The air we breathe in our homes and cars contains thousands of microplastics, study finds
Thousands of microplastics so small they can penetrate deep into the lungs are in the air you breathe in your home and car, a new study has found.
The particles are likely the result of the degradation of plastic-filled objects such as carpet, curtains, furniture and textiles and the plastic parts of car interiors, according to the study published Wednesday in the journal PLOS One.
'People spend an average of 90% of their time indoors, including homes, workplaces, shops, transportation … all the while they are exposed to microplastic pollution through inhalation without even thinking about it,' senior study author Jeroen Sonke and lead author Nadiia Yakovenko said in a joint statement.
'Microplastics in the air, especially indoors, may be an invisible threat we are only beginning to understand.'
Sonke is a research director at the National Centre for Scientific Research, which is affiliated with France's University of Toulouse. Yakovenko is a postdoctoral researcher of environmental geosciences at the university.
'While research is still ongoing, there is concern that long-term exposure to microplastics and their additives may contribute to respiratory problems, disrupt endocrine function and increase risk for neurodevelopmental disorders, reproductive birth defects, infertility, cardiovascular disease, and cancers,' the two said.
The study found adults may inhale some 68,000 microplastic particles of 1 to 10 micrometres per day from indoor air — an estimate that is 100 times more than expected, according to Sonke and his team.
In comparison, a red blood cell is 6.2 to 8.2 micrometres, while E. coli bacteria may be 1 to 2 micrometres long.
'This adds to the body of knowledge we have that microplastics are everywhere and getting into humans in every way imaginable,' said microplastics researcher Sherri 'Sam' Mason, director of Project NePTWNE at Gannon University in Erie, Pennsylvania, via email. She was not involved in the study. (NepTWNE is short for Nano & Polymer Technology for Water and Neural-networks.)
Scientists have detected microplastics in human testes and the penis, human blood, lung and liver tissues, urine and feces, mother's milk, and the placenta. A February study found nearly a spoon's worth of microplastics in human brain tissue. A March 2024 study found people with microplastics in their carotid artery tissues were twice as likely to have a heart attack, stroke or die from any cause over the next three years than those who had none.
'The size of these particles are especially concerning as the smaller the particle, the bigger the impact on human health,' said Mason, one of the first scientists to measure microplastics in bottled water.
Kimberly Wise White, vice president of regulatory and scientific affairs at the American Chemistry Council, which represents the plastics industry, expressed concerns about the study's methodology.
'This study is based on a very small sample size and acknowledges a contamination rate of 18%, which raises questions about the accuracy of the findings,' White said via email. 'Additional work using validated methods and standardized exposure assumptions is essential before drawing conclusions about potential health impacts.'
Cars are a significant source of microplastic pollution
To do the study, Sonke and his team took indoor air samples from their apartments and while in their cars driving between cities in France. In the United States, AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety statistics have shown the average American spent about 60 minutes a day inside a car in 2023.
Car cabins can be a significant source of microplastic exposure because they are small, enclosed spaces filled with plastic-based materials — dashboards, steering wheels, door handles, seat fabrics, carpets and carpet liners are all made with plastics, Sonke and Yakovenko said.
'These materials can shed tiny plastic particles over time, especially by solar irradiance, friction, heat and daily use,' they said. 'Unlike homes, car cabins often have limited ventilation, allowing microplastic particles to accumulate and concentrate in the air. As a result, they can be inhaled in higher amounts during regular commutes or long drives.'
Testing found some 2,238 microplastics particles per cubic metre of air inside the cars — much more than the 528 particles found in a similar amount of air from inside homes.
'We often associate plastic pollution with oceans or industrial areas,' Sonke and Yakovenko said, 'but our findings showed that the everyday indoor environment where we spend most of our time can be a major source of human exposure.'
To measure the plastic concentrations, the team used Raman microscopy, a newer and powerful technique that can measure down to about 1 micrometre. This technique is different from those applied in past studies, which have used methods that can only measure larger particles down to 20 micrometres, they said.
'Their analysis is sound,' said Wei Min, a professor of chemistry at Columbia University in New York City who specializes in developing next-generation microscopy techniques. He was not involved in the study.
