Galway Downs ‘surprised' to learn it is no longer L.A. Olympics equestrian venue
The 242-acre site was approved by a Los Angeles City Council vote last month to host the 2028 Olympic equestrian competition. But after getting its venue masterplan approved Wednesday by the International Olympic Committee executive board, LA28, the private committee responsible for organizing and executing the Games, informed Galway Downs that the equestrian competition will head elsewhere.
'We are extremely surprised that we were suddenly removed from consideration,' Galway Downs owner Ken Smith said in a statement. 'We don't understand how, based on the March 28 City Council's vote of approval, that this could happen. When we started this process more than four years ago, we understood the equestrian venue selection for LA28 would be a highly competitive, evolving process. Being selected as the proposed equestrian venue put Galway Downs and Temecula Valley on the world stage. We're very proud of that, and we're just getting started. Galway Downs will continue to host elite national and international competitions as well as additional sporting events.'
LA28's full venue plan has not been publicly announced. Equestrian was initially slated to take place at a temporary facility built in the Sepulveda Basin, but the plan shifted toward Galway Downs, where there was existing infrastructure to host dressage, eventing and jumping.
'Galway Downs has showcased its Equestrian Center in Temecula Valley as the superior venue capable of hosting all Olympic equestrian games,' Temecula Mayer Brenden Kalfus said in a statement. 'While the City is disheartened to learn of this abrupt change, particularly in light of LA28's venue approval granted by the Los Angeles City Council just two weeks ago, we remain confident that Galway Downs will continue its legacy and mission uninterrupted as a vibrant, world-class Olympic-caliber equestrian presence in Temecula Valley.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Medicine Hat refuses mayor's request to cover $70K in legal bills
Medicine Hat's city council has decided against reimbursing its mayor for thousands of dollars she spent on taking the city to court and paying for outside legal advice during a leadership conflict that has dominated much of the last two years. Mayor Linnsie Clark requested compensation from the City of Medicine Hat totalling $76,017.62 across three items. Council decided to vote on each of the expenses separately instead of as a lump sum. The six councillors present at Monday's regular public meeting voted unanimously to reimburse Clark about $5,800 for one of the expenses, but denied her compensation on the other fees worth over $70,000 combined. "I thought that I laid it out fairly clear the cause and effect in relation to my costs," Clark told CBC News in a phone interview Tuesday. "So it was certainly a bit of a surprise and disappointment." Clark's reimbursement request first appeared on a council agenda in April, but she pushed back a vote several times citing the need to collect more information. After a municipal audit revealed an "untenable working environment" at city hall largely caused by a rift between Clark and the chief administrator, the legal fees remained as the only apparent outstanding item of interest after 24 months of division. 'Not just about right and wrong' Due to pecuniary interest rules, Clark was outside of the council chamber for most of the time her colleagues spent debating her payback request. Coun. Shila Sharps, who put forward the reimbursement motion, said Clark shouldn't be responsible for such a large sum because responsibility for the conflict at city hall rests with all of council. "Everybody was at fault ... I don't think one individual here should be picking up the tab," Sharps said. "I feel like we hold her to a higher level than we do our city manager, and that is unacceptable." Councillors who voted against reimbursing Clark for most of the fees said they couldn't justify spending taxpayer dollars on an issue that could've been resolved before lawyers were involved. "This job is not just about right and wrong, it's about working as a team and there was none of that," Coun. Allison Knodel said in reference to the mayor. Coun. Andy McGrogan, who is running for mayor in the fall election, asked Clark if she had attempted to get her legal fees paid through existing city policies. When she answered that she had and found that no options were available to her, McGrogan said he supported repayment for the sake of turning the page. "If there was nowhere for her to go than back to us, then I think we need to pay (the legal fees)," said McGrogan. "We need to heal, and move on." What were the fees for? Clark, who worked as a lawyer in Medicine Hat's solicitor office before running for mayor, paid for a third-party legal opinion on the reorganization of city hall that chief administrator Ann Mitchell carried out in 2023. Lawyer Guy Giorno, a partner at the national law firm Fasken, wrote that Mitchell's restructuring contradicted a city bylaw and was "null and of no effect." Clark used Giorno's opinion at the Aug. 21, 2023, meeting, catching councillors off guard and leading to a sharp exchange between Clark and Mitchell. Clark said she spent $10,500 for Giorno's services. Several councillors raised concerns about Clark's unilateral decision to acquire external legal advice without council approval. "The process has to be honoured or we make a mockery of it going forward and we set a dangerous precedent," said Coun. Robert Dumanowski at Monday's council meeting. With Sharps the only councillor to vote in favour of covering the Giorno expense, the item was not approved for repayment. Mitchell's lawyer sent Clark a letter in November 2023 demanding she "cease and desist" from further defaming the city manager. Council later reimbursed Mitchell the $6,520 she spent on the letter. Clark said she wanted to be remunerated for the $5,841.94 spent on retaining legal counsel after she received Mitchell's letter. "In light of the fact that there were fees covered in a similar vein