Fergus Finlay sought Labour Party run for presidency
grandee
Fergus Finlay
asked
Ivana Bacik
in January if he could
run for President
for the party.
Mr Finlay, who had also sought the party's nomination for the 2011 contest and considered a run in 2018, said he was 'very disappointed' to see Labour supporting Catherine Connolly.
The former head of Mary Robinson's historic 1990 campaign said he did not know what Ms Connolly had done to 'deserve' the Labour Party's support.
Speaking on RTÉ's Behind The Story podcast this week, Mr Finlay revealed he had approached party leader Ms Bacik in January indicating he was open to running for President.
READ MORE
'I wanted to say that Labour should contest, must contest, must do everything we possibly can to contest, recognising all the difficulties that we don't have 20 Oireachtas votes sewn up there. But there were a lot of Oireachtas votes in play at that time,' Mr Finlay said.
'There was no other left-wing candidate in the field at that time – I wanted to say that Labour should contest, and I wanted to be considered as a candidate.'
Mr Finlay, who added he felt no 'entitlement to anything', said it quickly became clear to him that his proposal was 'going nowhere'.
'I think [Ms Bacik] felt that this was not a winnable situation for Labour. Maybe she felt it wasn't winnable for Labour with me. Maybe she felt that I was a burned-out waste of space! I have no idea. She's far too polite ever to say anything like that, but it became clear to me very quickly that it was going nowhere.'
Mr Finlay had lost out on the Labour Party's nomination in 2010, ahead of Michael D Higgins winning his first term. Mr Finlay would also later reveal he had also considered putting himself forward in 2018, before it became clear to him that President Higgins would seek a second term.
Mr Finlay said he believed in the role of the President to 'get the best out of people', and that if he had a criticism of President Higgins it was that 'he didn't do enough of that', particularly in terms of national morale during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Mr Finlay said he was 'very disappointed' that Labour had decided to row in behind Independent left-wing candidate Ms Connolly.
'There's a lot of stuff I don't agree with Catherine Connolly about, there's a lot of stuff I admire her for. But Catherine Connolly left the Labour Party because we wouldn't give her a nomination to run alongside Michael D Higgins, and she has never had a good word to say about the Labour Party from that moment on,' he said.
Mr Finlay said it would have been a 'crazy, suicidal decision' to give Ms Connolly a nomination, which would have meant there was 'no chance of anybody winning that seat'. He said Ms Connolly 'couldn't bring herself to accept that', and she 'has never had a good word to say about the Labour Party since'.
'And now we're backing her. And I have no problem with members of the Labour Party going out and voting for Catherine Connolly, none in the wide, Earthly world. But I don't know what she's done to deserve our support, to be absolutely honest with you.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Trump says US may provide air support to Ukraine as part of peace deal
Donald Trump said the United States may provide air support as part of a peace deal to end Russia's war in Ukraine . The US president ruled out putting US troops on the ground in Ukraine, however. Asked during a phone interview with Fox News whether he could assure listeners that the US would not put troops on the ground in Ukraine , Mr Trump replied: 'You have my assurance, and I'm president.' He did, however, say Washington may be willing to provide air support to Ukraine to backstop a deal, in what would still be a remarkable shift in his administration's policy on the conflict. READ MORE 'There'll be some form of security. It can't be Nato,' he said, ruling out Ukraine's admission to the transatlantic bloc. 'They're [Europeans are] willing to put people on the ground. We're willing to help them with things, especially, probably, if you could talk about by air,' Mr Trump said in an interview with the Fox News Fox & Friends programme. The president's latest comments come a day after he pledged security guarantees to help end the war at an extraordinary White House summit. The path to peace remains uncertain, however, as the US and allies seek to work out what military support for Ukraine might include. Nato military leaders are expected to meet on Wednesday to discuss Ukraine, with US gen Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, expected to attend virtually, officials told Reuters. At least 14 people, including a family with three children, were wounded in an overnight Russian attack on Ukraine's northern region of Sumy, Ukraine's prime minister said on Wednesday. 'Russia continues to manifest its fears through acts of pure terrorism across Ukraine, once again targeting the homes of families and their sleeping children,' Yulia Svyrydenko wrote on X. Russia launched a 'massive drone strike' on the southern Ukrainian region of Odesa, injuring one person and causing a large fire at a fuel and energy facility, Ukraine's State Emergency Service said on Wednesday. Russia's Vladimir Putin has shown no sign of backing down from demands for territory, including land not under Russia's military control, after his summit with Mr Trump on Friday in Alaska. Later, in a radio interview, Mr Trump characterised his negotiating style in trying to end the war as 'probably instinct more than process'. Following Monday's meeting, Russia launched its biggest air assault in more than a month on Ukraine, with 270 drones and 10 missiles launched, the Ukrainian air force said. – Guardian
