logo
World Cup: A Year Out, Growing Attacks on Rights

World Cup: A Year Out, Growing Attacks on Rights

(Amsterdam) - The Federation Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) should take immediate and demonstrable steps to safeguard human rights for all people involved in the 2026 FIFA Men's World Cup, the Sport & Rights Alliance said today. With just one year until the monumental event kicks off across the United States, Canada, and Mexico, and only days until the Club World Cup kicks off on June 14, 2025, escalating attacks on human rights and civil freedoms threaten to undermine FIFA's human rights commitments and responsibilities.
"In 2018, the US, Mexico, and Canada provided clear human rights commitments in their bid documents to host the 2026 FIFA Men's World Cup," said Andrea Florence, executive director of the Sport & Rights Alliance. "Despite FIFA's mantra that 'football unites the world,' a World Cup held under discriminatory and exclusionary policies risks deepening social divides rather than bridging them. FIFA should exert its leverage and demand concrete, legally binding guarantees that human rights won't be further sacrificed for the sake of the game."
In its statutes, Human Rights Policy, and 2026 Bidding Process Guide, FIFA accepts its responsibility to respect human rights in line with the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The Bidding Process Guide specifically requires would-be hosts to document their commitment to "ensur[ing] that the hosting and staging of the Competition do[es] not involve adverse impacts on internationally recognized human rights." The guide gives particular attention to "labor rights, the rights of children, gender equality, freedom of expression and peaceful assembly, and protecting all individuals from all forms of discrimination."
The Sport & Rights Alliance has identified several critical areas where government policies in the 2026 host countries, particularly the United States under President Donald Trump, pose significant and immediate risks to the human rights of immigrants; freedom of the press and free expression; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) rights; safety for children; and the right to be free from discrimination, requiring urgent and transparent intervention.
Discriminatory Immigration Policies
FIFA anticipates that as many as 6.5 million people could attend the 2026 tournament across the host countries. The current US administration's abusive immigration policies, including enforced disappearances under the Alien Enemies Act, travel bans, increased detention, and visa restrictions, threaten the inclusivity and global nature of the World Cup.
Despite President Trump's executive order stating that teams qualifying for the 2026 Men's World Cup will be exempt from travel bans, as of now fans and extended family members from banned countries will not be allowed to enter the United States. Delays, denials, and the real prospect of detention for fans, media, and other participants from specific countries could severely disrupt the tournament.
"FIFA should publicly acknowledge the threat US immigration and other anti-human rights policies pose to the tournament's integrity and use its leverage with the US government to ensure that the rights of all qualified teams, support staff, media, and fans are respected as they seek to enter the United States regardless of nationality, gender identity, religion, or opinion," said Minky Worden, director of global initiatives at Human Rights Watch. "FIFA should establish clear benchmarks and timelines for the US policy changes needed to ensure respect for immigrants' rights during the 2026 World Cup and beyond."
Human Rights Watch wrote to FIFA on May 5 to say that it should use its leverage to push the Trump administration to roll back discriminatory immigration policies in the United States. FIFA responded on June 3, stating that it "expects ... host countries take measures to ensure that any eligible persons who are involved in the Competition are able to enter the respective countries," and "is actively working on this matter with relevant authorities." FIFA also said it would engage with relevant authorities if it becomes aware of human rights concerns.
