Scottish Government criticised over arms firms funding review
Back in February, MSPs backed a review into grants given by government agency Scottish Enterprise (SE) to weapons firms linked to Israel.
The Scottish Government also pledged to look at "due diligence" procedures around state support for arms, which is being carried out internally by SE. No detail has been given on the status or make-up of the review, with the Scottish Government previously saying that MSPs would be updated once the review is complete.
READ MORE: Scottish Government 'short-changed by £1bn' by Rachel Reeves, Finance Secretary says
Since their introduction in 2019 – following criticism of the previous regime – not a single company has ever failed SE's human rights checks, according to data obtained by the Ferret and Amnesty International.
SE has given £8 million to 13 companies involved in weapons manufacturing since 2019, including £1.1m to Thales UK in 2022 and £600,000 to Raytheon Systems in 2021-22 – both of which supply weapons to Israel.
However, the Scottish Government has always maintained that the funding does not go directly to the production of munitions, and that the "due diligence" checks are thorough.
Speaking in Holyrood on Wednesday, Scottish Greens MSP Maggie Chapman called on the Scottish Government to provide an "urgent update" on the review.
Chapman (above) said: "Despite supposed human rights due diligence checks, companies like Raytheon – who produce weapons and military components used by the Israeli state to inflict unimaginable harms on Palestinians in Gaza – they've recently received public subsidies from Scottish Enterprise.
"FOI data from Amnesty International found that as of May this year, still not a single company has ever failed these checks.
"We called this out in February and the Scottish Government said it would review Scottish Enterprise's human rights due diligence process.
READ MORE: Scottish Government rules out reopening national park process
"We've asked time and time again for an update. So, once again, will the Deputy First Minister finally provide an urgent update on the progress of the review before the summer recess?"
Forbes (below) responded: "Well, this was obviously a Labour Party amendment – that part is often forgotten, I think, by the Labour Party – to review Scottish Enterprise's due diligence work.
"I will keep the Parliament updated on that review and perhaps I could just draw attention to the fact that the subject of the debate back in February was about Scottish Government funding for defence, which seems to have been forgotten by the opposition."
The Deputy First Minister was criticised of a "lack of transparency" over the review process by human rights organisation Amnesty International.
Neil Cowan, Amnesty International UK's Scotland programme director, said it would be "unacceptable" for ministers not to be updated on the review before the summer recess.
READ MORE: Scottish Government responds as bus firm set to move all manufacturing to England
Cowan commented: 'The Deputy First Minister's response today did nothing to reassure us about the lack of transparency surrounding this process. It seems that Scottish Enterprise is going to be allowed to mark its own homework with the full backing of Scottish ministers.
'We cannot understand the reluctance to hold an independent review which invites input from human rights experts. Everyone involved should share the goal of ensuring Scottish public money is not supporting companies implicated in the most serious human rights violations imaginable, including genocide.
'It would be completely unacceptable for Parliament to begin two months of parliamentary recess without hearing more about the status and make-up of this review.
"The very least the Deputy First Minister can do is to provide an update and provide MSPs with the chance to scrutinise plans.'
The Scottish Government has been approached for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Inside SFA AGM: Clarke defended amid Lennon Miller 'example'
Nothing silences dissent at a football AGM quite like a ringing cash till. Announcing a record turnover of £78.72million and a pre-tax profit of £7.41m to member clubs at yesterday's Hampden gathering Chief Executive Ian Maxwell was blunt. Read more: Reaching major tournaments is critical. And, if Scotland's quest to reach next summer's World Cup Finals gets off to a stuttering start against Denmark and Belarus the focus of the debate surrounding the manager will switch from whether the SFA can afford to sack Steve Clarke to whether they can afford to keep him. Underlining the importance of major tournaments, Maxwell said: 'You can't underestimate it. Any sporting organisation, any football club, any football association, a lot of the revenue that's driven comes from success on the pitch. That also manifests in people wanting to play, people wanting to engage with football. 'The feel-good factor that everybody still talks about from Germany is a huge part of that. We need to make sure that we keep qualifying both from a men's and a women's perspective. They're both vital. 'We've also been able to secure significant funding from the UK Government through DCMS and the Scottish Government for extra time programmes, which all goes back out either to facilities or to clubs to help run programmes and help grow and develop the game and use the power of football to have that positive impact on individuals that we know that it can. 'There's a lot of things that have combined to give us the 2024 that we had. Qualification is a big part of that.' It's better, sometimes, to travel than it is to arrive. While Scotland's men's team raced to Germany in jig-time, the engine stalled as soon as they reached their destination. Performances at Euro 2024 were anti-climactic, the final game against Hungary draining much of the credit Clarke stored up in the bank. While the team rallied for the Nations League a dismal League A play-off defeat to Greece at Hampden rendered the prospect of a World Cup qualifying rematch against the same opponents unappealing. A Scotland manager who deserves credit for raising expectations and standards over the last six years might now become a victim of his own success. In defence of Clarke Maxwell flagged up how difficult it is to be a manager in Scottish football these days. 'We've seen three managers be appointed in Scottish football in the last two or three weeks, and none of the three of them have been met with great happiness from the relevant supporters. For whatever reason people are always looking at the negatives, and I've said this for as long as I've been doing this job, we need to take a much broader view. 'When you look at the World Cup for Steve, it's the missing bit of the jigsaw, it's the bit that he's not been able to do. 