
US tariffs: Smartphones, PCs may become expensive for customers, says S&P
New Delhi:
Smartphones
and
personal computers
(PCs) may become expensive as a result of manufacturers passing on the higher costs, arising from
US tariffs
, to end-consumers, S&P Global Ratings said.
'We expect PC and phone makers will pass on the higher cost to customers even if it leads to some demand destruction, especially for consumers who make up 45 per cent of PC sales and most of smartphone sales,' the global credit ratings agency said in a research note, seen by
ETTelecom
.
It noted that smartphone makers, such as
Apple
and its key suppliers, and personal computer (PC) manufacturers heavily reliant on China, are the most vulnerable to the US tariffs.
'S&P Global Ratings believes the most vulnerable companies are those with the largest reliance on China's integrated technology production infrastructure and the U.S. as a major end market,' it said in the research note.
In particular, it said Apple and its key suppliers, including Hon Hai Precision Industry (Foxconn), may be the most disrupted due to reliance on China for production.
Apple, with a shipment share of over 60 per cent in the US market as of Q4 2024, faces a risk given its significant reliance on production in China. iPhones account for nearly 50 per cent of Apple's revenue, with the US representing approximately a third of its global smartphone shipments, said S&P.
The Cupertino-headquartered firm, however, has been shifting its production supply chain to India, which is expected to cover most of Apple's iPhone shipments to the US by 2026, the credit rating agency estimated. In turn, Korean Samsung's bulk of production happens in Vietnam and India.
'Vietnam and India account for the bulk of Samsung's production base. Smartphone production is labor intensive, favoring production in countries with low labor costs such as India and Vietnam. Tariffs on these countries pose further risk for the issuers with significant U.S. smartphone exposure such as Apple and Samsung and their suppliers,' said S&P in its research note.
Xiaomi is the only outlier that does not have direct exposure to the US consumer market. Its chips, too, are fabricated in Taiwan, and are unlikely to be a target of the US export restrictions, and neither will be subject to China's tariff on US goods.
The Donald Trump administration has imposed a 10 per cent baseline tariff on all countries, including India, with China also imposing reciprocal tariffs on the US. Notably, consumer electronics items, including smartphones and laptops, remain exempt from tariffs.
However, Trump has threatened to impose a 25 per cent tariff on all smartphone brands, particularly targeting Apple iPhones and Samsung handsets made outside the US, unless they are manufactured in America, the US media reported recently.
Apple's vendors nearly doubled exports of iPhones from India in March–a majority to the US–to ₹20,000 crore, from ₹11,000 crore a year ago, ET reported in its April 7, 2025, edition.
Recently, the International Data Corporation (IDC) projected that global smartphone shipments may grow by just 0.6 per cent year-on-year to 1.24 billion units in 2025, down from the 2.3 per cent year-on-year shipment growth it forecasted in February.
'Since April 2nd, the smartphone industry has faced a whirlwind of uncertainty. While current exemptions on smartphones have offered temporary relief, the looming possibility of broader tariffs presents a serious risk,' Nabila Popal, senior research director with IDC, said in a report separately.
Popal added that despite complexities driven by geopolitical uncertainties and trade risks, India and Vietnam are expected to remain the key alternatives to China for smartphone production. 'However, additional tariffs of 20-30 per cent on US-bound smartphones could post a serious downside risk to the current U.S. market outlook,' she had said.
Laptop, PC makers also at risk
Beyond smartphones, PC makers Dell, HP and Lenovo are also exposed to tariff risk.
S&P said this is due to high input costs, from which tariffs are calculated, and high reliance on China for manufacturing laptops. Desktops, by contrast, are assembled across Asia and Mexico.
The credit rating agency estimates the US PC sales contribute to about 15%-20 per cent of the operating profit for each of Dell, HP and Lenovo. S&P noted that Dell's contract manufacturers have already shifted their production of US-bound PCs outside China, while HP is expected to do so by June-end.
