logo
Education secretary says universities must follow the 1964 Civil Rights Act

Education secretary says universities must follow the 1964 Civil Rights Act

Yahooa day ago

May 28 (UPI) -- Federal funding could be withheld from U.S. universities that don't abide by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Education Secretary Linda McMahon said on Wednesday.
McMahon was interviewed by CNBC on Wednesday morning regarding President Donald Trump's call to withhold all federal funding to Harvard University, threatening to revoke its non-profit status for failing to protect Jewish students and halting its intake of international students.
"When we looked at different aspects of what Harvard was doing relative to anti-Semitism on its campuses, they were not enforcing Title VI the way it should be," McMahon told CNBC.
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act "prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color and national origin in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance," according to the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice.
"If a recipient of federal assistance is found to have discriminated and voluntary compliance cannot be achieved, the federal agency providing the assistance should either initiate fund termination proceedings or refer the matter to the Department of Justice for appropriate legal action," the DOJ says.
McMahon said the Trump administration had conversations with Harvard President Alan Garber and anticipated more conversations, but the university filed a federal lawsuit against the administration.
McMahon said it's important for the administration to "call attention" to what Harvard and other universities are doing
Harvard has a $53 billion endowment that it has invested and draws annual returns of between 5% and 10%, she said.
"That's billions of dollars," McMahon said, adding that Trump might consider increasing the endowment tax on universities.
"That's something that the American public can wrap its head around," she said. "There are a lot of issues that we'd like to look at, and we'd like to continue to talk to Harvard."
The CNBC interviewer asked McMahon if she agrees the federal government should vet international students by reviewing their social media posts, which the Trump administration has proposed.
McMahon said she doesn't know the criteria that the State or Homeland Security departments are considering to vet international students seeking visas to study in the United States.
"The president certainly has great concerns," she said.
"There are foreign students who come to this country ... who help create this unrest," McMahon explained.
"There are activists who come in," she continued. "There are professors that are hired and brought in who are teaching ideology more than they are subject matter."
She said it's important to know what the backgrounds and ideologies of international students and professors might be prior to the arrival at college campuses in the United States
As the interview opened, McMahon said universities "should continue to be able to do research as long as they're abiding by the laws and are in sync ... with the administration and what the administration is trying to accomplish, but primarily abiding by the laws.
That comment drew strong rebukes from some media outlets.
Gizmodo accused the Trump administration of continuing an "attack on higher education."
Rolling Stone ran a headline claiming McMahon said Harvard needs to be in sync "with Trump's political goals" after the Trump administration cut off all contracts with Harvard.
"The Trump administration is warning the nation's universities that their federal funding and research grants will only remain safe if the school is compliant with the goals of the Trump administration," Rolling Stone reported.
The entertainment magazine accused the administration of attempting to "force Harvard -- and other prominent American universities -- to surrender their academic independence and accept government oversight in respect to their curriculums, staffing decisions and student body."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

It's Musk's last day - what has he achieved at the White House?
It's Musk's last day - what has he achieved at the White House?

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

It's Musk's last day - what has he achieved at the White House?

