&w=3840&q=100)
US Op Midnight Hammer damaged only 1 of 3 Iranian nuke sites before Trump blocked wider strike: Report
A satellite view shows an overview of Fordow underground complex, after the US struck the underground nuclear facility, near Qom, Iran. Maxar Technologies/Reuters
A US strike on Iran last month damaged just one of three targeted nuclear enrichment facilities, according to an internal assessment reported by NBC News, raising questions about the true extent of Operation Midnight Hammer's impact on Tehran's atomic programme.
The attack on the Fordow nuclear site 'significantly' set back Iran's work there, but the facilities at Natanz and Isfahan were reportedly left largely intact due to their deep underground construction, NBC said, citing unnamed officials familiar with the report.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The US military had prepared a far more expansive plan for sequential strikes on additional facilities over several weeks. However, President Donald Trump ultimately opted against the broader operation. NBC quoted senior officials as saying Trump was concerned about high casualty figures on both sides and was unwilling to escalate America's military involvement, consistent with his aversion to foreign entanglements.
Contradictory claims
The findings are in stark contrast with public statements by both Trump and the Pentagon, which have continued to portray the June 22 strikes as overwhelmingly successful.
Trump has repeatedly described the results as total destruction, calling reports to the contrary 'fake'. He posted on Truth Social: 'Monumental damage was done to all nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images. 'Obliteration' is an accurate term! The white structure shown is deeply embedded into the rock, with even its roof well below ground level, and completely shielded from flame. The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!'
Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell echoed the president's view in a separate statement: 'The credibility of the Fake News Media is similar to that of the current state of the Iranian nuclear facilities: destroyed, in the dirt, and will take years to recover. President Trump was clear and the American people understand: Iran's nuclear facilities in Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz were completely and totally obliterated. There is no doubt about that.'
Limited success
Despite the administration's rhetoric, the NBC report cites internal assessments suggesting that only Fordo's enrichment work was disrupted in any substantial way, potentially setting Iran back by up to two years. The use of GBU-57 'bunker buster' bombs in the operation — the first time they were deployed in combat — had limited impact on deeper underground structures at Natanz and Isfahan, officials said.
Operation Midnight Hammer, conducted in a single night, was publicly framed around its most successful element, with Fordow's visible damage serving as proof of American military effectiveness. However, the muted effects on the other two sites are believed to have led military planners to quietly scale down post-strike assessments and shift attention away from the less successful aspects of the mission.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The Iranian government has yet to offer an official assessment of the damage or confirm any setbacks to its nuclear programme.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
26 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Supported by Brics, like-minded allies: Russia amid Trump's tariff threats
Russia on Monday (local time) said the country is supported by a vast number of partners, like-minded states, and allies amid tariff wars or sanction threats by US President Donald Trump. Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova made these remarks in response to a media question regarding the tightening of tariffs by the Trump administration towards the countries of the Global South. Zakharova noted, "Sanctions and restrictions have, unfortunately, become a defining feature of the current historical period, impacting countries across the globe." She further added that Washington is unable to accept the erosion of its dominance in an emerging multipolar international order and is continuing to pursue a neocolonial agenda, employing politically motivated economic pressure against those who choose an independent course on the international stage. Remarks from Russia's foreign ministry come days after Trump announced sweeping new tariff rates on dozens of countries, including India. On August 1, Trump imposed a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, adding that the latter would also have to pay a penalty for its continued trade with Russia amid Moscow's ongoing war with Kyiv, which has now entered the fourth year. Zakharova also added, "Such actions by the United States represent a direct infringement on the sovereignty of other nations and an attempt to interfere in their internal affairs. Beyond these concerns, this policy risks slowing global economic growth, disrupting supply chains, and deepening the fragmentation of the international economic system." Russia exits the INF Treaty with the US Russia also announced its exit from the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty with America. Russia's foreign ministry stated that it believes that the conditions required to maintain the INF Treaty have "disappeared." The exit from the treaty came days after Trump ordered the deployment of two nuclear submarines to "be positioned in the appropriate regions" near Russia. Trump's order to deploy the nuclear submarines came after former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev accused Trump of playing a "game of ultimatums" with Moscow. US-India trade ties strained Amid the ongoing global tensions, the US has also accused India of its continuous trade with Russia. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said, "Remember, while India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the World, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any Country. Also, they have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE — ALL THINGS NOT GOOD! INDIA WILL THEREFORE BE PAYING A TARIFF OF 25%, PLUS A PENALTY FOR THE ABOVE, STARTING ON AUGUST FIRST." In a separate post, he doubled down on both India and Russia and said, "I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care. We have done very little business with India; their Tariffs are too high, among the highest in the world." India counters Trump's claims The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) criticised Trump's "dead economy" remark, reminding the US that when India started importing oil from Russia at the outbreak of the conflict, Washington encouraged such trade. Calling Trump's statements "unjustified and unreasonable', India defended its oil imports from Russia, saying they were driven by national necessity and were far smaller in scale compared to the West's energy purchases.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
