logo
How to 'Trust Your Gut' With Confidence

How to 'Trust Your Gut' With Confidence

Entrepreneur07-05-2025

There are many things that can get in the way of hearing your inner voice, with all of its useful wisdom. Here's how to cut through the noise.
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
If you listen to enough interviews with entrepreneurs, there's one piece of advice you will hear over and over: Trust your gut.
Unfortunately, this may be the least practical advice ever, because "trusting your gut" looks and feels different to everyone. And if you're a billionaire who has built and sold ten companies, trusting your gut may seem like a more valid strategy than if you're Joe Shmoe starting a dog food business in his garage. After all, Joe's gut doesn't have much of a track record.
But this is exactly why I wrote my book Everyday Intuition: What Psychology, Science and Psychics Can Teach Us About Finding and Trusting Our Inner Voice. Intuition is just another word for "trusting your gut," and I believe it's a tool that we can all learn to use.
One of the funny paradoxes about intuition is that it is both derided as not real, and then trotted out in the highest-stakes moments. When faced with the choice between two jobs or two apartments or two romantic partners that both have an equal ledger of pros and cons, where there is no clear winner, what do you do? You go with your gut. It's a fine idea, in theory, but why should you trust your gut at these critical junctures when you haven't practiced using it in the day-to-day? We need to cultivate everyday intuition.
When I first started writing about intuition, it felt like trying to staple Jell-O to the wall. Because, what the hell is it? I'd use a very technical term, like "vibe." That didn't exactly seem like something you could take to the bank. Intuition is indeed a vibe, and it's also knowing without knowing why (I'd argue the "why" isn't all that relevant, but your knowing is), and it's direction: Go this way, not that, move toward this and away from that. You can't always show your work to mark how you got from point A to point B, and that can make you doubt the final destination.
But after exploring intuition from many different angles — neuroscientific, corporeal, psychological, metaphysical, spiritual, and the plain old pragmatic — I realized something. While intuition is often derided as irrational, illogical, and fanciful, intuition actually is data.
As I did research for this book, I spoke to scientists and psychics alike who study and use intuition. While a psychic might contend that intuition is the province of the spirit, neuroscientists attribute it to the brain. Neuroscientist Patrick House describes the brain thusly: "a thriftstore bin of evolutionary hacks Russian-dolled into a watery, salty piñata we call a head." Our brain's main job is to keep us alive, and recognizing patterns rapidly is an evolutionary asset.
So, to neuroscientists, intuition is pattern recognition and memory retrieval that happens superfast, below the level of our consciousness, and often results in biofeedback (sweaty palms, a lump forming in your throat, a wave of nausea). Our brains process the data and spit it out in sweat and feelings. Our minds make meaning from it. Our bodies are inextricably linked to it all. Attempting to locate an Intuition Central in the brain is kind of a fool's errand (one this fool spent many hours trying to find) because of the complex and dynamic interplay of the human beast.
Related: 4 Reasons Intuition Is an Essential Leadership Skill
From the scientific perspective, intuition is our brains recognizing patterns in the world and sending signals about the meaning of those patterns at light speed, often subperceptual and through biofeedback. Think: your palms sweat when you hear a certain song on the radio that you associate with a memory, even a deeply buried one. So, intuition is an ensemble of brain processes like memory activation, unconscious processing, and prediction. We make predictions based on past experience, and if you have a lot of experience in a given area — reading people, for example — then your intuitions probably come fast and correct. Since that super rapid processing of information is a wildly adaptive trait for humans living in complex environments, here's the good news: Intuition — you have it! You're born with it. You don't have to sit there wondering whether you are intuitive or not. You are.
This is why labeling intuition as an out-there, mystical thing actually makes no sense. Intuition, from the science perspective, is literally everything that's ever happened to you that you are able to draw upon to make meaning quickly and efficiently. Because intuitive hits do sometimes come out of "nowhere" (even though "nowhere" is actually "everywhere") it can feel otherworldly. As cognitive neuroscientist Sara Laszlo said on Voices in the River, intuition is "practicing so much it feels like magic."
Another reason why intuitive data can feel so slippery is because people experience intuition differently. For me personally, intuition is both very embodied and very intellectual. I get sensations in my body, like constriction in my throat, when I don't like something or someone. Or if I think something or someone is great, I'll feel a warmth and expansion across my chest. Sometimes I'll get an intuitive hit that is just a complete sentence, like "That's a good idea," or "Stop, stay away." But you know what else says "Stop, stay away?!" Anxiety, intuition's evil twin.
Related: How to Blend Data and Intuition for Better Decision-Making
That's why intuition can be such a mess. But if we apply the framework of our scientist friends — intuition is pattern recognition based on expertise — then the best thing we can do is to become experts in ourselves. How and when do you pick up intuitive information? This is where the clairs are very helpful.
This sort of thing might easily be cast as "out there," but I prefer to think of the clairs simply as learning styles.
There's clairvoyance (clear seeing), clairaudience (clear hearing), claircognizance (clear knowing), clairintellect (clear thinking), clairempathy (clear emotion), clairtangency (clear touching), clairalience (clear smelling), clairgustance (clear tasting), and other clairs not on this list that you might experience. They are useful shorthand for how you know what you know, and I believe we can conceptualize them broadly. Take clairvoyance, for example: the image that might spring to mind is someone gazing into a crystal ball. But clairvoyance can be much more than that. It can mean getting images, yes, but it also might mean noticing visual signs in your life.
I vividly remember standing on the street and reading an annoying email. I looked up, and right before me was some graffiti that read, "Please go away." Coincidence? Maybe, but noticing that little visual message made me smile and shrank my irritation, preventing me from getting totally hijacked.
Clairempathy can be picking up on other people's emotions, feeling what other people are feeling — or just getting a specific feeling about something yourself. Clairintellect? You just know.
Spend some time — a week, a month — noting how you experience intuition. Is it a constriction in your throat, a drop in your stomach, a warm expanse across your chest (clairsentience)? Perhaps when meeting a new client or contractor you might get a distinct download like "This person is going to screw me over" or "This person is going to be a wonderful collaborator" (clairintellect). But even more broadly, ask yourself: When you have an intuition, do you feel it in your body? Does it come to you in a sentence? Do you get visual flashes or notice objects in your visual field that take on a special significance?
There are a bunch of quizzes you can take to learn your clair. Here are a few.
But... I have a feeling you probably already know.
If you'd like more common sense insights on intuition, you can find them in my book, Everyday Intuition, or my newsletter, "Letters of Intuition."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why We're Dodging These 3 Gold CEFs (Even With Gold Soaring)
Why We're Dodging These 3 Gold CEFs (Even With Gold Soaring)