It, however, cautioned that shifting PC assembly to the US would not meaningfully offset tariff risks, unless components like processors, memory modules and display panels sourced from Taiwan, South Korea and China are tariff-exempted by the US.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Oil Surges as US Orders Partial Evacuation of Iraqi Embassy
Oil surged as the US government ordered a partial evacuation of its embassy in Iraq amid rising security risks. West Texas Intermediate futures jumped 4.9% to settle above $68 a barrel, the largest gain since October, as the Trump administration reduced embassy staff in Iraq and permitted military service-members' families to leave the region in response to ongoing security concerns. The UK Navy also issued a rare warning to mariners that higher tensions in the Middle East could affect shipping. The developments compounded speculation about possible supply disruptions in the Middle East after AFP reported that Iran threatened to target US military bases in the region if conflict breaks out. 'Iranian rhetoric has turned notably more hostile, and these threats are being substantiated by real-world developments,' said Rebecca Babin, a senior energy trader at CIBC Private Wealth Group. 'While geopolitical rallies are often seen as selling opportunities, this situation carries the added complexity of potential Israeli military action if negotiations break down, which is keeping traders more cautious about selling into the rally.' Elsewhere, President Donald Trump told the New York Post he's 'less confident' about whether he can convince Tehran to agree on shutting down its nuclear program. He also posted on social media that a trade deal with China was 'done,' subject to the approval of President Xi Jinping. Oil had been weighed down by expectations that a trade war between the world's two largest economies would hurt demand and that a deal with Iran would bring back sanctioned barrels, adding to rising OPEC supplies. Prices have recovered in recent sessions, supported by easing trade tensions and the outlook for summer demand. A monthly report from the US Energy Information Administration underscored the oil market's current uncertainties. While the agency expects supply to eclipse demand by 800,000 barrels a day this year, the most since it began publishing a forecast for 2025, it also doesn't see US crude production topping last month's levels before the end of next year, a sign that lower prices are curbing some supply. Signs of market tightness have also appeared along the futures curve. Earlier this week, the February-March WTI spread flipped to backwardation — where near-term prices are higher than longer-dated ones — for the first time since April, with several subsequent months following suit earlier today, signaling concerns about oversupply are easing. To get Bloomberg's Energy Daily newsletter in your inbox, click here. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Trump says China trade deal ‘done': 55% tariff, supply of rare earth minerals
President Donald Trump said Wednesday that the United States has reached a trade agreement with China, including an easing of curbs imposed by Beijing on export of rare earth minerals and magnets that are key inputs for industries ranging from automobiles to electronics. 'Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me,' Trump said in a post on Truth Social. He said China would supply 'any necessary rare earths' and magnets, while the US would make concessions on allowing Chinese students to attend American universities. The Trump administration had recently begun to clamp down on the presence of Chinese nationals on US college campuses. 'We are getting a total of 55% tariffs, China is getting 10%. Relationship is excellent!' Trump wrote, without elaborating. Bloomberg quoted a White House official as saying that the agreement allows the US to charge a 55 per cent tariff on imported Chinese goods, which, crucially, includes a 10 per cent baseline 'reciprocal' tariff, a 20 per cent tariff for fentanyl trafficking, and a 25 per cent tariff reflecting pre-existing tariffs (imposed by Trump in his first term, that the Biden administration persisted with). China would charge a 10 per cent tariff on American imports, the official said. Though the details of the deal were still unclear, analysts predicted that China seems to have gained the upper-hand after its rare earth restrictions prompted US carmakers, including Ford Motor and Chrysler, to cut production. Significantly, Trump said a final deal is subject to approval from him and Chinese President Xi Jinping. Chinese state media said earlier Wednesday that Beijing had reached a 'framework' for an agreement with the US during talks in London, but there was no official response from China on Trump's subsequent claims on Truth Social. Earlier, both the negotiating sides said they had agreed in principle to a framework for dialling down trade tensions between the world's two biggest economies. After the meeting in London — the second time the two sides have met in the last couple of months, since Trump's sweeping tariff onslaught — there were indications of a reconciliation. What is beginning to get clearer after the second meeting is that this