Ex-promoters of Bhushan Steel seek open court hearing on liquidation review; CJI to form bench
open court hearing
to their plea seeking review of the May 2 verdict ordering liquidation of BSPL under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
The top court had on May set aside the resolution plan submitted by JSW Steel for the BSPL, holding it illegal and in violation of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).
A bench comprising Justice Bela M Trivedi (since retired) and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma had also ordered the liquidation of BSPL under the IBC.
The former promoters of BSPL were
Sanjay Singhal
and his family, specifically including his father Brij Bhushan Singal and brother Neeraj Singal.
On Monday, senior advocate Vikas Singh, appearing for former promoters of the ailing firm, told a bench comprising Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran that the review plea be listed before a bench for an open court hearing.
The senior lawyer said the value of the assets of the company under liquidation have been fixed at a very low price by the tribunal and the remaining liability will have to be cleared by former promoters.
"Let me constitute a bench," the CJI said. Usually, the review petitions against the apex court judgements are decided in chambers by the judges concerned by way of circulation.
The top court, in its verdict, had criticised the conduct of all key stakeholders in the resolution process, the resolution professional, the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the
National Company Law Tribunal
(NCLT), for enabling what it termed a "flagrant violation" of the IBC.
Justice Trivedi, since retired, criticised multiple stakeholders, including successful resolution applicant (SRA) JSW Steel Limited, for procedural lapses and failure to uphold the objectives of the IBC.
"Having thoroughly examined the entire matter factually and legally, we arrive at the following irresistible conclusions: the resolution professional had utterly failed to discharge his statutory duties contemplated under the IBC and the CIRP regulations during the course of the entire CIR proceedings of the corporate debtor, BPSL," the verdict had said.
The bench held that the CoC failed to exercise its commercial wisdom while approving JSW's resolution plan, which was in absolute contravention of the mandatory provisions of the IBC and CIRP regulations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
13 hours ago
- United News of India
SC sets aside NCLAT ruling, allows IL&FS appeal in insolvency case
New Delhi, Aug 1 (UNI) The Supreme Court today allowed the appeal filed by IL&FS Financial Services Ltd. (IFIN) and overturned the March 25, 2025, judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), which had upheld the National Company Law Tribunal's (NCLT) dismissal of IFIN's insolvency plea as time-barred. The case involved a loan default by Adhunik Meghalaya Steels Pvt. Ltd., and the key issue was whether entries in the company's 2019–20 balance sheet could be treated as an acknowledgment of debt. IFIN argued that this acknowledgment extended the limitation period under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, allowing them to initiate insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The Supreme Court agreed with IFIN, holding that the balance sheet entries indicated that the debt was still unpaid even though IFIN's name was not directly mentioned. The Court said that acknowledgment of liability does not need to name the creditor, as long as it shows the existence of a debt. The Bench also addressed confusion over its earlier COVID-related orders on extension of limitation. It clarified that the correct clause to apply was Para 5(I) of its suo motu judgment in In Re: Cognisance for Extension of Limitation. As a result, the period between March 15, 2020, and February 28, 2022, would not be counted in calculating the deadline. Thus, IFIN's application filed on January 15, 2024, was held to be well within the extended limitation period. The Court referred to and reaffirmed earlier rulings, including Asset Reconstruction Co. v. Bishal Jaiswal (2021) and Vidyasagar Prasad v. UCO Bank (2024), stating that balance sheet entries should be interpreted in a broad, contextual manner to determine acknowledgment of debt. Setting aside the findings of both the NCLT and NCLAT, the Supreme Court sent the matter back to the NCLT for a fresh decision on the merits. Senior Advocate Ritin Rai, along with a legal team from Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, represented IFIN. UNI SNG AAB
Time of India
15 hours ago
- Time of India
Rare Recall: SC will Again Hear JSW-BPSL Case
