Dum Dums lollipops stands by bright dyes, despite RFK Jr.'s push
Kirk Vashaw, chief executive officer of Spangler Candy Company, said a key problem with changing ingredients is taste. Take beet juice: "That's a nice red, but it tastes like beets," he said.
Then there's carmine, which makes some consumers queasy because the reddish pigment comes from cochineal insects.
"People said, 'I'd rather get cancer than eat the bug,' " Vashaw said, referring to an instance when his company used the coloring.
Spangler, which employs about 550 workers in Bryan, Ohio, also makes Bit-O-Honey candy, Necco Wafers and Circus Peanuts. The 119-year-old company already uses some natural colors and is testing other natural dyes. But a number of its confections include artificial colors such as Yellow 5 and Red 40. Spangler pulls in an estimated $200 million in annual retail sales, and it produces roughly 12 million Dum Dums a day.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, led by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., said last month that it will work with the packaged-food industry to phase out artificial dyes by early 2027. Kennedy and other officials have linked the ingredients to diseases such as obesity and diabetes while calling for "real and transformative change" to get "the worst ingredients out of food."
Health advocates have said for years that synthetic colors add no taste or nutritional value but make unhealthy foods more visually appealing. Red No. 3, which has been linked to cancer and is used in products such as candy and cold medicine, will be banned in the U.S. starting in early 2027. Spangler doesn't use the ingredient.
Food-industry lobbyists have said that there's no official agreement in place with the government, at least for now. The industry says artificial food dyes are safe, and Vashaw's comments underscore how some companies aren't on board with Kennedy's time line and perspective.
Vashaw said his company has used artificial dyes for around 50 years and "we believe they're safe." He added Spangler hasn't reached an agreement "with anybody" on discontinuing their use. There aren't any regulations currently saying companies will have to stop using the dyes, he said.
"There's talk, but actual regulations are another thing," he said during an interview at the Sweets & Snacks Expo in Indianapolis last week and a subsequent phone conversation.
"It's likely that when we get to the end of 2026 that we will still have products that will still have these artificial colors," Vashaw said. "One, there might not even be the supply for these natural colors, and two, we have to do what the consumers want, and it's not clear to us that these consumers want these natural colors."
Spangler has made dye-free variants of some of its products with natural flavorings for more than 30 years, including candy canes and, at times, a line of Dum Dums. But Vashaw's experience is that these products aren't what consumers actually want.
"We have natural items now," Vashaw said. "They're just not bought in any meaningful way." In the case of the candy canes, "some people think it tastes like dirt," he said.
Natural candy canes make up less than 2% of Spangler's total candy cane sales, and the firm ended up pulling its natural Dum Dums after they proved a flop.
Allergy concerns
Vashaw also expressed concern about new colors that the FDA approved this month, such as Galdieria extract blue, which is derived from algae, and butterfly pea flower extract, made from dried flower petals, saying the ingredients could potentially be allergenic for some people. In their regulations approving the dyes, the FDA concluded that both colors pose little risk for allergic reactions.
Some companies are expanding their tests of natural dyes as government pressure for a change increases. PepsiCo Inc., for example, has come out with Simply Ruffles Hot & Spicy, which uses tomato powder and red chile pepper instead of the artificial dyes that give other chips their vibrant color.
Vashaw said his company will continue to test natural ingredients, but the lack of regulatory clarity is creating confusion about what will happen.
"Right now, it's more of a guideline," he said. "Is it really going to get enforced? Is it going to get pushed back? When their Doritos are a dull orange, are people going to accept that?"