"Fans travel to the World Cup to celebrate and express their passion, and any attempt to curtail our fundamental rights, including the right to free speech, is a betrayal of the spirit of football," said Ronan Evain, executive director of Football Supporters Europe. "We're particularly concerned about the potential for selective enforcement and discrimination against fans based on our perceived political views or national origin. FIFA must obtain the necessary guarantees to ensure fans from all over the world are able to safely travel and attend the games."
Right to Protest; Freedom of Expression
With the 2026 Men's World Cup potentially serving as a spotlight for public criticism and controversy, the escalating crackdowns on freedom of expression and peaceful assembly, particularly for people engaged in speech and protest related to Palestinian rights, is deeply troubling, the alliance said. Students and activists have been detained and their visas revoked for speaking out about their views. The Trump administration has also deployed National Guard troops to Los Angeles following protests against immigration arrests, claiming they constitute an act of "rebellion" against the government.
FIFA's stated commitments to free expression have also previously been contradicted when it has imposed rules prohibiting players and fans from making political or religious statements. At the 2022 Men's World Cup in Qatar, for example, Iranian fans displaying "Woman, Life, Freedom" banners were removed from stadiums, while rainbow flags were confiscated at a number of matches.
"The ability to peacefully protest without fear of retribution is a cornerstone of a free society, yet is increasingly under threat in the United States," said Daniel Norona, Americas advocacy director at Amnesty International USA. "There is a long history of peaceful protest in global football. FIFA and the US authorities must ensure that the World Cup does not become a pretext for stifling dissent or expanding mass surveillance, and every player, fan, journalist, and resident can participate and protest without fear of sanction, arbitrary detention or discriminatory treatment."
Discrimination, Violence against LGBTI People
The increasing legislative and rhetorical attacks on the rights of LGBTI people, particularly transgender people in the United States, underscore the current administration's intention to erase transgender people from public life and dismantle crucial human rights protections. Discriminatory laws and the hostile political climate around LGBTI rights in the United States could directly threaten the security, bodily autonomy, dignity, and inclusion of LGBTI fans, players, and workers at the 2026 Men's World Cup.
In Mexico, LGBTI people, and especially trans and gender-diverse people, face violence across the country, which affects their daily lives and participation in public events. Federal and state authorities should take urgent steps to prevent and punish violence against LGBTI people, with particular attention to the specific risks faced by trans and gender-diverse communities.
"The alarming discrimination and violence against LGBTI individuals in the United States and Mexico cast a chilling shadow over the promise of an inclusive World Cup," said Gurchaten Sandhu, director of programs at ILGA World. "As organizer of the event, FIFA should demand that all host cities and states uphold universal human rights, ensuring no fan, worker, or athlete faces discrimination based on their sexual orientation, gender expression, gender identity, or sex characteristics, and that any discriminatory laws are actively challenged and nullified."
Press Freedom
Journalists covering the 2026 Men's World Cup face distinct and alarming risks in both Mexico and the United States. Mexico consistently ranks among one of world's most dangerous and deadly countries for media professionals, who face threats, harassment, and violence from both organized crime and public officials. The pervasive impunity for these crimes creates a chilling effect and zones of silence in which critical information is suppressed. In the United States, journalists could face intrusive screening, social media monitoring, and be denied entry based on perceived political views, undermining their ability to report independently.
