logo
Why Peter Schiff says a house is a 'money pit' and that renting is a 'better option' for many — do you agree?

Why Peter Schiff says a house is a 'money pit' and that renting is a 'better option' for many — do you agree?

Yahoo24-05-2025

Moneywise and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below.
Buying and owning a house is often considered a significant financial investment and a milestone in personal wealth building. However, economist Peter Schiff believes that this notion is simply not true.
During a recent appearance on the Iced Coffee Hour podcast, hosted by Graham Stephan and Jack Selby, Schiff was asked about the common belief that, for many, a house represents their primary means of saving.
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
BlackRock CEO Larry Fink has an important message for the next wave of American retirees — here's how he says you can best weather the US retirement crisis
Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10)
Schiff, who runs Euro Pacific Capital, strongly disagrees with this perspective.
'A house depletes your savings. It's a money pit,' he said. 'It's crazy the amount of money that a house costs you.'
Proponents of homeownership often argue that property values appreciate over time. For example, the average sales price of new houses sold in March 2025 was $497,700, compared to $492,700 in February, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
But not everyone is convinced that this trend tells the whole story.
'People think, 'Oh, the house appreciates' — not always,' Schiff cautioned. 'It's inflation that's doing it. All that's happening is your land is keeping pace — but houses don't.'
This raises an important point. If inflation is the main driver, is owning physical property the only way to benefit from rising real estate values?
Not necessarily.
Here are a few other ways to invest in real estate without the burden of a mortgage, maintenance or timing the market.
If you bought a house years ago and sold it today, chances are you will receive more than the purchase price.
However, Schiff cautions that these sales often have significant caveats.
'Even if somebody tells you, 'Oh, here's this house that I sold for $1 million and I bought it, whatever, 10, 20 years ago for $500,000,'' he said. 'If you think about all the money they put into that house over that period of time, they may not have made any money.'
He explained that houses can require significant upgrades, which can be costly.
Read more: You're probably already overpaying for this 1 'must-have' expense — and thanks to Trump's tariffs, your monthly bill could soar even higher. Here's how 2 minutes can protect your wallet right now
For investors who want exposure to the real estate market without the headaches of ownership, maintenance and costly upgrades, the U.S. home equity market offers opportunity.
This $36 trillion market has historically been the exclusive playground of large institutions.
But Homeshares is changing the game by allowing accredited investors to gain direct exposure to hundreds of owner-occupied homes in top U.S. cities through their U.S. Home Equity Fund — without the headaches of buying, owning or managing property.
The fund focuses on homes with substantial equity, utilizing Home Equity Agreements (HEAs) to help homeowners access liquidity without incurring debt or additional interest payments.
This approach provides a hands-off way to invest in high-quality residential properties with the added benefit of diversification across regional markets. Minimum investments start at $25,000.
With risk-adjusted target returns ranging from 14% to 17%, the U.S. Home Equity Fund could unlock lucrative real estate opportunities, offering accredited investors a low-maintenance alternative to traditional property ownership.
The choice between buying and renting a home hinges on factors like your finances, lifestyle, local market trends and interest rates. While home ownership is a personal decision, Schiff believes one option often makes more sense.
'It depends on your circumstances and where the home is located,' Schiff said. 'But for a lot of people — and this has been the case for a long time — renting is a better option.'
His advice? Save the money you'd spend on homeownership and invest it instead.
Schiff also points to government policies that have skewed the housing market, such as tax breaks for mortgage interest that aren't available to renters. Add a sharp rise in interest rates — from about 3% three years ago to nearly 7% today — and the case for buying can become weaker for many.
Beyond the purchase price, homeownership comes with hidden costs like maintenance, upgrades, insurance and property taxes.
But you can still benefit from rising real estate values and generate income — without being a landlord.
One option is tapping into this market by investing in shares of real estate through Arrived.
Backed by world-class investors including Jeff Bezos, Arrived allows you to invest in shares of vacation and rental properties, potentially earning passive income without the headaches of being a landlord.
How it works is simple: Browse through their selection of vetted properties, each picked for their potential appreciation and income generation. Once you choose a property, you can start investing with as little as $100, potentially earning quarterly dividends.
Access to this $22.5 trillion asset class has traditionally been limited to elite investors — until now. Here's how to become the landlord of Walmart or Whole Foods without lifting a finger
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
Are you rich enough to join the top 1%? Here's the net worth you need to rank among America's wealthiest — plus a few strategies to build that first-class portfolio
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senate to Keep Spectrum Sales in Tax Bill, Key Republican Says
Senate to Keep Spectrum Sales in Tax Bill, Key Republican Says

Bloomberg

time11 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Senate to Keep Spectrum Sales in Tax Bill, Key Republican Says

A key Republican said senators have reached an agreement to reauthorize spectrum sales to internet companies that would generate billions of dollars in revenue toward funding US President Donald Trump's sweeping tax cuts and spending bill. Spectrum sales were included in the House version of the reconciliation package but the provision had drawn objections from South Dakota Republican Senator Mike Rounds, who previously said they risked undermining the US military's communications capabilities.