is perhaps not how the US imagined the trade war to unfold. China is beginning to dictate the direction of the bilateral talks, with the US almost seen as requesting for much-needed concessions on the resumption of supplies of critical inputs. In the first round of talks in Geneva, the US delegation led by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent had asked the Chinese to cut its tariffs in tandem with theirs, primarily because the Americans were facing the heat back home from the early fallout of the high tariffs, including empty shelves at grocery stories and surging prices of daily use commodities. In London, the US side is learnt to have specifically asked the Chinese to 'suspend or remove' restrictions on rare earths magnets, which had forced a supply-chain crunch. The London meeting follows a call between Trump and Xi on June 5, which was initiated by the White House — the first call since Trump's reciprocal tariff announcement. After the London talks, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the deal should result in restrictions on rare earth minerals and magnets 'being resolved'. 'We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus… Once the Presidents approve it, we will then seek to implement it,' he said. 'The two sides have, in principle, reached a framework for implementing the consensus reached by the two heads of state during the phone call on June 5 and the consensus reached at the Geneva meeting,' the BBC quoted China's Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang as saying. Chinese export controls over rare earth minerals were high on the agenda of the meetings. While Beijing has not imposed an outright ban on the export of rare earth magnets, the process has been made very difficult; it could take a long time to source, posing shortage risks. Rare earth magnets, especially neodymium-iron-boron (NdFeB) magnets, are crucial for EV manufacturing. They provide the strong magnetic fields needed for efficient and powerful electric motors, including traction motors that drive EVs. These magnets also play a major role in other EV components like power steering systems, wiper motors and braking systems. China has a virtual stranglehold over these rare earth magnets. In May, talks held in Geneva led to a temporary truce after the tit-for-tat tariff increases by both sides, which led to duties that peaked at 145 per cent. Trump called the outcome of the talks in Switzerland a 'total reset', which brought US tariffs on Chinese products down to 30 per cent, while Beijing cut duties on US imports to 10 per cent. Both sides also agreed to a 90-day deadline to try to reach a trade deal. However, the US and China have since accused each other of breaching the deal. The US has said that Beijing has been dragging its feet on opening up exports of rare earth metals and magnets while the Chinese claim that Washington has restricted its access to American goods such as semiconductors and other related technologies linked to artificial intelligence. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer had said China had failed to roll back restrictions on exports of rare earth magnets. In the run-up to this week's talks, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce said on Saturday that it had approved some applications for rare earth export licences. The problem for the US is that the Chinese side has wrested some advantage, especially by leveraging its strategy of weaponing its dominance in key sectors. Rare earth minerals and magnets is one such area, where the US is now desperate for concessions. Both sides have since claimed breaches on non-tariff pledges, but the Americans clearly seem more eager for a reconciliation, given the impact of the Chinese blockade on its key manufacturing sectors. These Chinese trade blockades are already impacting companies in other geographies. Hamamatsu-based small car maker Suzuki Motors, for instance, said last week it plans to suspend the production of its flagship Swift compact hatchback due to China's rare earth restrictions, becoming the first Japanese automaker to be impacted. There are similar worries among other manufacturing entities across the world, including in the US. Anil Sasi is National Business Editor with the Indian Express and writes on business and finance issues. He has worked with The Hindu Business Line and Business Standard and is an alumnus of Delhi University. ... Read More
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Samsung assembled more mobile phones in India than Apple last year
Korean firm makes more phones across most segments and has higher volumes: S&P report Surajeet Das Gupta New Delhi Listen to This Article Samsung's global volume share of final assembling of smartphones in India might not get the same focus as that of Apple Inc because of the latter's aggressive export strategy and higher average selling price leading to higher value. But in terms of volume, the reality is that Samsung is much higher than its US rival. A research by S&P Global shows that Samsung's share of global final assembly volume of smartphones in India in 2024 was at 25 per cent compared to only 15 per cent of the Cupertino-based Apple Inc in the same period. For Samsung, its biggest exposure