Elon Musk's time in the Trump administration is coming to an end after a tempestuous 129 days in which the world's richest man took an axe to government spending - stirring ample controversy along the way. Earlier this week, the South African-born billionaire, on his social media platform, X, thanked President Trump for his time at the Department of Government Efficiency, or Doge. Trump announced he will host a news conference in the Oval Office on Friday with Musk, writing: "This will be his last day, but not really, because he will, always, be with us, helping all the way." While Musk's time in government lasted little more than four months, his work with Doge upended the federal government and had an impact not just in the halls of power in Washington - but around the world. Let's take a look at some of the ways Musk has left a mark. Musk took a job with the Trump White House with one mission: to cut spending from the government as much as possible. He began with an initial target of "at least $2 trillion", which then shifted to $1tn and ultimately $150bn. To date, Doge claims to have saved $175bn through a combination of asset sales, lease and grant cancellations, "fraud and improper payment deletion", regulatory savings and a 260,000-person reduction from the 2.3 million-strong federal workforce. A BBC analysis of those figures, however, found that evidence is sometimes lacking. This mission has at times caused both chaos and controversy, including some instances in which federal judges halted mass firings and ordered employees reinstated. In other instances, the administration has been forced to backtrack on firings. In one notable instance in February, the administration stopped the firing of hundreds of federal employees working at the National Nuclear Security Administration, including some with sensitive jobs related to the US nuclear arsenal. Musk himself repeatedly acknowledged that mass firings would inevitably include mistakes. "We will make mistakes," he said in February, after his department mistook a region of Mozambique for Hamas-controlled Gaza while cutting an aid programme. "But we'll act quickly to correct any mistakes." Doge's efforts to access data also garnered controversy, particularly the department's push for access to sensitive treasury department systems that control the private information of millions of Americans. Polls show that cuts to government spending remain popular with many Americans - even if Musk's personal popularity has waned. The presence of Musk - an unelected "special government employee" with companies that count the US government as customers - in Trump's White House has also raised eyebrows, prompting questions about potential conflicts of interest. His corporate empire includes large companies that do business with US and foreign governments. SpaceX has $22 billion in US government contracts, according to the company's chief executive. Some Democrats also accused Musk of taking advantage of his position to drum up business abroad for his satellite internet services firm, Starlink. The White House was accused of helping Musk's businesses by showcasing vehicles made by Tesla - his embattled car company - on the White House lawn in March. Musk and Trump have both shrugged off any suggestion that his work with the government is conflicted or ethically problematic. Around the world, Musk's work with Doge was most felt after the vast majority - over 80% - of the US Agency for International Development's (USAID's) programmes were eliminated following a six-week review by Doge. The rest were absorbed by the State Department. The Musk and Doge-led cuts formed part of a wider effort by the Trump administration to bring overseas spending closer in line with its "America First" approach. The cuts to the agency - tasked with work such as famine detection, vaccinations and food aid in conflict areas - quickly had an impact on projects including communal kitchens in war-torn Sudan, scholarships for young Afghan women who fled the Taliban and clinics for transgender people in India. USAID also was a crucial instrument of US "soft power" around the world, leading some detractors pointing to its elimination as a sign of waning American influence on the global stage. While Musk - and Trump - have for years been accused by detractors of spreading baseless conspiracy theories, Musk's presence in the White House starkly highlighted how misinformation has crept into discourse at the highest levels of the US government. For example, Musk spread an unfounded internet theory that US gold reserves had quietly been stolen from Fort Knox in Kentucky. At one point, he floated the idea of livestreaming a visit there to ensure the gold was secured. Fact-checking Trump's Oval Office confrontation with Ramaphosa More recently, Musk spread widely discredited rumours that the white Afrikaner population of South Africa is facing "genocide" in their home country. Those rumours found their way into the Oval Office earlier in May, when a meeting aimed at soothing tensions between the US and South Africa took a drastic twist after Trump presented South African President Cyril Ramaphosa with videos and articles he said were evidence of crimes against Afrikaners. Musk's work in government also showed that, despite public pledges of unity, there are tensions within the "Trump 2.0" administration. While Trump publicly - and repeatedly - backed the work of Musk and Doge, Musk's tenure was marked by reports of tension between him and members of the cabinet who felt Doge cuts were impacting their agencies. "They have a lot of respect for Elon and that he's doing this, and some disagree a little bit," Trump acknowledged in a February cabinet meeting. "If they aren't, I want them to speak up." At one point, he was asked whether any cabinet members had expressed dissatisfaction with Musk and turned to the room to ask them. No one spoke. The announcement of Musk's departure also came the same day CBS - BBC's US partner - publicised part of an interview during which Musk said he was "disappointed" by Trump's "big, beautiful" budget bill. The bill includes multi-trillion dollar tax breaks and a pledge to increase defence spending. Musk said the bill "undermines" the work of Doge to cut spending - reflecting larger tensions within the Republican Party over the path forward. Elon Musk leaves White House but says Doge will continue What is Doge and why is Musk leaving? Musk 'disappointed' by Trump's tax and spending bill How much has Elon Musk's Doge cut from US government spending?

