logo
French government hid Nestlé's illegal treatment of bottled water

French government hid Nestlé's illegal treatment of bottled water

Euronews19-05-2025

The government of French President Emmanuel Macron covered up decisions over the illegal treatment of mineral water by food industry giant Nestlé, including the world-famous Perrier brand, a Senate inquiry commission has said.
Its report focused on Nestlé's years of use of treatments to avoid bacterial or chemical contamination of water labelled as "natural mineral water" or "spring water" for brands also including Contrex, Vittel and Hépar.
Such treatments are prohibited under French and European regulations.
The report concluded that France's government had concealed "illegal practices."
"In addition to Nestlé Waters' lack of transparency, the French government's lack of transparency must also be highlighted," it said.
French media reported the banned treatments last year.
The report noted a "deliberate strategy" of concealment since the first government meeting on the issue in October 2021.
Months later, authorities agreed to a Nestlé plan to replace the banned treatments with microfiltering.
Nestlé did not immediately respond to a request for comment and France's government did not comment.
Last year, the Swiss company publicly acknowledged having used treatments on mineral waters and agreed to pay a €2 million fine to avoid legal action.
The inquiry commission interviewed more than 120 people including Nestlé's CEO and top managers.
The commission concluded "that the presidency of the republic had known, at least since 2022, that Nestlé had been cheating for years."
Asked about scandal in February, Macron said he was "not aware of these things. There is no collusion with anyone."
Alexandre Ouizille, the commission's rapporteur, said the total amount of the fraud has been estimated at over €3 billion by France's agency in charge of fraud control.
Natural mineral water is sold about 100 to 400 times the price of tap water, he said, denouncing "misleading of consumers."
Ouizille described a Nestlé plant in southern France the commission visited where there were "sliding cabinets behind which illegal treatments were carried out."
The report said Nestlé argued there was a risk of job losses if the government did not authorise some kind of treatment or microfiltration, because its plants would have to close due to spring water being contaminated by bacteria like E. coli that can cause serious illness and death.
Laurent Burgoa, the president of the commission, said there has been no proven harm to the health of people who drank water sold by Nestlé.
Representatives of Brazil's indigenous peoples travelled to Brussels to set out concerns with the trade agreement between the European Union and Mercosur countries at recent meetings with MEPs and European Commission officials.
A key issue is the likely expansion of agriculture and livestock farming in the lands inhabited by native peoples, which predate Portuguese colonisation in the 16th century.
If the agreement is ratified by the European Parliament and EU Member States, many agri-food products will be exported from South America to Europe at zero or reduced duties.
Considering that the EU is already the second largest trading partner of the countries of the Mercosur bloc (Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, and Uruguay), with an exchange of more than one hundred billion Euros per year, the trade agreement will likely lead to increases in agricultural production.
In Brazil, this is expected to translate into an increase in the cultivation of soya, millet, and sugar cane as well as cattle breeding.
"The agreement will increase deforestation and socio-environmental conflicts. It does not guarantee the rights of indigenous peoples, on the contrary, it creates instability and legal uncertainty for us, as economic interests that want to further exploit indigenous territories will benefit from this agreement", Dinamam Tuxá, coordinator of the Association of Indigenous Peoples of Brazil told Euronews.
He said the trade agreement would benefit large private companies and those who are using criminal methods to take land from the indigenous peoples for agriculture. It will also complicate the implementation of the European law on deforestation, which will come into force in 2026, he claimed.
"We are against this agreement, but the Brazilian government is in favour, because it wants to produce more. And this production will be done on our heads, on our bodies, at the expense of our rivers and the forest," said another indigenous leader, Alessandra Korap, spokesperson for the Amazonian munduruku people.
Both representatives of the indigenous peoples emphasised the combination of the agreement's entry into force and an alleged tendency of the Brazilian parliament to favour the agricultural exploitation of the territories inhabited by natives.
The Brazilian constitution protects the so-called 'demarcated lands', portions of territory guaranteed by the constitution and allocated to the country's more than 300 indigenous peoples, where they decide what to cultivate.
In 2023, however, a much contested law was passed restricting the allocation of these lands.
"Law 14.701, the Temporal Framework Law, relaxes the rights of indigenous peoples to exploit agro-industry within their territories and paralyses the demarcation of indigenous territories," said Dinamam Tuxá.
The legislation only considers as demarcated lands to those territories inhabited or claimed by indigenous peoples up till 1988, when the Brazilian constitution was promulgated. A condition that penalises indigenous communities that have grown up or moved away in the meantime, a situation not uncommon for many of the peoples living in the Amazon rainforest.
"When they block the demarcation of indigenous lands, they do so with the aim of depriving indigenous peoples of their rights to their own territory," Tuxá argued. "The agribusiness lobby in the Brazilian parliament has promoted a package of measures aimed at loosening the rights of indigenous peoples and expanding agricultural production areas to indigenous territories," he claimed.
The EU-Mercosur agreement includes a chapter on sustainability, but the representatives of the indigenous peoples do not believe it could protect them enough. And they fear for their future, as is evident from the words of Alessandra Korap.
"If you visit my region, you will not even feel like you are in the Amazon. You will see warehouses full of tons of soya. The government is favouring its production, which is spreading everywhere in the states of Pará and Mato Grosso."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