Forbes

time31 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Why We're Dodging These 3 Gold CEFs (Even With Gold Soaring)

A lump of gold on a stone floor getty Here's a surprise from a die-hard closed-end fund (CEF) fan like me: Sometimes CEFs aren't your best bet. I'll admit, that's tough for me to say—especially when the average CEF yields a historically high 9.1%. (CEF yields are usually around 8.5%). That high yield partly reflects the fact that many CEFs are trading at steep discounts to their net asset value (NAV). Translation: The fund is trading for less than what its underlying portfolio is worth. That, in turn, has resulted in lower prices among some CEFs, along with higher yields (as yields and prices move in opposite directions). All of this simply means that CEFs are generally out of favor right now, which is an opportunity for us. But not every CEF is ripe for buying. We especially want to avoid the three top performers among CEFs with market caps over $200 million: ASA Gold and Precious Metals (ASA), the Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and the Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF). The fact that these funds have booked strong runs this year shouldn't come as a surprise: They're all gold funds, and gold has taken off due to rising economic uncertainty (the usual fuel for the yellow metal). Even so, as you can see, there are some clear differences in performance here, and those are worth unpacking. Gold Funds Ycharts Above we see that the Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust—with the somewhat confusing 'CEF' ticker, not to be confused with CEFs in general (in purple)—and PHYS (in blue) have similar returns to the benchmark SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) ETF (in green), at around 25%. Then there's ASA (in orange), which has more than doubled even the best of these three other funds. There is some logic at work here. For starters, PHYS and GLD really should track each other, since they both devote almost 100% of their portfolios to physical gold (both own gold bars that are locked up in vaults), and both have similar expense ratios (0.4% for GLD, 0.41% for PHYS). The lower performance of 'CEF' is also not surprising, given that the fund also holds silver, and the 'poor man's gold' hasn't done as well as its yellow counterpart this year. ASA, however, is the clear outperformer. That's thanks in part to its ownership of several gold-mining stocks. Its largest position, G Mining Ventures Inc., a Canadian firm that explores for precious metals, has nearly doubled year to date. ASA's fast short-term gain is, of course, great, but it's unlikely to last. Here's why. Note that, if we go back to 2010, the year the last of these funds, PHYS, launched, we see that GLD (again in green) outran all three of the CEFs. This shows that CEFs were poor options in the case of gold. Moreover, ASA (again in orange) was actually the worst performer, returning just 53% over 15 years, and being in the red for most of that time. ASA Underperforms Ycharts In terms of key takeaways, there are a few here. First, if you want to hold gold, this is a rare case where an ETF, not a CEF, is the better choice. Second, gold is not a great play for income, given that the highest yielder among these funds is ASA, with a puny 0.2%. Third, gold itself is a poor play for the long term, no matter how you invest in it. To see why, all we need to do is splice the S&P 500's performance (in pink below) into that last chart. Gold Underperforms Ycharts It doesn't get much clearer than that! This, however, is where the good news ends for ETF investors. Because when it comes to investing in stocks (or pretty well any other asset class, for that matter), you're far better off with CEFs. Let's take a look at the Adams Diversified Equity Fund (ADX), a CEF we've held in my CEF Insider service since its earliest days: We bought ADX in July 2017, just a few months after CEF Insider's launch. Here's how the fund—current yield: 9% (and in orange below)—has done since, as compared to the S&P 500 index fund SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), in purple, with dividends reinvested: ADX Outperforms Ycharts This chart says it all: CEFs like ADX can crush the S&P 500 and pay us generously while doing so. Plus they give us access to top-notch management and upside-generating discounts to NAV, too. Those are strengths no index fund can match. Michael Foster is the Lead Research Analyst for Contrarian Outlook. For more great income ideas, click here for our latest report 'Indestructible Income: 5 Bargain Funds with Steady 10% Dividends.' Disclosure: none

