logo
Who is Amy Gleason? DOGE administrator named by White House — but Elon Musk is still in charge

Who is Amy Gleason? DOGE administrator named by White House — but Elon Musk is still in charge

Independent26-02-2025
When the White House abruptly named her the administrator for an agency wreaking havoc across the federal government, Amy Gleason was in Mexico.
After weeks of secrecy in court and refusals from the White House to answer who, exactly, is running the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, reporters were sent a message on February 25 from an unnamed White House spokesperson naming Gleason in the role.
Reporters then received a follow-up message to clarify that Gleason is 'acting' administrator of the agency, formerly known as the United States Digital Service.
After his inauguration, Donald Trump swiftly renamed the agency the 'U.S. DOGE Service' and declared that Elon Musk would be running it.
The Trump administration is facing an avalanche of lawsuits alleging the president and Musk are unconstitutionally running roughshod through federal agencies.
But the breakneck effort to keep up with the administration's actions in court has been met with what appears to be a rapid attempt among administration officials and government lawyers to obfuscate the true nature of Musk's role — or to scramble to name someone else in charge — while the White House accuses the press of hysterically obsessing over DOGE leadership.
The 53-year-old former healthcare worker was not aware that her sudden promotion had been announced. She was on leave in Mexico at the time.
Nearly two dozen DOGE staff who submitted a resignation letter to White House chief of staff Susan Wiles that same day said nobody in the agency had ever been notified who was running it, so they sent their letter to Wiles instead.
Administration officials have insisted that Musk is not the administrator for DOGE. Trump, however, has said the exact opposite.
Musk is merely an employee of the White House, serving as a 'senior adviser to the president,' who has 'no greater authority other than other senior White House advisers [have], and has 'no actual or formal authority to make government decisions himself,' according to a sworn statement from a senior White House official on February 18.
The billionaire is 'not the U.S. DOGE Service Administrator,' nor is he even an employee of the agency, according to the statement from White House Office of Administration director Joshua Fisher.
White House officials previously labeled Musk a 'special government employee.'
Last week, a judge in a separate case said DOGE appears to be trying to 'escape' the 'obligations that accompany agencyhood' — including being subject to the Freedom of Information Act, the Privacy Act and the Administrative Procedures Act — 'while reaping only its benefits.'
In court documents, government lawyers have recognized that the unnamed 'U.S. DOGE administrator' is embroiled in lawsuits targeting the Trump administration.
After the White House elevated her to that role, Gleason is likely to end up in the crosshairs of that tidal wave of litigation.
'Elon Musk is wielding extraordinarily broad and unprecedented power in leading DOGE without constitutional authority,' according to Norm Eisen, executive chair of State Democracy Defenders Fund, which is representing a group of 17 federal employees suing the administration to block Musk's rampage.
'Our government has rules to protect the American people from executive overreach,' he added 'An unelected, part-time 'special government employee' cannot legally circumvent them. We can and will achieve accountability through the courts.'
One former USDS worker who resigned after nearly two years with the agency said the mass firings of DOGE staffers were 'shortsighted, ill-informed, and indiscriminate,' and that 'the government and the American people will be worse off from the loss of these people.'
Gleason did not respond to The Independent 's request for comment.
Gleason, who appears to live in Tennessee, previously worked as a 'digital services expert' with the U.S. Digital Service from October 2018 to December 2021.
She returned to the agency — which was created in 2014 as something of a low-profile, government-wide information technology department — after Trump's inauguration.
Gleason still lists her current role as a 'senior advisor' for the U.S. Digital Service on her LinkedIn profile.
Before returning to the agency earlier this year, she was a 'chief product officer' at two Nashville-based healthcare-related companies, Russell Street Ventures and Main Street Health.
Both companies were founded by Brad Smith — who worked in the first Trump administration and joined the transition team's early DOGE efforts with Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy.
