logo
'Anxious, uncertain': US study plans for Singaporeans derailed by halt on new student visas

'Anxious, uncertain': US study plans for Singaporeans derailed by halt on new student visas

CNA7 days ago

SINGAPORE: Music teacher Sharon had long dreamed of studying piano in the United States. With her children now grown, she finally pursued that goal – auditioning in person, enduring multiple screening rounds and securing offers from two American universities.
But on Tuesday (May 27), her plans were thrown into turmoil.
An internal cable obtained by Reuters revealed that US President Donald Trump's administration has ordered consular offices worldwide to stop scheduling new visa interviews for students and exchange visitors. The move comes as the State Department prepares to expand its vetting of applicants' social media activity.
'It's pretty disappointing. I've actually put in a lot of effort to go to America," said Sharon, who asked that her real name not be used. "The audition preparation took about a year. If I cannot go, it's going to be like a waste of … another academic year."
UNCERTAIN POLITICAL SITUATION
Many affected students, speaking to CNA on condition of anonymity due to fear of visa repercussions, expressed deep concern over the US move.
Among them is Kevin, who had accepted an offer to study computer science at a university in California. He had wanted to study in the US since junior college, he told CNA.
'My end goal was always to potentially move there and work there, because I wanted to do tech, and I think the US is the best place to do tech,' he said.
But in light of recent political developments, including a controversial move to block Harvard from enrolling foreign students, Kevin decided to 'play it safe' and enrol in a university in Singapore instead.
Before he changed his mind, he had settled most administrative matters and had just stopped short of getting his visa.
It was 'too big of a risk', especially because he would be funding his own studies, Kevin said.
'If I go, I'm always going to have this at the back of my mind, this stress about the political situation,' he said. 'So I don't think it's worth that extra stress when you're already stressing about things like finances, academics and career in uni.'
A judge has since suspended the Harvard directive pending a legal challenge from the university.
Students typically begin their visa application process shortly after accepting university offers in April or May. Sharon, for instance, is still waiting on her I-20 form, which certifies eligibility to apply for a student visa. Though she deferred enrolment to a later semester, her university had advised early visa preparation. Now, all she can do is wait to see how the situation unfolds – and scrub her social media profiles.
She has even considered deactivating her accounts, as she does not know what authorities will look for when vetting her online presence.
'I'm not young anymore,' she said. 'If I'm going to go through another round of applications … I have to prepare everything all over again. There's a lot of effort and time.'
In response to queries from CNA, the US Embassy in Singapore said visa applicants have been required to provide social media identifiers as part of the application process since 2019. A spokesperson said the State Department uses 'all available information' to screen visa applications.
"At this time, applicants may continue to submit applications," the embassy said, "as the consular section constantly adjusts schedules to allow for sufficient time to vet cases before them.'
For some, the process had already begun before the visa directive was issued. Diane, who started a graduate programme in New York, applied for her student visa in April. She received approval in May, describing the experience as "smooth".
But the latest developments have shaken her confidence.
When she accepted the university offer, she did not think the political situation would escalate to a point where the US would turn away international students, Diane said.
"I was naive and did not think it would affect me. Hence the political situation did not weigh heavily in my decision to choose a programme," she told CNA. "But right now, after the visa interview pause, I am very worried that (Trump) can ask all international students to leave on a whim," she said.
Even though she has already started school, she is wondering if she should have accepted the other offers she had from the UK and the Netherlands.
"At least with that, I will get the certainty that I won't get kicked out of the school and country for no good reason, and I'll be able to finish my degree," she said.
Education consultancies supporting students in their overseas applications said their clients are concerned but that most are staying the course – for now.
Ms Joanne Gao, regional manager at education consultancy Crimson Education, said about half of their 500 Singapore-based clients apply to US schools. While students are "definitely concerned", she said many remain committed to their plans, especially those headed to prestigious institutions like Harvard.
"None of them are rushing to change their plans," said Ms Gao. "They know how competitive it is to get into these institutions and how much work they've put in to get there."
Still, she advised students with confirmed visa interviews to keep their appointments and reminded all clients to 'carefully review their public social media profiles'.
Dr Chan Khai Leok, director of education consultancy theRightU, echoed these concerns. Of the 1,000 students his team advises annually, around 10 to 15 per cent express interest in US schools.
'Obviously, they would not be changing their minds immediately, because they would have paid a deposit. They would have committed quite a bit of time and attention to and pretty much committed to going to the US,' he said.
The consultancy has also advised its clients to be mindful of how they present themselves on social media, he said.
Dr Chan added that while those who have accepted offers are likely to stay committed, students in the process of deciding where to pursue their studies are 'more likely to turn their attention to other countries'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration threatens Columbia University's accreditation
Trump administration threatens Columbia University's accreditation

