logo
50 Cent savagely trolls Diddy again with wild AI baby oil video after rap mogul's shock verdict

50 Cent savagely trolls Diddy again with wild AI baby oil video after rap mogul's shock verdict

Daily Mail​6 days ago
50 Cent has taken yet another blistering swipe at Diddy, in the latest escalation of the long-running feud between the two rappers.
Ever since Diddy's dramatic downfall amid allegations of sex crime - which he has denied - 50 has been giddily trolling him on social media.
Early this month, the public was left in shock when Diddy was acquitted of the most serious charges against him, sex trafficking and racketeering.
However he was found guilty of two lesser charges of transportation to engage in prostitution, and is currently in prison awaiting sentencing on October 3.
As the date crept nearer, 50 fired up his Instagram page this weekend to post a wild AI-generated video that took a sly dig at the stash of baby oil the authorities discovered during a raid of Diddy's Los Angeles home.
In the clip - which 50 credited to the Instagram account @Geisha305 - a glistening Diddy is seen walking a fashion show runway, modeling a pink dress with a Johnson & Johnson baby oil logo splashed across the front.
The video was set to rapper Jody2Good's song Baby Oil Freak Off Party, a track about Diddy that was released last year after his arrest.
In his caption, 50 Cent wrote: 'I didn't know Diddy walked in the Michael Amiri show, when did he make Bond!' - prompting the fashion designer to leap into the comments and quip: 'Cmon 50, don't include me in this.'
His new post comes after another online wag issued an apology for an irreverent stunt that also made reference to Diddy's baby oil.
Content creator Armon Wiggins has apologized after footage showed him dancing shirtless and being sprayed with baby oil outside the courthouse following the Diddy trial verdict.
In an interview with the Mail's The Trial of Diddy podcast, the self-described 'independent media personality' insisted his actions were not in support of the disgraced rap mogul.
Wiggins told podcast host Kayla Brantley that he was 'misrepresented by the media', adding that fans of his reporting know he believes Diddy was fortunate to escape the most serious charges.
'In reporting the case, I was trying to take a very eerie, grim situation and turn it into something digestible for people', the YouTuber argued.
'I wasn't making light of the victims or poking fun at them. What ended up happening on the final day was that we were just having a good time.
Diddy was convicted earlier this month of two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution but acquitted of sex trafficking and racketeering
'We had been there at the trial from start to finish – we were tired and wanted to celebrate making it to the end.
'I was just vibing with another YouTuber, to be honest with you, and before I knew it, there was a crowd of people with television cameras and lights that circled around me.'
Wiggins claimed he didn't profit from the viral video and said his intention was to mock Diddy, not his victims.
'I got a lot of hate and lost followers', he said.
'I said to myself afterwards: I've got to grow up and learn to control the narrative because it was irresponsible.
'Even if my fans knew the intent behind it, that doesn't matter when you have 150 cameras out there in a heightened situation. You've got to be smarter than that.
'The amount of baby oil involved in the trial became ridiculous. You can't even say baby oil now without laughing. Really, I was making fun of Diddy – he came across as crazy.
'How many bottles of baby oil does one person need?
'In hindsight, I regret it for the simple fact that people were hurting, and it taught me never to be above reproach.
'If you make a mistake, you have to be humble enough to say, I didn't mean that and I apologise.'
Despite his apology, Wiggins shared his belief that traditional media wanted a reason to target him.
He argued that the press feels intimidated by the 'realness and relatability' of creators like him, who can deliver news in a more entertaining way.
'A lot of the press didn't think we deserved to be there', Wiggins told the podcast.
'It was so easy for them to slap a headline on me – they knew who I was. The story about me came from them.
'Us YouTubers had to fight for respect – because the journalists went to school and have got all these degrees.
'News doesn't travel like that anymore. Traditional media is still necessary, but there's something to be said for the people that can go out and reach their audience.
'There's a rawness, a realness, a relatability – they come to me to have a good time.'
To listen to the full bonus episode, search for the The Trial of Diddy now, wherever you get your podcasts.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man accused of stockpiling bombs, using Biden photo for target practice, pleads guilty
Man accused of stockpiling bombs, using Biden photo for target practice, pleads guilty

The Independent

time7 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Man accused of stockpiling bombs, using Biden photo for target practice, pleads guilty

