetence and Liz Truss and the Conservatives crashing the economy.' Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said: 'As a result of Scottish Government policies, the poorest 10% of households with children are estimated to be £2,600 a year better off in 2025-2026.' However, she added: 'Inequality is still too high, with too many economic powers left in the hands of the UK Government which has too often sought to balance the books on the backs of the poorest. 'With the full powers of independence, Scotland could do more to take a different approach from the UK status quo, and take decisions which would make Scotland the fairer, more equal country that we want to see.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
The National
6 hours ago
- The National
Checks on arms firms appear to be just a cosmetic formality
THE Scottish Government has come under criticism in recent months for the continuing financial support it provides to companies involved in the arms trade, some of whom continue to supply Israel with military equipment, even as it publicly condemns the Israeli government for the genocide unfolding in Gaza. The Scottish Government insists that no public money is spent on the manufacture of munitions and that all companies which the Scottish Government supports via grants from Scottish Enterprise are subject to a human rights due diligence check. However, no company has ever failed one of these checks, calling into question whether the checks are anything more than a cosmetic formality without any real-world consequences. It now transpires that some companies with an important role in supplying military equipment to Israel have not been subject to a due diligence check in more than six years. A Freedom of Information request has revealed that two major arms companies in receipt of Scottish Enterprise grants – Italian arms giant Leonardo and American multinational Raytheon Systems – have not received a human right due diligence check since October 2019. Both firms have been in receipt of Scottish public money – Leonardo received £786,125 in 2023 while Raytheon Systems, which has a factory in Glenrothes, was given £500k in the first half of 2024. Leonardo produces laser targeting systems for Lockheed Martin, which sells the F-35 jets used by Israel, and Raytheon makes Paveway II guided missiles which are also used by Israel. Both these firms were given public money after the brutal reality of Israel's so-called 'right to defend itself' had become apparent and the genocidal nature of Israel's repeated killing of civilians was well established. Both companies have continued to supply Israel with weapons throughout Israel's assault on Gaza which began in October 2023 in the wake of the Hamas attack on southern Israel. Israel's war on Gaza has now gone way beyond anything which could be described as self-defence and the Israeli government's prime minister now speaks openly of its goal to occupy and ethnically cleanse the territory. The civilian infrastructure of Gaza has now been destroyed and the traumatised and starved population are being herded into small overcrowded and insanitary tent encampments in what it pleases Israel to call "humanitarian zones" from which they will not be permitted to leave except into permanent exile in as yet unknown third countries. Israel claims that the Palestinians will be encouraged to leave "voluntarily" but when you incentivise people to leave by starving them, destroying their homes and all medical educational and sewage disposal infrastructure, shooting people dead as a routine method of crowd control at the pathetically inadequate aid distribution points which are the sole source of food and water for people who have already been displaced multiple times, there is nothing voluntary about it. In response to the revelations uncovered by the Freedom of Information Request, human rights charity Amnesty International told The National that the 'more we learn' about the checks 'the more concerning it becomes' that Scottish Enterprise and Scottish ministers are defending the process. A spokesperson for the organisation said: "Amnesty is aware from our own research that payments were made to companies known to supply Israel without a new check being triggered by the unfolding genocide in Gaza. 'Alarmingly, that is the process Scottish Enterprise and the Scottish Government attempted to characterise as robust and well aligned to international standards. The recent in-house review of the human rights checks recommended some improvements, but unsurprisingly they don't go far enough. We will be meeting with Scottish Enterprise in the coming weeks to take these concerns forward." Scottish Greens co-leader Lorna Slater condemned the lack of effective checks, saying it 'flies in the face of any kind of due diligence'. She added: "These are some of the biggest arms companies in the world. They have armed human rights abusers and dictatorships and some have directly enabled and profited from the genocide in Gaza. "They should not be receiving public money in the first place, and the Scottish Government absolutely should not be setting up tests to win favourable headlines while refusing to actually implement them. "How can