‘Exorcist', schoolgirl's father escape POCSO Act conviction in Madras High Court due to doubts over her age
Trigger warning: the following article has references to child sexual abuse, sexual assault, and rape. Reader discretion advised.
An 'exorcist' and the father of a schoolgirl have escaped punishment under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act of 2012 because of the prosecution's failure to prove she was only 16 years old when the duo subjected her to sexual assault and aggravated penetrative sexual assault, respectively.
A Madras High Court Division Bench of Justices A.D. Jagadish Chandira and K. Rajasekar held that a certificate issued by the school headmistress was insufficient to prove the age of the victim. A radiologist who conducted the ossification test was not examined, and the test report was not marked as evidence before the trial court, they said.
To get today's top stories from the State in your inbox, subscribe to our Tamil Nadu Today newsletter
The judges, therefore, set aside the conviction of the girl's father Gunasekaran and the 'exorcist' Sivakumar for the offences under Sections 7 (sexual assault) and 5 (aggravated penetrative sexual assault) of the POCSO Act, which the trial court had invoked to impose five years of rigorous imprisonment and life sentence, respectively.
Charged under rape
Nevertheless, since Additional Public Prosecutor A. Thiruvadi Kumar had succeeded in proving the other facts of the case before the High Court, the Division Bench convicted the girl's father under Section 354 (outraging a woman's modesty) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced him to three years of simple imprisonment.
The Bench also found the 'exorcist' guilty under Section 376(1) (rape) of the IPC and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for 10 years. It also reduced the fine amount of ₹5 lakh imposed on him by the trial court under the POCSO Act to ₹25,000 for the IPC offence, with a default sentence of one year of simple imprisonment.
The judges further ordered that the compensation of ₹7 lakh ordered to be paid to the victim by the trial court by invoking the provisions of the POCSO Act, should instead be paid from the Tamil Nadu Victim Compensation Scheme for Women Victims/Survivors of Sexual Assault/Other Crimes 2018.
What is the case about?
According to the Inspector of an All Women Police Station in Ramanathapuram, the girl was first molested by her father in 2018 when she was 14 years old and studying in Class VII.
He later moved abroad for a job. Subsequent to his return to the country in 2020 due to COVID-19, the convict continued to sexually assault his daughter and threatened her with dire consequences if it was revealed to her mother. Meanwhile, the mother, concerned about her daughter's changes in behaviour, took her to the 'exorcist' for remedy.
The exorcist, however, further subjected the girl to penetrative sexual assault in 2021. The girl then opened up to her mother, who immediately called the child helpline 1098, leading to the registration of the POCSO Act case against the father and the 'exorcist'.
Accused found guilty
Though the convicts raised multiple grounds to attack the prosecution case on merits and attempted to get acquitted from all charges, the judges rejected those grounds and held that the evidence adduced by the prosecution was sufficient to prove the guilt of the accused beyond all reasonable doubt.
The Division Bench also observed there was nothing wrong on the part of the trial court in having conducted a joint trial against the two convicts though the charges levelled against them were of different periods, spanning between 2018 and 2021, and the alleged offences too had occurred at different places.
'The accused have understood the charges for which they have been facing the trial and they were not able to establish prejudice, if any, caused to them... This court finds that no prejudice had been caused to them due to their joint trial and there is no miscarriage of justice against the accused,' the Bench concluded.
The judgment was reserved at the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court but delivered at its principal seat in Chennai.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
State vicariously responsible for Custodial death, says Delhi HC
The Delhi High Court has held the State vicariously liable for unnatural deaths in judicial custody, asserting that it has a constitutional obligation to ensure the safety and dignity of incarcerated individuals. The verdict came on Thursday from justice Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar in a case involving the custodial death of a Tihar Jail inmate, Javed, just two days before he was to be released in 2013. The court not only awarded compensation to Javed's legal heirs but also issued sharp observations on the failure of prison authorities to prevent gang violence in prisons. 'The State, owing a duty to ensure the security of the general public, including incarcerated persons, is responsible to compensate in cases of unnatural deaths in custody,' the court ruled. The judgment squarely placed the blame on systemic lapses and emphasised that the State's responsibility doesn't end at incarceration—it includes active efforts to prevent violence and the proliferation of gangs inside jails. Javed, who was serving a seven-year sentence for robbery, was due to be released on May 5, 2013. But two days before his release, his mother, Shakila, was informed that he had succumbed to injuries following a violent clash between rival gangs inside the prison. In her plea, Shakila had demanded a judicial inquiry, alleging that jail staff were responsible for her son's death. She also sought compensation, stating she was financially dependent on him. In December 2014, she was granted ₹1 lakh as interim relief based on recommendations by the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC). The case was closed in 2017, following Shakila's death the previous year. But in 2019, her four children and five grandchildren successfully moved to revive the case. The Delhi government opposed the plea, contending that Javed had died in an intra-gang fight and that the petitioners were not eligible for compensation under the Delhi Victims Compensation Scheme (DVCS), 2018, as they were not 'dependents' after Shakila's death. Rejecting these claims, the court said Shakila had been wrongfully denied rightful compensation during her lifetime. 'She was forced to come to this court… but before the petition could be decided, she passed away,' the court observed. Highlighting NHRC's findings, the judge said there were evident lapses by jail personnel. He ordered the Delhi government to immediately pay ₹2 lakh to Javed's legal heirs and asked the Delhi State Legal Services Authority (DLSA) to conduct a fact-finding exercise to determine additional compensation. In a noteworthy interpretation of DVCS, the court ruled that siblings and grandchildren of deceased victims are also entitled to claim compensation—regardless of marital status. 'Since this court has already held that a sibling is also entitled, there can be no distinction made between a married or unmarried sibling either. A similar logic would be applicable in the case of the children of the sibling(s),' the order said. Though the court declined to order a new judicial inquiry—citing prior acquittals in the case—it rebuked prison authorities for failing to maintain order. 'The fact that rival gangs had access to weapons or tools to cause injuries, resulting in death, reflects poorly on the discharge of duties by the jail administration,' the court said. This ruling comes amid heightened scrutiny of custodial violence in the Capital. Just days earlier, a preliminary report on the death of 24-year-old Aman Poddar inside the Saket court lock-up had flagged grave lapses, including the failure to separate rival inmates and delays in police response. Echoing that case, the court remarked: 'The State cannot escape liability by attributing the death to a gang altercation. Preventing such violence is a core part of the State's responsibility.'