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Heather Humphreys races ahead in FG nomination battle as Ministers and TDs endorse her
Heather Humphreys appears certain to become Fine Gael's new candidate for the presidential election, having secured the support of the majority of the party's parliamentary party. Almost 40 ministers, TDs and senators had declared their support for the former minister within hours of her announcing her intention to seek the Fine Gael nomination on Tuesday. MEP Seán Kelly , who also announced his intention to become the Fine Gael presidential candidate on Tuesday, had secured the backing of at least six politicians, which left him 14 short of the nominations he requires. Including Fine Gael politicians who are understood to be backing Ms Humphreys but have not yet declared, it does not now seem possible for Mr Kelly to attract the 20 nominations required. READ MORE The parliamentary party members publicly backing Ms Humphreys so far include ministers Peter Burke, Helen McEntee and Patrick O'Donovan and junior ministers Neale Richmond, Hildegarde Naughton, Colm Brophy, John Cummins and Emer Higgins. Also among her backers were TDs Emer Currie, John Paul O'Shea, David Maxwell, Jerry Buttimer, Paula Butterly, Grace Boland, Frank Feighan, Naoise O'Muirí, Catherine Callaghan, Alan Dillon, Keira Keogh, Maeve O'Connell, Pete Roche, James Geoghegan, Colm Burke, John Clendennan and Micheal Carrigy and Barry Ward. Senators Seán Kyne, Maria Byrne, Nikki Bradley, Joe O'Reilly, Mark Duffy, Gareth Scahill, PJ Murphy, Cathal Byrne, Manus Boyle, Linda Nelson Murray and Noel O'Donovan also supported her. Mr Kelly has the support of TDs Michael Murphy, Joe Cooney, Brian Brennan and Noel McCarthy, and senators Garret Ahearn and Michael Kennelly. [ In Heather Humphreys, Fine Gael faithful think they've found their first president Opens in new window ] Setting out her campaign on Tuesday morning, Ms Humphreys said that she has 'never felt as good about taking on a challenge.' 'We're living in an increasingly divisive world, and I believe that the President can be a unifying force in this country that really brings people together and throughout my political career, I have always sought to break down barriers and reach out that hand of friendship,' she said.
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the European dash to Washington: pulling the emergency cord
Three days after Donald Trump's calamitous encounter with Vladimir Putin in Alaska, the sight of a hastily assembled delegation of European political heavyweights arriving at the White House underlined how grave the consequences could be. Rarely has a single presidential performance so unsettled allies while emboldening an adversary. The Americans may have intended the summit to signal progress towards ending the war in Ukraine. Instead, it left Europe scrambling to limit the damage. The source of alarm is obvious. Trump reversed his recent insistence that any peace process must begin with a ceasefire. He also appeared willing to entertain Putin's demand that Kyiv surrender territory it currently controls. To many, this looked like capitulation to Russian aggression and a betrayal of Ukraine. Monday's emergency transatlantic mission brought Volodymyr Zelenskiy to Washington flanked by some of the most senior figures in European politics. Their presence was designed both to bolster the Ukrainian president and press Trump to reaffirm positions that had been cast aside in Anchorage. Chief among these was the need for credible and durable security guarantees for Ukraine, without which any settlement would simply invite future Russian aggression. European leaders who reconvened again yesterday will have been aware that the vague Anerican assurances they received are not worth very much. But they will have been somewhat reassured that principles so recklessly discarded were at least partially restored. The price for this modest success was an unedifying spectacle of European politicians flattering and fawning over a president who appears to relish the rituals of deference more than the responsibilities of leadership. READ MORE All the same concerns remain, though. Trump had, in recent months, inched towards a more considered stance on Ukraine. That he could be swayed so abruptly by Putin confirms European fears about his longstanding admiration – bordering on obsequiousness – for the Russian leader. The path ahead is now uncertain. The Kremlin responded to the Washington meeting with a position paper that repeated the aggressive demands that accompanied the full-scale invasion in 2022. Trump believes he can engineer a direct meeting between Putin and Zelenskiy. Perhaps he can, though it is far from clear that the Russian would countenance such optics with a man he has so persistently sought to delegitimise. For now, the war grinds on with contining airstrikes on civilian targets, and Kyiv's stretched resources facing a slow but relentless Russian advance in the east. By drawing Trump into his worldview, Putin has deflected pressure for harsher sanctions, unsetttled European capitals and undermined Ukrainian morale. He has reason to view the week's work as a strategic success.