'They were using a commercial instrument, and the limit of detection is at its best condition (around 1 micrometre),' Min said via email. 'This allows them to capture (1 to 10) micrometre population, which had remained largely undetected in previous studies of in-door air.'
However, the study was unable to measure even smaller particles, called nanoplastics, which are measured in nanometres instead of micrometres. It takes 1,000 nanometres to make 1 micrometre — in comparison, an average human hair is roughly 80,000 to 100,000 nanometres in diameter.
'The present study provides important information but also speaks to the need for advancements in the technology to assess even smaller polymer particles, both in the air and in our bodies,' said microplastics researcher Matthew Campen, regents' professor and professor of pharmaceutical sciences at the University of New Mexico in Albuquerque.
Nanoplastics are the most worrisome type of plastic pollution for human health, experts say. That's because the minuscule particles can invade individual cells and tissues in major organs, potentially interrupting cellular processes and depositing endocrine-disrupting chemicals such as bisphenols, phthalates, flame retardants, perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, and heavy metals.
Ways to cut back on plastic
There are many steps individuals can take to reduce their exposure to plastics and their plastic footprint, experts say. In February, CNN spoke to pediatrician Dr. Philip Landrigan, lead author of a March 2023 report from the Minderoo–Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health, a global consortium of scientists, health care workers and policy analysts charged with following plastics from creation to final product.
In that report, the consortium determined plastics are associated with harms to human health at every single stage of the plastic life cycle.
'I say to people, 'Listen, there are some plastics that you can't escape. You're not going to get a cell phone or a computer that doesn't contain plastic.' But do try to minimize your exposure to the plastic that you can avoid, especially single-use plastics,' said Landrigan, a professor of biology who directs the Program for Global Public Health and the Common Good and the Global Observatory on Planetary Health at Boston College.
It's hard to avoid foods wrapped in plastic film because they are so ubiquitous, Landrigan said, but you can take food out of the plastic wrapping before cooking or putting it in the microwave.
'When you heat plastic, that accelerates the movement of the microplastics out of the wrapping into the food,' he said.
Invest in a zippered fabric bag and ask the dry cleaner to return your clothes in it instead of those thin sheets of plastic, suggests the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental advocacy group. Bring a travel mug to the local coffee store for takeout and silverware to the office to cut back on plastic cups and utensils.
'Don't use plastic bags when you go shopping. Use a cloth bag or a paper bag or a recycle bag,' Landrigan said. 'Try to avoid plastic water bottles, if you can possibly do so.'
A January 2024 study found 1 liter of bottled water — the equivalent of two standard-size bottled waters typically purchased by consumers — contained an average of 240,000 plastic particles from seven types of plastics. Some 90% of those were nanoplastics.
'Use a metal or glass drinking cup instead of a plastic cup. Store your food in glass containers instead of in plastic ones,' Landrigan said. 'Work in your local community to ban plastic bags, as many communities around the United States have now done. There is a lot you can do.'
By Sandee LaMotte, CNN
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
2 days ago
- CTV News
Alberta's coal mine reclamation standards failing to protect water, fish: study
In this March 28, 2017, file photo, a dump truck hauls coal at Contura Energy's Eagle Butte Mine near Gillette, Wyo. THE CANADIAN PRESS/AP/Mead Gruver, File CALGARY — Alberta regulations meant to keep old coal mines from polluting streams and lakes are failing, suggests a study by government scientists. The study says high levels of numerous contaminants are having grave outcomes for aquatic life and their ecosystems. One of the authors, a former Alberta government scientist in charge of environmental monitoring, says the paper speaks to 'regulatory inaction.' 