logo
Woman, 26, sues drunk bosses who threw her into pool as a joke on 5-star company holiday

Woman, 26, sues drunk bosses who threw her into pool as a joke on 5-star company holiday

The Sun4 hours ago

AN EVENTS manager is suing her drunk bosses who threw her into a pool as a joke while on an expensive company holiday.
Chloe Hewitt was chucked into the swimming pool by the boozed-up salesmen at a luxury hotel on Mauritius.
5
5
The 26-year-old wants £250,000, saying she landed on broken drink glasses after she was flung into the pool "in jest".
She was thrown in by intoxicated "distributors" who had been enjoying a "free bar" at the paradise island event organised by health drinks brand Herbalife to reward high-selling salesmen.
Chloe, from Weybridge, Surrey, emerged from the water bleeding, having cut her foot on the bottom of the pool.
She was left with nerve damage which has required two operations and physiotherapy.
The young woman is now suing the company's European arm, Uxbridge-based Herbalife Europe Ltd, claiming damages on the basis that it had not done enough to ensure the boozy event was safe.
However, Herbalife is denying liability. It argues that the accident occurred during an "after party" which took place when the company's event had ended, and when Chloe was no longer on the clock.
Herbalife is a worldwide "direct-selling" company, founded in 1980 to sell weight loss shakes, but expanding to produce other nutritional products, which it sells in over 90 countries.
Chloe began working for the company in June 2020, taking a job in regional promotions for Europe and Africa, which required her sometimes to attend events outside of the UK.
As part of her role, she was sent to Mauritius ' five-Star Paradise Hotel for a training and team-building event, to which Herbalife distributors who had achieved qualifying high sales were invited.
The hotel is part of the Beachcomber Resort, on the island's Le Morne peninsula.
It features an 18-hole golf course, bars, swimming pools, and where every room faces towards the sea.
Her accident happened at the event's "farewell party" which took place on June 4, 2022, including dinner, a DJ and a free bar.
5
Her barrister, Matthew Chapman KC, said in documents recently filed at the High Court: "At around midnight on 4 June 2022, the DJ continued to play music and the free bar continued to serve drinks.
"The dance floor was located next to the resort swimming pool. Drinks were provided in glasses, rather than plastic containers, and there was broken glass on and around the dance floor.
"Some of the party-goers were exhibiting obvious signs of intoxication. There were no security staff on duty.
"After midnight, the claimant observed a French employee of the defendant being picked up and carried by male party-goers who appeared to be drunk.
"Despite his protestations to be put down, the party-goers threw the member of staff into the resort swimming pool.
"Other members of the defendant's employed staff were then pushed or thrown into the swimming pool. Suddenly, the claimant was pushed from behind into the swimming pool. She was fully-dressed and was wearing make-up at the time.
"The claimant protested and, as she exited the swimming pool, asked not to be pushed again. She could hear people remonstrating with the responsible party-goers and asking them to calm down.
"The claimant was then pushed forcefully and unexpectedly from behind and back into the swimming pool.
"The claimant was completely submerged under the water and the force of her entry carried her to the base of the swimming pool where she caught her foot on an object lying there and felt an immediate, sharp pain.
Inside Herbalife – the 'it' brand pedalled by Towie stars and footballers that's said to be linked to hepatitis and liver damage
By Kathryn Knight
LOOKING at pictures of Towie star Danielle Armstrong, it's clear to see that she is in great shape.
Earlier this year she debuted her new figure in a series of posts to her 1 million Instagram followers, declaring that following her 21lb weight loss she had 'never felt so body confident'.
She claimed it was down to Herbalife, a nutrition brand that sells supplements, meal-replacement shakes made from soy and dairy proteins, energy bars, multivitamins and minerals tablets.
Danielle was so impressed, she recommended Herbalife to fellow Towie star Ferne McCann, who said that the meal-replacement shakes had helped keep her in shape during her pregnancy - and she in turn has encouraged her followers to sign up as a member of the company's worldwide club.
And Towie stars aren't the only ones giving Herbalife a publicity boost in recent months.
Model Emma McVey credited them with helping her shed her baby weight within 10 days of giving birth to baby son Chester in January, and last month Kerry Katona claimed that she had lost three stone by drinking Herbalife shakes for breakfast and lunch.