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
13 minutes ago
- The Hill
Ex-Trump surgeon general slams RFK's ‘tepid' response to CDC shooting
Former U.S. Surgeon General Jerome Adams blasted Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for his 'delayed and tepid response' to the fatal shooting that occurred at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta on Friday. In an opinion piece published by Stat on Saturday, Adams wrote it was 'clear' that the shooting was a 'a dire reflection of ever-escalating threats public health workers face in a climate increasingly shaped by misinformation, politicization, and inflammatory rhetoric.' Last Friday afternoon, a shooter whom authorities have identified as 30-year-old Patrick Joseph White shot at the Atlanta headquarters of the CDC, killing DeKalb County police officer David Rose. White's father reportedly told police his son had been fixated on the COVID-19 vaccine. In his op-ed, Adams, who served in the first Trump administration, lambasted Kennedy for waiting 18 hours before issuing a statement, writing that he himself heard from staffers at the CDC within that time frame who felt 'already demoralized.' 'Leadership in moments of crisis is critical. Kennedy's delayed and tepid response, coupled with his own record of inflammatory claims, has only deepened the wounds and amplified a dangerous sense of betrayal among America's frontline public health workers,' Adams wrote. He also noted other recent violent incidents, including a shooting at a Pennsylvania hospital and the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. 'What ties these events together is not just the violence — but the context that enables it,' wrote Adams. 'Repeated rhetoric from influential voices, including Kennedy and his supporters, has portrayed health professionals as corrupt, untrustworthy, or outright malicious. They've been labeled 'grifters,' 'enemies of the people,' and worse.' He called on federal leadership to condemn rhetoric that vilifies public health professionals, to stop scapegoating public frustration onto health professionals, protect health care workers and to fund actionable solutions instead of just messaging. Appearing on CBS News's 'Face the Nation,' Adams continued his criticism of Kennedy, noting the secretary's past remarks villainizing the CDC. 'He said no one should be harmed while working to protect the public. There's an out there,' said Adams. 'If you don't believe that people are working to protect the public, then that means it's okay to commit violence, at least in some people's eyes.' Writing on social media following the shooting, Kennedy said, 'We know how shaken our public health colleagues feel today. No one should face violence while working to protect the health of others. We are actively supporting CDC staff on the ground and across the agency. Public health workers show up every day with purpose — even in moments of grief and uncertainty.' 'Secretary Kennedy has unequivocally condemned the horrific attack and remains fully committed to ensuring the safety and well-being of CDC employees,' HHS Communications Director Andrew Nixon said in a statement Monday. 'He extends his deepest condolences to the family and loved ones of Officer David Rose, who was tragically killed. Officer Rose's sacrifice to protect the CDC on its darkest day will never be forgotten. 'This is a time to stand in solidarity with our public health workforce, not a moment for the media to exploit a tragedy for political gain,' Nixon added.
Atlantic
2 hours ago
- Atlantic
Are You Cowmaxxing?
A not-insignificant number of TikToks aim to convince the viewer that beef-tallow moisturizer will not make your face smell like a cow. The beauty influencers who tend to appear in these videos—usually clear-skinned women rubbing tallow into their face as they detail their previous dermatological woes—describe the scent as 'buttery' or 'earthy' or grass-like. Many of them come to the same conclusion: Okay, even if the tallow does smell a little bit, the smooth skin it leaves behind is well worth it. Beef tallow (as both a moisturizer and an alternative to seed oils) is one of many cow-based products that have crowded the wellness market in the past five or so years. Beef-bone broth is a grocery-store staple. Demand for raw milk has grown, despite numerous cases of illness and warnings from public-health officials that drinking it can be fatal. In certain circles, raw cow organs—heart, liver, kidney—are prized superfoods. Target and Walmart sell supplements containing bovine collagen (a protein found in cowhide and bone) and colostrum (the rich liquid that mammals produce for their newborn offspring); they promise healthier skin, a happier gut, and stronger immunity, and come in flavors such as watermelon lime, lemon sorbet, and 'valiant grape.' You can buy cow-placenta pills for postpartum healing, or powdered bull testicle for testosterone support. The slightest interaction with clean-beauty Instagram can fill your feed with ads for beef-tallow