‘No Kings' protest organizer calls Texas National Guard deployment an overreaction by Governor
AUSTIN (KXAN) — A protest planned to occur at the Texas Capitol Saturday comes after Texas Governor Greg Abbott's deployment of the state's National Guard to Austin and other Texas cities following a Monday night protest in the state's capital city.
Andrew Mahaleris, press secretary for the Governor's office, said in a statement that 'peaceful protests are part of the fabric of our nation,' but that Texas cities need soldiers to 'uphold law and order.'
'Soldiers are on standby in areas where mass demonstrations are planned in case they are needed,' reads part of Mahaleris's statement. 'Texas will not tolerate the lawlessness we have seen in Los Angeles. Anyone engaging in acts of violence or damaging property will be swiftly held accountable to the full extent of the law.'
Mayor: Texas National Guard on standby to assist DPS during protests in Austin
The Monday night protest, organized by the Party for Socialism and Liberation, was held to show solidarity with protesters in Los Angeles.
Saturday's protest, 'No Kings/Kick out the Clowns,' is part of a nationwide action against a military parade in Washington DC, also on Saturday. The Austin rally is organized by Hands Off Central Texas (HOCTX), a coalition of liberal activist groups such as 50501, Indivisible Austin, Indivisible Rosedale, Third Act Texas and ResistAustin.
Sophia Mirto, Hands Off Central Texas' president, said that the rally will feature speeches by activists and locally elected politicians, as well as performances.
'[The idea is] to point out the extreme ridiculousness of government waste that the regime will be using on Saturday, spending over $30 million of our tax money on a what's tantamount to a birthday party and a very tacky parade,' she said. 'It's extraordinarily concerning that they are wasting so much tax money that they are seeking to intimidate citizens and residents of America, especially here in Texas, where we love to use our constitutional freedoms.'
Democratic Congressman Greg Casar is one of Saturday's scheduled speakers. He said that the protests bring attention to concerning deportations of children and lawful migrants.
'These are concerning things that people should be allowed to bring up without the governor trying to crush that message and intimidate people by sending in the National Guard,' he said.
Casar also said the 'needless' deployment makes National Guard soldiers into political pawns. He has spoken at some of the coalition's prior rallies and said that the events have been peaceful and without incident.
'I've done multiple rallies … where there's hundreds or a few thousand people peacefully assembled … with zero incident at all. Unfortunately, right now, Trump and Abbott want to stoke chaos,' he said. 'They aren't just pouring gasoline onto the flames. They're starting the fire themselves and then pouring gasoline onto the fire because they want there to be division. They want to dominate the news stories by helping stoke up a confrontation or stoke up a problem.'
The organizers' hope is that the event will be non-violent, but that security will be in place to isolate instigators in necessary. They have previously organized rallies at the Capitol in coordination with the Texas Department of Public Safety, according to Mirto.
'DPS has actually removed instigators and people threatening unlawful action. We work with DPS, we work with APD for all of our events,' she said. 'We will not be marching anywhere, and if ordered to disperse, we will be very calmly, safely leading people to their vehicles.'
Those reasons are why Mirto said she thinks the Guard's deployment in Austin is unnecessary.
'It is incredibly unwarranted and unnecessary that the governor of Texas is threatening to deploy National Guard on civilians utilizing their First Amendment,' Mirto said. 'Threatening to deploy law enforcement against non violent, peaceful, permitted displays of American patriotism is incredibly alarming.'
While Mirto stressed the difference between her coalition's tactics and others, she said that law enforcement 'rapidly escalated violence' Monday night. She also called on Texans to pay attention to the actions of law enforcement during protests.
'Deploying chemical weapons on the streets of our city is absolutely unacceptable. It is a violation of our constitutional rights, and it is a violation of morality to deploy chemical weapons on civilian streets,' she said.
During the Monday night march, Texas DPS troopers deployed tear gas against protestors.
Saturday's rally at the Capitol starts at 5 p.m. and lasts until 8 p.m.