Key Fed Inflation Rate May Hit 4-Year Low; S&P 500 Futures Flat (Live Coverage)
Key Fed Inflation Rate May Hit 4-Year Low; S&P 500 Futures Flat (Live Coverage)

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Key Fed Inflation Rate May Hit 4-Year Low; S&P 500 Futures Flat (Live Coverage)

The Federal Reserve's primary inflation rate, the core PCE price index, out at 8:30 a.m. ET, is seen dipping to its lowest level since March 2021. S&P 500 futures fell modestly ahead of the report, as President Donald Trump said China has "violated" the preliminary trade deal. The inflation outlook, however, just became more hazy after a U.S. Court of International Trade ruling on Wednesday threw out the bulk of President Trump's second-term tariffs, saying he overstepped his authority.

S&P 500, stocks inch higher after appeals court unpauses tariffs
S&P 500, stocks inch higher after appeals court unpauses tariffs

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

S&P 500, stocks inch higher after appeals court unpauses tariffs

US stocks (^DJI, ^IXIC, ^GSPC) edge higher to close out Thursday's session in the green, all while coming off of Nvidia's (NVDA) first quarter earnings and a US appeals court temporarily reversing a trade court's pause on President Trump's tariffs. Market Domination Overtime anchor Julie Hyman and Yahoo Finance markets and data editor Jared Blikre recap the latest market and sector moves after the day's closing bell. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime here. The Dow recovering a little bit by the end of the day, up 120 points or so, about a fifth of 1%. Remember the trajectory of the day, right? And it's probably shown more clearly in the S&P 500, which at one point was up quite a bit, then dipped into the negative, then finishing higher by about four tenths of 1%. So off the lows of the session. This following the various trade headlines. First, a court blocking a wide swath of President Trump's tariffs. Some still in effect, including sectoral tariffs. Then an appeals court coming in and blocking the block, at least for now. In other words, the tariffs still remain in effect while that case goes to appeal. So still, um, you know, the tariffs perhaps weighing on the market, or at least the base case of the tariffs weighing on the market. The NASDAQ finishing higher as well, by about four tenths of 1%, but it too finishing well off the highs of the session. Jared's got a closer look at the action. Thank you, Julie. Great recap. Nvidia is in the rearview, so that major catalyst off the table right now. And tariffs, they didn't really do too much damage to the market. So green close despite well off the highs there. And I'll just show you the VIX. I'm gonna center on the VIX volatility index with Josh in about 30 minutes here, but you can see it was down today, holding below 20. Uh we can see that in some other markets. And I'll just show you quickly here the 30 year. The 30 year yield down five basis points to 4.92%. So edging away from that 5% line that was causing some hiccups last week. And let's check out the sector action. Only communication services in the red there, that's an alphabet and meta story, but we'll dig into that in a second. Everything else in the green, but as you will notice, real estate here at the top, that's defensive, as is utilities, as is healthcare. So, a little bit of a defensive setup to the bullish action today. Tech had been leading in the early market, and that was thanks to Nvidia. You can see that print right back there, up 3 and 1/4%, but tech lost a lot of momentum over the day. Uh I did mention that communication services was down, Alphabet down three tenths of a percent, that's part of the deal. Apple also, which is tech, that was down about a quarter of a percent. But for the most part, a little bit more green than red. Broadcom also up 1.06%, and if I put a one-year chart on there, you can see it is had, has this nice rounded base and it looks like it wants to break out, might need a little bit more time to form a handle there. We'll have to see what happens, but Broadcom testing its all-time highs right now. Uh, I'm gonna finish here on some of our leaders, and guess what? Biotech was the winner today. So I got two biotech ETFs up at the top, up about 2%, and after that we got Korea, China did well today, regional banks, home builders, which have been kind of downtrodden for some time now, solar energy, and the magnificent seven. On the bottom, what did not work today? Bitcoin down about 1%, also IPOs and software, and small tech. Arc Innovation fund was down two thirds of 1%. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store