My wife and I were both managers. When we retired, we set 3 marriage rules so we wouldn't micromanage each other.
I was a lawyer running my own practice. My wife was a social worker. We guided other people through the intricacies of complex bureaucracies for a living. We used to decompress by talking about our days at the kitchen table. Her enemies became mine, and my enemies became hers. It was the two of us against the world.
Then we retired — her first, then me. With both of us home and without the routine we'd become used to, there was no common enemy, and gradually, we began trying to micromanage each other.
As time went on, we grew concerned about how this tendency would affect our marriage. Being good managers, we derived a set of guidelines to protect our continued health as an organization.
No Lists
In our professions, we kept many lists. One such list was for things we'd bring up during performance reviews for those who worked under us.
Out of habit, we continued to make lists after retirement.
In the back of our minds, each of us kept a list of things the other person did poorly or not at all around the house. I might point out to my wife a more efficient system for keeping our saltshakers full. Rather than thanking me for my wise observation, she'd tell me how I could improve the way I park in the garage. I'd bring up the fact that air conditioning doesn't work if one leaves the windows open, and she'd ask why some people feel the need to leave three pairs of shoes abandoned in the living room.
These stored-up complaints would spew out onto our kitchen table during discussions, leaving hurt feelings and unpleasant evenings in their wake. Every issue was trivial, but long lists of trivial things make a heavy load for a marriage to carry.
So we decided, no lists. Neither of us was an employer or underling. If she did something that annoyed me, I had to bring it up immediately, or the objection was waived. The same applied to her.
Frequently, I'd let the time for making a complaint pass and regret that I didn't say something, but then later, when I was less hungry or tired, I'd wonder why something so trivial ever even bothered me. Our home life improved immediately. Maybe my professional life would've been better had I banished similar lists about things my direct reports did, too.
No shoulds
My wife and I were both kind and helpful managers who guided others through professional difficulties.
As retirees, when we both relax in our respective La-Z-Boys listening to NPR, it's inevitable that one of us will have a suggestion about how the other person could be happier, such as by joining a bridge club, volunteering at the local animal shelter, or learning to play the harmonica. The temptation is to then start a conversation with the sentence, "You should."
This is a mistake. The spouse receiving the suggestion, being a lifelong manager, already knows what needs to be done, and nobody likes unsolicited advice. It comes off as bossy and condescending.
When I have an idea to improve my wife's life, I've decided I must lead by example rather than using "you should." If I rise from my La-Z-Boy and exercise or join a bridge club, surely she'll see the joy the activity brings me and go into action herself.
I can't say the lead-by-example strategy has ever spurred her to change her behavior, but it has been a great success in avoiding arguments.
Our marriage has improved significantly by expelling "you should" from the house. We're also working on getting rid of other accusatory sentence starters, like "You always," and "Why are you doing that?"
No supervising
I know how to dice an onion. My method is safe, efficient, and produces perfectly uniform dice. If my wife dices an onion, I have to leave the room.
I dislike the way she does it. Seeing her waste an extra 45 seconds of our valuable retirement with her slower chopping, only to get a less uniform dice, causes me physical pain. My choices are to suffer pain, violate the previous rule about sentences that begin with "you should," or leave the room.
The right choice is to leave the room. It's not easy. The urge to ensure things get done according to my own liking didn't instantly disappear when I left the workplace.
Vacuuming isn't one of my ordinary household duties. As I toiled to vacuum one day, inventing new techniques as I went, I looked over at my wife. On her face was the same pain I felt watching her cut onions. I love her and don't want her to suffer. I no longer vacuum while she's around to see me do it.
As my wife and I have grown older, health problems have arisen, and at times, each of us has been called on to do housework that's ordinarily done by the other. When that occurs, we must complete those jobs in solitude, in a place where the other cannot see. Doing this makes the days pass more smoothly for both of us.
Today, my wife and I have a peaceful retirement and a strong marriage
Despite the challenges of aging and failing health, my wife and I are getting along well in retirement, in part thanks to banishing the tenets we lived by as managers.
Banishing lists, shoulds, and supervision has left our humble home in relative peace. In my working life, I used these methods because I was taught them by the managers who trained me. Looking back, I can't help but wonder if those were the best approaches to management.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
6 days ago
- Business Insider
My wife and I were both managers. When we retired, we set 3 marriage rules so we wouldn't micromanage each other.