Ronaldo has also endorsed it, and while he was playing for LA Galaxy, David Beckham wore a shirt sponsored by the brand.
Yet behind this glossy façade troubling questions have been asked about the multi-billion pound company.
It's been accused of being nothing less than a pyramid scheme - a model in which members are paid for recruiting others rather than selling products - propped up by some of the high profile names they get to endorse their products.
Not only that: others have claimed that Herbalife might even cause long term problems - over the years the company's products have been linked to lead poisoning, liver damage, and hepatitis.
A spokesperson for Herbalife said: 'All our independent Herbalife Nutrition Members are independent business people and not employees of Herbalife Nutrition or paid ambassadors.
"Every day millions of consumers safely use our products around the world and no known hepatotoxins have ever been found in our products."
"The claimant had caught her foot on broken glass debris which was on the bottom of the swimming pool, having found its way there from glasses containing drinks served at the farewell party."
Chloe was treated at a local hospital and again back in England to repair a nerve in her foot, but Mr Chapman says she has been left with "significant pain and stiffness, loss of sensation and loss of movement" in her right foot, which is likely to be permanent.
Suing Herbalife, her lawyers say it is responsible for her injury because it did not do enough to ensure she was safe, having allowed its partygoing distributors to carry glasses onto the dancefloor and close to the swimming pool, and also having allowed free drinks to be served to "clearly intoxicated" partygoers.
"The claimant will say that accidents of this kind do not usually occur without negligence in the conduct of the relevant operation," says her barrister.
In its written defence to the action, Herbalife denies responsibility for anything its distributors did, pointing out that "Herbalife members" are people who run independent businesses selling its products, while Chloe was off the clock by the time of the accident anyway.
The free bar element of the party had only lasted an hour, says its barrister Rory Holmes, while the entire Herbalife event was finished at midnight, after which Chloe was no longer working.
"At midnight, there was an announcement on stage for the purpose of the distributors that the event had finished and the Paradis bar was staying open where drinks could be purchased from the hotel at the expense of the distributors," he said.
"Once the farewell party ended, the claimant's time was her own. She was no longer on duty.
"The claimant was naturally free to spend her personal time however she wanted - she could have gone to bed, she could have gone for a walk in the hotel grounds, she could have chosen to be on her own, she could have chosen to socialise with whomever she wished."
Instead she had chosen to congregate with the distributors by the pool, with the event DJ agreeing to move his equipment and begin a new set there.
"At some point shortly before the claimant's accident, some of the French distributors decided to push or throw other members of the group, including some of the defendant's staff members, into the pool.
"This was intended to be in jest, however one of the defendant's members of staff asked the relevant distributors to calm down.
"The claimant was sitting at high tables to the side of the bar area with other members of staff. She was pushed/thrown into the pool on at least one occasion.
"As the claimant exited the pool, having been thrown in, it was noted that she had a laceration to her foot.
"It is not admitted that the claimant cut her foot on broken glass debris which was on the bottom of the swimming pool, having found it way there from glasses containing drinks at farewell party."
He said Chloe had said at the time that thought she had cut herself not on broken glass, but on a rounded light, possibly an uplighter which had fallen into the pool.
"The defendant does not condone the actions of the distributors who threw members of the group into the pool," he added.
"The defendant asked the distributors to calm down, which was a reasonable and proportionate response given what was known at the time."
"The defendant was entitled to rely, and did rely, upon a reasonably held belief that, at a luxury five-star hotel with a good record, the hotel's premises/systems would be reasonably safe.
"For the avoidance of doubt, it is not the defendant's case that the hotel's premises, systems etc were unsafe."
Chloe's claim was recently filed at the High Court, but the case has not yet gone before a judge. It will now go forward to a full trial, unless settled by the parties outside of court.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer insists Nato committed to mutual defence as Trump casts doubt on support
Starmer insists Nato committed to mutual defence as Trump casts doubt on support