"Journalists covering the World Cup must be granted unimpeded access, free from arbitrary restrictions, detention, or violence," said Antoine Bernard, advocacy and assistance director at Reporters Without Borders (RSF). "FIFA and the local authorities must implement exceptional measures to protect all media workers - not only ensuring smooth entry for foreign press but actively safeguarding all journalists who will be covering large crowds, excited spectators, and potential protests, and addressing the systemic impunity that allows violence against them to persist. Local law enforcement's policies need to be strengthened to ensure the distinction of journalists from demonstrators, bystanders, and fans, and they must clearly communicate the policies they intend to follow in ensuring this distinction, in full respect of journalists' freedom and independence."
Labor Rights
The immense scale of the 2026 Men's World Cup will necessitate a massive workforce in host cities to staff stadiums, hospitality, transport, and more. The Trump administration's dismantling of federal programs and anti-union sentiment increase the risk of exploitation and child labor, wage theft, and unsafe working conditions for these critical workers.
"The extensive network of contracts for stadium construction, hospitality, and event services in the host cities must be built on a foundation of respect for workers' rights," said Luc Triangle, general secretary of the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC). "We are gravely concerned that without strong, enforceable labor protections, this tournament will inadvertently fuel precarious work and child labor, suppress wages, and deny workers their fundamental rights to organize and bargain collectively. FIFA must demand robust social dialogue and binding agreements to protect every worker contributing to this World Cup."
Transparency and Anti-Corruption
The Sport & Rights Alliance also harbors significant concerns related to low governmental transparency and weak anti-corruption regulations in and around the 2026 Men's World Cup, particularly given recent policy shifts in the United States and Mexico. As the tournament approaches, robust oversight and unwavering commitment to ethical principles are needed to prevent the exploitation of this global event for private gain at the expense of human rights and public trust.
"The 2026 FIFA World Cup will take place in a global context where anti-corruption efforts are increasingly under strain," said Tor Dlvik, special adviser at Transparency International. "All host countries and FIFA must uphold their anti-corruption responsibilities by establishing comprehensive risk management mechanisms that close potential loopholes for corruption, and reliable systems for detecting and reporting irregularities. Full transparency regarding all expenditures related to the World Cup-before, during, and after the events-will be vital in building trust and ensuring integrity throughout the process."
FIFA's Responsibility
FIFA, as the chief actor responsible for an event that will leave a tremendous footprint, needs to conduct an updated human rights due diligence assessment and unequivocally leverage its influence to ensure that the 2026 Men's World Cup is a rights-respecting and rights-advancing event.
A new human rights due diligence assessment should consider the need for tangible commitments to reverse discriminatory policies, strengthen protections for historically marginalized groups, ensure substantial accountability for human rights abuses, and establish truly effective, transparent, and independent grievance mechanisms for people to seek support and a remedy. Failure to act decisively risks irrevocably tarnishing the legacy of the 2026 FIFA Men's World Cup and setting a dangerous precedent for future mega-sporting events.
***
The Sport & Rights Alliance's mission is to promote the rights and well-being of those most affected by human rights risks associated with the delivery of sport. Its partners include Amnesty International, The Army of Survivors, Football Supporters Europe, Human Rights Watch, ILGA World (The International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association), the International Trade Union Confederation, Reporters Without Borders, Transparency International, and World Players Association, UNI Global Union. As a global coalition of leading nongovernmental organizations and trade unions, the Sport & Rights Alliance works together to ensure sports bodies, governments, and other relevant stakeholders give rise to a world of sport that protects, respects, and fulfills international standards for human rights, labor rights, child wellbeing and safeguarding, and anti-corruption.
Source: Human Rights Watch