'These results suggest current reclamation practices and regulatory requirements for water quality and aquatic ecosystems are not meeting the desired objectives,' the authors write at the end of the report. The peer-reviewed study is by three Alberta government scientists and the former government scientist, who is now an environmental consultant. They took samples from rivers near three old coal mines south of Hinton, Alta., which are four kilometres from Jasper National Park at their closest point. The mines closed in the early 2000s. The authors discovered some improvements to water quality since mining activities ended. But in rivers downstream from those mines, they found high concentrations of several pollutants in the water. In the Luscar Creek and Gregg River, for example, nickel ratios were 200 times higher downstream from the mines than in water upstream. In the nearby McLeod River Basin, they determined selenium levels and other ions provide a 'persisting threat to water quality,' even though one mine has been nearly fully reclaimed and another is 60 per cent reclaimed. The authors looked at the number of samples in which selenium concentrations exceeded Alberta's protection of aquatic life guideline, a limit the province uses to determine when contamination levels would likely cause harm to an ecosystem. At six locations, 98 to 100 per cent of testing samples found selenium concentrations exceeded that limit. They write that elevated selenium levels have 'insidious' effects on certain fish and birds, because the substance is passed down from parents to offspring and presents in deformities and impairs their ability to reproduce. It is otherwise a naturally occurring element that's vital in small amounts. The authors also note the McLeod River Basin is home to Athabasca Rainbow Trout, listed as endangered Canada's Species At Risk Act — a law created to protect and recover at-risk species. They write that the trout is likely to go extinct. More broadly, they write that a growing body of research shows 'reclamation and mitigation practices may not restore aquatic habitat or reverse ecological damage.' Bill Donahue, one of the study's authors and a former chief of environmental monitoring for the Alberta government, said in an interview that the study demonstrates 'regulatory inaction.' 'The big lie is that Albertans seem to think that the regulator is going to look at what's submitted and, if those promises and requirements aren't met, then the company is going to have to fix it,' he said. 'Well, here's the paper that says that's not true.' Donahue said he's unsure proper regulations can be created to reverse the impacts of coal mining, because there is little historical evidence companies have been able to do so after they've ended operations, no matter how much money they spend. He also called the study a 'warning flag' for future coal projects in Alberta. Earlier this year, the Alberta Energy Regulator granted an Australia-based coal company permission to start a controversial coal exploration on the eastern slopes of the Rockies, concluding the small-scale project likely won't have any effect on water quality downstream. The regulator said at the time that it couldn't consider the possibility that the exploration permit might lead to a full-blown coal mine in the future. Ryan Fournier, press secretary for Alberta's Environment Ministry, said the province has shared the study with the regulator and it's one of the reasons the province isn't allowing any more open-pit mines. It's up to the regulator to decide if more monitoring or actions are needed in the bodies of water referenced in the study, Fournier said, adding selenium levels sometimes exceeded fish protection alert levels but there's currently no evidence of population decline. 'These results are also why any new mines will be required to either be underground mines or use advanced selenium management techniques and deploy state-of-the-art technology and monitoring to protect the surrounding environment,' he wrote in a statement. The regulator said in a statement it's reviewing the findings. Asked if it was aware of selenium concentrations in Luscar Creek or Gregg River, the regulator said it has a long-standing requirement for approval holders to reduce selenium concentrations to levels that don't affect the aquatic environment and it has tools to enforce regulatory compliance. 'Achievement of selenium reduction objectives is expected to progress over multiple years as mines advance towards reclamation,' it said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 1, 2025. Matthew Scace, The Canadian Press


CTV News
2 days ago
- CTV News
Trump administration weighs fate of $9M stockpile of contraceptives feared earmarked for destruction
Irene A Kerkulah, the health officer in charge at the Palala Clinic, looks at an almost-empty shelf at the clinic that once held contraceptives, in Bong County, Friday, June 13, 2025. (AP Photo/Annie Risemberg, File) BRUSSELS — President Donald Trump's administration says it is weighing what to do with family planning supplies stockpiled in Europe that campaigners and two U.S. senators are fighting to save from destruction. Concerns that the Trump administration plans to incinerate the stockpile have angered family planning advocates on both sides of the Atlantic. Campaigners say the supplies stored in a U.S.-funded warehouse in Geel, Belgium, include contraceptive pills, contraceptive implants and IUDs that could spare women in war zones and elsewhere the hardship of unwanted pregnancies. U.S. State Department deputy spokesman Tommy Pigott said Thursday in response to a question about the contraceptives that 'we're still in the process here in terms of determining the way forward.' 'When we have an update, we'll provide it,' he said. Belgium says it has been talking with U.S. diplomats about trying to spare the supplies from destruction, including possibly moving them out of the warehouse. