Samsung launches ultra-slim Galaxy S25 Edge smartphone in S. Korea
Samsung Electronics Co. released the Galaxy S25 Edge, its thinnest smartphone to date, in South Korea on Friday, featuring a sleek 5.8-millimeter profile and a lightweight design at just 163 grams.
Despite its slim form factor, the S25 Edge boasts high-end camera capabilities on par with the flagship Galaxy S25 Ultra model. It comes equipped with a 200-megapixel wide-angle main camera and a 12-megapixel ultra-wide lens for expansive framing.
The device includes all Galaxy artificial intelligence-powered editing tools available in the S25 series. It runs on the latest Galaxy-exclusive Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, Samsung's most powerful mobile processor to date.
The S25 Edge is available in three colors -- Titanium Silver, Titanium Jet Black and Titanium Ice Blue -- and comes in 256 gigabyte and 512 gigabyte variants with an entry price of 1,496,000 won ($1,081)
"The Galaxy S25 Edge is a culmination of top-tier design and performance with no compromise," said Roh Tae-moon, acting head of Samsung's device experience division. (Yonhap)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
2 days ago
- Korea Herald
Could glass help Samsung crack next semiconductor conundrum?
Glass substrates inch closer to commercialization — poised to redefine performance, power efficiency in chips Glass substrates, long viewed as a promising next-generation component in advanced chip packaging, are now nearing real-world deployment, as Samsung Electronics signals a transition away from conventional silicon interposers. According to industry sources Wednesday, Samsung plans to adopt glass substrate interposers for its advanced semiconductors by 2028 to 'meet customer demands.' While the company neither confirmed nor denied the development, it stated, 'We are investing in (research and development) and preparing in line with industry trends.' In semiconductor manufacturing, interposers are critical in advanced packaging technologies. They connect high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips with graphics processing units (GPUs) or other logic chips, enabling faster data transfer and improved overall performance. Although chipmakers have traditionally relied on silicon substrates for their manufacturing maturity and compatibility, they are increasingly exploring glass as a high-performance alternative that offers improved energy efficiency. 'If glass substrates are successfully adopted, they could become a very attractive material,' said a chip materials professor on condition of anonymity. 'But there are still significant hurdles to clear before they can be commercialized.' A game changer for advanced packaging Glass core substrates are widely seen as a potential game changer in the semiconductor landscape. They serve as thin, rigid platforms that allow for side-by-side mounting of logic and memory chips, forming the foundation of high-performance computing systems. Their advantages are substantial: exceptional heat resistance, ultra-flat surfaces for greater chip density and finer patterning capabilities. According to SKC, the parent company of glass substrate maker Absolics, the material can improve chip processing speeds by up to 40 percent and reduce power consumption by more than 40 percent compared to traditional silicon substrates. Despite these benefits, commercialization has been slow, primarily due to the brittleness of glass and the high-precision demands of the manufacturing process. Nevertheless, leading chipmakers — including Samsung, Intel, AMD, Broadcom and Nvidia — are actively exploring the adoption of glass substrates in their next-generation chip products. 'Competition in the chip market is intensifying, and players are constantly seeking breakthroughs to set themselves apart,' said Lee Byung-hun, professor of electrical engineering at Pohang University of Science and Technology. 'It's encouraging that Samsung continues to pursue differentiation to strengthen its competitive edge.' Amid growing momentum, the global glass substrate market is projected to grow from $7.2 billion in 2024 to $10.3 billion by 2034, according to market tracker Global Market Insight. Who's winning the game? The first company expected to commercialize glass core substrates is Absolics, a semiconductor materials subsidiary of SKC. The firm has already begun prototype production at its Georgia, US facility, which boasts an annual capacity of 12,000 square meters. Absolics is currently undergoing product qualification with clients and aims to complete preparations for mass production within this year. Its Georgia plant, completed in the first half of last year, made Absolics the first Korean firm to receive $40 million in subsidies under the US CHIPS and Science Act — part of a broader $75 million support package from the US government. Samsung Electro-Mechanics, which announced its entry into the glass substrate market last year, aims to produce its first prototype by the second quarter of this year. It has reportedly begun operating a pilot line at its Sejong plant. LG Innotek is also preparing to enter the space, building a pilot line at its Gumi plant and planning to begin prototype production by year-end. As a latecomer, the company aims to differentiate itself through a strategic partnership with a 'major North American client,' according to its CEO. While companies are racing to develop prototypes in 2024, experts caution that the timeline for full commercialization remains uncertain. 'Company activities are largely driven by client interest, but that does not necessarily guarantee immediate deployment,' said another professor specializing in glass core technologies, also requesting anonymity. 'Absolics, for instance, announced more than a year ago that it had begun product qualification with clients, but no results have been disclosed to date.' 'Glass substrates clearly offer compelling advantages,' the professor added. 'But so do their limitations, especially in terms of long-term reliability. Their use will depend heavily on specific applications, and competing materials remain in play. So while the potential is there, it's still too early to speak with certainty.'