26 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India struggles to engage Trump admin as key US roles remain vacant
It's become urgent for New Delhi to make its case to Washington after being unexpectedly slapped with a 25% tariff, one of the highest in the region, facing further threats over its ties with Russia Bloomberg Indian officials have struggled to engage with President Donald Trump's administration because key foreign policy roles in Washington remain unfilled, people familiar with the matter said, making it difficult for New Delhi to effectively push for a favorable trade deal. Several positions in the Department of State and the Department of Defense are vacant, which has made it harder for India to lobby its view, the people said, asking not to be identified to discuss a sensitive matter. It's become urgent for New Delhi to make its case to Washington after being unexpectedly slapped with a 25 per cent tariff — one of the highest in the region — and facing further threats over its ties with Russia. Trump said Monday he'll increase the rate 'substantially' because of New Delhi's refusal to halt buying of Russian oil. The US says India, alongside China, is helping President Vladimir Putin fund his war against Ukraine with the oil purchases. New Delhi defended its position Monday, saying criticism from the US and European Union about the Asian nation's trade with Russia was 'unjustified and unreasonable.' It highlighted that the EU and US continue to buy energy and other materials from Russia when 'such trade is not even a national compulsion.' The steep tariff adds to already strained ties, with Trump repeatedly claiming he used trade as leverage to broker peace between India and rival Pakistan in May — an assertion New Delhi has strongly denied. One of the most critical vacancies is the Assistant Secretary for South and Central Asian Affairs — a role that oversees US foreign policy and relations in the region. Although Indian-American academic Paul Kapur was nominated for the role by Trump, his appointment has yet to be confirmed. The post of US Ambassador to India — a key role in managing bilateral tensions — has remained vacant since January 2025, with career diplomats currently running the New Delhi embassy. Eric Garcetti, former President Joe Biden's representative to India, was confirmed only after a two-year delay, but strong personal ties between key officials on both sides helped bridge the gap at the time, the people said. India's Ministry of External Affairs didn't comment when contacted for further information. The US Embassy in New Delhi didn't immediately respond to an email seeking further information. The sharp downsizing of the US National Security Council — from over 300 officials under Biden to around 50 under Trump's second term — has further compounded the challenges, the people added. The White House pushed out scores of NSC staffers in May as officials sought to transform the council into a smaller organization focused on implementing Trump's policies instead of helping to shape them.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
26 minutes ago
- First Post
When US armed Pakistan: Indian Army's throwback post after Trump's India funding Russia's war charge
At a time when US President Donald Trump has accused India of funding the Russian war on Ukraine, the Indian Army has shared newspaper clippings from 1971 with reports of US assistance to Pakistan ahead of the war in India. The United States sided with Pakistan in the India-Pakistan War of 1971. read more A US Navy SH-60 helicopter hovers off the bow of the USS Enterprise July 20, 1998, during a training exercise near Puerto Rico. The United States had deployed USS Enterprise and the 7th Fleet to intervene in the India-Pakistan War of 1971 on Pakistan's side. (Photo: Timothy Smith/US Navy/AFP) At a time when US President Donald Trump has accused India of funding the Russian war on Ukraine, the Indian Army has reminded the world of the US role against India in the India-Pakistan War of 1971. In a post on X, the Eastern Command of the Indian Army on Tuesday shared newspaper clippings from August 5, 1971, with reports of US military assistance to Pakistan at the time. In 1971, India and Pakistan fought a 13-day war in which India scored a decisive victory that led to the creation of the nation of Bangladesh that had until then been a part of Pakistan called East Pakistan. While the United States supported Pakistan ahead of the war —as news clippings shared by the Army show— it also supported Pakistan during the war. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD After Pakistan attacked India, formally starting the war on December 3, 1971, the United States came to the active military support of Pakistan and dispatched the 7th Fleet of the US Navy towards Indian shores to pressure India and break the blockade of East Pakistan (now Bangladesh), led by the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise. US support to Pakistan haunts India-US ties again In the Cold War, India and Pakistan were on the opposite camps. While Pakistan was aligned with the West led by the United States, India was aligned with the Soviet Union even though the country was formally non-aligned. In the India-Pakistan War of 1971, the United States and allies like the Shah of Iran helped Pakistan whereas the Soviet Union helped India. The US military intervention against India in 1971 tainted the India-US ties for decades and turned the public opinion in India against the United States for generations. Once India detected the US military movement, India reached out to the Soviet Union for help. The Soviet Union dispatched its own warships and submarines that shadowed and encircled US warships, forcing them to halt their mission and preventing any armed confrontation.
