
N.C. lawmakers look to crack down on psychoactive hemp products
Why it matters: North Carolina remains one of just a handful of states where marijuana — medical or not — remains illegal. At the same time, it's among the most lenient for its regulation of products extracted from hemp, some of which can provide a weed-like high.
That lack of regulation has given way to a situation in which anything goes: Dispensaries, bars, bottle shops, restaurants and even pizzerias across the state can sell an array of intoxicating products without age restrictions.
The big picture: If a hemp bill filed Tuesday becomes law, it will transform the state's hemp industry, which has largely remained unchecked since 2022.
That year, the General Assembly passed legislation bringing the state in line with federal regulations on hemp, declassifying it as a controlled substance so long as the dry-weight product contains less than 0.3% of the psychoactive component of marijuana, delta-9 THC.
Driving the news: State Sens. Todd Johnson, Danny Britt and Michael Lazzara filed a 16-page bill Tuesday that would crack down on the manufacturing, sale and distribution of hemp.
The legislation would make it illegal for stores to sell consumable hemp-derived products to anyone under 21 or for anyone under 21 to possess the products. Additionally, the products would be prohibited on school grounds.
The bill would also require licenses for hemp manufacturers, distributors and sellers, and it would mandate that manufacturers test the products for heavy metals, pesticides and other toxic substances.
What they're saying: Among the states that are considering hemp legislation, North Carolina's bill "is one of the best — if not the very best — hemp bills in the country," cannabis advocate and business law attorney Rod Kight told Axios by email.
"It supports the state's existing hemp industry while also creating appropriate guardrails to prevent minors from accessing hemp products, mandating safety standards, and requiring specific labeling and marketing information so that adults can make informed decisions about the hemp products that they choose to purchase and use."
The intrigue: House Rules Chairman Rep. John Bell, who is the president of CBD and hemp manufacturer Asterra Labs, has been involved in discussions about the legislation.
Bell attributes his involvement to the fact that he is the only person in the industry in the state legislature, however he wasn't familiar with the details of the final version of the bill, he told Axios.
Asterra has a "pharmaceutical-grade clean facility where you can eat off the floor," Bell told WUNC last year, but it's "competing in the same market space as a guy who's making it in their backyard."
The Senate's proposal this year could put those backyard manufacturer types out of business, as it would ban home-based manufacturing.
Bell argues that, though there aren't many companies in the state doing what Asterra does, the legislation won't necessarily be a slam dunk for his company: New licensing fees would cost Asterra money and require changes to how it packages its products, for example.
Still, Bell said he'll seek an advisory opinion from the State Ethics Commission, which gives advice to legislators and other public servants on issues including conflicts of interest.
Zoom in: As of now, the state has no limits on cannabinoids with psychoactive effects much like those of THC, such as delta-8 — which is often seen in products on shelves across the Triangle — THC-O, HHC, THC-A, delta-7 and delta-10.
The cannabis plant has more than 100 cannabinoids. Some of them are psychoactive, while others, like CBD, are not.
The Senate's proposal would set dosage limits for a handful of cannabinoids — delta-7, delta-8, delta-9 and delta-10 — but would not set limits on other psychoactive cannabinoids.
For edible products, like gummies, a serving could not contain more than 75mg of delta-7, delta-8, delta-9 or delta-10. Liquid products, like drinks, could not have more than 25mg per serving.
Zoom out: "North Carolina is widely perceived to be the best hemp state in the country due to its long history with hemp and also its support for the hemp industry," Kight told Axios.
"Over the years, the state's hemp-friendly laws and overall pro-hemp environment have resulted in NC being the home base for many of the world's top companies," he wrote in a blog post Tuesday after senators filed the bill.
State of play: In 2023, UNC School of Government professor Phil Dixon told WFAE the hemp market in the state was the "wild west."
Since then, the industry has only grown: Hemp-derived edibles, drinks and joints with psychoactive effects are in some of Raleigh's favorite restaurants, bottle shops and stores.