lip balms, cleansing creams, sunscreen, and deodorants. (One brand even offers creamsicle-flavored beef-tallow personal lubricant, which is currently out of stock online.) Influencers praise tallow for clearing their acne and eczema—and offer discount codes so you can experience the same. Even the government's recent public-health messaging has veered toward the bovine. During his tenure as health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has championed cooking in beef tallow (which he says is healthier than seed oils) and drinking raw milk (one of many items that he claims are suppressed by the FDA). Casey Means, President Donald Trump's nominee for surgeon general, also supports raw milk; she has suggested that Americans can decide whether a given bottle is safe to drink by looking the dairy farmer in the eye and petting his cow. Means and Kennedy have largely avoided engaging with the many public-health experts who reject their views. But in May, after months of such critiques, Kennedy took shots of raw milk at the White House to celebrate the release of the 'Make America Healthy Again' report. Woo-woo, it seems, is becoming moo-moo. America has entered its cowmaxxing era. Like most wellness offerings, cow products are marketed with vague health claims that are virtually impossible to confirm or deny, such as 'deeply nourishes and supports the skin barrier,' 'activate cellular health,' and 'supports memory.' One of the many promises of the Ancestral Supplements Starter Pack of organ-based capsules is simply 'vitality.' (The company also includes a disclaimer that the FDA has not reviewed said vitality benefits.) Advocates of these goods tend to be more specific in their praise. Raw-milk enthusiasts claim that unpasteurized milk contains bioactive chemicals that improve human health. In one video, a woman drinks raw milk that's been in the fridge for more than a month; she claims it is safer to consume than store-bought pizza or salad and that it reduces rates of eczema, fevers, and respiratory infections. One smooth-skinned influencer, who says she hasn't washed her face in two years, claims that beef tallow is 'bioidentical' to the sebum produced by human skin. (It's not, because it's from cows.) Some of these products are more likely to provide benefits than others. Bone broth is indeed rich in collagen (which, when produced by the human body, strengthens hair and skin). Whey powder, made from leftover cheese water, does contain protein. But very few studies support the idea that eating more collagen strengthens hair and skin. Whey protein can help build lean muscle, but the body can only absorb so much at a time. Some dermatologists say tallow can strengthen and hydrate the skin; others say it clogs pores and should be avoided. Other products can be downright dangerous: Just this week, Florida officials announced that 21 people fell sick after consuming contaminated raw milk. At least part of the appeal of cowmaxxing is the cows themselves: The products evoke the pastoral ideal of a cow grazing freely in the plains, milked lovingly by human hands. It's an image that's been embedded in American culture for centuries. Consider how Laura Ingalls Wilder, who was no stranger to the harsh reality of farm life, described cow-raising in Little Town on the Prairie: 'Warm and sweet, the scent of new milk came up from the streams hissing into the rising foam, and it mixed with the scents of springtime.' It's enough to persuade a microbiologist to drink raw milk. In 21st-century America, cows still summon images of fields and clover and wide blue sky, enough to trigger the human tendency to believe that what's natural is 'fundamentally good,' Courtney Lappas, a biology professor at Lebanon Valley College, told me. Her research has shown that some Americans prefer natural over man-made products even when the former is described as objectively worse—a phenomenon her colleague Brian Meier has called the 'naturalness bias.' This tendency, which is prevalent across cultures, likely leads people to assume that unprocessed cow-based products are safe and healthy, she said. Tallow, some skin-care enthusiasts claim, is a healthier, safer alternative to conventional moisturizers, which supposedly contain toxic chemicals. The branding of such products, too, leans into the notion that natural is best: Fat Cow Skincare markets its tallow cosmetics as 'pure skincare, powered by nature'; Heart and Soil sells capsules of 'nature's superfood' (that is, organ meats). Other brands invoke nature through the prehistoric, with names such as Primal Harvest, Primal Kitchen, Primal FX, Primal Being, and Primal Queen. Ancestral Supplements' ad copy reads: 'Putting Back In What the Modern World Left Out.' America's current health landscape is the perfect setting for cowmaxxing to thrive. The naturalness bias is deeply ingrained in Kennedy's MAHA campaign, which aims to improve public health by returning to a more natural lifestyle. In Kennedy's view, beef tallow is superior to seed oil because it's less