French government overwhelmed by school knife attacks
French government overwhelmed by school knife attacks

LeMonde

time29 minutes ago

  • LeMonde

French government overwhelmed by school knife attacks

No knives were confiscated by gendarmes during two surprise searches that were carried out in recent weeks around the Françoise-Dolto middle school, in the eastern French town of Nogent. Yet it was on the sidelines of one of these operations that a pupil fatally stabbed a 31-year-old teaching assistant, on Tuesday, June 10. Faced with this tragedy, teachers, educational staff and parents mourned a new stabbing attack committed in a school, and many expressed bitterness. On April 24, a student at a Catholic high school in the western city of Nantes killed a classmate and wounded three others with a knife, and similar attacks have followed over recent months. On Wednesday, the education minister called for a minute of silence to be held in all schools, at noon on June 12. Faced with widespread shock and excessive security rhetoric from factions on the right and the far right, the government has been searching for ways to prevent these attacks. Yet their solutions have, so far, proven ineffective to secure all of France's 12 million students and 1.2 million educational staff members. The June 10 stabbing has, once again, proven that all educational institutions, from private high schools in city centers to rural middle schools, could be struck by such violent acts – even those not identified as being "at risk."

Austria's gun laws come under scrutiny after 10 die in school shooting
Austria's gun laws come under scrutiny after 10 die in school shooting

Euronews

timean hour ago

  • Euronews

Austria's gun laws come under scrutiny after 10 die in school shooting

A day after a gunman attacked a school in Graz and killed 10, including students, many in Austria were left questioning how such an act of violence could occur, turning attention to the country's gun laws. According to police, the 21-year-old attacker legally owned both weapons used in the assault on Tuesday: a Glock pistol and a shotgun. According to Kleine Zeitung newspaper, the attacker had purchased one of the weapons just days before carrying out the attack. To acquire it legally, he was required to pass a psychological evaluation, Süddeutsche Zeitung reported, citing Austrian authorities. Around 1.5 million weapons are registered in Austria - a country with a population of just over 9 million and more liberal gun laws relative to the rest of Europe. After the attack, a debate on the country's laws is gaining pace, with Graz Mayor Elke Kahr calling for a ban on weapons in the private sector on Tuesday evening. In her opinion, gun licences are "simply issued too quickly". Austrian newspaper Der Standard reported that there are approximately 400,000 more weapons in the Alpine country today than there were five years ago. Compared to other European countries such as Germany or France, Austria's gun laws are considered to be somewhat more liberal, especially in how they allow for handgun ownership and cite self-defence as a reason to be able to carry weapons. Austria's Weapons Act divides firearms into four categories: Prohibited weapons (category A), firearms subject to authorisation (category B), firearms subject to registration (category C) and other firearms (category D). The possession of category B weapons — such as pistols or semi-automatic rifles — is only permitted with a firearms licence or a firearms pass. The latter also authorises the holder to carry the weapon in public. Category C and D weapons — such as hunting rifles — may be purchased from the age of 18, but must be registered in the Central Weapons Register within six weeks. In Austria, the basic requirements for legal possession of weapons include being of legal age, holding a permanent residence permit, and not having a weapons ban. Depending on the weapon category, additional proof such as reliability, training, and evidence of justification may also be required. Weapons and ammunition must be stored safely at home, usually in a gun cabinet, and may only be transported unloaded and in a locked container. Austrian authorities have widely condemned the attack, said to be Austria's worst mass shooting since World War II. Austria's President Alexander Van der Bellen said the 'horror could not be put into words', while Chancellor Christian Stocker has declared three days of national mourning in response to the tragedy.