A Virginia man pleaded guilty Friday in a federal case that accused him of stockpiling the largest number of finished explosives in FBI history and of using then-President Joe Biden's photo for target practice. Brad Spafford pleaded guilty in federal court in Norfolk to possession of an unregistered short barrel rifle and possession of an unregistered destructive device, according to court documents. Each count carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison. His sentencing is scheduled for December. Federal authorities said they seized about 150 pipe bombs and other homemade devices last fall at Spafford's home in Isle of Wight County, which is northwest of Norfolk. The investigation into Spafford began in 2023 when an informant told authorities that Spafford was stockpiling weapons and ammunition, according to court documents. The informant, a friend and member of law enforcement, told authorities that Spafford was using pictures of then-President Joe Biden for target practice and that 'he believed political assassinations should be brought back,' prosecutors wrote. Two weeks after the assassination attempt of then-presidential candidate Donald Trump in 2024, Spafford told the informant, 'bro I hope the shooter doesn't miss Kamala," according to court documents. Former Vice President Kamala Harris had recently announced she was running for president. On around the same day, Spafford told the informant that he was pursuing a sniper qualification at the local gun range, court records stated. Numerous law enforcement officers and bomb technicians searched the property in December. Spafford stored a highly unstable explosive material in a garage freezer next to 'Hot Pockets and frozen corn on the cob,' according to court documents. Investigators also said they found explosive devices in an unsecured backpack labeled '#NoLivesMatter.' Spafford has remained in jail since his arrest last December. U.S. District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen ruled against his release last January, writing that Spafford has 'shown the capacity for extreme danger.' She also noted that Spafford lost three fingers in an accident involving homemade explosives in 2021. Spafford had initially pleaded not guilty to the charges in January. Defense attorneys had argued at the time that Spafford, who is married and a father of two young daughters, works a steady job as a machinist and has no criminal record. Defense attorney Jeffrey Swartz said at Spafford's January detention hearing that investigators had gathered information on him since January 2023, during which Spafford never threatened anyone. 'And what has he done during those two years?' Swartz said. 'He purchased a home. He's raised his children. He's in a great marriage. He has a fantastic job, and those things all still exist for him.' Investigators, however, said they had limited knowledge of the homemade bombs until an informant visited Spafford's home, federal prosecutors wrote in a filing. 'But once the defendant stated on a recorded wire that he had an unstable primary explosive in the freezer in October 2024, the government moved swiftly,' prosecutors wrote.

Why the Star Wars franchise is a poisoned chalice
Why the Star Wars franchise is a poisoned chalice

Telegraph

time8 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Why the Star Wars franchise is a poisoned chalice

