Disturbed's Career-Defining Hit Returns To Multiple Billboard Charts
A cover that has come to define the outfit's career and commercial success is not only rising, but returning to multiple tallies at the same time in the United States, becoming a true bestseller across the board.
"The Sound of Silence" — the Simon & Garfunkel classic that Disturbed reworked into a rock smash nearly a decade ago — reenters two Billboard tallies this frame. It breaks back onto the Alternative Digital Song Sales chart at No. 7 and finds its way to No. 9 on the Rock Digital Song Sales list after not appearing on either of those rankings at all last frame.
The same tune can also be found on a third purchase-only tally. "The Sound of Silence" climbs from No. 7 to No. 3 on the Hard Rock Digital Song Sales list.
"The Sound of Silence" has previously topped all three sales charts in the past. If it can hold on for 10 more frames on the Hard Rock Digital Song Sales list, it will reach 500 stays. Disturbed's cut has spent the least amount of time among these three tallies on the Rock Digital Song Sales roster, where it's now up to 328 turns.
The song is so popular that it even managed to cross over and become an electronic dance win well over a year ago, and still holding strong to this day. Producer Cyril remixed Disturbed's version of the composition, and it hit No. 1 on Billboard's Dance Digital Song Sales chart. After 68 weeks on that tally, it still holds at No. 3.
Fans of Disturbed seem to be shifting their focus back to "The Sound of Silence" as "I Will Not Break" dips on most of the rankings on which it appears this frame. The current focus drops one spot to No. 5 on the Rock & Alternative Airplay list and down to No. 17 on the Hot Hard Rock Songs tally. At the same time, it holds in fifth place on the Mainstream Rock Airplay roster, where it recently dominated, adding to the group's list of champions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
President Donald Trump's "One Big, Beautiful Bill" Will Speed Up the Timeline to Social Security Benefit Cuts, New Analysis Finds
Key Points Social Security's Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) trust fund is an estimated eight years away from exhausting its asset reserves, which would trigger sweeping benefit cuts. A fresh analysis from the Social Security Administration's Office of the Actuary foresees the "big, beautiful bill" modestly exacerbating the program's cash outflow. However, ongoing demographic changes are the root cause of Social Security's financial woes. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook › For most aging Americans, Social Security income isn't a luxury -- it's a necessary payout that ensures a stable financial foundation. For 24 years, Gallup has been surveying retirees to gauge their reliance on the income they receive from Social Security. Every year, 80% to 90% of respondents have noted their payout represents a "major" or "minor" income source. In other words, it's a necessity, in some capacity, to cover their expenses. Ideally, elected lawmakers -- which include President Donald Trump -- should be doing everything in their power to ensure the long-term financial stability of Social Security. But based on the latest update from the Social Security Board of Trustees, that's not happening. Worse yet, President Trump's flagship tax and spending law, the "big, beautiful bill," is expected to speed up the timeline to across-the-board Social Security benefit cuts, according to a new analysis. Social Security benefit cuts are an estimated eight years away Before digging into Donald Trump's newly passed law, the groundwork needs to be laid for what challenges await America's leading retirement program. Every year since the first retired-worker benefit was mailed out in 1940, the Social Security Board of Trustees has published a report that intricately details the program's financial health. It allows anyone to see how every dollar of income is collected and to track where those dollars end up. Arguably, the most important aspect of these annual reports is the long-term forecast. The long-term outlook takes into consideration fiscal and monetary policy changes, as well as ongoing demographic shifts, to determine how financially sound Social Security will be in the 75 years following the release of a report. Since 1985, every Social Security Board of Trustees Report has warned of a long-term unfunded obligation. In essence, projected income in the 75 years following the release of a report is believed to be insufficient to cover outlays, which are primarily comprised of benefits but also include the administrative expenses to operate the Social Security program. As of the 2025 report, this unfunded obligation has ballooned to $25.1 trillion. While this is a daunting figure, it's not the most immediate cause for concern. Rather, it's the Trustees' projection that the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) trust fund will exhaust its asset reserves by 2033. The OASI is the fund responsible for making monthly payments to retired workers and survivors of deceased workers. To be clear, the OASI doesn't need a dime in its asset reserves to continue doling out payments to eligible beneficiaries. However, the depletion of its asset reserves would signal that the existing payout schedule, including near-annual cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs), is unsustainable. According to the Trustees Report, sweeping benefit cuts of up to 23% may be necessary in eight years if the OASI's asset reserves run dry. Analysis: Trump's "big, beautiful bill" exacerbates this cash outflow However, this projected timeline for benefit cuts isn't set in stone. In late July, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR), the highest-ranking Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, sent a request to the Social Security Administration's Office of the Chief Actuary (OACT) to determine what, if any, financial impacts Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" would have on the Social Security trust funds. On Aug. 5, the OACT offered its response and updated projections to Sen. Wyden. The headline takeaway from the OACT's analysis is that Trump's flagship law will speed up the timeline to across-the-board benefit cuts. Specifically, the OACT analysis points to alterations in tax collection that are expected to adversely impact the Social Security program, beginning this