In addition to Casar, State Rep. John Bucy, D-Austin, attorneys Pooja Sethi and Sara Spector, and HOCTX board member Melody Tremallo are also scheduled to speak.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
38 minutes ago
- Politico
Claws out for Cuomo, Mamdani at debate as rivals dig into their missteps, weaknesses
NEW YORK — Mayoral candidates Brad Lander and Andrew Cuomo tussled at the second Democratic primary debate Thursday evening over the former governor's description of immigrants — an emotional flashpoint as protests over ICE arrests grip cities around the country. Zohran Mamdani, who is trailing in second place behind Cuomo in most polls, also went after the former governor repeatedly for mispronouncing his name. And the former New York governor returned fire, insisting the 33-year-old Mamdani is too young and inexperienced for the difficult job of running the nation's largest city. The clashes revealed cleaner lines of attack against Cuomo a week after the first debate — as well as how candidates hoping to shrink Cuomo's polling lead are seizing every opening, big and small, in an effort to weaken the frontrunner in the final days of the Democratic primary. Lander didn't relegate his broadsides against Cuomo to one topic. He honed in on the sexual harassment allegations against the former governor — which state Attorney General Letitia James concluded in a report and Cuomo denies — and his management of the MTA. 'The MTA goes through a rigorous contracting process,' Cuomo responded. 'They should never have hired illegal immigrants, if it is true.' 'What did you call them?' Lander, the progressive city comptroller, quickly challenged. 'If anyone was undocumented, or they didn't pay the proper wages, I had nothing to do with it,' Cuomo said, rephrasing with a term viewed as typically more acceptable in the city. Lander carried on with his targeting of Cuomo. 'You cheated them out of the prevailing wages they were due and the health care they were due.' Mamdani, a state assemblymember, separately ticked off the record that Cuomo's critics say disqualify him from returning to power, including the sexual harassment allegations that forced him from the statehouse in 2021. But Mamdani's focus on the pronunciation of his name appeared intended to spotlight how some supporters of Cuomo have cast the Muslim immigrant as an outsider. 'I have never had to resign in disgrace. … I have never hounded the 13 women who credibly accused me of sexual harassment. I have never sued for their gynecological records,' Mamdani said. 'And I have never done those things because I am not you, Mr. Cuomo. And furthermore, the name is Mamdani, M-a-m-d-a-n-i, you should learn how to say it, because we've got to get it right.'

Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Judge Questions Trump's Authority to Deploy National Guard to Los Angeles
SAN FRANCISCO—A federal judge on Thursday sharply questioned the Trump administration's justifications for mobilizing troops in Los Angeles in response to protests that have swept the city, promising to issue a decision soon in California's bid to stop the deployments. During the hourlong hearing before U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco, a lawyer for the Justice Department argued that courts have no power to second-guess the president's decisions regarding the National Guard troops and Marines that President Trump has sent over the objections of state and local officials.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Judge weighs constitutionality in Newsom v. Trump hearing, promises to rule quickly
During a federal court hearing of Newsom v. Trump on Thursday, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer focused on the interpretation of the U.S. Constitution regarding the president's authority to federalize the National Guard. Were President Donald Trump's actions on June 8 to deploy nearly 4,000 California National Guard soldiers on protesters against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement an abuse of power or constitutionally sound? Trump's order to deploy 700 Marines was beyond his scope of jurisdiction, Breyer said. 'I'm just trying to figure out where the lines are drawn,' Breyer said during the hearing. 'It's important because it establishes a system of process, a system of regularity, a system of norms, and a system (of) how you go forward and how you govern yourselves and how you implement the basic dictates of the Constitution and of the Declaration of Independence, that's what the system is.' Breyer said he would rule quickly on the issue. The federal law in question states explicitly three conditions to which the president of the United States can activate the National Guard: The United States, or any of the Commonwealths or possessions, is invaded or is in danger of invasion by a foreign nation. There is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States. The President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States. Gov. Gavin Newsom's suit against Trump is his response to what he believes was an abuse of power. 'Theatre, it's madness, it's unconstitutional,' he said during an interview on The New York Times podcast, 'The Daily,' and went as far as to say Trump was using the Guard as 'pawns.' Though Trump's attorney, Brett Shumate, an attorney for the federal government, argued before the judge that Trump was within his executive authority in federalizing the guards, and also said Trump had spoken to Newsom the day before he did. But even if he hadn't, Shumate said it ultimately doesn't matter. 'I think there's no doubt on this record that Gov. Newsom was fully aware of this order. He objected to it publicly.' 'You need to focus on the language of the statute that says the orders shall be issued through the governors of the state. It doesn't say by the governors. It doesn't say consult with the governor. It doesn't say the governor is the co-executive and has a right to approve. It merely says pass through. It says the governor here is a conduit for those orders. He is not somebody who gets to issue orders, countermand orders.' Breyer's concern with how Trump's authority is interpreted was made clear when he related it to monarchy. 'This country was founded in response to a monarchy, and the Constitution is a document of limitations, frequently limitations, and an enunciation of rights,' he said. Nicholas Green, attorney for California, fed the idea that Trump was serving more like a King George than a George Washington. 'The version of executive power to police civil community that the government is advancing is breathtaking in its scope,' he said, adding that the federal attorneys were treating presidential power as if it has 'no guardrails' and is 'unreviewable by the courts.' 'The provisions in the Constitution related to the militia and the domestic use of law enforcement flow from the initial concerns of the deployment of military forces to police a civilian population that animated the founders.' After nearly an hour of back and forth, Breyer said he would try to reach a decision as soon as possible.