Experts say IU President plagiarized her dissertation. What happens when IU students plagiarize?
Plagiarism is often taken very seriously at universities and can result in serious consequences for the student accused.
A professor may ask the student to redo the plagiarized assignment, but they also could give the student an "F" on the plagiarized assignment or require withdrawal and assign a failing grade to the entire course.
If the professor finds the plagiarism particularly egregious, it could be escalated to disciplinary probation, suspension or even expulsion.
Here's what happens to Indiana University students when they are caught plagiarizing.
What is plagiarism?
According to the definition by Merriam-Webster, someone who plagiarized has "stolen and passed off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own : used (another's production) without crediting the source."
All students, but especially college students, are expected to complete and submit their own original work during their enrollment in order receive their diploma, degree or certificate. This is why plagiarism is typically taken so seriously within universities and why it goes against student codes of conduct and academic honesty policies.
What happens when IU students plagiarize?
Students who are accused of plagiarism at IU can face a number of serious consequences, according to the Indiana University Student Code of Conduct.
If a faculty member suspects that student misconduct occurred, they have to meet with the student to discuss it in-person. If the student does not attend despite the professor's best effort to speak with them, they should complete their investigation.
If a faculty member determines misconduct occurred, then sanctions will be imposed and those sanctions must be reported to the Dean of Students.
Sanctions that may be imposed by the faculty member include but are not limited to one or more of the following:
A lower or failing grade for any assignment(s) in which misconduct occurred.
A lower or failing grade for the course; the penalty for a serious act of academic misconduct ordinarily should involve the recording of a failing grade for the course.
Repeating the assignment(s) in which misconduct occurred.
Completing additional assignment(s).
Required withdrawal from the course, with a grade of either F or W at the faculty member's discretion, regardless of when during the semester the student withdraws from the course.
From The Herald-Times: New evidence arises alleging IU President Pamela Whitten plagiarized her dissertation
Does failing a class due to plagiarism impact your GPA?
Yes; once an "F" is added to an academic transcript as a saction for plagiarism, the grade will not be removed for any reason and it will be calculated as part of the student's GPA.
The Registrar is notified about the reason for the failing grade, and it is their job to maintain that it does not disappear from the student record and is added into their GPA.
Even if a student later redoes the same course for credit, the "F" will be on their record permanently.
Katie Wiseman covers trending news for IndyStar and Midwest Connect. Contact her at klwiseman@gannett.com. Follow her on Bluesky @katiewiseman.
This article originally appeared on The Times-Mail: What are the consequences of plagiarizing at Indiana University?
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democratic-led states sue over Trump restrictions on crime victim grants
By Nate Raymond (Reuters) -A group of Democratic-led states filed a lawsuit on Monday seeking to prevent the Trump administration from forcing them to cooperate with immigration enforcement activities in order to receive grant funding to support crime victims. The lawsuit filed in federal court in Rhode Island is the latest case to challenge efforts by Republican President Donald Trump's administration to impose immigration-related conditions on states' ability to receive federal funding. Monday's lawsuit by state attorneys general in 20 states and the District of Columbia takes aim at a condition the U.S. Department of Justice recently imposed on the ability of states to receive grants pursuant to the Victims of Crime Act, which Congress enacted in 1984 to bolster support for crime victims. The Justice Department did not respond to a request for comment. The department administers programs funded by fines and penalties assessed in federal criminal cases that allow states to receive grant funding to provide services for victims including medical care, counseling, shelter and compensation for lost wages. Attorneys general from states including California, Illinois, New Jersey, New York and Rhode Island say those funds help about 10 million people annually. In 2025, nearly $1.4 billion in such funding is available, the lawsuit said. But under a new Trump administration policy, states can lose out on such funding if they decline to provide U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement access to facilities or honor all civil immigration enforcement requests, the lawsuit said. The conditions were imposed in keeping with a policy Attorney General Pam Bondi unveiled in February requiring the Justice Department to ensure that federal funds do not flow to so-called "sanctuary jurisdictions" that do not cooperate with ICE. The states' lawsuit argues that such conditions are unlawful and violate the U.S. Constitution by undermining Congress' power over appropriations. They are asking a judge to block the Justice Department from enforcing the conditions. Judges in Rhode Island have issued a series of rulings preventing the administration from imposing conditions on grant funding that align with Trump's broader agenda. Most recently, a judge in the state this month barred the Justice Department from enforcing new restrictions on grant funding used to support victims of domestic violence and sexual assault.
Fox News
23 minutes ago
- Fox News
James Comey mocked for 'dramatic' video gushing over Taylor Swift
'The Ruthless Podcast' co-hosts Michael Duncan and John Ashbrook join 'America's Newsroom' to react to the former FBI director's bizarre anti-Trump rant and the latest on the Trump admin's D.C. crime crackdown.
Washington Post
23 minutes ago
- Washington Post
The twist in these mystery novels: You get to solve the crime
The first book I ever read by myself as child was a mystery, and since then, I have read a mountain of them. Despite my passion for mysteries, however, I'm still terrible at guessing 'whodunit.' It's not that I'm totally clueless at spotting red herrings, although I'll admit I was the kid who always had to check the answers at the back of the classic 'Encyclopedia Brown' mysteries. It's just that I'd much rather focus on the characters and the story, so solving the puzzle and identifying the murderer before the big reveal just doesn't grab me as much. Yet the puzzle aspect of mysteries is beloved by many readers, as evidenced by a recent mini-trend of 'solve-it-yourself' mysteries being published for adults. Intrigued, I set out to read five of them and write about my experience. (Spoiler alert: It was a highly entertaining experiment, but my ability to guess the culprit sadly remains negligible). I began with 'A Most Puzzling Murder' by Bianca Marais. Set on desolate Eerie Island, the novel blends fantasy and mystery. The protagonist is Destiny Whip, a former child puzzle-solving prodigy who travels to Scruffmore Castle in search of information about her birth parents and instead finds herself in the midst of a deadly Scruffmore family power battle. To keep the murder count down, Whip — and the reader — must solve a series of puzzles. In a fascinating twist, readers can get clues by sending an email to an address provided by the author. Even so, I solved few of the puzzles, but — mercifully for me — Marais channels 'Encyclopedia Brown' and provides the answers in the back of the book. My next book, 'Can You Solve the Murder?' by Antony Johnston, is billed as 'an interactive crime novel.' As the reader, I was required to don the persona of an English police detective and actually create the story by deciding what evidence to gather, what clues to follow and which suspect to accuse of murdering a local businessman at a wellness retreat. The book is divided into 200 short, numbered sections: Readers start with the first section, then — depending on the choices they make — move through the book in a nonchronological order, jotting down a series of numbers and letters designed to help identify the murderer. It's an incredibly inventive concept, and I quite enjoyed playing detective, although it took me two tries to guess the killer. Author Hazell Ward then took me on a wild ride in her debut, 'The Game Is Murder.' The book is based on a 50-year-old real — and unsolved — murder case in which a nanny named Sally Gardner was killed, and the main suspect, her aristocratic boss, Lord John Verreman, disappeared before facing trial. Readers can take on the role of 'The Great Detective' at an exclusive murder mystery dinner party hosted by David Verreman, who wants you to decide if his father is really guilty after hearing evidence laid out by the other guests. While this is the main thread of the book, it's only one layer of the dizzying story presented by Ward in this tour-de-force meta mystery. There are puzzles for the reader to solve, frequent authorial intrusions, dozens of sly, knowledgeable references to detective fiction classics and unexpected twists galore. I'll freely admit I was baffled much of the time, and the last-minute reveal of the murderer was a total surprise, but Ward's book is so captivating that I eagerly kept turning the pages. Things got even more challenging for me with 'Murder in Tinseltown' by Max Nightingale, which is set in the glitzy world of late-1950s Hollywood. This time, I was thrust into the role of a Los Angeles homicide detective working to solve the mystery of who brutally murdered young movie star Blanche Aikerman in her luxury hotel suite. Similar to Johnston's 'Can You Solve The Murder?,' I jumped around in the book, depending on my choices and decisions. More often than not, I guessed wrong and was either killed, demoted or forced to start at the beginning again (and again). While I'm admittedly not the ideal reader for this type of mystery, I did find it the most frustrating of all the 'solve-it-yourself' books I read. Fortunately, my final book offered the perfect antidote. 'You Are the Detective: The Creeping Hand Murder' by Maureen Johnson and Jay Cooper is packaged as a police file on a particularly tricky locked-room murder. Six suspects were present in the room when a seventh person died, but it seems none of the six could be the killer. The police are stumped and have asked a famous detective — the reader — to comb through the file and determine the murderer. The book is a blast to read, filled with drawings of crime scene photos and interviews with the suspects. At the end, there's a gift for clueless readers like me: an envelope containing the killer's confession. Karen MacPherson is the former children's and teen coordinator at the Takoma Park Maryland Library and a lifelong mystery fan.
