Tree census ordered after allegations that hundreds were cut down for cricket stadium in Madhya Pradesh
A bench comprising judicial member Sheo Kumar Singh and technical member Afroz Ahmad ordered that the census be conducted city-wise and district-wise across the state.
'There should be a tree census within the state, city-wise and district-wise to be monitored by the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest or an official nominated by the PCCF,' the tribunal said.
The NGT also directed a joint committee to submit a report on the tree-felling allegations. This committee will include representatives from the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change's integrated office in Bhopal, the Central Pollution Control Board (Bhopal), the Additional Chief Conservator of Forest (Bhopal), and the State Pollution Control Board.
The NGT said it would take between 70 and 100 years to regenerate the green cover provided by 700 trees. '…thus the destruction of so many trees adversely affects the environment and lives of several human beings. Accordingly, the compensation of compensatory afforestation should be in ratio to that period and ratio to the oxygen generated by the plant during the lifetime of the trees,' the tribunal said.
The order came in response to a plea filed by Nitin Saxena, who alleged that 700 trees were illegally cut down in violation of the state's tree conservation law — Madhya Pradesh Vrikshon Ka Parirakshan (Nagariya Kshetra) Adhiniyam, 2001. The trees were allegedly felled to facilitate construction within the catchment area of the Bhoj Wetland, near the Neelbad-Barkheda Nathu area in Bhopal.
Saxena emphasised the ecological significance of the Bhoj Wetland, a designated Ramsar site — a site that is designated to be of international importance under the Ramsar Convention.
The NGT also directed the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests and Divisional Forest Officers to ensure that geo-tagging of all trees be made mandatory, so that accurate records of their location, species, and number can be maintained. The geo-tagging data must be published and reported to the Chief Conservator of Forests, the tribunal added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Approval issue: Plaint against Cacora sewage treatment plant dismissed
Panaji: The Goa State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (Goa-SEIAA) dismissed a complaint filed by a political party against the Cacora sewage treatment plant (STP). The authority stated that the project does not fall under its purview and, therefore, does not require prior environmental clearance (EC). The complaint was filed by Revolutionary Goans, based on which the Goa-SEIAA asked the Sewerage and Infrastructural Development Corporation of Goa to submit its response. The authority noted that the 7.5 MLD capacity plant being constructed near the Hodar bridge was sanctioned by the Union jal shakti ministry and that its construction started after obtaining all the necessary permissions, including CRZ clearance. 'Regarding the allegations made by RG pertaining to violating the EIA Notification 2006 and the NGT order, the authority noted that standalone STPs don't require prior environmental clearance. The authority also noted that the NGT order specifically pertains to common effluent treatment plants, which differ from sewage treatment plants that handle domestic sewage,' the Goa-SEIAA said in its order. 'Moreover, the NGT confirmed that STPs are not covered under the EIA Notification 2006 and therefore don't require prior EC,' the authority said. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Changing track on pollution
The Supreme Court's decision on Tuesday to halt coercive action against owners of so-called end-of-life vehicles (ELVs) is more than just a procedural breather: It's a much-needed shift away from an unscientific, punitive approach that has bothered motorists for nearly a decade. The court has agreed to revisit its own 2018 order, which upheld the National Green Tribunal's 2014 directive banning diesel vehicles over 10 years old and petrol vehicles over 15 from the roads in the National Capital Region. In doing so, it has given space to discuss a valid argument: Emissions, rather than age, should be the yardstick of a vehicle's roadworthiness. There is no data-based evidence proving that every diesel vehicle over 10 years old is uniformly more polluting than a newer one. (Hindustan Times) On paper, the logic of the original ban appeared to be straightforward — older vehicles are presumed to pollute more. But such a presumption is a poor substitute for scientific rigour. There is no data-based evidence proving that every diesel vehicle over 10 years old is uniformly more polluting than a newer one. In fact, many such vehicles have low annual mileage, are well maintained, and meet pollution under control (PUC) norms. A vintage car that is taken out a few times a year may be cleaner over its lifetime than a modern SUV driven daily through Delhi's gridlock. The age-based ban is a blunt approach — easy to enforce, but scientifically questionable. The broader point is that Delhi's pollution crisis will not be solved through piecemeal measures. Targeting motorists while leaving far more damaging sources — industrial emissions, construction dust, biomass burning — largely untouched is selective enforcement. Such bans also disproportionately affect lower- and middle-income citizens for whom replacing a vehicle is a financial burden. They also ignore the environmental cost of scrapping and manufacturing — processes that consume vast energy resources. If the aim is cleaner air, the route must be a comprehensive, sector-wide strategy that marries technology with policy. Real-world emissions monitoring, expansion of clean public transport, mandatory retrofitting of high emitters, and investment in walkable and cyclable infrastructure must form the core. The role of the State is to create systems that are proactive, consistent, and rooted in science. The Supreme Court has now opened the door to establishing a more rational framework — one that focuses on pollution vehicles, not their birthdays. If the government can seize this moment to craft a broad-spectrum, evidence-based plan, Delhi could finally take a step towards solving its air crisis.