Korea Herald
2 days ago
- Korea Herald
Samsung hit with $117m judgment over patent infringement against Maxell
Samsung Electronics was ordered by a US federal jury to pay $117.7 million in damages to Japanese electronics firm Maxell for infringing on several technology patents related to smart home platforms and smartphones. The verdict, delivered by a federal jury in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas on Wednesday, sided with Maxell that Samsung's Galaxy smartphones, tablets and other devices infringe on three of Maxell's US patents related to the unlocking function on devices, managing data and the reproduction of images and videos. The verdict, however, is not a final ruling and could be subject to appeal. The case dates back to September 2023, when Maxell sued Samsung alleging the tech giant violated seven patents by producing and selling a wide range of products, including the SmartThings station, smartphones, laptops and home appliances. According to the complaint, Samsung and Maxell's relationship dates to 2011 when Samsung signed a licensing agreement with Maxell's predecessor Hitachi Consumer Electronics to use 10 of its patents for a 10-year period. The agreement expired in 2021, but Samsung continued to use the patented technology without renewing the license. Maxell argued that it contacted Samsung about the violations and to request a new licensing agreement, but Samsung refused. Instead, the Korean company continue to make and sell products with the disputed technology, prompting Maxell to pursue legal action in multiple jurisdictions, including the US, Germany, Japan and the US International Trade Commission. Since then, Maxell has been stepping up its legal offensive. In April, it filed another lawsuit against Samsung in Texas alleging a similar patent violation.
Korea Herald
3 days ago
- Korea Herald
Spinoff or stay? Samsung's foundry dilemma back in spotlight
Experts say spinning off lackluster foundry could boost trust, competitiveness, but Samsung says it's too early Samsung Electronics is again facing speculations that it may spin off its foundry business from the broader semiconductor division, amid concerns over the same conflicts of interest that drove Samsung Biologics to split its biosimilar business and contract drug manufacturing. Last week, Samsung Biologics, the biotech arm of Samsung Group, announced it will spin off its biosimilar subsidiary Samsung Bioepis into an independent entity. Once the deal is completed, Samsung Biologics will only retain its contract development and manufacturing organization, a strategic move aimed to address growing customer and investor concerns about potential conflicts of interest in its competing business lines. A similar conflict of interest conundrum has long weighed on Samsung Electronics' Device Solution division, which houses three distinct yet interconnected semiconductor operations under one roof: memory chips, foundry and System LSI. While the foundry manufactures chips for fabless companies, System LSI is responsible for designing logic chips, including Samsung's own Exynos. This dual role as both a chip designer and a manufacturer has raised concerns over possible technology leakage and inherent conflicts of interest for years. 'Trust is critical in the foundry business," said an industry source who requested anonymity. "For fabless companies like Nvidia and Qualcomm that don't manufacture their own chips and rely on foundries, there's always concern that sensitive design data could be exposed to competitors. Spinning off the foundry business would reduce these risks and make Samsung more competitive." Growing calls for spinoff Many market analysts have been calling on Samsung to carve out its foundry unit, arguing that organizational independence would help the company respond quickly to clients' demands and scale faster to keep up with technological advancement. Even the conglomerate's financial subsidiary Samsung Securities, recommended that Samsung spin off the foundry and list on the US market in a 2022 report. The broader semiconductor industry is also moving away from integrated device manufacturer models like Samsung -- where a single company handles both chip design and manufacturing -- toward a more specialized structure such as a fabless-foundry partnership. A fellow IDM Intel is also reportedly exploring a similar path, considering spinning off its foundry unit, potentially as a joint venture with TSMC. Another factor driving the spinoff discussion is financial. Analysts say Samsung's underperforming foundry unit is dragging down Samsung Electronics' bottom line. In the first quarter of 2025, Samsung's DS division reported revenue of 25.1 trillion won ($18.17 billion) and an operating profit of 1.1 trillion won, down 42 percent on-year and marked the third consecutive quarter of decline. This figure falls far short of the 7 trillion won profit posted by smaller chipmaking rival SK hynix posted during the same period. While Samsung does not disclose performance by specific business unit, industry sources estimated that memory chip operations posted around 3 trillion won in operating profit, which was offset by 2 trillion won losses in System LSI and foundry. This sluggish performance of its non-memory chip units strengthens the argument for a spinoff, yet paradoxically, this same weakness makes near-term divestiture less feasible. Too early to split? 'In principle, Samsung's spinoff would be ideal, similar to TSMC, whose specialization in foundry services has earned trust from customers,' said Lee Jong-hwan, a system semiconductor engineering professor at Sangmyung University. 'But right now, Samsung foundry remains in the red, and splitting off under these conditions would be meaningless. The company must first return to profitability and then consider a spinoff when it's ready. It's too early for now." Given the capital-intensive nature of the foundry business, any separation would require a stable revenue stream and securing major clients, both of which Samsung currently lacks, observers say. If Samsung were to spin off its foundry unit, it would lose key advantages of operating under the umbrella of Samsung Electronics. Despite continued losses, the foundry has managed to stay afloat and conduct large-scale investments, largely due to the tech giant's strong earnings from its memory and consumer electronics businesses, including smartphones. Amid growing speculation, Samsung is not considering a spinoff of its foundry unit at this time, according to a source familiar with the matter. Even Samsung Electronics Chair Lee Jae-yong appears reluctant on the idea. 'We are hungry to grow the business. Not interested in spinning (them) off,' Lee told Reuters last October in the Philippines, when asked whether the tech giant is considering spinning off the foundry. Professor Lee noted that Samsung envisions becoming a successful IDM capable of excelling in both memory and non-memory. In an era where AI chips are reshaping the semiconductor industry, Samsung could gain a competitive edge if it can develop and produce AI critical high-bandwidth memory chips entirely in-house. "Samsung first needs approval from Nvidia for its HBM chips to become a trusted AI chip supplier," said Professor Lee. "If that happens everything changes. But until then, the priority is profitability. Only after that can a spinoff or any kind of restructuring make strategic sense."
