
Forget K-dramas: Korea's political crisis is the real drama
The 2006 US comedy 'Stranger Than Fiction' follows IRS auditor Harold (Will Ferrell), who realizes he's a character in a novelist's work. As he learns that the writer plans to kill him off in the end, Harold races to confront her in real life – and she ultimately rewrites the story to let him live.
Much like bewildered Harold as he realizes what fate is in store for him, many foreign observers are finding themselves increasingly perplexed by the political landscape in South Korea, where reality seems stranger than fiction.
A leading Seoul newspaper, Chosun Ilbo, published an interesting article on March 28, 2025. It features a conversation between a Chosun Ilbo reporter and a foreign journalist who has been covering Korea.
At a recent meeting, the journalist shared his frustration: readers back home frequently complain that 'Korean news is incomprehensible.'
He cited several recent developments:
The president suddenly declared martial law on the night of December 3, 2024, without informing cabinet members, ruling party lawmakers, or even South Korea's key security ally, the US,
The leader of the main opposition party, the Democratic Party of Korea (DPK), has four prior criminal convictions and five ongoing trials, yet remains the leading presidential contender.
After passing an impeachment motion against Prime Minister Han Duck-soo on December 27, 2024, which was rejected by the Constitutional Court on March 24, 2025, the opposition party is now introducing an impeachment motion against the deputy prime minister for the economy, who had until recently been the acting president.
Readers abroad responded with disbelief, saying, 'This doesn't make any sense. Maybe the reporter misunderstood the facts and wrote inaccurate reports?'
The journalist himself admitted, 'There are so many absurd events happening in Korea that even I struggle to understand them.'
Since then, things have only grown stranger. After the Constitutional Court rejected the impeachment of Prime Minister Han on March 24, the opposition quickly vowed to try again. Then just four days later, on March 28, the DPK announced it would seek to impeach the entire cabinet.
Their urgency is not without cause. On March 26, DPK leader Lee Jae-myung was acquitted in an election law case, but the prosecution has already filed an appeal. Beyond this, he remains entangled in multiple legal battles, including a high-profile $1 billion real estate scandal. A conviction carrying a fine of just over one million South Korean won – or even a suspended sentence – would disqualify him from running for office for up to ten years.
Meanwhile, the Constitutional Court has yet to rule on the impeachment of President Yoon. What initially seemed like a decisive outcome now appears increasingly likely to be rejected as the delay continues.
Lee's troubles extend far beyond the courtroom. He is also facing open challenge within his own party.
South Korea's leftist bloc has long been split between two major factions: National Liberation (NL) and People's Democracy (PD). The NL faction emphasizes ethnic nationalism, North-South reunification under socialism and an anti-US stance.
The PD faction is more in line with Western-style progressivism.
Although Lee does not fit neatly into either camp, the NL faction clearly sees him as an enemy and is now openly challenging him.
Foreign policy is another obstacle for Lee. While Lee and his party have taken symbolic steps to affirm the US-ROK alliance – including a resolution supporting the alliance and even suggesting Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize – these moves appear mostly superficial. In substance, Lee remains pro-China.
Lee is also pushing the Democratic Party in a direction that may alienate its base. His efforts to shift the party toward the center – or even the right – mirror a cautionary tale from Japan.
In 1994, the Japan Socialist Party shocked supporters by forming a coalition with its longtime rival, the Liberal Democratic Party. Its leader, Tomiichi Murayama, became prime minister and quickly abandoned core socialist policies, including opposition to the US-Japan Security Treaty.
The backlash was swift. By 1996, badly defeated in elections, the party had rebranded itself as the Social Democratic Party. It faded into irrelevance.
The lesson is clear: When a party abandons its ideological roots, it risks collapse. The Democratic Party of Korea, under Lee's leadership, may now be heading down the same path.
Lee Jae-myung's future is anything but certain. Legal jeopardy could disqualify him. Internal divisions could unseat him. And ideological drift could hollow out the movement he claims to lead.
For foreign observers, Korean politics is bewildering. But for Koreans – and their allies – it is more than just domestic turmoil. It is a test of stability in one of the world's most volatile geopolitical regions.
