logo
City of Tacoma shouldn't withhold Moore records on a technicality

City of Tacoma shouldn't withhold Moore records on a technicality

Yahoo29-05-2025

C'mon.
That's the thought that keeps popping into my head as I go over the City of Tacoma's reasons for denying a public records request from The News Tribune. When the news team here learned the city had investigated former police chief Avery Moore's use of leave while at the Tacoma Police Department, they made a request to see the records of that investigation.
Now, the city has taken that straightforward ask and headed for the nearest loophole. It's part of a larger pattern of unnecessary delay on public records requests coming out of City Hall. And it comes at a time when the public has every reason to wonder what happened.
Here's the city's reasoning: it hasn't made a final decision in its investigation into Moore's use of leave, so the city is exempted from providing the records. Based on state public records laws, the city is shielded from revealing notes and other records that would reveal opinions shared as part of the 'deliberative process,' before a final decision has been made.
That has the ring of sense to it. But hold on, didn't Moore depart the Tacoma Police Department with a nearly $500,000 severance package in February? And wasn't another investigation into Moore's personal use of his work phone already concluded (and revealed to have cost the city $11,000 to conduct)?
Yes, those things did just happen, which leaves one more question. What is there left for the city to decide when it comes to its investigation into the former chief's use of leave? Moore is gone. It's not like they can discipline him, let alone fire him.
The City of Tacoma didn't indicate to The News Tribune's reporter when there might be a final decision. I can't help but wonder if the city shelved its questions into Moore's use of leave after he agreed to resign. That would leave a permanent ellipses at the end of its investigation, and an eternal cop-out from handing over any records.
I asked City of Tacoma spokesperson Maria Lee whether the investigation had been shelved due to Moore's departure. She referred the question to the city's public records office, which did not provide additional information.
It's not the first time the city has stonewalled public records requests. In 2021, two groups sued the city over withheld records, and won. The first group wanted to see documents from the Tacoma Police Department's use of cell phone location technology called a Stingray. A judge ordered the city to hand over the records and pay a penalty plus the group's legal fees.
The second lawsuit concerned the city's records surrounding Puget Sound Energy's plans to build a liquid natural gas plant near the Port of Tacoma. A judge in that case ordered the city to implement public records training for the heads of all city departments, finding the city's previously existing training inadequate.
Declining to provide answers based on a cute interpretation of public records laws doesn't serve the public interest.
Sure, records of the investigation into Moore's use of leave could be a nothingburger. The News Tribune first learned of an investigation into Moore's use of leave from records of the city's investigation into a $1,000 charge Moore racked up on his work phone while using it for GPS during a family vacation to Sweden. Those records noted that city manager Elizabeth Pauli opened the HR investigation into Moore's use of leave in response to rumors.
It could turn out that those rumors were unsubstantiated. But that's not the point. When a high-profile city hire takes a huge payout and leaves town without explanation, it's going to raise questions. Even more so when another investigation into that same hire cost more than 10 times the amount of the inappropriate phone charges it was looking into.
So c'mon, City of Tacoma, it's time to give a real answer.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Do Grandmothers Deserve Baby Showers Too? New Trend Sparks Debate
Do Grandmothers Deserve Baby Showers Too? New Trend Sparks Debate

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Do Grandmothers Deserve Baby Showers Too? New Trend Sparks Debate