I was a lawyer running my own practice. My wife was a social worker. We guided other people through the intricacies of complex bureaucracies for a living. We used to decompress by talking about our days at the kitchen table. Her enemies became mine, and my enemies became hers. It was the two of us against the world. Then we retired — her first, then me. With both of us home and without the routine we'd become used to, there was no common enemy, and gradually, we began trying to micromanage each other. As time went on, we grew concerned about how this tendency would affect our marriage. Being good managers, we derived a set of guidelines to protect our continued health as an organization. No Lists In our professions, we kept many lists. One such list was for things we'd bring up during performance reviews for those who worked under us. Out of habit, we continued to make lists after retirement. In the back of our minds, each of us kept a list of things the other person did poorly or not at all around the house. I might point out to my wife a more efficient system for keeping our saltshakers full. Rather than thanking me for my wise observation, she'd tell me how I could improve the way I park in the garage. I'd bring up the fact that air conditioning doesn't work if one leaves the windows open, and she'd ask why some people feel the need to leave three pairs of shoes abandoned in the living room. These stored-up complaints would spew out onto our kitchen table during discussions, leaving hurt feelings and unpleasant evenings in their wake. Every issue was trivial, but long lists of trivial things make a heavy load for a marriage to carry. So we decided, no lists. Neither of us was an employer or underling. If she did something that annoyed me, I had to bring it up immediately, or the objection was waived. The same applied to her. Frequently, I'd let the time for making a complaint pass and regret that I didn't say something, but then later, when I was less hungry or tired, I'd wonder why something so trivial ever even bothered me. Our home life improved immediately. Maybe my professional life would've been better had I banished similar lists about things my direct reports did, too. No shoulds My wife and I were both kind and helpful managers who guided others through professional difficulties. As retirees, when we both relax in our respective La-Z-Boys listening to NPR, it's inevitable that one of us will have a suggestion about how the other person could be happier, such as by joining a bridge club, volunteering at the local animal shelter, or learning to play the harmonica. The temptation is to then start a conversation with the sentence, "You should." This is a mistake. The spouse receiving the suggestion, being a lifelong manager, already knows what needs to be done, and nobody likes unsolicited advice. It comes off as bossy and condescending. When I have an idea to improve my wife's life, I've decided I must lead by example rather than using "you should." If I rise from my La-Z-Boy and exercise or join a bridge club, surely she'll see the joy the activity brings me and go into action herself. I can't say the lead-by-example strategy has ever spurred her to change her behavior, but it has been a great success in avoiding arguments. Our marriage has improved significantly by expelling "you should" from the house. We're also working on getting rid of other accusatory sentence starters, like "You always," and "Why are you doing that?" No supervising I know how to dice an onion. My method is safe, efficient, and produces perfectly uniform dice. If my wife dices an onion, I have to leave the room. I dislike the way she does it. Seeing her waste an extra 45 seconds of our valuable retirement with her slower chopping, only to get a less uniform dice, causes me physical pain. My choices are to suffer pain, violate the previous rule about sentences that begin with "you should," or leave the room. The right choice is to leave the room. It's not easy. The urge to ensure things get done according to my own liking didn't instantly disappear when I left the workplace. Vacuuming isn't one of my ordinary household duties. As I toiled to vacuum one day, inventing new techniques as I went, I looked over at my wife. On her face was the same pain I felt watching her cut onions. I love her and don't want her to suffer. I no longer vacuum while she's around to see me do it. As my wife and I have grown older, health problems have arisen, and at times, each of us has been called on to do housework that's ordinarily done by the other. When that occurs, we must complete those jobs in solitude, in a place where the other cannot see. Doing this makes the days pass more smoothly for both of us. Today, my wife and I have a peaceful retirement and a strong marriage Despite the challenges of aging and failing health, my wife and I are getting along well in retirement, in part thanks to banishing the tenets we lived by as managers. Banishing lists, shoulds, and supervision has left our humble home in relative peace. In my working life, I used these methods because I was taught them by the managers who trained me. Looking back, I can't help but wonder if those were the best approaches to management.


CNN
05-06-2025
- CNN
What do you do when you're the lone Democrat on Trump's FCC? You go on tour
Anna Gomez, soon to be the lone Democrat on the Federal Communications Commission, has been sounding the alarm about President Donald Trump's 'weaponization' of her agency against the press. And now she's taking it on the road. Gomez has embarked on a 'First Amendment Tour' of planned speeches across multiple states, saying Trump has shown a 'pattern of censorship and control' threatening free speech rights. Under Trump-appointed Chairman Brendan Carr, the FCC has conducted what she calls 'sham investigations' against news outlets. Last week, Gomez gave a speech at California State University in Los Angeles — her first tour stop outside Washington, DC. She'll soon make appearances in Kentucky and Illinois, and the tour is expected to last through the end of the year. 'I want to speak out, make sure we get the message out about what is happening and how this is a threat to our democracy,' Gomez told CNN. The FCC's efforts to investigate news outlets — including NPR, PBS, ABC, CBS and NBC — 'is a threat to the freedom of speech and the freedom of the press,' she added, 'and I want to encourage others to join me, to speak out and to push back against this violation of the First Amendment.' Get Reliable Sources newsletter Sign up here to receive Reliable Sources with Brian Stelter in your inbox. Gomez suggested she could be fired for openly criticizing her agency. However, she said she's 'more worried about our democracy and the folks standing up to defend it.' (The FCC is an independent agency, and the president cannot fire a commissioner without just cause. If Trump removed anyone from the panel, it could trigger a legal fight.) 