Why Tesla now needs the EV tax credit that Musk once said should go away
Why Tesla now needs the EV tax credit that Musk once said should go away

CNN

time14 minutes ago

  • CNN

Why Tesla now needs the EV tax credit that Musk once said should go away

It wasn't long ago that Tesla CEO Elon Musk was advocating for ending the $7,500 tax credit for buyers of electric vehicles. 'Take away the subsidies. It will only help Tesla,' he said in a post on his social media platform X last year, adding 'Also remove the subsidies from all industries!' But now, with House budget and tax bill known as the 'big, beautiful bill' proposing to end that tax credit, he and Tesla are suddenly arguing for the continuation of those same credits as the Senate debates its own version of the bill. 'Abruptly ending the energy tax credits would threaten America's energy independence and the reliability of our grid' said Tesla's solar power unit in its own post on X late last month. 'There is no change to tax incentives for oil & gas, just EV/solar,' Musk said in a follow-up post. The turnabout may have to do with the recent financial troubles at Tesla. Many experts believed that getting rid of the EV tax credit would hurt legacy automakers, which continue to lose money on their EV operations, more than it would hurt Tesla. But Tesla's sales took a nosedive this year, and it needs the credits to maintain buyer demand. The battle over EV tax credits, and Musk's broader opposition to the Republicans' budget and taxation bill, has caused a major split between President Donald Trump and Musk – a member of the administration's inner circle as recently as last week. The outcome could endanger the key legislative priority of Trump and Republicans. It could also be affect the finances of the beleaguered Tesla. Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson have both suggested that the loss of federal support for EV's is driving Musk's opposition to the bill. 'Elon and I had a great relationship, I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump told reporters Thursday. 'I am very disappointed. Elon knew the inner workings of this bill… all of a sudden he had a problem and he only developed the problem after he found out we had to cut the EV mandate.' Despite Trump's reference to an EV mandate, there has never been a federal rule requiring Americans buy EVs rather than gasoline-powered cars. But the Biden administration did pass the $7,500 EV tax credit in an effort to spur demand for EVs. Musk immediately denied removal of the EV tax credit was the reason for his opposition to the bill. 'Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill,' he posted on X shortly after Trump's remarks. Tesla shares (TSLA) fell 14% following the exchange. Musk has focused most of his criticism on how the domestic policy bill would balloon the deficit. However, he is also no longer is arguing that ending the EV tax credit would be good for Tesla. Tesla did not respond to a request for comment. However, Musk's shift on the EV tax credit likely reflects changes at Tesla since late last year. Backlash to Musk's political activities played a major role in the company's recent sales troubles, including its first drop in annual sales in 2024 and its biggest ever drop in its sales during the first three months of the year. That resulted in a 71% plunge in net income in the first quarter. While the $7,500 EV tax credit goes to car buyers, it indirectly benefits EV makers by increasing demand. When an earlier version was phased out in 2019, Tesla was forced to cut prices to keep buyers interested. It's not just Musk who changed his opinion on the credit's important to Tesla. The same analysts who once believed removing the EV tax credit would help Tesla are now concerned over its loss. In a note to clients the day after the election, Garrett Nelson, an analyst for CFRA Research, wrote that ending the credit 'will widen Tesla's competitive moat by making competing EV models even more uneconomic, as we believe (Tesla) is the only profitable manufacturer of EVs.' But now, Nelson is expressing worry over Tesla's value if the credits go away. 'Our view is the 'Big Beautiful Bill' would be a net negative for Tesla, as tax credits for EVs, energy storage and solar would be going away,' Nelson said in response to questions from CNN. 'That, and ongoing EV market share losses in China and Europe, are some of the primary reasons why we downgraded the stock in April.' Still, despite cutting his price target for Tesla, Nelson still has a buy recommendation on Tesla shares, as does Dan Ives, another Tesla bull. The tech analyst for Wedbush Securities said the change in finances at Tesla make the tax credits more important than in the past. 'Musk has definitely changed his tune from earlier on this,' Ives told CNN. 'The reality is it will hurt Tesla less than other EV makers, but it will still hurt. And Tesla needs all of the demand help it can get.' Under current bill language, the tax credit remains in place for upstart EV makers like Rivian and Lucid but goes away for Tesla and most legacy automakers, said John Murphy, auto analyst at Bank of America. But he said the greatest challenge for Tesla is that demand for EV among American buyers appears to have stalled. 'I think 8% market share might be the high water mark for EV,' he said at a presentation Wedneday, speaking about overall demand for electric vehicles in the US market. Because of that, and the lack of new Tesla models, especially a lower-priced version that had been promised, 'I think (Musk) is going to be challenged to grow volume.'

Trump Threatens Musk Contracts as Feud Escalates
Trump Threatens Musk Contracts as Feud Escalates

New York Times

time14 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Trump Threatens Musk Contracts as Feud Escalates

President Trump threatened to cut billions of dollars in federal contracts and tax subsidies for Elon Musk's companies on Thursday, the latest escalation in the growing feud between the two men. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' the president wrote on Truth Social. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Last year, Mr. Musk's companies were promised $3 billion across nearly 100 different contracts with 17 federal agencies. Most of the contracts were for SpaceX, Mr. Musk's space technology company. Tesla, his electric vehicle company, also has contracts with the federal government. But the relationship between the two men very publicly dissolved Thursday. Mr. Musk until last week was a top presidential adviser and has since turned into a critic of one of Mr. Trump's priorities. Mr. Musk has called the president's signature legislation currently moving through Congress a 'disgusting abomination.' The two lashed out at each other from on their own social media platforms on Thursday. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Mr. Trump wrote on Truth Social. Mr. Musk responded on X, the social media platform he owns, 'Such an obvious lie. So sad.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store