Hanjin Lew is a former international spokesman for South Korean conservative parties.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South China Morning Post
14 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
What South Korea's new president means for its US, China ties
Six months ago, South Korea teetered on the brink of authoritarian regression. But on Tuesday, its citizens elected Lee Jae-myung – a symbol of resilience and reform – as their new president, in a vote seen as a rebuke of his predecessor's failed martial law decree that plunged the nation into a political crisis. The liberal Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) candidate secured a decisive victory over conservative rival Kim Moon-soo of the People Power Party (PPP), capturing 49.42 per cent of the vote to Kim's 41.15 per cent in Tuesday's snap election. The vote – triggered by the impeachment of former president Yoon Suk-yeol – left no room for a transition period. Lee was sworn in immediately, ushering in a new chapter in South Korean politics. With nearly 17.3 million votes, Lee achieved the largest vote count for a presidential candidate in the country's electoral history on a voter turnout of 79.4 per cent – the highest in nearly three decades. For many, the election served as a referendum on the PPP, the former party of Yoon, whose unconstitutional martial law bid late last year stunned the nation. 'I will do my utmost to overcome the aftermath of the rebellion and ensure that never again will arms entrusted by the people be turned against them,' South Korea's new president declared to a crowd gathered near the National Assembly in the early hours of Wednesday morning. President Lee Jae-myung and his wife Kim Hye-kyung leave after his inauguration at the National Assembly in Seoul on Wednesday. Photo: Reuters


South China Morning Post
15 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
What South Korea's new president means for its US, China ties
Six months ago, South Korea teetered on the brink of authoritarian regression. But on Tuesday, its citizens elected Lee Jae-myung – a symbol of resilience and reform – as their new president, in a vote seen as a rebuke of his predecessor's failed martial law decree that plunged the nation into a political crisis. The liberal Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) candidate secured a decisive victory over conservative rival Kim Moon-soo of the People Power Party (PPP), capturing 49.42 per cent of the vote to Kim's 41.15 per cent in Tuesday's snap election. The vote – triggered by the impeachment of former president Yoon Suk-yeol – left no room for a transition period. Lee was sworn in immediately, ushering in a new chapter in South Korean politics. With nearly 17.3 million votes, Lee achieved the largest vote count for a presidential candidate in the country's electoral history on a voter turnout of 79.4 per cent – the highest in nearly three decades. For many, the election served as a referendum on the PPP, the former party of Yoon, whose unconstitutional martial law bid late last year stunned the nation. 'I will do my utmost to overcome the aftermath of the rebellion and ensure that never again will arms entrusted by the people be turned against them,' South Korea's new president declared to a crowd gathered near the National Assembly in the early hours of Wednesday morning. President Lee Jae-myung and his wife Kim Hye-kyung leave after his inauguration at the National Assembly in Seoul on Wednesday. Photo: Reuters


Asia Times
a day ago
- Asia Times
Korean leader Lee likely on a collision course with Trump
The new South Korean president, Lee Jae-myung, calls himself a foreign policy 'pragmatist.' He says he is driven by South Korea's national interest, rather than ideology, and has spoken of his desire to improve relations with China and North Korea. Under the former president, Yoon Suk Yeol, South Korea's relationship with these countries came under increasing strain. Yoon adopted a confrontational stance toward North Korea, and openly sided with Washington in its rivalry with Beijing. Lee's vision may bring his government into conflict with the Trump administration. On the campaign trail, Lee sought to dispel doubts about his commitment to the longstanding military alliance between the US and South Korea. He repeatedly described Seoul's relationship with Washington as the 'basic axis of our diplomacy.' But he signaled that there would be some rebalancing of relations under his leadership, stressing that South Korea should not rely solely on the US. This reflects the fundamental belief of liberal politicians in South Korea. While acknowledging the importance of ties with the US, they want a more balanced relationship with other regional powers like China. Lee says closer relations with China will occur within the framework of South Korea's alliance with the US. But, with Washington and Beijing battling for global influence, this is still likely to become a major point of tension with the US. The Trump administration has taken a hawkish approach towards China and wants its allies to do the same. Lee, for his part, has stated that South Korea should not be forced to choose between the US and China, saying: 'We should not put all our eggs in one basket.' And he has signalled that his government will resist efforts by Washington to draw South Korea into any conflict with China over Taiwan or territorial disputes in the South China Sea. The Lee government clearly has a delicate balancing act ahead when it comes to the two superpowers. Trump has previously criticized the amount South Korea pays for the US forces stationed on its soil, while recent reports suggest he is considering the withdrawal of about 4,500 of 28,500 US troops from the country. Another of Lee's pressing foreign policy issues is how to deal with the North Korean threat. Yoon's government avoided dialogue with the North and encouraged the spread of outside information across the border. Over the past decade, in response to North Korea's improved nuclear and missile capabilities, public opinion in South Korea has shifted in favor of developing an independent nuclear weapons program. This is not a strategy the Lee government will pursue. The Democratic Party, of which Lee is a member, has historically advocated a policy of engagement and peaceful coexistence with North Korea. From 1998 to 2008, and then again from 2017 to 2022, liberal governments in South Korea pursued a so-called 'sunshine policy' towards the North. The goal was to reduce tension through engagement, with the ultimate goal being to create the conditions for unification. In his inaugural address on June 4, Lee said his government would deal with North Korean aggression with 'strong deterrence' – referring to the military alliance with the US. But he also elaborated on the need to again reopen channels of communication with North Korea to deliver peace through talks and cooperation. He added: 'Peace is always cheaper than war.' In a signal of his intent for renewed engagement with the North, Lee has nominated the former unification minister, Lee Jong-seok, as chief of the National Intelligence Service. Lee Jong-seok was the architect of South Korea's policy towards the North between 2003 and 2008, during the presidency of Roh Moo-hyun. However, the geopolitical landscape has changed in recent years. In January 2024, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un declared South Korea an 'enemy' nation and said the North would no longer be working toward reunification. North Korea has since then stopped any contact with the South and has ceased any economic collaboration. South Korea's sunshine policy had seen the development of projects such as the Kaesong Industrial Complex, which involved South Korean businesses establishing factories in North Korea and employing North Korean workers. North Korea is a foreign policy issue in which the Trump administration and the Lee government may pursue similar objectives. Trump has also signalled that he is seeking to renew dialogue with North Korea, and has hinted at the possibility of future summits to discuss a nuclear agreement. Trump's first term saw him become the first US president to meet with a North Korean leader while in office, though he ultimately made no progress in restraining North Korea's nuclear program. Kim is very unlikely to be responsive to efforts by either country to engage in dialogue. North Korea has forged a close partnership with Russia in recent years, which has even seen it send troops to fight against Ukraine, and no longer considers engagement with the US or South Korea necessary. It is instead banking on making significant advances in military technology. Russian assistance has reportedly already contributed to improvements in North Korea's missile guidance systems, while Russia has also supplied North Korea with advanced air defense systems. The new Lee government faces a very challenging international environment. The North Korean threat is growing, the US security guarantee is weakening and it will have to resist Trump's attempts to draw South Korea into a regional military network to contain China. How it meets all of these challenges will become clear in the months and years ahead. Christoph Bluth is professor of international relations and security, University of Bradford This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.