for the city manager, I think it would be appropriate to do the same here," said Dumanowski. Council voted unanimously to cover Clark's expenditure to respond to the letter — the only of the three expense categories to receive approval. In March 2024, Medicine Hat's council placed several sanctions on Clark after finding she broke its code of conduct during the back-and-forth with Mitchell in 2023. Clark filed for a judicial review in an attempt to get the limitations on her mayoral powers removed, taking the City of Medicine Hat to court in summer of 2024. A Calgary justice ruled the sanctions were "disproportionate" and restored Clark's mayoral powers — while at the same time upholding council's conclusion the mayor broke its code of conduct. Clark reported Monday she spent $59,675.68 on taking the city to court. After some debate and a failed attempt by Dumanowski to get half the costs covered, the motion to cover the court costs failed after a tied 3-3 vote. Paul Salvatore, CEO of the Municipal Experts consultancy firm, said it was a tough decision for council to make after 24 months of controversy. "There is value in turning the page and resetting but I think, at the same token, just spending money for the sake of spending money is not a good way to move forward," Salvatore told CBC News. 'Terribly disappointed' Clark's supporters viewed council's decision not to pay the mayor back for most of fees as an injustice. "I am terribly disappointed," said Shirley Greenfield, a Medicine Hat resident who says she has followed the conflict at city hall for the past two years. "That to me feels like — and seems like — almost a punishment because of what they did to her previously with the sanctions and with cutting back on her income." Donald Knudsen, a declared council candidate for the October civic election, said council's decision was a poor way to put past issues to bed. "They've messed with Mayor Clark too much. She should be paid and move on from there. They'll never move on as long as they do that," Knudson said. After voting on the mayor's expenses, council agreed to seek legal counsel to find out if her reimbursement request falls under an existing city indemnification policy. It wasn't clear at Monday's meeting how that long that process would take.
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Denver City Council postpones $26,000 mountain retreat amid layoffs
The Denver City Council has decided to postpone a $26,000 mountain retreat as the city plans to lay off 171 employees. The postponement comes after CBS Colorado Investigator Brian Maass's report on the timing of the retreat, as the city is facing a budget shortfall. Ten of Denver's 13 city council members had been planning to attend a $26,000 retreat in the foothills next week for team building and professional development. This is the statement from Denver City Council President Amanda P. Sandoval: "This week has been an especially difficult time for all who work for the City and County of Denver. One hundred seventy-one employees have been laid off, creating great disruption for them, their families, and their colleagues. Our full attention must now be on supporting one another and helping our city move forward from this challenging period with the best interests of our constituents at heart. "With that in mind, and after consultation with the full Council, I have decided it is best to postpone our planned professional development and team-building workshop. It will be rescheduled for a future time and place to be determined. "Together, we will steady our civic ship and continue the important work of governing." Earlier this week, Sandoval had told Maass that the council retreat had been in the works since December 2024, and the contract was signed on May 8. Two weeks later, Mayor Mike Johnston revealed the depths of the city budget problems that would necessitate city workers being laid off, others needing to take furlough days and belt-tightening across city agencies. "I would never have done any of this had I known any of this information prior to signing that contract," said Sandoval in an earlier interview. At the time of the interview, Sandoval said she tried to void the contract and get the city's money back or change the date of the retreat, but could not, so council members will travel to the location near Bailey the evening of Aug. 27 and return the morning of Aug. 29 -- a city furlough day.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Rangers trio gets US Olympic team-building camp invite
The NHL's return to the Olympics is starting to feel real. Rangers Adam Fox, J.T. Miller and Vincent Trocheck were invited to the U.S. men's Olympic orientation camp, USA Hockey announced on Tuesday. The camp will be held from Aug. 26-27 in Plymouth, Mich., and will largely serve as an administrative and team-building event with no formal on-ice activity. Advertisement 3 Vincent Trocheck #16 of the New York Rangers takes a shot and scores a goal against the Pittsburgh Penguins. Robert Sabo for NY Post All three players participated for Team USA at the NHL's 4 Nations Faceoff tournament in February last season, but none were included amongst the initial players officially named to the team in June. The six U.S. players who were announced early include Jack Eichel, Quinn Hughes, Auston Matthews, Charlie McAvoy, Brady Tkachuk and Matthew Tkachuk. Advertisement 3 Rangers defenseman Adam Fox #23 moves the puck down ice. Charles Wenzelberg / New York Post Fox, Miller and Trocheck may not have officially made the team yet, but sharing a head coach with Team USA could certainly help. Mike Sullivan not only coached the three in Montreal and Boston for 4 Nations, but the new Rangers head coach is set to be behind the bench in Milan for the 2026 Winter Games. Advertisement Former Blueshirts Chris Kreider, Patrick Kane, Ryan McDonagh, Neal Pionk and Brady Skjei were also invited to the orientation camp. 3 J.T. Miller #8 of the New York Rangers reacts after he scores a goal against the Islanders. Robert Sabo for NY Post The final 25-man roster is expected to be revealed in early January.