The Supreme Court Thursday recalled its May 2 judgment that scrapped JSW Steel 's acquisition of Bhushan Power & Steel Ltd (BPSL) and ordered its liquidation, giving interim relief to the Sajjan Jindal-led company that claims to have infused Rs 30,000 crore to turn around the bankrupt steelmaker. A bench led by Chief Justice BR Gavai allowed the review pleas filed by JSW Steel and BPSL's lenders, including State Bank of India and Punjab National Bank , and posted the petitions for a detailed hearing on August 7. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Data Analytics MCA Degree Operations Management Project Management Digital Marketing Finance Management Data Science PGDM Design Thinking Leadership Public Policy healthcare others MBA Data Science Cybersecurity Others Technology Product Management Healthcare CXO Artificial Intelligence Skills you'll gain: Data Analysis & Visualization Predictive Analytics & Machine Learning Business Intelligence & Data-Driven Decision Making Analytics Strategy & Implementation Duration: 12 Weeks Indian School of Business Applied Business Analytics Starts on Jun 13, 2024 Get Details While it is rare for the top court to reconsider its orders, a bench that also includes Justice Satish Chandra Sharma said this 'is a fit case' where the judgment 'needs to be recalled and the matter is to be considered afresh'. 'Prima facie, we are of the view that the impugned judgment does not correctly consider the legal position as has been laid down in the catena of judgments,' the bench said. It also noted the contention of the petitioners that the previous judgment had considered various incorrect factual aspects. 'We are inclined to allow the review. We won't look into any documents, just the judgment itself,' Justice Gavai said. Another bench of Justices Bela M Trivedi and Satish Chandra Sharma had on May 2 scrapped JSW Steel's acquisition of BPSL, four years after the transaction was closed, holding that the steelmaker's Rs 19,700 crore resolution proposal was 'illegal' and 'in gross violation' of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code . It termed JSW's intention 'mala fide and dishonest', saying that the company took undue advantage of pending Enforcement Directorate proceedings and did not implement its plan for two years. Justice Trivedi has since retired. After JSW sought a review of the order, SC on May 26 ordered status quo on the liquidation proceedings till it decided the review petition . The lenders too approached the court with a similar review plea.
Time of India
17 hours ago
- Time of India
D G Shipping urged to roll back circular barring crew holding certificates through fraudulent means from sailing
Advt Advt By , ETInfra Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals. Subscribe to Newsletter to get latest insights & analysis in your inbox. Get updates on your preferred social platform Follow us for the latest news, insider access to events and more. Pressure is building up on the Directorate General of Shipping to scrap its July 18 circular that barred Indian seafarers holding certificates issued by the maritime administration of countries that are not recognised by India from sailing on foreign flagged ships The D G Shipping circular was aimed at curbing the practice of seafarers obtaining Certificate of Competency (CoC) and Certificate of Proficiency (CoP) from foreign administrations through what it calls 'fraudulent' much as 80 per cent of the Indian seafarers are employed on foreign flagged move, though, has sparked widespread criticism over fears that thousands of Indian seafarers would lose expected, at least a couple of individuals have filed petitions in court seeking to reverse the circular issued by the maritime Thursday, hundreds of seafarers, under the banner of the Forward Seamen's Union of India, staged a demonstration in front of the office of the Directorate General of Shipping demanding withdrawal of the has opposed the new regulatory directive that mandates Indian seafarers recruited by Recruitment and Placement Services License (RPSL) agencies for working on foreign-flagged vessels to possess a valid Certificate of Competency (CoC) or Certificate of Proficiency (CoP) issued only by an Indian maritime authority, or countries with mutual recognition agreements (MRAs) with India such as Malaysia, the UAE, South Korea, Sweden, UK and Indian Seafarers holding CoC/CoP and modular course certificates issued by Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and Ireland may be accepted for recruitment if the certificates were obtained by attending training in these countries.'The circular further excludes CoCs issued by several International Maritime Organisation (IMO) white-listed countries like Panama, Liberia, Honduras, Belize, Bahamas, and Cook Islands directly threatening the employability of thousands of Indian seafarers, many of whom possess legitimately acquired certifications from these jurisdictions,' said Manoj Yadav, General Secretary, Forward Seamen's Union of the mandate to verify the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers), 1978 ( STCW Convention ) certificates only from D G Shipping approved institutes has created significant barriers and fears of disqualification, even among genuinely trained professionals, Yadav FSUI reckons that thousands of Indian seafarers will face career disruption, disqualification, and financial insecurity due to the circular which will increase the burden of compliance, due diligence, and legal ambiguity for RPSL agencies and shipping