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Canada-U.S. talks on economic and security deal intensify: sources
Canada-U.S. talks on economic and security deal intensify: sources

CTV News

time31 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Canada-U.S. talks on economic and security deal intensify: sources

Prime Minister Mark Carney and U.S. President Donald Trump meet in the White House in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, May 6, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld The U.S. and Canada have intensified talks for an economic and security deal in recent weeks — with a framework for such an arrangement trading hands between the two parties — sources tell CTV News. Sources who spoke to CTV News on the condition of anonymity all universally cautioned the finalizing of such a deal requires sign-off directly from U.S. President Donald Trump, and there are no explicit assurances that will happen on a certain timeline. A senior government source, speaking on background, also confirmed that documents are going back and forth between Canadian and American sides of the negotiating table, but would not confirm the documents' contents. The source described it as 'part of a normal negotiation,' adding the government 'will not negotiate in public.' Sources say there has been substantial progress on a deal, but that Trump's own mercurial nature, plus recent domestic pressures — such as the protests in Los Angeles, Calif. and the president's feud with billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk — are making any certainty around a timeline even more unpredictable. The U.S. and Canada have been embroiled in a trade war since February, when the president began implementing a series of tariffs on Canadian goods. Prime Minister Mark Carney has frequently said in response to Trump's levies that the decades-old Canada-U.S. relationship is 'over,' but that a new economic and security relationship between the two countries remains possible. Speaking to reporters on his way into a caucus meeting Wednesday morning, Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne said the talks are a 'very dynamic situation,' adding he would defer to the prime minister and the minister responsible for Canada-U.S. trade. 'We're all on the same page. We're fighting for Canada, we're fighting for industry, making sure that they understand that this is damaging on both sides of the border,' Champagne said. Last week, Industry Minister Melanie Joly confirmed Carney and Trump have been in direct talks in recent weeks, with readouts of those calls not being made public. Meanwhile, during a fireside chat hosted at the Canadian Club of Ottawa on Wednesday, U.S. Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra said that 'all the indications are that we could move to a very positive agreement.' 'Let's see what's in here, because there's also the possibility you could end up with something like no deal or whatever,' Hoekstra said. 'That wouldn't be ideal, but until a deal is announced, you really won't know what's in it, and you won't know that it's finalized.' Hoekstra, who attended the luncheon following Carney's visit to Washington last month, also said the two leaders are 'in a hurry to get things done,' adding 'the pace is unprecedented.' 'Premature to break out the champagne': Bolton Former U.S. National Security Advisor John Bolton said in an interview on CTV Power Play with Vassy Kapelos on Tuesday that he too has heard of increased speculation of an imminent deal, but cautioned 'there could still be a long way to go.' 'I think that is a risk,' Bolton said, when asked whether a deal in the traditional sense is possible with Trump, considering the president's tariffs contravene the existing trade pact he signed during his first term. 'I think what Trump wants more than anything else is to be able to announce that he's got a deal that solves the problem. Now, whether it does or not is, is anybody's guess.' 'I think it's premature, based on the speculation to break out the champagne,' Bolton also said. Carney announced Monday that he plans to boost spending to finally meet the NATO target of spending two per cent of GDP on defence this year. That's later than Canada first signed onto the target more than a decade ago, but five years earlier than Carney committed to during the election. 'It's probably worth what you paid for it,' Bolton told Kapelos. 'It is a sore point for many Americans, not just Donald Trump, that going back to (former U.S. president) Barack Obama, who called NATO allies who didn't hit the two per cent target 'free riders.'' 'And if that's part of the deal, I could see that coming,' added Bolton, who served as National Security Advisor from 2018-2019, during Trump's first term as president. With files from CTV News Chief Political Correspondent Vassy Kapelos, Senior Political Correspondent Mike Le Couteur, and Supervising Producer Stephanie Ha

Protests at G7 summit in Alberta set to be largely peaceful, targeting Trump policies
Protests at G7 summit in Alberta set to be largely peaceful, targeting Trump policies

CTV News

time31 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Protests at G7 summit in Alberta set to be largely peaceful, targeting Trump policies