we trust a word they say on ensuring they are applying human rights standards when they are refusing to even ask the right questions of those they are giving public money to?" Serious nuclear incident on Scottish base Following reports last week that the Ministry of Defence (MoD) had attempted to cover up decades long leaks of water contaminated with radioactive waste and that the leaks had continued despite claims in 2020 by the MoD that it was taking steps to remedy the situation, we now learn that even more serious safety breaches occurred this year. A serious nuclear incident took place at the Faslane naval base earlier this year. Nuclear Site Event Reports (NSERs) are graded on a scale from Category A through D with A being the most serious category, defined as being one which carries an "actual or high potential for radioactive release to the environment". Figures released show there was a Category A event at Faslane in the period between January 1 and April 22 this year. The MoD has refused to release further details about the event, all the MoD is willing to release is radioactive waste into the Scottish environment. As a result of this refusal we do not know whether there was a radioactive release into the environment or only the high risk of one having happened. Putting the minds of the Scottish public at ease has never been a concern for the MoD. Another category A incident also took place in Faslane in 2023. In total there were five Category B, 29 Category C and 71 Category D incidents at Faslane between April 22, 2024 and the same date this year. The MoD has been responsible for repeated leaks of radioactive material into the Clyde. These leaks have been going on for decades and the MoD repeatedly attempts to cover up its culture of negligence. The leaks which have been made public are merely those which the MoD has been forced to admit to. We can only speculate about what the MoD is continuing to cover up.
The Independent
9 hours ago
- The Independent
Sturgeon tells of fresh abuse in ‘toxic' trans rights debate
Nicola Sturgeon has spoken out about the abuse she has suffered in recent days as a result of the 'toxic' debate on trans rights. While the former Scottish first minister said she does not 'spend a lot of time looking at the bowels of social media', she is aware some people online have 'laughed' about her miscarriage, and said they want her to be 'raped in a toilet'. She spoke about the miscarriage she had in 2010 as part of events and interviews in recent days to publicise her memoir, Frankly. She says in the book that she 'should have hit the pause button' on controversial legislation to allow trans people to self-identify and gain legal recognition in their preferred gender without a lengthy medical process. Despite fierce opposition from some women's rights campaigners who feared this would give biological males access to female spaces, the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill was passed by Holyrood – though it has never been enacted after being blocked by Westminster. Speaking at the Edinburgh International Book Festival on Thursday, Ms Sturgeon said the debate was 'toxic on both sides'. Highlighting comments made on social media this week, she said: 'There are people who call themselves feminists, standing up for women's rights, saying things about me such as when I described my miscarriage experience the other day 'I haven't laughed as much in years', accusing me of making it up, people saying they hope I am raped in a toilet.' She accepted that 'in all of the tone and tenor of this I am not saying I was blameless at all', saying she 'desperately' wished she had been able to 'find a more collegiate way forward' on the controversial issue. She described transphobia as 'the soft underbelly of other prejudice'. Ms Sturgeon insisted not all opponents of gender reform are either transphobic or homophobic, but the issue of trans rights 'has been hijacked and weaponised by people that are transphobic and homophobic'. She said she was 'worried' that if she paused the gender reforms at Holyrood, this would have seen her 'give in to that'. However she said: 'I might have been wrong, and I probably was wrong about that.' Ms Sturgeon also made clear her support for transgender rights, saying: 'To my dying day… I will just never accept that there is an irreconcilable tension between women's rights and trans rights. 'I don't believe you have to choose between being a feminist and standing up for one of the most stigmatised minorities in our society. 'Who has threatened women for all the years I have been alive – abusive men have threatened women. 'You get bad people in every group in society but you don't tar the whole group with the bad people, and that I really regret appears to be what some are trying to do with trans people, to take some people and say that is representative of the whole trans community. 'My life might be easier if I just gave in on this issue and said 'yeah, I got it wrong' and we should never try to make life better for the trans community. 'But I will never, to make my own life easier, betray a stigmatized minority, because that is not why I came into politics and it is never what I will do in politics.'
