NASCAR Seeks Racing Teams' Financial Data in Antitrust Case
NASCAR on Wednesday petitioned U.S. District Judge Kenneth D. Bell to order racing teams that aren't part of 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports' antitrust case to provide financial documents related to costs, revenues and profits since those teams aren't willing to share them. If Bell refuses, NASCAR insists he should rule that this type of data is 'irrelevant at trial.'
Joe Gibbs Racing, Hendrick Motorsports, Spire Motorsports IV, Trackhouse Racing, Penske Motorsports, Richard Childress Racing Enterprises, Wood Brothers Racing, RFK Racing, Legacy Motor Club, Hyak Motorsports, Rick Ware Racing, and Haas Factory Team are the teams at issue. Each signed charters and none is a party to the litigation.
Advertisement
More from Sportico.com
NASCAR contends these teams possess crucial evidence that the association can't otherwise obtain. This evidence is described as essential for NASCAR to be able to rebut the plaintiffs' claim that it doesn't 'fairly' share 'industry revenues' with teams. Along those lines, NASCAR's use of charters, which guarantee teams a starting position in NASCAR-sanctioned races but restrict their opportunities to compete in other circuits, is central to the case.
In a brief authored by Tricia Wilson Magee and other attorneys from Shumaker, Loop, & Kendrick and Latham & Watkins, NASCAR says it subpoenaed the teams in April and sought 11 categories of documents. After discussion with those teams, NASCAR agreed to narrow its request. But the teams still won't produce the records, with NASCAR attributing their decision to confidentiality concerns. NASCAR maintains this concern is misplaced. The litigation is governed by a protective order that shields some materials from public access. NASCAR asserts it has offered 'extensive assurances' for confidentiality.
As NASCAR tells it, the teams have agreed to only share selected information that would feature redacted and anonymized data. NASCAR argues these limitations would invite 'questions' about the admissibility of the data at trial and whether NASCAR's experts could credibly draw from the data in formulating conclusions.
Advertisement
Teams, NASCAR argues, could 'easily provide' the 'ordinary-course financial documents' it seeks. The teams are described as 'sophisticated companies' that rely on contemporary accounting practices. Audited financial statements, income statements, cash flow statements and other 'ordinary course financials' are already generated by teams, NASCAR suggests.
NASCAR also contends that while it is the league in which teams compete, it nonetheless has 'limited visibility into teams' financial metrics.' Teams take in 'substantial revenue from sponsorships' that are 'separate from what they receive from NASCAR' in charters. This additional revenue allegedly represents a 'major component of the industry revenue' at issue.
Bell, NASCAR argues, shouldn't permit 23XI Racing and Front Row to accuse NASCAR of unfairly sharing revenue with charter teams if NASCAR can't ascertain the financial health of those teams. NASCAR makes that point as the Dec. 1 trial date looms. If Bell refuses to order racing teams to divulge financial information and permits NASCAR to be accused of unfairly sharing revenue, and if NASCAR loses the trial, NASCAR would be armed with a potential appellate argument that Bell erred.
Penske Motorsports is owned by Roger Penske and is not related to Penske Media, the parent company of Sportico.