'I will continue to speak out, regardless of what happens, because I think it's important that we bring attention to these actions that are so contrary to our constitutional freedoms,' Gomez told CNN. After this week, Gomez, a 2023 Biden appointee, will be the only Democrat left on the five-seat commission. Her fellow Democrat, Geoffrey Starks, who was appointed by Trump and reappointed by Biden, will step down on Friday. Republican commissioner Nathan Simington, a Trump appointee, will also exit the agency at the end of this week. The departures will leave just two commissioners on the bench: Gomez and Carr, the latter of whom has openly signaled a willingness to pursue media outlets deemed unfavorable by the president. The FCC will be unable to vote on any matters until it fills a vacant seat and fulfills a required three-commissioner quorum. In the meantime, Gomez said she plans to be vocal about her chairman's actions. Since Trump returned to the White House, Carr has reopened probes into NPR and PBS over their sponsorship practices and into CBS over alleged 'news distortion.' He's reinstated complaints against ABC News for its handling of a 2024 presidential debate and opened new probes into NBCUniversal and Disney over their diversity, equity and inclusion policies. Those actions, Gomez said, have been justified by Carr using 'an undefined public interest standard,' which she translated as 'things we don't like to see.' These are 'sham investigations,' Gomez bluntly told CNN. 'They are intended to affect how these broadcasters and companies are doing their business, whether it's how they make their editorial decisions or how they change their fair hiring practices.' Gomez has also used the tour to delve into Trump's lawsuits against media companies — a tactic that has FCC connections, in the case of CBS News. The broadcaster's parent company, Paramount, is seeking the FCC's sign-off on its lucrative merger with Skydance Media. At the same time, Trump is suing CBS, accusing '60 Minutes' of deliberately mis-editing its October interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris to manipulate the election. Even though experts have deemed the lawsuit bogus, CBS is reportedly considering settling the lawsuit. Pressure to settle the case and clear the way for FCC approval has trickled down to the network. CBS News president Wendy McMahon, a '60 Minutes' ally, stepped down last month. 'It's become clear that the company and I do not agree on the path forward,' she wrote in her farewell memo. Weeks before that, longtime '60 Minutes' producer Bill Owens resigned because he felt he could no longer make 'independent decisions based on what was right for 60 Minutes,' as he wrote in a memo to the show's staff. Days later, the newsmagazine's anchor Scott Pelley said that Paramount had started 'to supervise our content in new ways' amid the political pressure, and that Owens felt 'he had lost the independence that honest journalism requires.' 'That, to me, is completely against the public interest,' Gomez said of Owens and McMahon being pushed out, 'because what it says is that they are making news editorial decisions for reasons that have nothing to do with journalistic integrity, but everything to do with the corporate parent's desire to get their transaction done.' While Gomez is using her speeches to sound alarms, she said there are glimmers of hope. The audience at last week's Los Angeles show, she said, was thrilled to see press freedom groups pushing back against the administration. However, Gomez said, the overall takeaway from the L.A. event was just how pervasive the sense of fear for press freedom has become. 'There's a lot of fear about these actions being taken against broadcasters, in particular, and frustration,' Gomez said. 'We heard from a wide variety of people — reporters, broadcasters, professors, public media — and they all had the same message, which is that they are very nervous about the actions that this administration is taking.'
Yahoo
04-06-2025
- Yahoo
La-Z-Boy Incorporated Announces Timing of Fiscal 2025 Fourth Quarter Earnings Release and Conference Call
MONROE, Mich., June 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- La-Z-Boy Incorporated (NYSE: LZB) will report its Fiscal 2025 Fourth Quarter results for the period ended April 26, 2025 after the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange on Tuesday, June 17, 2025, and will hold its quarterly investor conference call at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Time the following day, Wednesday, June 18, 2025. The conference call will be webcast live with corresponding slides at The dial-in phone number for the live conference call will be (888) 506-0062 for persons calling from within the U.S. or Canada, and the number for international callers will be (973) 528-0011. The participant access code is 546047. The conference call will be archived on the internet and accessible for one year. A telephone replay will be available for two weeks following the call. This replay will be accessible to callers from the U.S. and Canada at (877) 481-4010 and to international callers at (919) 882-2331. The replay passcode is 52510. Investor Relations ContactMark Becks, CFA, (734) About La-Z-BoyLa-Z-Boy Incorporated brings the transformational power of comfort to people, homes, and communities around the world - a mission that began when its founders invented the iconic recliner in 1927. Today, the company operates as a vertically integrated furniture retailer and manufacturer, committed to uncompromising quality and compassion for its consumers. The Retail segment consists of nearly 200 company-owned La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® stores and is part of a broader network of over 360 La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® that, with serve customers nationwide. Joybird®, an e-commerce retailer and manufacturer of modern upholstered furniture, has 12 stores in the U.S. In the Wholesale segment, La-Z-Boy manufactures comfortable, custom furniture for its Furniture Galleries® and a variety of retail channels, England Furniture Co. offers custom upholstered furniture, and casegoods brands Kincaid®, American Drew®, and Hammary® provide pieces that make every room feel like home. To learn more, please visit: in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data