Judge approves NCAA House settlement, changing the landscape of collegiate athletics
Judge approves NCAA House settlement, changing the landscape of collegiate athletics

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Judge approves NCAA House settlement, changing the landscape of collegiate athletics

Very late on Friday afternoon, we got a massive end-of-the week news dump when a judge officially approved a settlement in the NCAA v. House case. With the ruling, the landscape of college athletics will soon look very different than it has prior. The goal of the settlement is to provide structure to the NIL landscape in college football, which is currently effectively a free-for-all. Following the ruling, On3 discussed some of the ramifications of the ruling. 'Since the NCAA was founded in 1906, institutions have never directly paid athletes, On3's Pete Nakos wrote. 'That will now change with the settlement ushering in the revenue-sharing era of college sports. Beginning July 1, schools will be able to share $20.5 million with athletes, with football expected to receive 75%, followed by men's basketball (15%), women's basketball (5%) and the remainder of sports (5%). The amount shared in revenue will increase annually. Advertisement 'Power Four football programs will have roughly $13 to $16 million to spend on rosters for the 2025 season. Many schools have front-loaded contracts ahead of the settlement's approval, taking advantage of contracts not being vetted by the newly formed NIL clearinghouse . . . ' . . . The settlement also imposes new restrictions on college sports. An NIL clearinghouse will be established, titled 'NIL Go' and run through Deloitte. All third-party NIL deals of $600 or more must be approved by the clearinghouse. If not approved, the settlement says a new third-party arbiter could deem athletes ineligible or result in a school being fined. In a gathering at the ACC spring meetings last week, Deloitte officials reportedly shared that 70% of past deals from NIL collectives would have been denied, while 90% of past deals from public companies would have been approved.' It remains to be seen exactly how the new rules will affect USC specifically. Given the Trojans' recent hire of Chad Bowden and the subsequent revamping of their recruiting operation, USC seemingly has the right people in place to bring the program into college football's new era. This article originally appeared on Trojans Wire: NCAA House settlement approved, as college sports braces for impact

WWDC to focus on redesigns as Apple remains sidelined on AI, Bloomberg says
WWDC to focus on redesigns as Apple remains sidelined on AI, Bloomberg says

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

WWDC to focus on redesigns as Apple remains sidelined on AI, Bloomberg says

Apple's (AAPL) upcoming Worldwide Developers Conference will do little to assuage fears that the iPhone maker is a laggard in AI, Blomberg's Mark Gurman reports. Instead, the event will focus on design and productivity enhancements for its long-established operating system franchises. The company's keynote address will introduce redesigned software interfaces for the iPhone, iPad, Mac, Apple TV and Apple Watch, in addition to more minor tweaks to the Vision Pro headset. As part of the end-to-end overhaul, the company is also making a sweeping change to its software branding, which will shift from version numbers to a year-based system. That means Apple will introduce iOS 26, iPadOS 26, tvOS 26, visionOS 26, macOS 26 and watchOS 26 – named for 2026. Internally, the operating systems are known as Luck, Charisma, Discovery, Cheer and Nepali, respectively, the author notes. The AI changes will be surprisingly minor are unlikely to impress industry watchers, especially considering the rapid pace of innovation by Alphabet's (GOOG) (GOOGL) Google, Meta Platforms (META), Microsoft (MSFT) and OpenAI, the publication adds. Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter Published first on TheFly – the ultimate source for real-time, market-moving breaking financial news. Try Now>> See the top stocks recommended by analysts >> Read More on AAPL: Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue Apple's growing list of issues hinders AI reboot, WSJ says Apple expands partnership in India with Tata, Reuters reports Morning News Wrap-Up: Thursday's Biggest Stock Market Stories Apple says App Store ecosystem facilitated $1.3T in developer sales in 2024 This Is How Much Analysts Expect Apple's (AAPL) EPS to Fall after Court Ruling

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store