processed (some people even render it at home). The carnivore and tradwife movements embody a similar message, promoting the consumption of raw cow organs and making butter from scratch. You may not know what's in store-bought products, the thinking goes, but you do know what's in tallow: pure, unadulterated cow fat. And yet most modern cows live in a decidedly unnatural environment. The majority of U.S. cattle are fed genetically modified crops, and some genetically modified cows are allowed to be sold as food. Many cow-based wellness products bear the label 'grass-fed,' which suggests cows that were raised on pastures rather than feedlots. But the label is not strictly enforced, and it doesn't necessarily prohibit farmers from giving cows antibiotics or hormones. There's no guarantee that a cow whose colostrum is harvested to be sold by a tradwife on Instagram had a happy, bucolic existence. Not to mention that colostrum, whey, and placenta do not come out of the cow in the form of powders or pills. The spread of science misinformation, along with legitimate concerns about the state of public health in the United States, have left many Americans understandably confused about whether conventional science and Western medicine can be trusted in 2025. Getting to the bottom of, say, the seed-oil controversy requires engaging with thorny scientific debates that reference inscrutable research papers; embracing the natural and ancestral by opting for tallow is an attractively simple-seeming alternative. 'It brings with it a sense of purity or wholesomeness that is desirable right now,' Marianne Clark, a sociologist at Acadia University who studies wellness trends, told me. In this sense, cowmaxxing is not so much a health endeavor as it is a spiritual one, its promise downright biblical: Cowliness is next to godliness.
NBC News
2 hours ago
- NBC News
CDC staffers voice frustration over Kennedy's anti-vaccine rhetoric
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention staffers are voicing frustration over Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s past vaccine comments, following Friday's shooting at the agency's headquarters in Atlanta that left one police officer dead. Although the motive of the suspected shooter — Patrick White, 30, from Kennesaw — remains unknown, he told a neighbor that he believed the Covid vaccines had made him sick, a source told NBC News on the condition of anonymity. Kennedy is expected to visit CDC's headquarters later Monday to speak with staff, according to a person familiar with the matter. The shooting took place near the campuses of both the CDC, which includes an on campus daycare, and Emory University. For some employees, the shooting highlighted growing hostility toward public health officials, which they feel has been shaped by Kennedy's long history of spreading vaccine misinformation, including the Covid vaccine. In 2021, Kennedy filed a citizens' petition requesting that the Food and Drug Administration revoke the authorization of the Covid vaccines. The same year, he described the Covid shot as the 'deadliest vaccine ever made.' Just last week, Kennedy terminated 22 contracts focused on developing mRNA vaccines — the same technology used to develop Pfizer's and Moderna's Covid shots. In an announcement on X, Kennedy claimed 'mRNA technology poses more risks than benefits for these respiratory viruses.' In an emailed statement, Andrew Nixon, an HHS spokesperson, said Kennedy 'has unequivocally condemned the horrific attack and remains fully committed to ensuring the safety and well-being of CDC employees.' 'This is a time to stand in solidarity with our public health workforce,' Nixon said, 'not a moment for the media to exploit a tragedy for political gain.' Kennedy has not yet spoken publicly about vaccine misinformation that may have contributed to the shooting. Numerous studies have shown that the Covid vaccines are safe and effective. 'There's a lot of misinformation, a lot of really dangerous rhetoric that's currently being spread by the current administration, that makes us seem like villains, that makes us seem like our work is setting out to hurt people,' CDC employee Elizabeth Soda said in an interview. 'So it's not at all surprising, right, that people are going to listen to our leaders.' Likewise, in employee group chats, staffers are also voicing frustration. 'People feel like this is a natural progression when you spend years denigrating science and public health, spread misinformation about vaccines and publicly attack federal workers,' said one CDC employees who was granted anonymity for fear of repercussions. 'Folks, myself included, are pissed off,' the source added. An employee at the Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees the CDC, said it's not lost on them that Kennedy 'has demonized our work.' In an email obtained by NBC News, Kennedy told CDC staff on Saturday that he was praying for the entire agency, adding that the shooting was 'deeply unsettling,' especially for those working in Atlanta.