CNA

timean hour ago

  • CNA

Trump administration threatens Columbia University's accreditation

NEW YORK: The US government threatened on Wednesday (Jun 4) to strip New York's Columbia University of its accreditation for allegedly ignoring harassment of Jewish students, putting all of its federal funding and prestige at risk. With the move, the administration of President Donald Trump appeared to be doubling down on its efforts to bring several prestigious universities to heel over claims they tolerated campus anti-Semitism during protests against Israel's war in Gaza. Several top institutions, including Columbia University, have already bowed to far-reaching demands from the Trump administration, which claims that the educational elite is too left-wing. "Columbia University looked the other way as Jewish students faced harassment," US Education Secretary Linda McMahon said on X. She accused the reputable Ivy League school of "breaking Title VI protections", referring to a federal law that prohibits recipients of federal funding from discriminating on the basis of race, colour or national origin. "After Hamas' Oct 7, 2023, terror attack on Israel, Columbia University's leadership acted with deliberate indifference towards the harassment of Jewish students on its campus," she said in a statement. "This is not only immoral, but also unlawful." In the statement, the US Education Department said its civil rights office had notified Columbia's accreditor of the alleged violation. It said it had notified the Middle States Commission on Higher Education that "its member institution, Columbia University, is in violation of federal antidiscrimination laws and therefore fails to meet the standards for accreditation set by the Commission". Withdrawing the Columbia's accreditation would see it lose access to all federal funds. Students attending the university, which has already seen the Trump administration strip it of US$400 million in federal funds, would also lose access to federal grants and loans towards tuition.

Stablecoin issuer Circle raises $1.05 billion in upsized US IPO
Stablecoin issuer Circle raises $1.05 billion in upsized US IPO

CNA

time2 hours ago

  • CNA

Stablecoin issuer Circle raises $1.05 billion in upsized US IPO

Circle Internet on Wednesday priced its upsized U.S. initial public offering at $31 apiece raising $1.05 billion, adding fresh momentum to a growing pipeline of late-stage cryptocurrency firms eyeing public markets. Circle and its shareholders sold 34 million shares at $31 apiece, valuing the company, which issues the USDC stablecoin, at roughly $8 billion on a fully diluted basis. The IPO had been marketed in a range of $27 to $28 per share. The company's flotation would be one of the biggest of the year after the Trump administration's trade policies rattled markets and pushed firms planning to go public to adopt a wait-and-see approach. However, market debuts of companies such as Israeli fintech eToro have offered some respite to investors tracking fresh public offerings.

Musk slams Trump's ‘disgusting abomination' spending bill, warns of ballooning US debt
Musk slams Trump's ‘disgusting abomination' spending bill, warns of ballooning US debt

CNA

time2 hours ago

  • CNA

Musk slams Trump's ‘disgusting abomination' spending bill, warns of ballooning US debt

WASHINGTON: Tensions between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump escalated Tuesday (Jun 3) as the billionaire tech mogul derided the administration's marquee economic legislation, just days after stepping down from a key White House advisory role. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination," Musk posted on X, adding, "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong." The Tesla and SpaceX chief had previously offered only mild critiques of the so-called "One Big Beautiful Bill," which includes deep cuts to welfare programs but is projected to add between US$2.5 trillion and US$3.8 trillion to the federal debt. His latest comments suggest a sharp break with the White House, where Musk recently led the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Musk's frustration boils over Musk's criticism was not limited to the bill's budgetary implications. He said it would leave citizens burdened with "crushingly unsustainable debt" and called out those who backed it for prioritising political gains over fiscal discipline. He also expressed frustration with the removal of electric vehicle tax credits, a direct blow to Tesla, and with other unfulfilled promises, such as the exclusion of his Starlink system from US air traffic control plans and the withdrawal of his ally Jared Isaacman's nomination to lead NASA. Though Trump previously praised Musk's role in cutting government waste, sources say the billionaire has become disillusioned after failing to secure policy wins that would benefit his companies. His stepping down from DOGE followed months of controversial cuts, including the closure of multiple agencies and tens of thousands of job losses. White House and GOP leaders push back White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt downplayed the remarks, saying: "The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill. It does not change his opinion. This is one big, beautiful bill, and he is sticking to it." House Speaker Mike Johnson was more forceful, calling Musk 'terribly wrong,' despite having walked him through the bill just a day earlier. Still, not all Republicans were united. Some fiscal conservatives have raised alarm over the ballooning national debt, echoing Musk's warnings. Bill under fire as negotiations continue The House narrowly passed the bill last month by a single vote. It now heads to the Senate, where revisions are expected during a month of tense negotiations. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the measure could add up to US$3.8 trillion to the federal debt, which already exceeds US$36 trillion. DOGE had initially promised to save US$2 trillion in discretionary spending, but the agency's own claims have fallen far short. The White House says it has saved just US$180 billion, a figure independent analysts have disputed. Senate Democrats on Tuesday released a report listing 130 instances of what they describe as unethical or corrupt decisions that enriched Musk, adding over US$100 billion to his wealth. Musk recalibrates political ties The rift with Trump marks a significant shift for Musk, who donated nearly US$300 million to the president's 2024 campaign and previously wielded significant influence over technology and fiscal policy. His recent moves suggest a deliberate pivot. Insiders say Musk is keen to reduce the political blowback facing Tesla, where customers in some markets have reportedly been turned off by his perceived proximity to Trump. In response to mounting criticism, Musk has pledged to refocus on his companies, stepping back from Washington and allowing DOGE to continue under new leadership. As the Senate prepares for a contentious round of negotiations, Musk's high-profile rebuke adds to the growing pressure on lawmakers to revise the bill, and signals a potential fracture in the president's business support base.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store