The Independent

time22 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Starmer insists Nato committed to mutual defence as Trump casts doubt on support

Sir Keir Starmer insisted Nato remains committed to collective defence after US President Donald Trump cast doubt on his support for the mutual aid pact. Before Wednesday's Nato summit in The Hague, Mr Trump had told reporters on the flight from Washington it would depend 'on your definition' of Article 5, when asked if he would commit to collective defence. Nato's Article 5 commits all members of the alliance to come to the defence of each other if attacked. But speaking to broadcasters on the way into the summit, the Prime Minister said allies were 'absolutely committed to the importance of Nato, particularly in a very volatile world'. And before the meeting of the North Atlantic Council on Wednesday, Sir Keir appeared to be in deep conversation with Mr Trump. Sir Keir's message was repeated by Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte, who opened the summit meeting with the words: 'Our joint commitment to Article 5, that an attack on one is an attack on all, sends a powerful message.' Standing next to Mr Trump, the secretary-general praised the US president for bringing about a commitment from the alliance to spend 5% of GDP on defence, telling him: 'You made this possible.' Earlier, Mr Rutte had described the US president as 'a man of strength' as well as a 'man of peace', praising him for securing a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. Mr Trump also compared Israel and Iran to 'two kids in a school yard' fighting. 'They fight like hell. You can't stop them. Let them fight for about two, three minutes. Then it's easier to stop them,' he said. Mr Rutte added: 'Then daddy has to sometimes use strong language.' The UK has signed up to the new Nato spending target, pledging to spend 3.5% of GDP on 'core defence' and another 1.5% on security and resilience measures such as critical national infrastructure, border security and intelligence. But the Government does not expect to reach the target until 2035, three years after the 2032 deadline some allies were pushing for, and has not said how the increase will be funded. Alongside the commitment to increase defence spending, the UK has also announced its intention to purchase 12 new fighter jets capable of carrying nuclear weapons. Billed as 'the biggest strengthening' of Britain's nuclear posture 'in a generation', the move will see the jets committed to a Nato mission that would see US nuclear bombs fitted to allied aircraft. It follows a recommendation from the strategic defence review, published earlier in June, to begin negotiations with the US and Nato on joining the alliance's nuclear mission. Following the announcement, Defence Secretary John Healey was seen speaking to his US counterpart Pete Hegseth on the margins of the Nato summit.

Trial of High Court claims against Andrew Tate brought forward to next summer
Trial of High Court claims against Andrew Tate brought forward to next summer

The Independent

time22 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trial of High Court claims against Andrew Tate brought forward to next summer

The trial of civil claims against social media influencer Andrew Tate is due to be held months earlier than originally planned after a High Court judge said she was 'very keen to get on' with the case. Four women are suing the former professional kickboxer over allegations of sexual violence, including that he grabbed one by the throat on several occasions in 2015, assaulted her with a belt and pointed a gun at her face. Tate's barristers told an earlier court hearing that there was 'total denial of wrongdoing'. In written submissions for a hearing on Wednesday, barristers for the women said that following a preliminary hearing in April this year, a 16-day trial had been listed to start on February 22 2027. But Mrs Justice Lambert told the court in London that she was 'very keen to get on' with the case and that it should be listed sooner, fixing the trial to start on June 22 2026. The trial could last up to five weeks, with a further preliminary hearing expected to take place at a later date. She said: 'We just need to make this happen, really. 'It is not in anyone's interests that this case goes into the long grass of 2027.' Following the short hearing, the four claimants said: 'We welcome the judge's decision to bring our case forward. 'We've already spent years waiting for justice, and so it's of some comfort to hear that Andrew Tate will face these allegations in a court earlier than the original plan of 2027.' Matt Jury, managing partner of law firm McCue Jury & Partners, which represents the women, said: 'We commend the judge's decision to move the trial forward to next summer. 'It's another step toward justice that's already been far too long in coming.' The hearing in April was told that the case is believed to be a legal first as it will consider whether allegations of coercive control, in a civil context, could amount to intentional infliction of harm. Judge Richard Armstrong said that the claimants were 'seeking damages likely to reach six figures'. The women are bringing a civil case against Tate at the High Court after the Crown Prosecution Service decided not to prosecute in 2019, with their allegations including rape and sexual assault. Three of the British accusers were the subject of an investigation by Hertfordshire Constabulary, which was closed in 2019. In court documents, one woman suing Tate claimed he 'would strangle her or grab her by her throat if she spoke back to him or said anything that he did not like… until she told him that she loved him or apologised for whatever he demanded at the time'. She said he, and his brother Tristan Tate, 'played good cop and bad cop to manipulate her', and that Tate allegedly put her in a headlock or whipped her with a belt if she did not get out of bed and do work for his webcam business. The documents also allege Tate 'had weapons, including firearms, which were often pointed at her' and that he had 'indicated to her that he would like to kill someone if he could'. Tate said that her account was 'fabrication' and a 'pack of lies', and has previously described the allegations as 'unproven and untested'. In a statement, a spokesperson for Tate previously said: 'He denies ever threatening anyone with a firearm, engaging in non-consensual acts or subjecting any individual to physical or psychological harm. 'These are civil claims, brought years after the alleged events and following a CPS decision not to pursue criminal charges. 'It is deeply troubling that such graphic and one-sided accounts are being publicised before any judicial assessment has taken place.' The statement added: 'Mr Tate will defend himself vigorously and remains confident the truth will prevail.'