Advertisement
Best of Sportico.com
Sign up for Sportico's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
18 minutes ago
- Forbes
Cyberattack On Whole Foods Supplier Disrupts Supply Chain Again
SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA - JUNE 11: A shelf is seen bare in the frozen foods section of a Whole Foods ... More store on June 11, 2025 in San Rafael, California. United Natural Foods, the primary food distributor to Whole Foods, has paused deliveries to Whole Foods stores after a cyberattack crippled its system. Some Whole Foods stores are experiencing empty shelves and freezers. (Photo by) On June 5, 2025, a cyberattack forced United Natural Foods Inc., the primary distributor for Whole Foods Market, to shut down its systems and halt deliveries to more than 30,000 grocery stores across North America. Nearly two weeks later, the company is still operating on a limited basis, relying on workarounds and manual processes. This was not a minor glitch but a direct hit to the digital backbone of the food supply chain. Grocery stores were deemed essential infrastructure during the COVID-19 pandemic, with workers hailed as frontline heroes. Now, in 2025, the breach at UNFI raises a chilling question: what a biological virus could not shut down, could a cyberattack succeed in crippling? If malicious actors can freeze the software that moves food, they can empty shelves, disrupt lives and trigger cascading economic impacts. 'Food security is national security,' one lawmaker warned earlier this year. Congress appears to agree and has introduced the bipartisan Farm and Food Cybersecurity Act of 2025. What happened, and what could have been done to stop it? Whole Foods Market locations across the U.S. experienced product shortages after a cyberattack on ... More its primary distributor, United Natural Foods Inc., disrupted supply chains in June 2025. UNFI, based in Providence, Rhode Island, is North America's largest publicly traded wholesale grocery distributor. The company operates more than 50 distribution centers and supplies approximately 30,000 locations, including supermarkets, independent grocers and food service providers. On June 5, the company detected unauthorized activity on its systems and immediately activated its incident response plan. As a precaution, it took portions of its network offline, which disrupted order processing, fulfillment and shipment capabilities. Law enforcement and external cybersecurity experts were called in to assist with the investigation. The outage was swift and severe. Automated systems for ordering and inventory went dark, forcing cancellations of employee shifts and a return to manual processes. Business operations were impacted across the board, resulting in significant delivery delays. UNFI did not publicly disclose the breach until June 9, when it filed an 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company warned that disruptions would continue and outlined its reliance on manual workarounds to maintain critical grocery shipments while digital systems remained down. The downstream impact on retailers was immediate. Whole Foods Market, which depends heavily on UNFI, saw noticeable shortages in key categories. Refrigerated and perishable sections in many stores went empty. Store employees posted apology signs for out-of-stock items and explained delays. Customers posted photos of empty shelves across multiple locations. Independent grocers and regional chains also reported missed or delayed shipments. Many scrambled to find backup suppliers. Some succeeded, but others simply ran out of stock, leaving consumers with fewer options. Even the United States military's Defense Commissary Agency was affected. Fifty-three commissary stores reported delays. While some mitigated the issue with manual ordering, many still faced inventory shortfalls. A single breach had turned into a national supply chain shock. With just-in-time inventory models and limited buffers, grocers were vulnerable to even short-term digital outages. The result was fewer choices for shoppers and deeper concerns for the industry. As of mid-June, UNFI has not confirmed the source or type of cyberattack. The company has avoided calling it ransomware, and no group has claimed responsibility. Still, experts widely agree that the attack shares several characteristics typical of ransomware events, including a full system shutdown, containment procedures and prolonged disruption. While unproven, the consensus is that ransomware is the most likely explanation, especially given the sharp rise in attacks against the food and retail sectors. In similar cases, attackers have encrypted systems and demanded payment in exchange for restored access. On a June 10 earnings call, UNFI Chief Executive Officer Sandy Douglas said only that the company was managing through the incident and focused on safe restoration. The company has shared few details. It remains unclear whether any data was stolen or whether negotiations are ongoing. The lack of attribution could indicate behind-the-scenes engagement with law enforcement, which is common in complex ransomware cases. Until the investigation is complete, the grocery sector remains on high alert. The breach underscores just how vulnerable essential supply chains have become. The attack on UNFI is part of a broader trend of attacks on the food supply chain. Recent high-profile incidents include: Cybercriminals have proven they can cause real-world consequences across the food sector. 'The cyberattack on United Natural Foods is not an isolated incident but part of a growing trend,' said Jeff Wichman, incident response director at Semperis. The risk is no longer hypothetical. The attack has sparked urgent conversations throughout the grocery industry. Key priorities include: Cybersecurity is no longer optional. Food supply chains are essential and increasingly targeted. Resilience must be a top priority across every tier of the industry. By mid-June, UNFI had resumed shipments from most distribution centers and made progress restoring systems. Still, many operations rely on manual processes, and product shortages persist in some regions. The impact is ongoing and visible. This breach should serve as a turning point. Whole Foods and other retailers must invest in both digital defenses and supply chain resilience. Distributors must act with urgency. In the business of feeding families, downtime is unacceptable. The next attack could hit harder and spread faster. The time to prepare is now.
