Warning to more than 5 MILLION drivers in UK over new compulsory test that could see you banned from roads
GEARING UP Warning to more than 5 MILLION drivers in UK over new compulsory test that could see you banned from roads
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
A WARNING has been issued to more than five million British drivers who could be banned from the roads under a new rule.
Ministers are considering introducing new rules for older drivers in England and Wales.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
4
The government is considering a number of new road safety law changes
Credit: Getty
4
The new rules could see older motorists forced to undergo regular eye and health tests
Credit: Getty
Mandatory eye tests for elderly motorists are being considered along with a raft of other legislation according to The Times.
The proposals, set to be published as part of a road safety strategy in the autumn, also include tougher penalties for uninsured driving and failing to wear a seatbelt.
It was reported that the drink drive limit was also set to be changed as part of the new road safety plans.
The change would mark the biggest shake-up of driving rules for nearly two decades.
Drivers over 70-years-old are already subject to different rules on the road.
When someone turns 70 they must begin renewing their licence every three years and they automatically lose their C1 or D1 entitlements.
C1 allows users to drive medium-sized vehicles with a Maximum Authorised Mass (MAM) of between 3,500kg and 7,500kg and D1 entails users can drive minubuses with no more than 16 passenger seats.
The new rules would slap older drivers with further regulations and come amid concern over the number of road traffic accidents on Britain's roads.
Last year, 1,633 people were killed and almost 28,000 seriously injured in traffic incidents.
Numbers have remained relatively constant following a large fall between 2000 and 2010.
Shocking moment elderly driver takes his car hurtling down Rome's iconic Spanish Steps - before saying 'I got mixed up'
Meanwhile, the number of people killed in drink-driving incidents has risen over the past decade, reaching a 13-year high in 2022.
This prompted concern that existing road safety measures are no longer working.
Under the plans being considered by Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander, the drink-drive limit in England and Wales could be cut from 35 micrograms of alcohol per 100ml of breath to 22 micrograms.
This figure would be in line with Scotland – which cut its drink-drive limit in 2014 – and the rest of Europe.
4
Over 70s are already required to renew their licence every three years
Credit: Getty
4
Millions of motorists could be banned under the new regulations
Credit: Getty
The UK is one of only three European countries to rely on self-reporting of eyesight problems that affect driving.
Ministers are therefore considering compulsory eye tests every three years for drivers aged over 70 when they renew their licence.
Any who fail the eye test would be slapped with a driving ban under the new legislation.
A potential medical test for conditions such as dementia is also reportedly being looked at alongside eye tests.
Other proposals are reported to include allowing the police to bring prosecutions for drug-driving on the basis of roadside saliva tests rather than blood tests as increasing numbers of drivers are caught with drugs in their system.
The strategy is due to be published in the autumn, and all proposals will be subject to consultation
Edmund King, AA president, said: 'The time has come for a bold and proactive approach to road safety.
'This strategy is much overdue as road deaths have plateaued over the last decade.
'We believe these new measures will not only modernise our approach to saving lives but also provide renewed momentum in making our roads safer for everyone.'
Vision checks for older drivers and targeting drink and drug drivers are 'practical steps that can make a real difference', he said.