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Florinda Baleci told The Associated Press that she couldn't comment further 'to avoid influencing the outcome of the discussions.' The Trump administration's dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development, which managed foreign aid programs, left the supplies' fate uncertain. Pigott didn't detail the types of contraceptives that make up the stockpile. He said some of the supplies, bought by the previous administration, could 'potentially be' drugs designed to induce abortions. Pigott didn't detail how that might impact Trump administration thinking about how to deal with the drugs or the entire stockpile. Costing more than US$9 million and funded by U.S taxpayers, the family planning supplies were intended for women in war zones, refugee camps and elsewhere, according to a bipartisan letter of protest to U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio from U.S. senators Jeanne Shaheen, a New Hampshire Democrat, and Alaska Republican Lisa Murkowski. They said destroying the stockpile 'would be a waste of U.S. taxpayer dollars as well as an abdication of U.S. global leadership in preventing unintended pregnancies, unsafe abortions and maternal deaths — key goals of U.S. foreign assistance.' They urged Rubio to allow another country or partner to distribute the contraceptives. Concerns voiced by European campaigners and lawmakers that the supplies could be transported to France for incineration have led to mounting pressure on government officials to intervene and save them. The executive branch of the European Union, through spokesman Guillaume Mercier, said Friday that 'we continue to monitor the situation closely to explore the most effective solutions.' The U.S. branch of family planning aid group MSI Reproductive Choices said it offered to purchase, repackage and distribute the stock at its own expense but 'these efforts were repeatedly rejected.' The group said the supplies included long-acting IUDs, contraceptive implants and pills, and that they have long shelf-lives, extending as far as 2031. Aid group Doctors Without Borders said incineration would be 'an intentionally reckless and harmful act against women and girls everywhere.' Charles Dallara, the grandson of a French former lawmaker who was a contraception pioneer in France, urged President Emmanuel Macron to not let France 'become an accomplice to this scandal.' 'Do not allow France to take part in the destruction of essential health tools for millions of women,' Dallara wrote in an appeal to the French leader. 'We have a moral and historical responsibility.' ___ Leicester reported from Paris. Matthew Lee contributed from Washington, D.C. Lorne Cook And John Leicester, The Associated Press


CTV News
2 days ago
- CTV News
Novo Nordisk shares extend losses, erasing nearly all gains since Wegovy launch
The weight-loss drug Wegovy is shown in this undated photo. THE CANADIAN PRESS/handout, Novo Nordisk Canada Inc. Shares in Novo Nordisk fell as much as six per cent on Friday to their lowest since August 2021, extending recent losses to wipe out almost all the gains made since the drugmaker launched its blockbuster weight-loss treatment Wegovy. The fall comes after U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday sent letters to 17 major pharmaceutical firms, including Novo Nordisk, telling them to cut drug prices in the United States. That prompted share price declines across the sector. Novo Nordisk on Tuesday slashed its forecast for 2025 sales growth due to competition from compounded, or copycat, versions of Wegovy and appointed veteran insider Maziar Mike Doustdar as its new CEO, prompting its shares to fall 23 per cent on the day. Novo became Europe's most valuable listed company following the launch of Wegovy in June 2021. But its shares have plunged by more than two-thirds since peaking last year on concerns the drugmaker is losing ground in the obesity drug race. 'The U.S. healthcare system is complex, but Novo Nordisk will continue to work to find solutions that help people access the medicines they need at affordable prices,' Novo said in an emailed statement. Novo's shares were 4.9 per cent lower at 08:39 GMT. Friday's drop brings this week's losses to more than 30 per cent - the stock's worst-ever weekly fall. The European healthcare index .SXDP was down 1.6 per cent, its lowest since April. 'Trump doesn't have the mandate to tell Novo Nordisk how to price their products in the U.S., but investors are just panicking about the risk of another downgrade,' said Nordnet analyst Per Hansen. The pressure to lower prices adds to Novo's problems in the United States, its biggest market. It faces competition from Eli Lilly LLY.N and from compounders - custom-made medicines that are based on the same ingredients as branded drugs. 'This is a repricing of the obesity market, it's a repricing of the United States as the world's most attractive drug market, and it's a repricing of the risk from Donald Trump,' Hansen said. (Reporting by Anna Pruchnicka, Elviira Luoma, Jacob Gronholt-Pedersen and Louise Breusch Rasmussen. Editing by Amanda Cooper and Mark Potter)