City data suggests 'stark decline' of waterfowl on Toronto beaches during summer, expert says
2 minutes ago
Duration 2:48
This story is a collaboration between CBC Toronto and the Investigative Journalism Foundation (IJF).
A new analysis of city data suggests a dramatic decline in birds on Toronto beaches over the past two decades.
The public dataset shows 73 per cent fewer waterfowl counted on Toronto's beaches from 2008 to 2024, indicating its waterfronts have become less hospitable to the animals, according to experts, but also that the city's efforts to keep birds away from the beaches are working.
The 11,488 counts were conducted by lifeguards, rather than scientists, and don't constitute a scientific survey, but make up one of the most widespread accounts of conditions for waterfowl in Toronto in the summer months, according to an expert who reviewed the data.
The counts were completed at 10 Toronto beaches during the summer months during the 17-year span. According to the data, lifeguards counted an average of 51 waterfowl per count across all beaches in 2008, compared with 14 in 2024. The most affected beaches include Sunnyside Beach, which went from an average of 100 waterfowl counted in 2008 to 17 in 2024, and Centre Island Beach, which went from 92 in 2008 to 15 in 2024.
A spokesperson for Toronto Public Health said the reduction in birds was expected as the city has been trying to discourage their presence when the beaches are open for swimming, to minimize droppings. This involves corralling and relocating birds, enacting bylaws against the feeding of waterfowl and the use of dogs to drive them away.
Fewer birds mean fewer droppings and less chance of E. coli in beach waters. But one expert says the data raises important questions about wildlife habitat and whether the reduced presence of birds on beaches means they're making homes elsewhere or if their population might be declining due to human activity.
Questions about long-term impact
According to Marc Cadotte, a biology professor at the University of Toronto Scarborough who has independently reviewed the data, the counts show a "stark decline" in the number of birds on waterfronts.
If the city's deterrents are successful, Cadotte wonders whether they result in a loss of habitat for the birds.
"Are they moving to other places in the city, or do these deterrents impact populations in the long-term? Wild animals consistently lose habitat with urbanization, and if we further drive them out of usable habitat, we are magnifying our impacts," he said.
"This is more of a case of classic human-wildlife conflict, and the usual outcome is that wildlife lose."
Asked about the possibility of population decline, Mahesh Patel, manager of health protection at Toronto Public Health said measuring the number of birds in an area can be challenging given their constant movement and that the data should be taken as a snapshot in time.
The city did not respond to questions about the possible environmental impact of its measure on bird populations overall.
The population of the Greater Toronto Area rose from 5,530,588 in 2008 to 7,106,379 in 2024, according to Statistics Canada.
"Cities are where we get multiple stressors together with humans, and so we kind of get a picture of what's going to happen in the future elsewhere," Cadotte said.
Toronto Public Health says the data shouldn't be used to estimate the presence of waterfowl in Toronto generally.
"Although the daily counts in the beach observation data are a rough estimate, the data collected are helpful to have as we know that a higher number of waterfowl may negatively impact water quality due to a potentially higher number of droppings," TPH said in an email.
Better data needed, says one expert
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority spokesperson Afiya Jilani said that some of the waterfowl population is impacted by city staff intentionally relocating geese away from humans and that it's hard to make conclusions about conditions for waterfowl overall.
"While there may be fewer waterfowl observed on Toronto beaches, this could reflect improved habitat conditions elsewhere in the region," she wrote.
Mark Peck, manager of the Schad Gallery of Biodiversity at the Royal Ontario Museum, said he is "heavily concerned" about relying on this specific dataset to understand bird population levels due to unknowns in the methodology, such as lifeguards having varying levels of aptitude or motivation to conduct the counts.
Headed to the beach for a swim? Here's what you should know before you go
He said other research points to Toronto still being a good place for waterfowl to migrate through during the winter and that counting them on beaches during the summer is not a good indicator of how they are doing.
"The areas where there's going to be lifeguards probably aren't the best areas for waterfowl in Toronto anyway," Peck said.
'A sad side-effect'
For Haroop Sandhu, a student living in Toronto and frequenter of Woodbine and Centre Island beaches, watching ducks is a main reason she goes to beaches.
"I love wildlife, it's one of the most important parts of being at the beach," she said. "I feel like if [human activity] is the main reason then we can't really do anything about it because people are going to go to the beach, so it's a side-effect, but it's a sad side-effect."
Bird watcher Vivian Li, who favours Sunnyside Beach, shared the same sentiment. "It's their home as well, and we need to share the space with them instead of chasing them off," she said.
Cadotte says despite limitations to the data, it is still useful for describing conditions on beaches.