Is it OK for grandmothers to have their own baby showers to celebrate the arrival of future grandchildren? 'It's a big deal to become a new grandparent and it deserves to be celebrated, but it's not the same as becoming a parent,' a grandmother of three, who uses the pseudonym DeeDee Moore on social media, tells Moore, who runs the TikTok account and website 'More Than Grand,' unpacked the topic in a video captioned, 'What do you think about granny showers?' 'OK, there are definitely two opinions about grandmother showers,' Moore said in the video. 'Opinion one: Grandmother showers are a lovely way to welcome a friend or co-worker into their new role. Opinion two: Granny showers are inappropriate and tacky gift grabs. So, which is it?' 'If a group of co-workers gets together and has a lunch where they celebrate someone becoming a new grandmother — giving her a card and a cake and a book about grandparenting or some things to keep at her house for the baby — it's a lovely way to welcome somebody to this new stage of life,' Moore said in the video. Moore added: 'When the grandmother shower rivals the shower for the actual parents, that's where it crosses a line.' 'Traditionally, a shower is thrown to help provide a young couple with the things that they can't afford themselves,' Moore pointed out in the video. 'It's harder to justify a shower for a grandmother who can likely afford most of the things she needs and probably won't need that many things to begin with.' Moore said gift-givers should think about what expecting parents need before they gift the grandparents. 'So, what do you think: Are grandmother showers a good trend or one that we should say goodbye to?' Moore asked in the video. The TikTok responses were heated: 'It's peak narcissism.' 'I don't understand the 'new role' comment. There is no 'role.' We're the parents. They get to observe and show love.' 'No grandmother shower. No circumstances support this.' 'A cute lunch with some goodies would be great, but wanting gifts like cribs and baby clothes is TOO much and puts an expectation that the baby will be sleeping over grandma's house a bunch.' 'Inappropriate and tacky. If the person is becoming a grandparent, they've already had their own children. The grandchild isn't a 'do-over' for them.' 'My friend is going to be a first-time grandmother. We are definitely having a get-together to celebrate her excitement.' 'I think the key is that grandma's shower should include a different set of guests, so the same people aren't getting hit up for gifts twice.' ''No' to the shower. But 'Yes' to a few friends celebrating new grandparents.' 'It's tacky as hell.' 'I can totally see how this would get out of hand. It's sweet for a few close friends to help you celebrate your new role but tread very lightly.' 'I've never heard of it, but I think it's great.' 'The absolute only time a grandparent shower should happen is if it's thrown by the parents of the baby. Or, possibly a small surprise party at work planned and attended by co-workers only.' Moore tells that she believes celebrating a future grandchild with close friends or co-workers is a nice way to mark a new life stage — but she has some reservations. First, she says, parents should preferably be the ones to suggest a 'grand shower.' When it's the grandparents' idea, they should get the parents' blessing. 'It's one thing if friends throw you a little shower — you don't need permission for that — but if you're planning a shower and have not consulted with the parents ... that's not OK,' says Moore. 'The prime focus needs to be on the new mom.' According to Moore, 'grand showers' are even less necessary for veteran grandparents, who have already experienced a change in the family dynamic. Moore says 'meal-prep showers' could be a replacement for grandparent showers. 'Get everyone in the kitchen to make meals for the new family,' says Moore. 'You can enjoy a glass of champagne and talk about how wonderful it is to become a new grandparent while providing something useful to the parents.' This article was originally published on

Israel-backed Gaza delivery group names US evangelical leader as chair
Israel-backed Gaza delivery group names US evangelical leader as chair

Yahoo

time15 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Israel-backed Gaza delivery group names US evangelical leader as chair