It's the ultimate Jedi mind trick. Announce a new Star Wars film, generate gigawatts of publicity and then, faster than you can say 'these aren't the droids you're looking for', pretend the movie never existed and the whole thing was a figment of the audience's imagination. Such has been the apparent strategy of Star Wars' parent studio, Lucasfilm, which has unveiled a Sith Lord's ransom in new spinoffs, only to ultimately leave fans spinning in deep space. The latest Lucasfilm associate to attempt an Obi-Wan Kenobi-style mind wipe is Taika Waititi, who has shelved his 'Untitled Star Wars Film' – its quasi-official name – in favour of an adaptation of trigger-happy 2000AD anti-hero Judge Dredd. Who needs a Jedi Knight when you have Judge Dredd? Not Waititi, who is confirmed as collaborating with screenwriter Drew Pearce on a new feature about Mega-City One's trigger-happy law enforcer. The news appears to confirm previous rumours that Waiti's Star Wars feature is on indefinite hold. That would be quite a u-turn from the far-off morning in May 2020 when Lucasfilm – a subsidiary of the all-powerful Disney – revealed that Waititi would be directing a 'fresh and unexpected' take on the galaxy far, far away. Unexpected – or non-existent? With Disney and Lucasfilm, it's increasingly hard to tell the difference. We are living through strange times, when Coldplay end marriages rather than soundtrack them, and in which freshly reformed Oasis are the hottest new band in Britain. Even so, how bracing to think that, at the halfway point of 2025, Judge Dredd has more appeal to a successful director than Star Wars – for so long, the last word in bum-on-seats franchises. With Waititi bouncing into the escape hatch and pressing the 'eject' button, it is worth reconsidering the idea of 'a Star Wars curse'. Like a sort of King Midas in reverse, everything Lucasfilm touches turns to dross. That includes the careers of once-buzzy directors Josh Trank and Colin Trevorrow, who went from the future of cinema to yesterday's story the moment it was confirmed they were to direct new Star Wars films. A similar miasma has hung over the careers of actors Daisy Ridley and John Boyega, up-and-coming stars, until the day they signed up to Disney's big new 2015 – 2019 'Sequels Trilogy'. The first of that sorry triptych, JJ Abrams's The Force Awakens, turned 10 this year, and its legacy might kindly be described as chequered. Boyega has since expressed his misgivings about the 'Sequels' (and pointed out how his character Finn was marginalised as the story went along). Ridley, by contrast, doubled down on the brand when agreeing to front an all-new trilogy about her spiky heroine Rey, to be directed by Pakistani journalist and documentarian Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy, only for that project to follow Waititi's trajectory into permanent limbo. Likewise drifting in the void is Rogue Squadron, a supposedly gritty X-Wing movie directed by Wonder Woman's Patty Jenkins, and a long-cancelled trilogy from Game of Thrones showrunners David Benioff and D B Weiss. They are joined by Last Jedi director Rian Johnson, who decided he'd much prefer making Knives Out whodunnits rather than being abused on social media by Star Wars fans. Why do so many Star Wars films stutter? Assuming it isn't a curse cooked up by Darth Vader and his fellow Sith Lords, the explanation is probably that the saga is a victim of its own iconic status. George Lucas's original trilogy forms a geek holy grail – here are hokey, flawed films that, over the decades, have come to be regarded as flawless masterpieces, pop art treated with the reverence of a Caravaggio. The weight of that legacy is felt by those hired to continue Lucas's work. When Godzilla director Gareth Edwards was tapped to direct the 2016 spinoff Rogue One, he spoke about the job not as a gig, but as carrying on a sacred tradition. 'You start to wonder whether this is all actually virtual reality. It seems too good to be true, like I'm playing the game version where I get to make a Star Wars film. It's not the sort of thing that should happen to you in your career, like even the best version of where your career could go.' Seemed too good to be true – and ultimately proved too good to be true, as well. Halfway through Rogue One, Disney concluded the production was running away from Edward and brought in unsentimental screenwriter Tony Gilroy. Gilroy, if not a hack, knew how to get a movie over the line. Moreover, he cared not a jot for Star Wars' associated baggage and didn't agonise over wrangling the film into shape. He brought the same indifference to the Jedi fanbase of his excellent Disney+ series, Andor, as he made clear in an interview with the Telegraph. 'The thing about the Star Wars community is they all disagree on everything and the moment they stop chewing on you, they start chewing on each other,' he said with a shrug. The other issue is the influence of Lucasfilm boss Kathleen Kennedy, a former lieutenant to Steven Spielberg who has become a sort of Galactic Emperor of green-lighting Star Wars projects. It was she who announced Waititi and used her address at the 2023 Star Wars Celebration fan convention to announce that she had reached out to Daisy Ridley about another red-letter day for Rey. Kennedy is passionate about Star Wars – perhaps to a fault. She is certainly not afraid to meddle. Such was the case with 2017's Han Solo movie, from which comedy improvisational duo (and Lego Movie directors) Lorde and Miller departed – supposedly because their improvised approach didn't chime with Kennedy's more straight-laced philosophy. With the pranksters expunged, Kennedy turned to a safe pair of hands, Ron Howard, who delivered what would prove to be the first-ever Star Wars film to post a loss. 'There's one gatekeeper when it comes to Star Wars, and it's Kathleen Kennedy,' an insider told Variety several years ago. 'If you rub Kathleen Kennedy the wrong way – in any way – you're out. You're done. A lot of these young, new directors want to come in and say, 'I want to do this. I want to do that.' A lot of these guys [i.e. Trevorrow] got very rich, very fast and believed a lot of their hype. And they don't want to play by the rules. They want to do sh–t differently. And Kathleen Kennedy isn't going to f–k around with that. ' But Kennedy's track record isn't anything to wave a lightsaber in the air over. She is widely regarded as having damaged the Star Wars brand with subpar TV spinoffs, such as The Acolyte and Ewan McGregor's Obi-Wan – expensive shows that featured low-budget production and poor writing. Still, fans will hope Waititi's departure marks the beginning of the end of Star Wars' long nightmare. At least two features are going ahead. Ryan Gosling's Star Wars: Starfighter is set for release in 2027, with Stranger Things producer Shawn Levy directing. Before that, Pedro Pascal and Baby Yoda will reunite for The Mandalorian and Grogu, a spinoff of the Mandalorian television series. Kennedy, meanwhile, is due to step down as head of Lucasfilm before the end of the year. There is the caveat that she is to 'continue to produce Star Wars content'. Still, her hand is going to be off the tiller, and there will be a new Star Wars movie coming down the line. After years of disappointment, you might say the saga has a new hope.

Three dead after explosion at sheriff training facility in Los Angeles
Three dead after explosion at sheriff training facility in Los Angeles

BreakingNews.ie

time8 minutes ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Three dead after explosion at sheriff training facility in Los Angeles

An explosion at a law enforcement training facility in Los Angeles that left three people dead is being investigated as a possible training accident, officials said. The explosion was reported around 7.30am on Friday at the Biscailuz Training Facility, said Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department spokeswoman Nicole Nishida. Advertisement Tragically, she said, three members of the department died. It was not immediately known what caused the explosion or what the department members were doing at the time. The training facility in LA where the explosion occurred (Etienne Laurent/AP) An early line of the investigation was looking at a possible training accident, according to a law enforcement official briefed on the matter who spoke to the Associated Press. US attorney general Pam Bondi in a post on X said it 'appears to be a horrific incident'. She said federal agents are at the scene to learn more. Advertisement 'Please pray for the families of the sheriff's deputies killed,' Ms Bondi wrote. Arson investigators from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the Los Angeles Fire Department and members of the Los Angeles Police Department bomb squad were assisting at the training facility, Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass said in a post on X. California governor Gavin Newsom's office said he has been briefed on the situation. Aerial footage from KABC-TV showed the explosion happened in a car park filled with sheriff patrol cars and trucks. Advertisement

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store