Russell Street Ventures' website was recently taken offline, but an archived version shows that the company described itself as 'an innovative healthcare firm focused on launching and scaling companies that serve some of the nation's most vulnerable and underserved patient populations.'
'There are so many ways that our nation's healthcare system can be improved, and I am excited for the ways our team will be able to help drive that change,' Smith said in 2021, when the company was launched.
The Independent also has requested comment from Russell Street and Main Street firms.
An archived version of Gleason's company profile on the Main Street Health website says she 'spearheaded technology efforts for the federal COVID-19 response' and worked on projects with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
In a podcast interview with Reveal in 2023, Gleason discussed the bureaucratic and technical hurdles to capture urgent federal health data throughout the COVID-19 crisis, fueling her work in creating the HHS Protect tracker.
She would have been familiar with that work as the co-founder and chief operating officer of health data firm CareSync, which was inspired by her attempts to collect her daughter's electronic medical records.
Gleason's personal blog, which was also taken offline this week, was last updated in 2019.
In her blog, she discusses her daughter's diagnosis with a rare autoimmune disease as well as her own health struggles. From 2014 to 2018, Gleason served as vice president for research at the Cure JM Foundation, which advocates for research, education and funding for juvenile dermatomyositis treatments.
It was CareSync's success that led President Barack Obama to name her a White House 'Champion of Change' for Precision Medicine who 'draws on these experiences to help patients and their families better coordinate care and improve health outcomes.'
'My challenge to our entire health care system, and especially the innovators looking to make it better: Put the patient in the center,' she said at the time.
She described the news of her daughter's diagnosis as the 'most terrifying day of my life' and said her experience sparked a passion for 'individualized care.'
'Break up the silos of information that prevent individualized medicine to take root and grow into something beautiful,' she said at the time. 'Combine the data, all of it, including genetics, medical records information, patient-generated data, with the collaborative, innovative minds of Americans who will create amazing discoveries to improve healthcare.'
While working with U.S. Digital Service and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in 2020, Gleason hosted a TEDx Talk, outlining a pilot project for streamlining health data after providers 'failed' her daughter by missing her diagnosis.
She encouraged private sector data and health workers to enlist in public service.
'Nobody else is coming,' she said. 'It's up to us to solve these problems.'
One day after refusing to give reporters the name of the public official running DOGE, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt claimed Gleason 'has been the DOGE administrator for quite some time.'
'I believe several weeks. Maybe a month,' she said on February 26. 'I'm not sure of the exact timeline. She's a career official. She's doing her job as the administrator of this organization. I know everybody's very interested in her name, and who she is and what she does — there's a lot of people who work for the federal government. They're just trying to do their jobs and, you know, that's what she's doing.'
She said the White House told reporters the name of the DOGE administrator 'in the effort of transparency' to satisfy 'hounds in the media' who are 'so obsessed with this for some reason.'
'There are so many bigger things in the world than who the DOGE administrator is, but for some reason, everybody in the press corps is so obsessed with this, that you were incessantly asking, so we thought, OK, we will be transparent, so now you know who it is,' she said.
As acting administrator of DOGE, Gleason reports to the White House chief of staff and must be 'dedicated to advancing the President's 18-month DOGE agenda,' according to the president's executive order creating the agency.
DOGE is 'modernizing Federal technology and software to maximize governmental efficiency and productivity,' according to the order.
The U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization is designed to dissolve July 4, 2026.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Girl, 11, dies in tragic water incident at Cornwall beauty spot
Girl, 11, dies in tragic water incident at Cornwall beauty spot