Demonstrators hold a banner reading: "No war, No G7 " during a protest against the G7 summit in Fasano, southern Italy, Saturday, June 15, 2024. (AP Photo/Gregorio Borgia) EDMONTON — Protests during the upcoming G7 leaders summit in Kananaskis, Alta., may be starkly different than demonstrations happening this week against immigration crackdowns in the United States. A University of Toronto research group that has been monitoring the meetings of world leaders since 1998 says its analysis shows Canadian protests are more peaceful and smaller. But similar to the recent demonstrations in Los Angeles, they're likely to be against the policies of U.S. President Donald Trump. 'The Los Angeles protests will add another (issue) the protesters going there already care about, but it won't do anything much more than that,' said John Kirton, director of the G7 Research Group. 'I don't think it'll bring more protesters, too. Nor will the L.A. protests delay Trump from coming here.' Prime Minister Mark Carney is hosting Trump and world leaders from France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, Italy and the European Union for the three-day summit starting Sunday in the Rocky Mountains southwest of Calgary. Leaders of several non-member countries, including India, Ukraine and Mexico, are also set to attend. The summit comes as protests in the United States continue against Trump's immigration raids, particularly his government's detainment of migrants. Hundreds of marines have joined about 4,000 National Guard troops in Los Angeles. The protests have seen clashes with police, burned cars, rubber bullets shot at journalists and arrests. In Alberta, Kirton said protests during the G7 are not expected to be the same. '(The G7's) distinctive mission from the very beginning was to promote within its own members the values of open democracy,' he said. 'In democracies, people are supposed to protest. It's an integral part.' It's unlikely Canada's government would respond to any clashes like Trump, by calling in the military, Kirton added. The remote Kananaskis location will be closed off to the public. Visuals and audio of protesters at three demonstration zones designated by the RCMP — two in downtown Calgary and one in Banff — are to be shown to the leaders and other delegates at the summit on TV screens. Another zone at the Calgary airport won't be broadcast. Kirton said the distance between officials and protesters ensures the summit unfolds peacefully. 'Trump has been subjected to two assassination attempts, and one almost killed him. So you can see why (RCMP) have to be hypervigilant,' Kirton said. The Calgary Raging Grannies group plans to be at the protest zone at Calgary City Hall on Sunday afternoon. Mary Oxendale-Spensley, 74, said the grandmothers will be far from raging and clashing with police when they call out Trump's tariffs and his pitch to annex Canada. 'We do intend to sing,' said the retired teacher. One of their songs in the lineup: 'U.S.A., you have got a problem.' The song calls the U.S. president an 'orange blob' because of his tan, says he's 'way out of line,' and declares 'our sovereign nation will never be yours,' said Oxendale-Spensley. Ensuring Trump hears their message is vital, she said, even if it's on a screen. 'I'm a Canadian. I was Canadian when I was born. I intend to be a Canadian when I die.' It's hard to say how many grannies will be at the protest, she added. 'My big complaint about the grannies always is that we're grannies. People get sick, people break their ankle, that kind of thing.' Protests at the last G7 summit in Kananaskis in 2002 were peaceful, Kirton said, as demonstrators were also given designated zones. 'I do remember most vividly it was very hot,' Kirton said, and there were not many protesters. 'There were so few of them and it was so peaceful that we didn't even bother to estimate a number.' Aside from protests against Trump, some are expected to address other issues — like calling for an end to the Israel-Hamas war and Russia's war in Ukraine, Kirton said. Kirton said he also anticipates a presence from Canadians who want Alberta to separate from Canada, as well as those opposed to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Tensions have been high between Canada and India since 2023, when former prime minister Justin Trudeau told the House of Commons that agents of the Indian government were linked to the killing of a Canadian activist for Sikh separatism outside a gurdwara in Surrey, B.C. The World Sikh Organization of Canada said inviting Modi to the G7 is unacceptable. The International League of Peoples' Struggles, an international alliance of grassroots organizations, is expecting about 200 people for a protest also at Calgary City Hall. Yasmeen Khan, vice-chair of the group's North America chapter, said protesters want to raise awareness about various issues, including Indigenous struggles, housing and climate change. 'We'll have banners. We'll be chanting,' she said. 'We will also have some cultural performances from some Indigenous artists and migrant youth.' Mounties said first responders are prepared for protests. 'While the number of participants may vary, we have strong situational awareness of anticipated demonstrations and are well positioned to respond accordingly,' said RCMP spokesman Fraser Logan. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 12, 2025. Fakiha Baig, The Canadian Press

Democratic governors defend immigration policies before Republican-led House panel
Democratic governors defend immigration policies before Republican-led House panel

Toronto Star

timean hour ago

  • Toronto Star

Democratic governors defend immigration policies before Republican-led House panel

WASHINGTON (AP) — As President Donald Trump spars with California's governor over immigration enforcement, Republicans in Congress called other Democratic governors to the Capitol on Thursday to question them over policies limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities. Members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform sat in front of large, full-color posters showing men who they said were in the country illegally when they were arrested for crimes in Illinois, Minnesota and New York — home of the governors testifying before the committee.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store