'You get the back-to-back Euros, Nations League C, Nations League B, Nations League A, unfortunately we came back down to B, but in the grand scheme of things, in the football ecosystem, that's probably where we are round about that level, and there's nothing wrong with that. 'Everybody has to be somewhere, so when you look at it over a piece, the progression's been great, he's desperate to get there, the players are desperate to get there, they are absolutely more than capable of getting there, and it's about getting everybody behind them to make sure that we do that.' Weakness in key positions doesn't help. When Ciaran Slicker, Ipswich Town's third choice keeper, took to the field against Iceland his nerves spread quickly around the stadium. At the age of 42 Craig Gordon can't go on forever, while the alternative options are unappealing. A lack of central defenders, left sided attackers and strikers has shone a light on Scotland's faltering system of player development. From next week clubs in the SPFL will be free to enter into cooperation agreements which allow teams in the Premiership and Championship to send players in the 16-21 age group out in search of first team action at a partner club, with more freedom and flexibility. Figures show that young Scottish players are finding it increasingly difficult to secure first team minutes in the top flight and the consequences for the national football team are difficult to deny. 'The Transition Report talked about league size and the perception over here that young kids don't play because of league size, but actually when you look across Europe, there's a lot of kids playing in a lot of leagues that are similar sizes to us, so it's about clubs having that belief and that ability in younger players. 'Lennon Miller's a shining example, I don't know how many games he's played for Motherwell, but it's a significant number at a really young age, and he goes into a Liechtenstein game and looks like the best player on the park. 'Now, without being disrespectful to Liechtenstein, there's the opposition level that he's playing against, and I don't for a minute think that that means he's ready to go and play against Denmark, but he's a lot closer than a lot would have been, and that's a testament to him, and his family and the way they've mapped out his career just to get him games. 'And the more of those types of experiences, the more of those players we can get at those ages, that amount of experience will be really positive.'
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Households face council tax hikes and £10billion stealth levies as Reeves gets boxed into corner by shrinking economy
Economists warned the circumstances meant tax hikes are almost certain this autumn GOGGLE-BOXED IN Households face council tax hikes and £10billion stealth levies as Reeves gets boxed into corner by shrinking economy HOUSEHOLDS face council tax hikes and £10billion in stealth levies as Rachel Reeves gets boxed into a corner by the shrinking economy, experts warn. The Chancellor, who wore protective goggles during a visit to the University of Derby yesterday, learned growth fell 0.3 per cent in April — less than 24 hours after her £113billion spending review splurge. Advertisement 2 Rachel Reeves wears protective goggles during a visit to the University of Derby Credit: Simon Walker / HM Treasury 2 Households face council tax hikes and £10billion in stealth levies Credit: Getty Businesses are reeling from the National Insurance rise, a jump in the minimum wage and ongoing uncertainty over Donald Trump's global trade war. Economists warned the circumstances meant tax hikes are almost certain this autumn — along with hard-pressed town halls having to up council tax rates by five per cent next year to pay for local services. Former Office for Budget Responsibility committee member Andy King said 'the writing was on the wall for another fiscal hole' — which would trigger tax rises or possible spending cuts in the Budget. Another expert accused Ms Reeves of 'making up numbers' in her spending review as there were few clues where savings would be found. Advertisement READ MORE ON SPENDING REVIEW TAX BLOW Council tax bills to rise at fastest rate in 20 years after Reeves' review Paul Johnson, from the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said her demands that all Whitehall departments cut administration budgets by ten per cent a year were not the result of a 'serious analysis'. He also said that if Ms Reeves was forced to raise taxes, the most politically straightforward approach would be to extend the freeze on income tax thresholds. Mr Johnson added that her plans will result in a 'sting in the tail' because local authorities would have to raise their levies. More than half of Brits — 52 per cent — reckon Ms Reeves' spending review will have a negative economic impact rather than positive. Advertisement But one piece of good news did emerge yesterday, as it was revealed the UK was finally ready to sign its trade deal with the US.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Households face council tax hikes and £10billion stealth levies as Reeves gets boxed into corner by shrinking economy
HOUSEHOLDS face council tax hikes and £10billion in stealth levies as Rachel Reeves gets boxed into a corner by the shrinking economy, experts warn. The Chancellor, who wore protective goggles during a visit to the University of Derby yesterday, learned growth fell 0.3 per cent in April — less than 24 hours after her £113billion spending review splurge. 2 2 Businesses are reeling from the National Insurance rise, a jump in the minimum wage and ongoing uncertainty over Donald Trump's global trade war. Economists warned the circumstances meant tax hikes are almost certain this autumn — along with hard-pressed town halls having to up council tax rates by five per cent next year to pay for local services. Former Office for Budget Responsibility committee member Andy King said 'the writing was on the wall for another fiscal hole' — which would trigger tax rises or possible spending cuts in the Budget. Another expert accused Ms Reeves of 'making up numbers' in her spending review as there were few clues where savings would be found. Paul Johnson, from the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said her demands that all Whitehall departments cut administration budgets by ten per cent a year were not the result of a 'serious analysis'. He also said that if Ms Reeves was forced to raise taxes, the most politically straightforward approach would be to extend the freeze on income tax thresholds. Mr Johnson added that her plans will result in a 'sting in the tail' because local authorities would have to raise their levies. More than half of Brits — 52 per cent — reckon Ms Reeves' spending review will have a negative economic impact rather than positive. But one piece of good news did emerge yesterday, as it was revealed the UK was finally ready to sign its trade deal with the US.