Failing to introduce limits on new drivers transporting peer-age passengers for six months is 'a major oversight', he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Auto Blog
2 hours ago
- Auto Blog
BMW Says Its Revival of Rolls-Royce Was a Secret Operation
By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Nobody needed a wider, faster Cullinan, but we got one anyway. BMW may make luxury cars, but a Rolls-Royce is a Rolls-Royce To many people who are and aren't car enthusiasts, the British ultra-luxury brand Rolls-Royce is recognized as one of the most well-known brands producing some of the most luxurious cars on the road. Today, they're owned by another name known for uncharted luxury and refinement: BMW. 2025 Audi S3: 4 reasons to love it, 2 reasons to think twice Watch More The Bavarians revived the brand in the early 2000s by creating modern marvels like the Phantom, Ghost, and Cullinan, which combine opulent old-world elegance in a package tailor-made for the well-to-do in the 21st century. As part of BMW North America's 50th anniversary, the company is sharing a series of stories from its illustrious history previously known only within Bavarian Motor Works. One such story recounts BMW's revival of Rolls-Royce, as it saved the brand in a fascinating and secretive revival with a twist worthy of a spy novel. By providing your email address, you agree that it may be used pursuant to Arena Group's Privacy Policy. We may receive compensation. Source: Rolls-Royce BMW took advantage of a major technicality In 1998, defense and engineering firm Vickers PLC sold Rolls-Royce and Bentley to Volkswagen for £430 million ($703 million), as it 'lacked the expertise or the resources needed to modernize the cars' sold under the respective marques, per BMW. In The Complete Book of BMW, Tony Lewin wrote that BMW offered to buy 20% of Rolls and Bentley in the early 90s, but Vickers offered to sell the entire automotive operations, which Beemer refused. However, BMW kept a working relationship with Vickers by sharing its expertise, including some of its tech, components, and testing facilities, resulting in the 5 Series-based 1994 Bentley Java concept, the BMW V12-powered Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph, and the BMW V8-powered Bentley Arnage. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Though it seemed BMW would have to say goodbye to its relationship with Rolls-Royce, they discovered a technicality that it could take advantage of. Volkswagen had purchased the intellectual property, including its engineering and design documents, in its multi-million Euro transaction; it did not have possession of the Rolls-Royce name. Coincidentally, the Rolls-Royce trademark and the famous double-R logo actually belonged to Rolls-Royce PLC, the aerospace company, a BMW business partner. For just £40 million ($66 million), BMW secured the trademarks, while Volkswagen agreed to sell BMW the Spirit of Ecstasy ornament design and grille shape trademarks in a separate agreement. Source: Rolls-Royce Re-starting Rolls had to be done in secret, according to BMW executives With the rights to the Rolls-Royce name in hand, BMW needed an all-new car, a factory, and a dealer network in order to get the 'new Rolls-Royce' up and running. Unabashed Anglophile, Karl-Heinz Kalbfell, BMW's then Head of Worldwide Product Planning, led the charge. Determined to keep the brand rooted in England, he struck a deal with the Duke of Richmond to build a facility on the Goodwood estate in Chichester, home to the Festival of Speed. But until January 1, 2003, Volkswagen held the rights to sell Rolls-Royces, and BMW couldn't legally use the Rolls-Royce name on a car. So Kalbfell's team worked in a secret London office, supported by engineers in Munich and Gaydon. Per BMW, 'BMW hadn't acquired any of Rolls-Royce's pre-existing intellectual property such as engineering or design documents, leaving the team free to create a truly new automobile.' As a result, BMW designed a Rolls that was unlike any other Rolls. The new Phantom featured an aluminum space frame, a 6.75-liter BMW-based V12 tuned for massive torque, and design work by Ian Cameron, who reimagined the iconic grille and the Spirit of Ecstasy to be sleeker, safer, and theft-resistant. Source: Rolls-Royce This level of secrecy extended to the car's reveal. Robert Austin, the then North American Communications Director, recalled that in order to show the cars to prospective dealers, BMW rented out industrial buildings with 'no signage, just a number on the door,' to show the new Phantom to a tightly-controlled audience. 'We set up three 'closed rooms' across the US. One was outside Miami, another in Culver City, California, and the third in a warehouse in Lyndhurst, New Jersey,' Austin said. '[…] Upon arrival, you'd be served coffee in a nice reception area, and then you'd be taken into a room where you'd see the story of Rolls-Royce. Finally, the lights would go out and we would reveal the new Phantom, long before anyone had even seen a spy photo of the car. It had a truly James Bond-like quality, and people loved it.' Source: Getty Images The wraps officially came off at the 2003 Detroit Auto Show. 