No, this video does not show a NATO strike on Moscow
No, this video does not show a NATO strike on Moscow

Euronews

time2 hours ago

  • Euronews

No, this video does not show a NATO strike on Moscow

A video circulating widely on social media claims to show NATO forces striking Moscow at night, in what users have described as an "escalation" and an attempt by the Western alliance to start a "nuclear war". Users claim, without evidence, that the strike occurred earlier this month, on the eve of the 2 June peace talks between Ukrainian and Russian delegations in the Turkish capital of Istanbul. Known US conspiracy theorist Alex Jones shared the false claim on his X account, garnering more than 2 million views. "NATO is openly trying to start a nuclear war with Russia. Moscow is under attack again. The night before the peace talks," Jones wrote. Euroverify detected the unfounded allegations spreading on Facebook, TikTok and X in at least five European languages. We used a reverse image search to identify the origin of the video, and found that it has been available since December 2023. A closer analysis found that it shows an attack by Ukraine's air forces on a Russian warship known as Novocherkassk in the port of Feodosia in Crimea, which Russia occupied and unilaterally annexed in 2014. One person was killed in that attack and several others injured, according to media reports. The footage corresponds to Euronews' reporting of that event on 26 December 2023. The misrepresentation of the video comes amid increasing disinformation about Russia's war in Ukraine. Targeted disinformation operations aimed at undermining the credibility of the NATO Alliance are also on the rise. NATO troops have not directly engaged in any military activity as part of Russia's war in Ukraine, but do supply Ukrainian armed forces with military equipment and arms, including long-range missiles. At least two people were killed and 60 wounded in Kharkiv after Russian forces launched a large-scale drone attack across Ukraine overnight Wednesday, Ukrainian officials said. 'Seventeen strikes by enemy UAVs were carried out within just 10 minutes in two districts of the city this night,' Kharkiv's Mayor Igor Terekhov said. More than 15 apartments were on fire in a five-storey building and several houses were hit. 'There may be people trapped under the rubble," Terekhov added. The strikes caused widespread destruction in the Slobidskyi and Osnovianskyi districts of Kharkiv, hitting apartment buildings, private homes, playgrounds, industrial sites and public transport. 'Those are ordinary sites of peaceful life — those that should never be targeted,' Terekhov wrote on Telegram, as Kharkiv regional head Oleh Syniehubov said that nine children aged between 2 and 15 were among the injured. Emergency crews, municipal workers and volunteers worked through the night to extinguish fires, rescue residents from burning homes, and restore gas, electricity and water services to the area. Images from the scene published by Ukraine's Emergency Service on Telegram showed burning apartments, shattered windows and firefighters battling the blaze. Ukraine's Air Forces said Russia attacked Ukraine overnight on Wednesday with 85 Shahed-type drones and decoy UAVs, which targeted the northeastern city and other areas. Air defence systems managed to neutralise 49 drones, intercepting 40 and jamming nine more with electronic warfare. Separately, the death toll from a wave of Russian strikes Tuesday morning on Kyiv and Odesa rose to at least three and another 13 wounded after Moscow attacked the areas with drones and missiles. A maternity ward and residential buildings were among civilian targets hit, according to Odesa's regional head Oleh Kiper. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy voiced frustration about the lack of response from the US and other countries over the recent escalation of Russian attacks, including a record 419 Russian drones which were launched at Ukraine on Monday night. "Russian missile and Shahed strikes drown out the efforts of the United States and others around the world to force Russia into peace," the Ukrainian leader posted on X on Tuesday morning. For yet another night, instead of a ceasefire, there were massive strikes with Shahed drones, cruise and ballistic missiles." Zelenskyy said 250 of the drones were Shaheds, and two of the seven missiles were of 'North Korean production'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store