An evangelical leader and adviser to Donald Trump on interfaith issues has been appointed the new head of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) as the controversial US- and Israeli-backed initiative attempts to recover from top-level resignations during a tumultuous rollout last week. Johnnie Moore, a member of the US Commission on International Religious Freedom and founder of the boutique advisory firm Kairos Company, was appointed the new head of the GHF after Jake Wood, a former marine, resigned, saying that he could not guarantee the GHF's independence from Israeli interests. Moore has been a vocal defender of the GHF who has bristled at public criticism of the rollout, telling the UN chief, António Guterres, on X that reports of Palestinians killed and injured while seeking aid in Gaza was 'a lie … spread by terrorists'. Related: US distances itself from Gaza food delivery group amid questions over leadership and funding Major partners continue to abandon the GHF, which was launched with vocal support from US government officials. Boston Consulting Group (BCG), a US consulting firm, said it had cancelled its contract with the GHF on Tuesday amid growing media scrutiny into the group's work and sources of funding. In a post on its social media, the GHF announced that its distribution points would be closed on Wednesday for 'update, organization and efficiency improvement work'. The group did not give more information on the improvements it intended to make. Operations would resume on Thursday, the group claimed. In a statement, Moore lauded the GHF's reported delivery of more than 7m meals in the last week, numbers that haven't been independently verified, and also took aim at media reports about murky finances and chaotic rollouts of the aid distribution centres in Gaza. Local health officials said that at least one person was killed and more than 50 people injured on 27 May when Israeli troops opened fire on the second day of operations at a GHF distribution centre. 'GHF believes that serving the people of Gaza with dignity and compassion must be the top priority,' Moore said in a statement. 'We welcome others to join us and urge extreme caution against sharing unverified information from sources that have repeatedly issue demonstrably false reports. 'False reporting of violence at our sites has a chilling effect on the local population and we can think of no greater disservice to a community in dire need,' he said. A biography on the Kairos website calls Moore a 'noted evangelical friend of the State of Israel' and says that he has played an important role in US outreach to Middle Eastern governments, including in the conclusion of the Abraham accords to normalise relations between Israel and Arab states. John Acree, the acting director of the GHF, said that Moore has a 'proven record of principled leadership and hands-on humanitarian work'. But Moore's paucity of experience working with major charitable organisations will make it difficult for him to refute criticisms about the GHF's lack of independence and experience dealing with a major humanitarian crisis. BCG, which was reported to be handling key logistics planning, abandoned the project late last week and a representative told CNN that 'unapproved follow-on work relating to Gaza lacked buy-in from multilateral stakeholders and was stopped on May 30'. 'BCG has not and will not be paid for any of this work,' the organisation said. BCG also told reporters that they had placed the employee responsible for overseeing the project on administrative leave pending an internal review. The Washington Post, which first reported on BCG cutting ties with the GHF, said that the consulting group was instrumental in planning GHF's operations. Three people closely connected to both the GHF and BCG told the Washington Post that it would be difficult for the foundation to continue to function without the consultants who helped create it. 'In addition to helping develop the initiative in close coordination with Israel, BCG set the prices for paying and equipping the array of contractors who built four distribution hubs in southern Gaza to deliver the aid,' the newspaper reported.

‘It was critical': St. Augustine close to finishing $1.35M City Hall waterproofing project
‘It was critical': St. Augustine close to finishing $1.35M City Hall waterproofing project

Yahoo

time18 hours ago

  • Yahoo

‘It was critical': St. Augustine close to finishing $1.35M City Hall waterproofing project

The City of St. Augustine is about two months away from finishing a project it describes as critical, but one you may not have known about. If you've walked through the courtyard of the Alcazar building, which includes City Hall and the Lightner Museum, you've likely noticed the scaffolding against the building. It's part of a $1.35 million project, funded through a state grant, to spray waterproofing material on the outside of the nearly 150-year-old building. 'If water keeps going into this building, it will crumble over time,' said Barb Moore, deputy director of general services for the City of St. Augustine. >>> STREAM ACTION NEWS JAX LIVE <<< Moore says the City Hall building, which was first constructed in the late 1800s, was made from a material called coquina, a mix of concrete and shells. Moore tells Action News Jax the material isn't only nearly impossible to find, but absorbs water and has caused rain damage to the building over time. 'Over time, with just the age of the structure, it will wear away, if we don't do something. So it was critical, but it was just a matter of time and money,' Moore said. Until recently, the city says nothing has been done to fix the cracks and crumbles seen on the outside of the building and damage to its windows because of worries from historians. The building is on the National Park Service's register of historic places and historians, from what the city tells us, have been concerned about the chance that any repair or restoration work would change the look of the building. 'It will save the integrity of the building. You're going to see cracks still because it was built in the 1800s. But what we are doing is we are making the structure sound,' said Moore. Even though the work on the city hall side of the building is close to being finished, the city says there's another round of waterproofing work needed for the exterior of the building on the side that houses the Lightner Museum. There aren't any plans to waterproof other buildings in the city with similar water repellent material, but the city hopes the work being done on City Hall will inspire leaders of other coastal cities to consider the same solution to protect their pieces of history. 'It should save us in the end. It will save us everything,' said Moore. The city says the waterproofing material being put on the building right now should be able to protect it from water damage for the next 10 years. [DOWNLOAD: Free Action News Jax app for alerts as news breaks] [SIGN UP: Action News Jax Daily Headlines Newsletter] Click here to download the free Action News Jax news and weather apps, click here to download the Action News Jax Now app for your smart TV and click here to stream Action News Jax live.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store