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Delhi: Fake ‘doctor sahab' nabbed after 10-year run from Haridwar
A 52-year-old man posing as a doctor from Haridwar, and affectionately called 'Doctor sahab' by locals in the Uttarakhand city, was arrested by the Delhi Police Crime Branch after a decade-long search, officers said Friday. Police said the accused, Raj Kumar Sharma, was allegedly living under a false identity and posing as a doctor affiliated with AIIMS, Rishikesh. He is wanted in two separate cases of cheating and forgery registered in Delhi. Police said Sharma was first booked on March 23, 2007, under IPC sections 420 (cheating), 468 (forgery committed with the intent to cause cheating), 471 (using a forged document or electronic record as genuine), and 120B (criminal conspiracy). He was among six people arrested for duping government banks by taking vehicle loans on forged documents. During trial proceedings, Sharma absconded and was declared a proclaimed offender (PO) by a court on December 15, 2016, after not appearing in hearings. In the second case, Sharma duped two individuals of Rs 14.10 lakh in 2015 by selling a plot using forged property documents. 'He first tried to compromise with the victim and issued a cheque of Rs 26 lakh from a bank account, which was already closed by him several years ago. Thereafter, the complainant approached the police. Feeling pressure from the complainant and the police, he vacated the house overnight in 2015 and, after changing his identity, settled in Haridwar. He could not be traced or arrested and was declared a PO by the court concerned,' said DCP (Crime Branch) Sanjeev Yadav. After fleeing Delhi, police said Sharma constantly changed his identity, appearance, addresses, and phone numbers to avoid arrest, said police. He settled in Haridwar and began living as a doctor, gaining the trust and respect of locals. Upon arrest and questioning, he allegedly admitted to evading police over the years. Police also discovered that he had no legitimate medical qualification linked to AIIMS. According to the police, Sharma was born in 1973 in Bulandshahr in Uttar Pradesh. He completed his BA from Meghalaya University and has one son and one daughter. Before turning to fraud, he ran monthly magazines and newspapers in North Delhi's Burari area. At present, he claimed to have no steady source of income and was relying on ancestral agricultural earnings for survival, said police. Following his arrest, Sharma was brought to Delhi, and the police stations concerned — Roop Nagar and Burari police stations — have been informed of necessary legal proceedings.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
State responsible for prisoner's death, states Delhi HC, awarding compensation
New Delhi: It is the duty of the State to ensure the safety and well-being of prisoners in its custody, and "gangs" are not permitted to proliferate in jails, Delhi High Court has said while awarding compensation to the kin of a man who died in a fight due to gang rivalry inside Tihar jail. Delhi HC said the State cannot shrug off responsibility by claiming that the convict was involved in a fight between gangs, adding that authorities owe a duty to ensure the security of the general public, including persons who are incarcerated, and compensate in cases of unnatural deaths in custody. "This court is of the firm opinion that it is the bounden duty of the State to ensure the safety of persons who are in its custody. While the deceased may have had criminal antecedents, the State is not absolved of its duty to ensure the safety and well-being of prisoners," Justice Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar observed in a recent order. The court directed the Delhi State Legal Services Authority (DSLSA) to pay Rs 3 lakh in compensation to the kin of the deceased, Javed—Rs 1 lakh of which has already been paid earlier to his mother, who has since passed away. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Switch to UnionBank Rewards Card UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo The court noted that the authorities' contention that two rival gangs instigated the altercation, in which the victim was involved, "would not absolve the authorities of their bounden responsibility" to maintain prisoner safety and security. The bench further remarked that the fact that such a violent altercation occurred, with rival gangs having access to weapons or tools used to inflict fatal injuries on Javed, "speaks highly of the manner in which jail authorities discharged their duties." The compensation petition was originally filed by Javed's mother, who stated that her son had served seven years of imprisonment in a criminal case and was scheduled for release on May 5, 2013. However, she was informed of his death on May 3, 2013, reportedly due to a fight between inmate groups. The mother, who was granted an interim compensation of Rs 1 lakh, died in 2016. Thereafter, Javed's siblings and their children continued the litigation, seeking compensation on the basis that they were financially dependent on him. In addition to awarding Rs 2 lakh compensation, the court directed the DSLSA to conduct a fact-finding inquiry to assess the actual physical or monetary dependence of the siblings and their children on Javed, in order to determine the precise loss or injury suffered. Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .
