Getting to the bottom of Boston's CarPlay dead zones
It's always frustrating when your car's GPS system crashes or resets.
It's even more infuriating when it happens every day — in the same spot.
Why it matters: That's what happens to some Boston drivers who say their Apple CarPlay or Android Auto dashboard units disconnect every time they drive over a certain spot on Storrow Drive by Harvard's athletic fields.
Other spots where drivers report CarPlay failures:
The Storrow Back Bay exit
The Park Drive bridge over the Fenway MBTA stop
Further down Storrow near the Hatch Shell
The other side of Soldier's Field by WBZ.
What's happening: Most dashboard devices like CarPlay and Android Auto don't handle GPS navigation on their own — they use a direct wireless connection to the driver's phone for their link to the outside Internet and navigation satellites.
Radio interference can disconnect the dashboard from the phone, causing the GPS route to get knocked offline.
What they're saying:"Given that these bands are unlicensed and that anybody can operate in these bands, it is likely that sometimes there may be some interference in the system," Northeastern University electrical and computer engineering assistant research professor Michele Polese told Axios.
Northeastern runs the Institute for the Wireless Internet of Things, which specializes in how modern online devices communicate.
The intrigue: Another user suggested point-to-point microwave links along the Charles River, possibly owned by a certain Ivy League university on either side of the river, are to blame.
If a microwave transmitter operated on the 2.4GHz band, the same one used by Bluetooth and to connect phones to most dashboard units, interference could knock out a driver's GPS.
Redditor calinet6 suggested WBZ's antenna dishes along Soldier's Field Road could also contribute to the problem.
"My wife thought I was crazy, then I told her to watch right before it happens the other night. It's been multiple years, phones, and cars using CarPlay that it happens," user vr6_kid reported in a popular Reddit thread on the phenomenon.
💭 Deehan's thought bubble: I drove loops around Soldier Field and up and down Storrow to see if I could replicate the problem with my Android Auto system.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
8 hours ago
- Forbes
Musk Follows Harvard In Biting The Hand That Feeds
Elon Musk and Harvard Both Bite the Governmental Hand that Feeds Them From an early age, children are taught essential lessons: do not play with fire, do not pet strange dogs, and if one cannot swim, stay out of the deep end. Another timeless rule—often forgotten by those in positions of immense wealth and influence—is this: do not bite the hand that feeds you. This lesson, while simple, has profound implications in the real world. It applies just as readily to billionaires and institutions as it does to children on a playground. Yet recent actions by both Elon Musk and prominent academic institutions—most notably Harvard, but also Columbia, MIT, and others—suggest that even the most successful individuals and organizations are capable of ignoring foundational wisdom. Harvard set the tone. Amid growing political scrutiny and a shifting cultural landscape, the university has drawn intense criticism over its handling of campus protests, particularly those involving slogans such as 'from the river to the sea.' The administration's decision to defend even the most controversial speech—widely viewed by many as antisemitic—has triggered investigations and jeopardized billions in tax-exempt status and government research funding. This raises a critical question: is this truly the hill worth dying on? Is preserving the right to controversial protest slogans worth risking Harvard's institutional future? It is doubtful that most students and faculty would knowingly trade funding, grants, and prestige for this fight. Elon Musk, the world's richest man, has now followed suit—this time turning his attention toward President Donald Trump, with whom he has launched a high-profile and personal feud. What makes this move especially striking is that President Trump is not a distant figure or a fading influence. He is once again sitting in the White House, wielding executive authority over regulatory agencies, defense contracting, and infrastructure initiatives—all areas that directly affect Musk's companies. Tesla, SpaceX, and xAI have flourished in part because of government partnership. SpaceX alone holds multibillion-dollar contracts with NASA and the Department of Defense. Tesla has benefitted from years of energy subsidies and EV tax incentives. Picking a fight with the sitting president—regardless of personal conviction—puts this entire ecosystem at risk. And again the question must be asked: is this battle worth the damage? Whatever principle Musk may be defending, the consequences extend far beyond himself. Shareholders, employees, and retail investors—many of whom placed their trust and savings in his leadership—are the ones left exposed. The parallel between Harvard and Musk is striking: both have been immensely successful, aided in large part by government funding, favorable regulation, and public goodwill. And both have, for different reasons, chosen to confront the very institutions and leaders that have helped sustain their growth. There is precedent for how this ends. Jack Ma, once the most powerful entrepreneur in China, famously criticized the Chinese government. The backlash was immediate and absolute. His companies were dismantled. His IPO was cancelled. His wealth and influence evaporated almost overnight. Even in less authoritarian systems, the lesson holds: those who antagonize the systems that support them may not survive the consequences. While Musk's personal net worth has dropped from nearly $450 billion to approximately $300 billion, the impact is more symbolic than practical for him. But for millions of investors, employees, and stakeholders, these battles matter. Market volatility, regulatory backlash, and reputational risk all come with tangible financial costs—costs borne not just by Musk himself, but by those who have trusted and invested in his vision. The same applies to Harvard and peer institutions. Their leadership may believe they are standing on principle, but the price of alienating government agencies and key financial backers could reshape the long-term trajectory of these universities. The erosion of public trust, the loss of bipartisan support, and the potential withdrawal of federal funding pose existential threats. Leadership—whether in business or academia—requires more than conviction. It requires judgment, timing, and the discipline to separate personal ideology from institutional responsibility. Founder-led companies often outperform when leaders are focused, visionary, and measured. But when ego replaces strategy, the consequences can be swift and severe. No one is demanding absolute political alignment or silence in the face of controversy. No one is asking Elon Musk to wear a MAGA hat. But his recent actions have been so volatile, so self-destructive, that investors may soon be tempted to hand him something else entirely—a MEGA hat: Make Elon Great Again. In today's polarized environment, the margin for error has narrowed. And for those who owe much of their success to public support—whether in Silicon Valley or the Ivy League—biting the hand that feeds is not just unwise. It is unsustainable. ---------------------------------- Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Please refer to the following link for additional disclosures: Additional Disclosure Note: The author has an affiliation with ERShares and the XOVR ETF. The intent of this article is to provide objective information; however, readers should be aware that the author may have a financial interest in the subject matter discussed. As with all equity investments, investors should carefully evaluate all options with a qualified investment professional before making any investment decision. Private equity investments, such as those held in XOVR, may carry additional risks—including limited liquidity—compared to traditional publicly traded securities. It is important to consider these factors and consult a trained professional when assessing suitability and risk tolerance.
