Democracies sometimes use foreign meddling as an ‘alibi': think tank
Foreign interference in elections is a real concern but sometimes used as an 'alibi' by democracies to divert attention from domestic issues, the head of a democracy think-tank said Monday.
According to a new report by Stockholm-based International IDEA, disinformation and manipulation of social media algorithms to influence results were among the major threats to democracies during election campaigns.
The threat is 'exacerbated by the explicit willingness of domestic, foreign and non-state actors to engage in such activities', the report said, highlighting states such as China, Russia and Iran.
Among 54 elections covered in 2024, 80 per cent experienced 'deliberate campaigns of disinformation trying to shape the electoral result', IDEA's Secretary General Kevin Casas-Zamora said.
However, when politicians blame foreign influence, it risked diverting the debate from real issues, and whether such campaigns 'succeeded or not is anybody's guess', he added.
'The question of inequality, the question of how a lot of citizens feel left behind and that they're not being heard by their political institutions, deserves probably at least as much attention as the external threats that come in the shape of foreign interference or disinformation,' Casas-Zamora said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Nato chief to urge 400% rise in air defence
Nato head Mark Rutte will on Monday call for a 'quantum leap' in defence capacities including a '400 per cent increase' in air and missile defence which 'protects' the alliance against Russia. 'We see in Ukraine how Russia delivers terror from above, so we will strengthen the shield that protects our skies,' the Nato Secretary General Rutte was to say in a speech to the Chatham House think-tank in London, according to comments released in a statement. To maintain credible deterrence and defence, Nato needs 'a 400 per cent increase in air and missile defence'. 'The fact is, we need a quantum leap in our collective defence,' he was to say. Rutte will meet UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Monday ahead of his speech, their second Downing Street talks since Starmer came to power in July last year. His comments come ahead of a Nato summit in the Netherlands this month. US President Donald Trump is pressurising alliance members to announce a major boost in their military budgets.
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Hong Kong's stock market has revived but what of the property sector?
Hong Kong needs all the help it can get. Since 2018, the city has suffered one shock after another, preventing a meaningful recovery from taking hold and fuelling concerns about its position as a global financial centre. Advertisement As an importer of US monetary policy with an economy that is far more synchronised with that of mainland China, Hong Kong has been the biggest casualty of economic and policy divergence between the world's two largest economies, prompting renewed questions about the suitability of the city's currency peg to the US dollar. Yet, over the past few months, a confluence of domestic and external factors has given Hong Kong a much-needed shot in the arm. The escalation of the US-China trade war and the damage to the US' safe haven status have provided a fillip to Hong Kong's markets, partly by buttressing the city's role as the leading offshore equity financing centre for mainland Chinese companies. Proceeds from initial public offerings and secondary share sales in Hong Kong have reached US$26.5 billion so far this year, compared with just US$3.8 billion in the same period last year, data from Bloomberg shows. Former Morgan Stanley Asia chairman Stephen Roach, who last year said Hong Kong was 'over' in part because of the intensification of the US-China conflict, said last week the city is benefiting from being mainland China's 'most important window to international finance'. Furthermore, the sharp drop in the US dollar since US President Donald Trump's inauguration, coupled with deeper concerns about the safety of US assets, forced the Hong Kong Monetary Authority to intervene aggressively to prevent the Hong Kong dollar from exceeding the upper end of its trading band against the greenback. Advertisement
Asia Times
2 hours ago
- Asia Times
Taiwan's de-sinicization drive as geostrategic leverage
In an era where US-China tensions run high but full decoupling is unfeasible, Washington must seek new low-cost diplomatic tools. One such tool may lie in an unexpected domain: Taiwan's internal cultural policies. Specifically, the island's ongoing de-sinicization campaign—while locally motivated—has inadvertently become a geopolitical irritant, escalating Beijing's threat perception. This article proposes that the US quietly explore the recalibration of Taiwan's de-Sinicization policies as a symbolic, non-security concession in broader negotiations with Beijing. Such a move could provide a controlled way to reduce tensions while preserving America's core commitments to Taiwan's security and democracy. Since the early 2000s, Taiwan has taken deliberate steps to shift its cultural identity away from China. Curriculum changes, altered national symbols, and linguistic prioritization form part of a longer campaign to assert a distinct Taiwanese identity. While understandable domestically, these measures have consistently provoked sharp reactions from Beijing, feeding its narrative of Taiwan's irreversible drift toward independence. For the United States, de-Sinicization poses a strategic paradox. On the one hand, it reflects democratic agency. On the other, it may undercut regional stability by giving Beijing a perceived justification to escalate. Importantly, Taiwan's cultural trajectory does not directly impact US national security priorities such as freedom of navigation, semiconductor supply chains or military deterrence. Therefore, Washington could — discreetly — signal to Taipei that a soft pause or reframing of the de-Sinicization drive could serve broader strategic goals. This could manifest as a period of 'consolidation' rather than reversal, buying time to focus on national resilience, defense and external alignment. Such a move would not require a formal public endorsement. Instead, it could surface through Track II dialogues, think tank publications or behind-the-scenes diplomatic conversations. Allies like Japan or South Korea could reinforce this approach by advocating for cultural moderation as a path to regional confidence-building. This approach offers several advantages. It provides the US a symbolic concession to offer in potential high-level US-China discussions without undermining core deterrence postures. It demonstrates to Beijing that the US-Taiwan relationship is not driven by ideological maximalism. And it reinforces Washington's image as a responsible power seeking balance, not confrontation, in the Indo-Pacific. Public emotion variable While most Western observers tend to focus on the Chinese government's calculated use of nationalism, what is often overlooked is that the Chinese state itself is restrained by popular nationalist sentiment, especially on issues like Taiwan. On matters of cultural sovereignty and national unity, it is often the Chinese public—not the leadership—that demands hardline responses. This dynamic creates a powerful incentive for Beijing to avoid appearing 'weak' in the face of perceived provocations, even when the government itself may prefer strategic patience. In this context, Taiwan's highly visible cultural distancing from China—through language reforms, educational shifts, and symbolic removals—acts as a flashpoint that fuels public anger more than elite strategic concern. Therefore, if Taiwan were to partially moderate or reframe its de-Sinicization policies—emphasizing cultural heritage, continuity or mutual historical roots—it could significantly lower emotional hostility among the Chinese populace. Such a change would reduce the pressure on Beijing to escalate or retaliate and empower more flexible policy responses. For Washington, this presents a critical window: by encouraging symbolic de-escalation in the cultural sphere, the US can indirectly calm Chinese domestic sentiment, giving the central leadership more room to maneuver diplomatically without being seen as capitulating. In short, strategic signaling toward Beijing doesn't only happen through naval deployments or economic tools—it can also take shape in how narratives of culture and identity are modulated. By understanding and leveraging the emotional logic of Chinese public nationalism, Washington may gain more influence in managing the Taiwan issue than through deterrence alone. L. Y. Chu is a retired engineer and independent analyst focused on cross-strait relations, US-China strategy and the role of cultural signaling in geopolitical competition.