the order would risk closure of maritime training institutes outside the D G Shipping approval list while potentially creating tensions with flag states whose certifications are now deemed non-compliant, raising diplomatic FSUI has submitted a representation to the D G Shipping seeking roll back of the July circular as well as its 2023 order stipulating age norms for ships for saving thousands of seafarer jobs. The representation also sought protection of seafarers abandoned at foreign ports, grant access to shore leave for all seafarers visiting Indian ports and provide pension benefits to a meeting with the Additional Director General of Shipping, FSUI urged the maritime administration to scrap the July circular but was told that no decision can be taken since the matter was sub to the D G Shipping, Indian seafarers have been lured by authorised as well as unauthorised RPSL agents to take up assignments on foreign flagged ships without adequate scrutiny of the fraudulent certificates issued to of the fraudulent CoC/CoP holders were found in possession of STCW course certificates issued by maritime training institutes which have not been accorded approval by the D G Shipping.'There have been Port State Control (PSC) intervention on vessels wherein engagement of seafarers with fraudulent CoCs/CoPs, and STCW course certificates have been noted with concern. As a prudent maritime administration, the Directorate General of Shipping initiated a detailed inquiry into these acts of agents and touts operating both within and outside the country,' the July 18 circular issued by the regulator inquiry revealed that seafarers sailing as ratings were lured with promises of being eligible to be issued with higher-grade Certificates of Competency (CoC) and Certificate of Proficiency (CoP) from foreign administrations through fraudulent means.'Fraudulent agents have been offering 'package' of delivering course certificates issued by institutes that were not approved by the Directorate General of Shipping, and the foreign CoC/CoP without any course being conducted. The inquiry had revealed that these maritime institutes did not even exist at the stated addresses,' the D G Shipping the serious nature of these violations, which undermine the fundamental principles and objectives of the STCW Convention and Rules framed under the Merchant Shipping Act, the Directorate has initiated necessary actions including the filing of criminal complaints, confiscation of such fraudulently obtained certificates, and informing the issuing authority with a request to initiate cancellation of certificates by recent times, several Certificates of Competency (CoCs) issued by a few administrations have been confiscated by the D G Shipping, as part of the investigation and identified during Port State Control inspections.'These activities which are attributable to a few unscrupulous agents has not only caused disruption to the lives of seafarers who are facing investigation by the authorities but has the potential to cause more damages in the future if not suitably addressed at this stage,' the D G Shipping wrote in the the FSUI has said that the ship age norms were issued by the D G Shipping in 2023 without a comprehensive study by a competent authority.'No data was provided regarding its impact on the strategic shipping sector, EXIM trade, or the potential loss of jobs. Although the order was later sent for review, the report is still pending. We strongly submit that India, as a developing nation, cannot afford the loss of seafarers' jobs or tonnage. While amendments to enhance vessel safety, marine environments, and seafarers' welfare are welcome, they should not jeopardize thousands of livelihoods,' Yadav pointed union has also asked the D G Shipping to take action for curbing the rising instances of Indian seafarers being abandoned across the world by unscrupulous shipping companies and RPSL agents. These workers are left without food, wages, legal support, or repatriation resulting in a humanitarian crisis demanding urgent resolution, it be sure, the government has incorporated stringent provisions in the Merchant Shipping Bill, currently before Parliament, to deal with the abandonment of Indian seafarers at foreign FSUI also highlighted that despite international norms, Indian seafarers often face denial of shore leave upon reaching destination ports, affecting their mental well-being and violating basic human rights. It has demanded a uniform, humane policy to permit shore leave in line with international union has also urged the government to roll out a nationwide seafarers' pension scheme recognising their service to national and global the Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways and the D G Shipping to call a meeting of all relevant stakeholders, including trade unions, manning agents, training institutes, and maritime employers to discuss and resolve the critical issues in a time-bound manner, FSUI warned that seafarers would be compelled to consider industrial action to protect their livelihoods, dignity, and future if concrete steps are not taken within a reasonable time frame.