Geek Tyrant
11 hours ago
- Geek Tyrant
This AI-Generated Video Is a Wake-Up Call For How Easy It is For AI To Decieve People Right Now — GeekTyrant
Filmmaker Travis Bible created a short and crazy video using Google's Veo 3, not to flex AI skills, but to send a warning. Bible says: 'I made this video for my parents. And maybe yours too. The internet already had a truth problem. In the wrong hands, AI video generators could throw gas on the fire. …But what about your parents? Or your grandparents? 'So I made this video to warn my parents about AI scams (And to test out Veo 3 to see first hand how these programs are evolving).' The video shows how AI-generated footage can be convincing enough to fool even the most careful people, especially those less familiar with rapidly evolving tech. His experiment isn't a scare tactic, it's a heads-up. The tech is impressive, and If someone can make a fake video this convincing from their desktop, imagine what scammers will do. AI is only going to keep getting better and better. This is wild!
Miami Herald
12 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Giant cable and satellite company closer to Chapter 11 bankruptcy
You can blame Elon Musk and the internet. That sentence applies to a lot of things. The internet and the controversial billionaire have caused all sorts of problems, but they have also solved a lot of them, Related: Troubled airline gets no bids at bankruptcy auction You can thank the internet for making the high school reunion pretty much irrelevant and for making it really easy to hear unqualified people offer their opinions on everything. Musk has also done some good things including pioneering electric cars, finding a new way to tunnel under cities cheaply, and creating SpaceX, which developed Starlink Internet. You may not care about billionaires traveling to Mars, but anyone on a cruise, people who live in remote areas, and folks who live in Internet desserts greatly appreciate Starlink. Starlink and the internet, however, ruined the satellite cable and internet business. Musk's internet service works better than the traditional satellite option sold by EchoStar's Dish and rival DirectTV. That allows people to get Starlink and used streaming cable services like YouTube Live, Hulu Live, Fubo, Sling,and various streaming options offered by traditional cable companies. That left EchoStar, a company heavily invested in satellite internet and cable, in a bad place. The company, however, does have a lot of assets and it may take a bold step to protect those assets. While EchoStar has seen its core businesses deteriorate, it has tried to diversify its business by buying Boost Mobile. The company also owns a number of assets in spectrum licenses. The problem is that those licenses come with promises to build out various networks. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) does not believe EchoStar has met those requirements. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter In September 2024, EchoStar celebrated that it had reached a deal with the FCC that would allow it to make progress in the wireless market. "Today the FCC took a significant step to promote competition in the wireless market by granting 5G network buildout framework. The updated framework enables to optimize and enhance its coast-to-coast buildout of the world's first cloud-native Open RAN 5G Boost Mobile Network, while more efficiently deploying the network in new areas of the country," the company shared in a Sept. 20, 2024 press release. The company was confident that it could build out an impressive network that benefits the American consumer: Enhancing Network Build. By the end of this year, Boost Mobile Network will cover 80% of the population, an additional 30 million more Americans than 2023 obligation to cover 70% of the population. will also accelerate and expand its final buildout milestones in more than 500 license areas on this same timeline. Requiring a Low-Cost Offering. EchoStar will make a low-cost wireless plan and 5G device available to consumers nationwide, regardless of whether they live in an area where has built out its Boost Mobile Network or relies on roaming partners to provide a More Efficient Build. The targeted extensions adopted by the FCC will provide a construction timeline that more closely aligns deployment with its 3.45 GHz spectrum licenses, reducing the resources necessary to install infrastructure twice at each cell site/tower. "The pricing and innovation improvements from continued presence in the wireless market is a win for all American consumers," the company added. The FCC's approval of EchoStar's wireless spectrum purchases included a timeline for constructing its network. The satellite company has not met those deadlines and the federal agency may come after its very valuable spectrum licenses. "The U.S. Federal Communications Commission recently began reviewing EchoStar's compliance with terrestrial buildout obligations in the AWS-4 band, as well as its use of adjacent 2 GHz spectrum for satellite services," reported. "The investigation follows pressure from rivals such as SpaceX, which in April claimed data from its Starlink broadband satellites showed the company had not satisfied a 70% buildout commitment in the AWS-4 band by the FCC's Dec. 31, 2023, deadline." EchoStar, in advance of a potential Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. has skipped two key interest payments. The satellite company, it should be noted, denies that it has not met its FCC obligations. Related: AT&T makes generous offer to older customers "This uncertainty over our spectrum rights has effectively frozen our ability to make decisions regarding our Boost business," EchoStar shared in a regulatory filing, "including continued network buildout and adversely impacts our ability to implement and adjust our overall business plan and requires us to re-evaluate the deployment of our resources." The company skipped a May 30 $326 million interest payment and the skipped a June payment on various loans to its Dish brand. Each payment has a 30-day grace period. Once those end, the company would likely face a voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