Buy Ford Ranger Price, PPC or HP
Buy Ford Ranger Price, PPC or HP

Top Gear

time27 minutes ago

  • Top Gear

Buy Ford Ranger Price, PPC or HP

Buying What should I be paying? Prices in the UK start at £29,275 excluding VAT (add 20 per cent if you're not able to take advantage of any tax relief) for the two-seater single cab, and £30,800 for the five-seater double cab in its weakest 168bhp guise. The double cab begins at £36,891 if it's the 202bhp 2.0-litre you're after, or a hefty £49,291 for the 3.0-litre V6. Again, minus the donation to HMRC. The plug-in hybrid starts at £40,841. Advertisement - Page continues below So more than you'd pay for an Isuzu D-Max or Toyota Hilux but less than a VW Amarok, though that only comes in double cab form. Let's not forget either that the Amarok is positioned as the posh pickup of the lot. What are the trim choices? There are seven trims to choose from: XL, XLT, Tremor, Wildtrak, Wildtrak X, Platinum and Stormtrak but not all trims are available with all engines. Listen carefully… The two-door single cab is only available in entry-level XL trim and lesser-powered 168bhp 2.0-litre turbodiesel. The four-door double cab is available in XL and XLT trims when paired with the same engine, and Tremor, Wildtrak and Wildtrak X trims with the upper-powered 202bhp four-pot. The PHEV can be had in XLT or Wildtrak guise, and until the end of 2025 at least there will be a special, fully-loaded Stormtrak trim to celebrate the launch of the hybrid. Finally, you've the choice of Wildtrak and Platinum trims with the top-spec 237bhp 3.0-litre twin-motor V6. Got it? Advertisement - Page continues below What do they come with? Not even the internet has enough space to run through every bit of kit on the Ranger, but entry-level models come equipped an 8.0in digital instrument cluster, 10.1in central touchscreen, a rearview camera and rear parking sensors, while XLT models add slightly more style courtesy of 16in alloys and body-coloured bumpers, mirrors and doors handles. Tremor is more off-roady courtesy of 17in alloy wheels, an increased ride height and wider track, Bilstein dampers, all-terrain tyres and wheel arch mouldings, while Wildtrak maxes out the creature comforts courtesy of 18in alloy wheels, auto folding door mirrors, a 12in central touchscreen, heated steering wheel and seats, interior ambient lighting, part leather trim, privacy glass and keyless start. Top-of-the-range Platinum gets luxuries such as 18in alloy wheels, a 12.4in instrument cluster, LED headlights, adaptive cruise control, B&O sound system, heated and ventilated leather seats, and wireless phone charging. What's the best spec? We're yet to try the 2.0-litre four pots, but we'd say peak Ranger is the 3.0-litre V6 Wildtrak, which offers maximum power for whatever your commercial (and off-road) needs require and a standard equipment list longer than our arm. In such guise, you're looking at £47,241 excluding VAT. It'll be expensive on fuel, mind, so if you're using one of these as a daily family car then perhaps the plug-in hybrid is for you. Alternatively, there's always the less work-, more play-focused Ford Ranger Raptor... you can read our separate review on that by clicking this here hyperlink.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store