Gizmodo
19 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Amazon Restocks the Dyson V8, Still at an Insanely Low All-Time Price
Having a cordless stick vacuum is a game-changer for the modern home… but only if it's powerful enough to handle daily messes. A weak cleaner can quickly become more hassle than it's worth. That's where Dyson comes in. With its track record for engineering expertise and design brilliance, Dyson has set the gold standard in home cleaning technology. If you're not looking to drop a thousand dollars on the latest Dyson model, you can still enjoy top-notch cleaning with a slightly older but still incredible machine like the V8 Plus. This model is the most affordable way to bring Dyson's legendary power into your home, and it's been flying off the shelves due to high demand. Amazon has just restocked, but with its popularity, another shortage could be just around the corner. Right now, the Dyson V8 Plus cordless vacuum is on Amazon for just $349, which is a considerable drop from its regular retail price of $469. That's over $120 in savings, so this is an excellent opportunity to upgrade your cleaning without spending a fortune. See at Amazon Why Buy a Dyson V8 Plus? First off, it's cordless and light, only weighing 2.6kg / 5.73lbs so you can carry it room to room with ease and no strain. The vacuum gives you up to 40 minutes of fade-free power so you can clean your entire home without needing to stress about losing suction midway. It features two cleaning modes: a normal mode for everyday use, which provides a balance of power and battery life, and a MAX mode for those really stubborn messes that need extra muscle. You will also love the upgraded Motorbar cleaner head that is designed to deep clean all floor types – hardwood, tile, carpet, and beyond. It even detangles long hair and pet hair as you clean, and reduces the frustration of clogged brushes. The vacuum easily converts to a handheld which makes it perfect for cleaning cars, stairs and upholstery. There are four Dyson-engineered accessories in the box: a mini soft dusting brush, a crevice tool, a hair screw tool and a wall docking station for convenient storage and charging. The Dyson V8 Plus also has improved whole-machine filtration which traps 99.99% of particles as small as 0.3 microns. That means not only will it pick up dirt and dust but it will also work to expel cleaner air back into your home, making it a great choice for anyone with allergies or anyone who wants a healthier home. The vacuum is built with tough materials for strength and convenience and is supported by a two-year warranty and lifetime Dyson service. With the Dyson V8 Plus, you're buying a cleaner, healthier home and the peace of mind that comes with it. See at Amazon
CBS News
23 minutes ago
- CBS News
The Market Square revitalization project is underway, but some businesses are unhappy
If you've been around Market Square over the past couple of months, you certainly have noticed the noise. The revitalization project is in full swing, but it's not making all the shops happy. Are those construction sounds that people hear good? It depends on who you ask. "Eh – it's so-so," Talib Hussein, owner of Cherries Diner, said. "This construction is killing us down here," Joseph Parsons, General Manager at Whiskey B's, said. Parsons thinks it's a net negative. "We're gonna be down $100,000 in sales in two months," he said. "We're on track to lose $400,000, $500,000 dollars – just this year." The lack of people filling the stools means payroll cuts, too. "I actually had to let go of my number one cook two days ago," Parsons said. Whiskey B's side of the square hasn't even had traffic cut off yet. Over at Cherries Diner, it hasn't been uniform. "Come up-down, up-down," Hussein said. Around the corner at Nicholas Coffee and Tea? It hasn't been all that bad. "They've been a little bit down – but nothing really to be upset about or be concerned about right now," Kathy Marsico, Operations Director at Nicholas Coffee and Tea Company, said. Marsico says their business model helps. "Our sole income is not dependent on walk-in traffic," she said. She says there aren't any battles brewing with the construction guys either -- that they've been cooperative. "They've made some changes for us when we asked for it," Marsico said. "As long as it doesn't impede their operations, they've been great with us." Marsico also has good words for the Pittsburgh Downtown Partnership. "They've been very open with email communication as well as coming in and just checking in to see how we're doing," she said. Over at Whiskey B's, Parsons says he's not getting that communication. "Not one time has anybody come in here and asked me anything about anything," he said. "Period – that's what it is." All this work is to welcome people for next year's NFL Draft. "If we can get to April – we'll be fine… but the concern is getting to April," Parsons said. The Pittsburgh Downtown Partnership did respond to KDKA-TV's request for comment.