year. Some of these changes include: Increasing the standard deduction amount for eligible seniors aged 65 and above from 2025 through 2028. Allowing eligible workers to deduct up to $25,000 in reported tips from their federal taxable income from 2025 through 2028. Allowing eligible workers to deduct a portion of their overtime pay from their federal income tax from 2025 through 2028. These provisions in the "big, beautiful bill" are meaningful because 91% of Social Security's income is collected from the 12.4% payroll tax on earned income (wages and salary, but not investment income), with another 3.9% coming from the taxation of Social Security benefits. These aforementioned tax-reducing initiatives are forecast to increase costs for the OASI and Disability Insurance (DI) trust fund by $168.6 billion, on a combined basis, from 2025 through 2034. This reduction in projected income collection comes at a price. The new asset reserve depletion date for the OASI has moved from the third quarter of 2033 to the fourth quarter of 2032, per the OACT. For the hypothetically combined OASI and DI (OASDI) -- asset reserves from the DI can potentially be leaned on to extend the solvency of the combined OASDI -- Trump's law moves the asset reserve depletion date from the third quarter of 2034 to the first quarter of 2034. Ongoing demographic changes are primarily to blame for Social Security's financial struggles Although the OACT's analysis finds that Trump's "big, beautiful bill" is going to worsen Social Security's financial outlook, it's important to recognize that the president's newly signed law isn't at the heart of the aforementioned $25.1 trillion (and growing) long-term funding shortfall. Social Security's worsening financial outlook primarily rests on an assortment of ongoing demographic shifts. Some of these demographic changes are well-known and have been ongoing for some time. For example, baby boomers retiring from the workforce are weighing down the worker-to-beneficiary ratio. We've also witnessed the average life expectancy notably increase since the first retired-worker benefit check was mailed in January 1940. The Social Security program was never designed to pay retirees for multiple decades. But a number of these major demographic shifts are occurring below the surface: The U.S. fertility rate hit an all-time low in 2024. Fewer births will lead to added pressure on the worker-to-beneficiary ratio in decades to come. Net migration into the U.S. has fallen off considerably since the late 1990s. Legal migrants entering the U.S. are typically younger and spend decades in the labor force contributing to Social Security via the payroll tax. Fewer legal migrants equate to less payroll tax income being collected. Rising income inequality is allowing more earned income to escape the payroll tax. In 2025, all earned income from $0.01 to $176,100 is subject to the payroll tax. For decades, the upper bound of taxable income (the $176,100 figure in 2025) has grown at a slower pace than earned income for high earners, thereby allowing more earnings to escape the payroll tax. While not a demographic shift, elected lawmakers' lack of progress in fixing Social Security is deserving of some blame, as well. Though proposals to strengthen Social Security are aplenty on Capitol Hill, finding some semblance of middle ground between America's two major political parties has proved virtually impossible. Even though Donald Trump's tax and spending law is forecast to make things worse for Social Security over the next decade, it's far from the root issues that need to be addressed to strengthen America's leading retirement program. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. President Donald Trump's "One Big, Beautiful Bill" Will Speed Up the Timeline to Social Security Benefit Cuts, New Analysis Finds was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rock icon plans to skip Hall of Fame ceremony, 'we have a gig'
The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame inductees of 2025 boast names such as The White Stripes, Soundgarden, Outkast, and Cyndi Lauper. Some of these names or remaining representatives for the bands will be in attendance for the celebration on Nov. 8 in Los Angeles. Chubby Checker appears not to be one of them. Checker, 83, rock n' roll pioneer and most famous for his 1960 cover of Hank Ballard & The Midnighters' R&B song 'The Twist,' initially appeared excited to be inducted into the hallowed hall after making a demand in 2014 to be included. In a clip circulating on Bluesky, the musician is seen speaking after a show and states that he will not be attending the ceremony. The reason is that the musician is booked for a show on the night of the induction. 'I told my manager, I says, 'Make sure when we go to the Rock & Roll Hall Of Fame, the induction, that I'm doing what I love doing the most: being in front of an audience,'' said Checker. 'A live audience, not a television audience. So she said, 'Let me just get it for you now, so if it happens.' So she did, she got me a show. And the Rock Hall says, 'We want you to come here this day and be here.' We said, 'We're not coming.' 'You're what?!' I said, 'We're not coming. We have a gig.' 'Well, forget about your gig.' You never forget about gigs.' It's not clear if Checker got the nod to perform at the Hall of Fame ceremony, but it's possible the singer was told that younger artists would be performing his music instead. Checker once took out a full-page ad in Billboard in 2001, stating the case that he is one of rock and roll's most under-appreciated figures and demanded inclusion in the Hall of Fame. Checker won't be the only one not attending the ceremony. Bassist Carol Kaye also stated she will not be attending either. Related coverage: Rock legends finally settle legal dispute. Will they ever reunite? Christian music singer accused of rape in latest allegations. Accusers want him in prison. Beloved metal band's ex-guitarist blasts former bandmates. 'They sound absolutely horrible.' Our journalism needs your support. Please subscribe today to Murjani Rawls may be reached at mrawls@ Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Family wants to unload van – hungry bear steals pork rinds
A family in Gatlinburg, Tennessee wanted to unload the van at their cabin when an uninvited guest showed up: a hungry black bear was after their pork rinds. Comical footage released on August 13 captured the moment.