Indian Express
6 hours ago
- Indian Express
Understaffed NGT gets 2 new judicial, 4 expert members; strength now 13
The Union Environment Ministry has ordered the appointment of two judicial members and four expert members to the National Green Tribunal (NGT) that is currently functioning below its sanctioned strength. The Centre in its order dated August 11 also ended with immediate effect the extended tenures of two judicial members – Justices Sudhir Agarwal and B Amit Sthalekar, and two expert members K Satyagopal and Arun Kumar Verma. As per the order, the two new judicial members are Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain, a former judge of Delhi HC and presently a member in the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), and Justice Umesh Chandra Sharma, a former judge of Allahabad HC and a member of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Chandigarh. Of the four new expert members two are former Indian Forest Service officers – Sudhir Kumar Chaturvedi, retired Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Gujarat, and Ishwar Singh, retired Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Delhi. The two others are Sujit Kumar Bajpayee, a member of the Commission for Air Quality Management and former joint secretary, Environment Ministry, and Prashant Gargava, former member secretary, CPCB. Until the Centre's latest order, the NGT had only five expert members and six judicial members. Now, there will be seven expert members, with the number of judicial members remaining unchanged. Section 4(1) of the NGT Act, 2010 states that the Tribunal shall consist of not less than 10 but a maximum of 20 full-time judicial members and the same number of expert members. The order does not specify when the new judicial and expert members will take charge and their exact place of assignment; the NGT has five benches – Principal bench (Delhi), Eastern zone (Kolkata), Western Zone (Pune), Southern Zone (Chennai) and Central Zone (Bhopal). NGT Registrar General S Vineeta was unavailable for a comment. Since August 12, NGT Chairperson Justice Prakash Shrivastava has been virtually hearing cases listed before the Kolkata bench, along with expert member Senthil Vel. Earlier, the Supreme Court had granted tenure extension to three judicial members and two expert members, in view of the vacancies and continuing search and selection process. On January 16, 2023, a bench headed by former CJI D Y Chandrachud ordered that Justice Sheo Kumar Singh, judicial member of NGT's Bhopal bench, will continue until the process of selection of new judicial members was completed. Justice Singh's tenure in Bhopal will end immediately after charge is assumed by a newly-appointed judicial member. Similarly, on April 3 this year, a bench of Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh ordered extension of tenure for two judicial members and two expert members. This allowed judicial members Justices Agarwal and Sthalekar and expert members K Satyagopal and Verma to continue; all were due to retire in April. Under the NGT Act and as per appointment norms, a judicial member is appointed for five years or until he attains the age of 67, whichever is earliest. Justice Singh was due to demit office in 2023, but he was granted an extension and was also briefly NGT's acting chairperson, until the current Chairperson Justice Prakash Shrivastava's appointment. A judicial member should be a former judge of the HC, or a district or additional district judge for 10 years or an advocate with substantial experience in environmental litigation matters before NGT, HC or SC. Meanwhile, expert members are supposed to be qualified with a degree or masters in science with an experience of 25 years in the relevant field, and five years practical experience in the field of environment and forests in a reputed national institution. Former state or central government officials are also eligible for this role.