"If anything, we are more in the Wild West than we were in '23," Dixon told Axios.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
SEPTA cuts could strain Amtrak service and boost remote work
The ripple effects of SEPTA 's service cuts could hurt Amtrak and force more workers to clock in remotely at some of Philadelphia's largest employers. Why it matters: The agency is preparing to operate at the lowest level of service in its history — a move that could reverse decades of transit growth. State of play: SEPTA's service cuts kick in at 5am Sunday. Meanwhile, Pennsylvania lawmakers have yet to agree on a state budget or address SEPTA's $213 million deficit, which is triggering the cuts. Driving the news: Amtrak will lose roughly $71 million in annual payments from SEPTA after the Philly transit agency stops using Amtrak's rail lines starting Jan. 1. That will hurt Amtrak's reinvestments in its rail network, potentially leading to deteriorating infrastructure and slower train speeds, Amtrak spokesperson Beth K. Toll tells Axios. Zoom in: The funding loss will affect the following Amtrak lines: The intrigue: U.S. Rep. Brendan Boyle has said Amtrak could eliminate the Keystone Service altogether over the lost funding, per the Pennsylvania Capital-Star. Plus: Approximately 140 riders could lose access to SEPTA's paratransit service (for people with disabilities) due to the cuts, agency spokesperson Andrew Busch tells Axios. Zoom out: Some Philly workers will likely take advantage of flexible remote work policies, while other employers aren't budging from their in-office mandates. What they're saying: A spokesperson for Independence Blue Cross (IBX) tells Axios that many of its employees rely on SEPTA, and the company has encouraged them to work with their managers if their commutes are affected. Most of IBX's workforce has a hybrid work policy that requires three days in the office per week, but it can be relaxed on a case-by-case basis. A Comcast spokesperson tells Axios the company is monitoring the SEPTA situation closely, and that they already offer flexibility to their four-day in-office policy. The other side: Mayor Cherelle Parker is holding firm to her full-time, in-office mandate for municipal employees, spokesperson Joe Grace tells Axios.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Gabbard's Revenge Purge Immediately Runs Into a Major Problem
Tulsi Gabbard may have broken the law by publicly identifying dozens of current and former officials while revoking their security clearances, according to a national security lawyer. Gabbard revealed that 37 people have been targeted in the clearance purge ordered by President Trump, accusing them without evidence of 'politicizing and manipulating intelligence, leaking classified intelligence without authorization, and/or committing intentional egregious violations of tradecraft standards.' Gabbard made the announcement—which comes after Trump stripped the security clearance of his political opponents—by posting a memo from her office on X. The list of 37 individuals targeted includes intelligence officials who concluded that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election, as well as those accused by far-right activist Laura Loomer of lacking loyalty to Trump, according to Axios. Mark Zaid, an attorney who represents intelligence officers and who is suing the Trump administration to have his own stripped security clearance restored, suggested Gabbard may have landed herself in legal trouble by making the memo public. 'Can you say 'Privacy Act violation'? I certainly can,' Zaid wrote in a post on X. 'Further proof of weaponization and politicization. The vast majority of these individuals are not household names & are dedicated public servants who have worked across multiple presidential administrations.' Zaid—who previously represented a whistleblower who accused Trump of attempting to extort Ukraine for dirt on former President Joe Biden ahead of the 2020 election—told Axios that a person's security clearance 'is maintained in a protected Privacy Act System of records.' He added the government 'cannot simply release that information without written consent from the individual or the existence of a Routine Use, which I do not believe exists for this purpose.' Those who lost clearances reportedly include officials who signed a letter supporting Trump's first impeachment trial, when he was accused of threatening to withhold military aid to Ukraine unless President Volodymyr Zelensky agreed to investigate Hunter Biden's business dealings ahead of the 2020 election. Others were targeted online by Loomer, an extremist and conspiracy theorist who has taken credit for multiple people being removed from the Trump administration, citing reasons such as their prior service in the Obama or Biden administrations. 'Thank you, Tulsi! MORE SCALPS,' Loomer posted while sharing Gabbard's memo. In response to Zaid's remarks, White House Spokesman Davis Ingle told the Daily Beast: 'President Trump promised to end the weaponization of government against American citizens which is why Director Gabbard rightfully directed the revocation of 37 security clearances from current and former intelligence officials who abused their positions of public trust.' The Trump administration has stripped numerous national security officials and political opponents of their clearances as part of the president's campaign of retribution. Those affected include Trump's 2024 election rival, former Vice President Kamala Harris. New York Attorney General Letitia James—who prosecuted Trump for filing fraudulent financial filings for years—was also targeted, as was former president Joe Biden and his entire family. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the Daily Beast.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Gabbard's Revenge Purge Immediately Runs Into a Major Problem
Tulsi Gabbard may have broken the law by publicly identifying dozens of current and former officials while revoking their security clearances, according to a national security lawyer. Gabbard revealed that 37 people have been targeted in the clearance purge ordered by President Trump, accusing them without evidence of 'politicizing and manipulating intelligence, leaking classified intelligence without authorization, and/or committing intentional egregious violations of tradecraft standards.' Gabbard made the announcement—which comes after Trump stripped the security clearance of his political opponents—by posting a memo from her office on X. The list of 37 individuals targeted includes intelligence officials who concluded that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election, as well as those accused by far-right activist Laura Loomer of lacking loyalty to Trump, according to Axios. Mark Zaid, an attorney who represents intelligence officers and who is suing the Trump administration to have his own stripped security clearance restored, suggested Gabbard may have landed herself in legal trouble by making the memo public. 'Can you say 'Privacy Act violation'? I certainly can,' Zaid wrote in a post on X. 'Further proof of weaponization and politicization. The vast majority of these individuals are not household names & are dedicated public servants who have worked across multiple presidential administrations.' Zaid—who previously represented a whistleblower who accused Trump of attempting to extort Ukraine for dirt on former President Joe Biden ahead of the 2020 election—told Axios that a person's security clearance 'is maintained in a protected Privacy Act System of records.' He added the government 'cannot simply release that information without written consent from the individual or the existence of a Routine Use, which I do not believe exists for this purpose.' Those who lost clearances reportedly include officials who signed a letter supporting Trump's first impeachment trial, when he was accused of threatening to withhold military aid to Ukraine unless President Volodymyr Zelensky agreed to investigate Hunter Biden's business dealings ahead of the 2020 election. Others were targeted online by Loomer, an extremist and conspiracy theorist who has taken credit for multiple people being removed from the Trump administration, citing reasons such as their prior service in the Obama or Biden administrations. 'Thank you, Tulsi! MORE SCALPS,' Loomer posted while sharing Gabbard's memo. In response to Zaid's remarks, White House Spokesman Davis Ingle told the Daily Beast: 'President Trump promised to end the weaponization of government against American citizens which is why Director Gabbard rightfully directed the revocation of 37 security clearances from current and former intelligence officials who abused their positions of public trust.' The Trump administration has stripped numerous national security officials and political opponents of their clearances as part of the president's campaign of retribution. Those affected include Trump's 2024 election rival, former Vice President Kamala Harris. New York Attorney General Letitia James—who prosecuted Trump for filing fraudulent financial filings for years—was also targeted, as was former president Joe Biden and his entire family. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the Daily Beast.