The Independent

time12 hours ago

  • The Independent

Girl, 11, dies in tragic water incident at Cornwall beauty spot

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.

Reeves did not discuss Grangemouth during Ineos meeting
Reeves did not discuss Grangemouth during Ineos meeting

The Herald Scotland

timea day ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Reeves did not discuss Grangemouth during Ineos meeting

Sir Jim, who is ranked seventh on the Sunday Times Rich List and is reportedly worth over £17 billion, was among several 'external stakeholders' present at the meeting, understood to have taken place on Monday April 8. The Grangemouth refinery ceased processing crude oil on Monday April 29. READ MORE: The SNP called the revelation 'damning', while the GMB described it as an 'inexplicable abdication of responsibility'. Petroineos, the joint venture between Ineos and PetroChina that owns the 100-year-old site, first announced plans to close the facility in November 2023. The company said it was losing £385,000 a day, and that its future as an import terminal would 'require significantly fewer people to operate', with a 'net reduction of approximately 400 roles over the next two years'. It was the last oil refinery operating north of the Border. In recent months, hundreds of workers have taken voluntary redundancy, while a number of compulsory redundancies have also been made. A report commissioned by the Scottish and UK governments — known as Project Willow — was tasked with charting a low-carbon future for the site. But it concluded that around £3.5 billion in private investment would be needed. Grangemouth stopped refining at the end of April (Image: Jeff Mitchell/Getty) As well as the impact on local jobs, the closure has also hit the economy. Recent figures from the Scottish Government show GDP growth fell by 0.4% in the three months to May — wiping out the 0.4% increase seen in the first quarter of the year. In May alone, GDP contracted by 0.2%, following a 0.1% boost the previous month. The largest drop was seen in the manufacturing sector, which was badly affected by the refinery's closure. Output fell by 4.1% that month. In response to an FOI submitted by the SNP, UK Government officials initially refused to disclose details of the meeting, before finally conceding that 'a meeting did take place in April 2025 at which the Chancellor and Sir Jim Ratcliffe were present'. However, they confirmed: 'The threatened closure of the Grangemouth refinery was not discussed at that meeting.' The Treasury said its obligations under the Freedom of Information Act meant it was unable to say who else was present. SNP energy spokesperson Graham Leadbitter said the episode demonstrated a lack of political will from the UK Government when it came to protecting Grangemouth, especially compared to the nationalisation of the Scunthorpe steel plant, the support for a refinery in Lincolnshire, and the £100 billion spent on nuclear energy in England. He said: 'This is a damning revelation. Scots will be disgusted to learn that just days before the Grangemouth doors slammed shut, Rachel Reeves held a meeting with the owner, Sir Jim Ratcliffe, yet didn't even bother to mention the refinery. 'The UK Government only conceded the information after significant pressure, which speaks volumes about how desperate they were to keep this under wraps. 'That's because the truth is that never mind being an afterthought, the fact the Labour Government didn't even think it worthwhile to bring up such a critical issue to Scottish jobs shows Scotland doesn't even register as a thought at all. 'A steel plant in Scunthorpe was nationalised, a refinery in Lincolnshire was bailed out, and £100bn is found for English nuclear power plants — yet when it came to a Scottish refinery the UK Labour Government didn't lift a finger to keep it in operation. "That tells Scots all they need to know about Westminster and where Scotland lies in its priorities. 'It is this disregard for Scottish industry that leaves a growing number of Scots to wonder just how long we stay tied to this so-called Union of Equals, because only with independence can we prioritise Scottish jobs, Scottish growth and Scotland's people.' Robert Deavy, a senior organiser with GMB Scotland, representing contractors at the site, said: 'In the months and years leading to its needless closure, the public support of ministers on both sides of the Border did nothing to save Grangemouth. 'Now we discover that despite all the warm words in public, in private, the Chancellor did not even think it worth raising with the owner. 'Her silence only confirms the lack of political will or even interest in protecting our industrial infrastructure and all the jobs and communities it supports. 'It beggars belief that Rachel Reeves did not discuss Grangemouth with Jim Ratcliffe weeks before he pulled the shutters down but thought it worth asking for his help to formulate government policy? 'The Chancellor would be far better asking for guidance from the workers, families and communities shattered by this avoidable closure.' The Treasury said the meeting in question was regarding a different issue and that the Chancellor has had "extensive engagement" on the future of Grangemouth. They also pointed to the £100 million funding package to "secure a just transition for the Grangemouth workforce and community," and the Prime Minister's promise to allocate £200m from the National Wealth Fund to "grasp the opportunities" of Grangemouth. A UK Government spokesperson told The Herald on Sunday: "This Government recognises Scotland's vital role in the UK economy, with the Chancellor delivering a record settlement in the Spending Review, the largest in real terms since devolution in 1998. "We are investing millions of pounds in Scotland's defence and clean energy industries, securing tens of thousands of jobs, and we have already announced a £300m package to secure a just transition for Grangemouth workers and secure the long-term future of the site." Ineos declined to comment. Sir Jim is Manchester United's minority owner (Image: PA/Adam Davy) Earlier this year it emerged it took First Minister John Swinney more than two months to secure a meeting with Sir Jim. According to investigative website The Ferret, the two men finally spoke via video call on April 25, after Mr Swinney had written to the Ineos chair requesting a meeting at a 'very early opportunity' to discuss 'a way forward that protects employment at Grangemouth'. Most of the meeting's details remain redacted, but partial minutes show Ineos arguing the refinery was 'aged and loss making', and Sir Jim expressing 'concern about carbon taxes and energy costs'. The Scottish and UK governments jointly funded the £1.5 million Project Willow feasibility study, which was carried out by Ernst & Young and commissioned by Petroineos to assess the future of the site. READ MORE Last month, UK energy minister Michael Shanks said there was a 'certain inevitability' that Grangemouth would close by the time Labour came to power. Appearing before the Scottish Affairs Committee in the Commons, he described Grangemouth currently as a 'hugely investable opportunity' for businesses. Asked whether the UK Government considered bringing Grangemouth into public ownership, Mr Shanks told MPs: 'I think it is fair to say we didn't take any option off the table and we did look at a whole series of options. 'But firstly, the Government's not in the business of nationalising failing businesses. 'That is difficult to say, but it is the reality that a business that's losing tens of millions of pounds, it can't be nationalised with the public facing the cost of that. 'That's the same position we're in with the Prax Lindsey refinery (North Lincolnshire), and it's the same position with Grangemouth.' Mr Shanks said Labour 'moved every possible option forward' to do what it could to save the refinery. He added: 'The truth is, we were far too far down the line with the Grangemouth process to really change the outcome and as regrettable as that is — and it genuinely is, and I've met the workers on a number of occasions, I know how significant the impact is on them and their families — there was a certain inevitability about the outcome by the point in which we came into Government.'

West Virginia sends hundreds of National Guard members to Washington at Trump team's request
West Virginia sends hundreds of National Guard members to Washington at Trump team's request

The Independent

timea day ago

  • The Independent

West Virginia sends hundreds of National Guard members to Washington at Trump team's request

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store