
Households face council tax hikes and £10billion stealth levies as Reeves gets boxed into corner by shrinking economy
Economists warned the circumstances meant tax hikes are almost certain this autumn
GOGGLE-BOXED IN Households face council tax hikes and £10billion stealth levies as Reeves gets boxed into corner by shrinking economy
HOUSEHOLDS face council tax hikes and £10billion in stealth levies as Rachel Reeves gets boxed into a corner by the shrinking economy, experts warn.
The Chancellor, who wore protective goggles during a visit to the University of Derby yesterday, learned growth fell 0.3 per cent in April — less than 24 hours after her £113billion spending review splurge.
Advertisement
2
Rachel Reeves wears protective goggles during a visit to the University of Derby
Credit: Simon Walker / HM Treasury
2
Households face council tax hikes and £10billion in stealth levies
Credit: Getty
Businesses are reeling from the National Insurance rise, a jump in the minimum wage and ongoing uncertainty over Donald Trump's global trade war.
Economists warned the circumstances meant tax hikes are almost certain this autumn — along with hard-pressed town halls having to up council tax rates by five per cent next year to pay for local services.
Former Office for Budget Responsibility committee member Andy King said 'the writing was on the wall for another fiscal hole' — which would trigger tax rises or possible spending cuts in the Budget.
Another expert accused Ms Reeves of 'making up numbers' in her spending review as there were few clues where savings would be found.
Advertisement
READ MORE ON SPENDING REVIEW
TAX BLOW Council tax bills to rise at fastest rate in 20 years after Reeves' review
Paul Johnson, from the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said her demands that all Whitehall departments cut administration budgets by ten per cent a year were not the result of a 'serious analysis'.
He also said that if Ms Reeves was forced to raise taxes, the most politically straightforward approach would be to extend the freeze on income tax thresholds.
Mr Johnson added that her plans will result in a 'sting in the tail' because local authorities would have to raise their levies.
More than half of Brits — 52 per cent — reckon Ms Reeves' spending review will have a negative economic impact rather than positive.
Advertisement
But one piece of good news did emerge yesterday, as it was revealed the UK was finally ready to sign its trade deal with the US.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Man Utd files: Victor Osimhen is shock Plan B to Viktor Gyokeres transfer but huge wages will cause major dilemma
NIGERIAN ace Victor Osimhen is emerging as a genuine back-up plan if Manchester United's move for Viktor Gyokeres falls through. Swede Gyokeres' relationship with Sporting Lisbon appears to be completely broken down after the Portuguese club attempted to jack up his asking price after agreeing he could leave for £59million. 8 Man Utd will consider a move for Victor Osimhen if they can't sign Viktor Gyokeres Credit: Getty 8 Gyokeres is United's No1 target Credit: Getty But while Ruben Amorim wants to be reunited with the former Brighton and Coventry striker, who scored 57 goals in 57 games under him at the Estadio Alvalade, United are also aware of Osimhen's availability. The Nigerian spent last term on loan at Galatasaray from Napoli, where he was not wanted by Antonio Conte. Osimhen, 26, bagged 32 goals in 37 appearances for the Istanbul club, who want him to stay but have also seen Saudi clubs including Al-Hilal join a bidding war. So far, though, no deal has been agreed, with Osimhen seemingly ready to consider all his options - including a potential move to the Premier League. READ MORE IN FOOTBALL GET IT DON Sancho at centre of three-way Prem transfer war as Chelsea line up Man U pal But the striker's Galatasaray contract is understood to be worth £300,000 per week after tax, which would equate to around £500,000 weekly in the UK - a figure United cannot afford to pay. Nevertheless, a move has not been ruled out amid uncertainty over the Gyokeres situation, although no matter who arrives - following the £62m signing of Brazilian Matheus Cunha from Wolves - there will have to be big money departures. SOLD TRAFFORD? TALKING of players set to go through the exit doors - and at least United should be able to cash in on two of those felt least likely to have a future under Amorim. Number crunchers at the Swiss-based CIES Football Observatory have unveiled their updated list of the 100 most valuable players in global football. Join SUN CLUB for the Man Utd Files every Thursday plus in-depth coverage and exclusives from Old Trafford Top of the rankings, which features Erling