"I would say that this type of data more than surpasses any questionable limits on the minimum amount of data. So I think that in terms of the number of observations, it's actually quite robust given comparable data sets," he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
4 hours ago
- CTV News
Beavers could help prevent wildfires, researchers say
A member of the beaver family creating tension in Martinez, Calif., gathers dam-building twigs during an evening swim on Monday, Nov. 5, 2007. (AP Photo/Noah Berger) As North America fights increasingly brutal wildfire seasons, one team of U.S. researchers is suggesting something among the lowest of low-tech strategies: To let the humble beaver do its work. In a study published Monday, environmental scientists at Stanford University and the University of Minnesota examined aerial photos across a vast area of the western United States and Canada, cataloguing more than 1,000 individual beaver ponds to better understand how they interact with watersheds and the surrounding land. 'Beavers are naturally doing a lot of the things that we try to do as humans to manage river corridors,' said study co-author Kate Maher, in a Monday release. 'Humans will build one structure, leave it there, and hope it lasts for many decades. Beavers on the other hand, build little, tiny dams where they're needed and flexibly manage what's going on with the water in their environment.' Furry firefighters? By building dams across rivers, beavers create ponds of cool water throughout forested areas, contributing to local biodiversity and, researchers say, both improving water quality and reducing the spread of wildfires. In particular, beaver ponds help create what forestry experts call 'fire refugia,' or patches of land that remain untouched, even when the surrounding area burns. In one 2020 study, researchers found that areas without beaver populations lost three times as much vegetation during wildfires as those with plentiful dams, on average. And while those burned zones tended to grow back over time even without them, refugia like beaver ponds were found to be strong contributors to wildfire resistance. 'When a fire does ignite, our data suggests that the beaver-dammed riparian areas have stored water that kept plants hydrated enough to make it energetically unfavorable to burn,' it reads. 'It's similar to trying to start a fire with a pile of wet leaves versus with dry kindling.' Included in the study is a photo from the aftermath of a California wildfire showing two branches of a creek, one scorched bare and the other with a strip of greenery cutting through the devastation. The difference between them? That still-green branch had a beaver dam spanning from bank to bank. Wildfire Beaver Dam (Image credit: Burned Area Emergency Response, via the Ecological Society of America) Lodging concerns Since the gold rush of fur trapping in the early days of European colonization, North American beaver populations have fallen sharply, to between 10 and 15 million in the modern day from estimated highs in the hundreds of millions. Most recently, though, conservation efforts have set the stage for a resurgence. 'After enduring centuries of hunting, habitat loss, and disease, North American beavers … are making a comeback – and bringing benefits for both humans and nature with them,' the Monday release reads. Not everyone would be thrilled to hear it, though. Researchers note that, in the wrong place at the wrong time, beaver dams can cause headaches, if not catastrophes, from flooding agricultural fields, to preventing drainage along roadways, to reducing water flows to already drought-stricken areas. Maher and her colleagues recommend a tailored approach, supporting the growth of beaver populations while relocating 'nuisance beavers' to somewhere they can help, not harm. Brad Bonner, Garrett Pittis In this Sept. 12, 2014, photo, Brad Bonner and Garrett Pittis transport a 50-pound male beaver nicknamed Quincy to a creek near Ellensburg, Wash. Under a program in central Washington, nuisance beavers are being trapped and relocated to the headwaters of the Yakima River where biologists hope their dams help restore water systems used by salmon, other animals and people. (AP Photo/Manuel Valdes) Identifying those high-impact areas is the next question to tackle, they say. The study published Monday provided data on how the length of dams, strength of streams and the height of local vegetation can influence the size of ponds, laying the groundwork for building site-selection maps. 'There's definitely a lot of exuberance around reintroducing beavers, and it may not be that every beaver reintroduction project is the right one to pursue,' said Maher in the release. 'It's important to understand those trade-offs and the risks and rewards from either intentionally reintroducing beavers, or just their natural return to watersheds.'
CTV News
7 hours ago
- CTV News
A look at how wildfire predictions held up throughout the years
The Mount Underwood wildfire is seen in this handout photo, southwest of Port Alberni, B.C., on Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Handout — BC Wildfire Service (Mandatory Credit) As Canada's forests burn, climate change scientists warn the increasingly warm planet will continue to take part in fuelling more frequent and violent wildfires. That is their forecast now, but how did their predictions hold up over the past decades? 'We are following the trend that scientists have predicted for some time,' says the director of research on adaptation at the Canadian Climate Institute Ryan Ness. CTV News archives shows that research two decades ago linked climate and a rise in fire frequencies. A 2006 television report points to a study that concluded new evidence showed climate change, not forest management and logging, was the main factor behind a spike of wildfires in California. 'We see this increase in fire frequency is well correlated with warming temperatures and the arrival of earlier springs in the last 16 or 17 years compared with previous decades,' said fire ecologist Thomas Swetnam, at the time. Ten years ago, as 196 countries signed on to the Paris Climate Agreement that aimed to curb global warming, a study in the Climatic Change journal projected that the annual frequency of fire spread days in Canada could increase by 35 to 400 per cent by 2050, with the greatest increases in Alberta and Saskatchewan. 'We can look back to papers published in the 1990s that predict an increase in area burned mainly because of climate change and rising temperatures,' says research scientist at the Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, Nathan Gillett. Statistics from the Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre (CIFFC) show that trend is proving to be a reality on the ground, not just a hypothesis. 'Winters are shorter, there is less snow to melt and keep our forest moist in the spring. Extreme heat further dries out the forests and turns them into fuel for intensifying wildfires,' says Ness. The Gault Nature Reserve, a McGill University-owned site an hour's drive from Montreal, aims to protect more than 1,000 hectares of natural forest and a trail network. Evidence of the dry conditions is on display. 'It can really spark, and you never know the consequences of throwing a cigarette or a campsite that is not well maintained,' says McGill's David Maneli, associate director at the reserve. To avoid risks, smoking is banned on the site. Maneli also says hikers who come to take in the majestic sights on trails that lead them to the top of a mountain, also learn valuable lessons about the need to protect forests. So far this year, wildfires have burned more than 7.3 million hectares, more than double the ten-year average for this time of the year. 'What we would hope is that people would take these wildfire seasons as a sign that things are not right, and that indeed projections and predictions of scientists are coming to pass. They were accurate,' says Ness. And now, scientists warn if the trend continue, the planet will continue to burn even hotter and help spread wildfires.
CBC
8 hours ago
- CBC
How researchers discovered Canada's 1st dinosaur-era dragonfly fossil
A McGill University undergraduate uncovered the fossil in 2023 during a digging expedition in Alberta's Dinosaur Provincial Park. The finding sheds light on a 30-million-year gap in the evolution of dragonflies.