Haaland and Jude Bellingham in the top three, is Barcelona teenage superstar Lamine Yamal, valued at a staggering £343m. Prem clubs dominate the list, with 42 of the top 100 making their living in England. Liverpool's £100m Barcola bid / Gyokeres forces Man Utd move / Grealish City axe | Transfers Exposed But in a worrying sign of what has gone wrong at Old Trafford over the past decade, the only two United players in the list are unwanted Rasmus Hojlund and Alejandro Garnacho. Dane Hojlund is 52nd, rated as worth £68m. Given his struggles to establish himself since his £72m move from Atalanta, United bean counters would snatch the hand off anyone making an offer anywhere near that - although the club needs to take £38m to 'break even' on the left-over amortisation costs on his five year contract. Garnacho is ranked 85th and valued at £54m - a sum which would be 'pure profit' in PSR terms if a deal was made. 8 Rasmus Hojlund is rated as worth £68m Credit: Getty 8 Alejandro Garnacho is set to leave Man Utd this summer Credit: Getty CLIFFE JUMP SOME rare good United news off the pitch for Sir Jim Ratcliffe - with the club's share price bouncing back. United shares dropped to less than £10 each in the immediate aftermath of the Europa League Final defeat by Spurs, representing a 60 per cent fall from the £26 per share he paid for his total £1.487bn investment last year. It was a public response to the £100m black hole in income for next season after United's worst campaign since they were relegated from the top flight in 1974. That meant the club's market capitalisation - its value in terms of the share price - had plummeted from the £4.54bn implied by Ratcliffe's purchases to just £1.72bn. But the past month has seen a change in fortunes, with the price of shares on the New York Stock Exchange briefly touching a 2025 high of £14.51 each on Monday. At close of business on Wednesday that price had dropped slightly but the total value of the club has recovered to a fraction under £2.5bn. Sir Jim will be hoping for a similar recovery on the pitch next term. 8 Man Utd's share price has bounced back - three weeks on from the club's Europa League final defeat Credit: Alamy IN THE RED THE Glazer debt is still taking a heavy toll on Old Trafford - as outlined by the latest Deloitte Annual Review of Football Finance. According to the latest figures, while United's net debt of £482m is significantly less than the £793m owed by Spurs after the building of their new ground it costs Ratcliffe and Ineos far more to service. United's debt repayments stood at £61m per year in 2023-24, compared to the £47m cost of meeting Tottenham's schedule. Deloitte reported that United's wage bill in the last full season under Erik ten Hag stood at £365m, below only Manchester City and Liverpool, representing 55 per cent of their £662m revenues. But the price of past transfer mistakes is crippling, with United losing £186m in 'amortisation costs' - the amount of each player's first contract after being bought divided by its length in that season - while Ineos made a further £159m cash injection. 8 The Glazer debt is still taking a heavy toll on Old Trafford Credit: AFP LIGHTS, CAMERA, ACTION TRYING to put a positive spin on Manchester United is not easy – particularly when the Red Devils have a year like last season. So perhaps it is no surprise that the Red Devils currently have two jobs being advertised for their in house media department at Old Trafford. They are searching for a director of communications and a media director as they begin preparations for the 2025/26 season. OH MAN MANUEL UGARTE might be in line for a ticking off when he returns to Carrington for pre-season training early next month. The Uruguayan midfielder went early by unveiling United's new home shirt on his social media pages a few hours before he was meant to. Perhaps it was due to the time difference being in South America during his time off but plenty of eagle-eyed United fans spotted the mix up. 8 Manuel Ugarte leaked the new United kit early Credit: Getty MAKING HIS MARC MARCUS RASHFORD is obviously keen to show his admirers he is returning to full fitness after injury wrecked his final few weeks at Aston Villa. The England forward posted footage of himself doing some warm weather training early this week. He also uploaded footage of him playing padel – which prompted a couple of cheeky replies from ex team-mates Bruno Fernandes and Kobbie Mainoo. Rashford is aware there is unlikely to be a way back for him at Old Trafford so the clock is ticking for him to find a new club. It is just over three weeks until United return to training at Carrington and Rashford will be keen to avoid an uncomfortable few days by finding a new club before then.


Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Rachel Reeves is leaving Britain defenceless
Last week, the Prime Minister said that we 'need to see the biggest shift in mindset in my lifetime: to put security and defence front and centre – to make it the fundamental organising principle of government'. The unfolding crisis in the Middle East underscores the need to do so. Now, more than ever, our national security must be the Government's overriding priority, trampling on any other competing demands for government money and ministers' time. But it isn't. This noble organising principle seems not to apply where it matters most: the Government's economic strategy. In her spending review this week, the Chancellor gave us her own definition of security: 'securonomics'. This ugly word, reeking of socialist greyness and uniformity, means – to quote Rachel Reeves – 'government must step up to provide security for working people and resilience for our national economy.' She is right about the need for economic resilience. For years, it has been clear that, in a turbulent world, the scale and structure of debt, combined with anaemic growth, makes our economy highly vulnerable to global shocks. Yet instead of rebuilding a fiscal buffer, the Chancellor has left us with a fiscal wafer so thin it could crack at the merest tap. Instead of bringing debt down, it will be higher at the end of the Parliament than today – and the cost of servicing it is already more than we spend on defence. And instead of supporting growth – critical to everything – the Government has suffocated it with higher taxes. Next, how has the Chancellor helped deliver 'security for working people'? For most working people, job security – the ability to find and keep a steady job – is key. Yet job insecurity is rising. By raising National Insurance on employers – a £25bn jobs tax – Rachel Reeves has provoked the biggest fall in employment in five years. Unemployment is ticking up. The broader definition of 'security' obviously encompasses our nation's defence. Although defence spending is set to rise to 2.5 per cent GDP during this Parliament, this is clearly not enough. At the upcoming Nato summit, the UK will be pressed to raise it to at least 3.5 per cent. But in Wednesday's spending review, what was the Chancellor's 'choice'? To give the NHS, not defence, a bigger slice of government largesse. 90 per cent of the total increase in spending from 2025-6 will go to health. The NHS will see a record cash investment: real-terms, day to day spending is set to increase by 3 per cent per year, costing an extra £29 billion. A government that sees defence as the organising principle of government would not have made that choice. It would have made the case that we need to move from a state that prioritises welfare to one that prepares for warfare. And as part of a strategy to put debt on a gradual downward path, it would have made tough decisions on spending overall – starting with a reform of incapacity and disability benefits, which now cost more than the defence budget. Instead, as her speech took us from spending more on affordable homes, to car production to training to buses in Rochdale, the Chancellor disorganised her Downing Street neighbour's organising principle, showing it the respect Tracey Emin had for her bed. There is only one conclusion one can draw from all this. Last week, when the Prime Minister said we need to make security and defence 'the organising principle of government', he left off four words: 'for this week only'.
.jpeg%3Fwidth%3D1200%26auto%3Dwebp%26quality%3D75%26trim%3D2%2C0%2C3%2C0%26crop%3D&w=3840&q=100)

Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Why there's plenty to like in Rachel Reeves' Spending Review for Edinburgh - but housing is the crunch point
The Chancellor's Spending Review announcements should be welcomed, writes Edinburgh City Council leader Jane Megaher. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... There was a lot to welcome in Chancellor Rachel Reeves' Spending Review statement. The single biggest injection into housing by the UK government for 50 years promises to transform social housing and living standards for tens of thousands of people across Britian – and there's no reason this shouldn't be replicated here in Scotland. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad With £52 billion promised in devolved budgets, the Chancellor has outlined the largest ever grant for Scotland. An exceptional opportunity, surely, for the Scottish Government to tackle our nation's shameful statistics on poverty and homelessness at long last, providing every Scot with the safe, warm home and life chances they deserve. Around £4bn over the next decade in extra funding for housing is expected to be provided to the Scottish Government as a result of the Spending Review – and with the Finance Secretary preparing to unveil her own spending plans on June 25, we're making the case loudly and clearly that this investment should be passed on in full to our cities and regions. Looking out across Edinburgh from Calton Hill | Adobe In Edinburgh and the South East of Scotland, where the housing emergency is most keenly felt, we know all too well the financial challenges of building enough homes to keep up with economic growth and demand. Add to that the fact that we have the fastest growing population in Scotland, accounting for 84 per cent of Scotland's predicted population growth over the next eight years, the challenge facing us could not be clearer. With Rachel Reeves committing £39bn towards affordable housing down south, the Scottish Government must follow suit and put much-needed homes at the heart of its own investment plans. As former US President Jimmy Carter famously said, 'decent housing is not just a wish, it is a human right'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The creation of the Cabinet Secretary for Housing portfolio is a positive step with Mairi McAllan MSP in this new role. Addressing the national housing emergency and accommodating the population growth in the Edinburgh City Region must be a priority and I look forward to working constructively with her to tackle these challenges. Another positive from Wednesday's announcement was confirmation from the Chancellor that she would commit up to £750 million for a next generation 'Exascale super-computer' to be housed at the University of Edinburgh. This will be a national asset supporting countless jobs and investment in the sciences and academia, cementing the region's role as a powerhouse for life sciences, technology and invention. Given Edinburgh's long-standing innovation capabilities, it is fantastic that we will be able to reap the associated economic, social and environmental benefits. On top of this, £410m will be shared across the devolved nations for a Local Innovation Partnership Fund and it makes great sense for our City Region to lead on this in Scotland. From artificial intelligence to data and robotics, this money could unlock a huge amount of investment building on the successful projects we've already delivered, including the National Robotarium, the Usher Institute and Easter Bush, which is now the global location of 'Agritech' excellence. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Chancellor has delivered her part. For the good of the Scottish economy, I now call upon the Scottish Government to pass on these additional funds in full and to prioritise investment in Edinburgh and the wider city region.