'Most of the people at the show were kind of awe-struck,' Austin said. 'It was more than they expected, physically overwhelming. But everyone had to admit that the new Rolls-Royce was beautifully built and exquisitely finished.' At $324,000, it wasn't built for the average car buyer, but perfect for those with mansions, CEOs, celebrities, and anyone who wanted 'the best car in the world.' Customization was the key. Each Phantom was bespoke—buyers could choose any color, commission mother-of-pearl inlays, or have a monogram stitched into the upholstery, features that were invaluable to high earners in sports and entertainment. 'You know why so many people in the music business love Rolls-Royce cars?' Austin said. 'Because it's virtually silent inside, and it's got a killer audio system.' Final thoughts This story raises many questions based on hypothetical scenarios, but mainly, it would be curious to know what would happen if BMW hadn't repurchased the Rolls-Royce trademarks in 1998. Would the next Rolls-Royce after the Silver Seraph be something that is based on a Bentley Continental GT? We may never know, but it's nice to hear the story from the storytellers who were there to see it for themselves. About the Author James Ochoa View Profile
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
The proof that older drivers are not the most dangerous
Drivers between 17 and 24 are twice as likely to be killed or seriously injured at the wheel as those aged over 70, data from the Department for Transport show. As the Government prepares to introduce compulsory eye tests for the over-70s, analysis suggests that serious accidents are more common among the youngest drivers than the oldest. Brian Macdowell, a spokesman for the Association of British Drivers, warned of 'unintended consequences' from the planned crackdown on older drivers. He said: 'We think it needs a much more comprehensive review of the subject.' Statistics show that 121.5 drivers aged between 18 and 24 are killed for every billion vehicle miles travelled, compared with 60.9 for over-70s (and just 30.9 for those in between). The data covers travel within Great Britain in 2023, the latest year for which figures are available. Young men in particular are to blame for the age disparity, being three times more likely to be involved in a deadly or life-threatening accident than over-70s. The numbers for women are broadly similar across both age groups. Overall, the under-20s and over-70s account for a broadly similar proportion of drivers who are injured on the roads, respectively at 8.2 and 9.1 per cent of the total where an age was recorded in 2023. But when it comes to severe injury and death, the older group is considerably more likely to be affected, at 9.1 of the total compared with 16.2 per cent. This is likely an indication of the fact that older drivers are typically more frail, rather than because they are more of a danger in the driving seat. DVLA records towards the end of that same year showed almost 6.2 million full or provisional driving licence entitlements held by those aged 70-plus, relative to just under 2.6 million to those under 21. Although the data does not necessarily back up eye tests for the over-70s, there is a marked rise in the likelihood of serious accidents later in life. Drivers aged 86 and older had a higher rate of death or serious injury, at 202.5 per billion miles travelled. Mr Macdowell added: 'We're not per se against some regulation that requires you to have an eye test, but we do not think it should be targeted just on people over 70.' 'It could be a way forward, but not if it's a draconian step, which could involve people losing their licences, because that is the risk of these proposals, that they have unintended consequences.' Police data show that older drivers are much more likely to be involved in an accident where one cause was a failure to look properly. This was a factor in 28 per cent of cases involving the over-70s between 2019 and 2023, compared to 19 per cent for younger motorists. However, young people in collisions are far more likely to have been recorded as driving drunk or on drugs. Some 7.1 per cent of those 20 and under were found to have been impaired by alcohol, to 0.9 per cent of those 70 and over. The comparable figures for drugs came to 5.8 and 0.2 per cent respectively. The overhaul of UK road safety legislation is also tipped to include a reduction of the drink-drive limit. Separate data show older people are far more likely to be reliant on their cars to access essential services, thus risking being cut off should their licence be withdrawn. Of the 10 local authorities with the highest proportion of people aged 70 or over as of the middle of last year, seven were classified as 'rural' by the Office for National Statistics. Across the 32 local authorities in England and Wales where at least a fifth of the population was at least in their seventies, there were an average of 8.6 supermarkets per 100 square kilometres – substantially more sparse than the 53.4 across other councils. A similar pattern emerges for post offices, with respective concentrations of 6.1 to 18.1, and pharmacies at 4.8 to 39.5. Seb Goldin, chief executive of Red Driver Training, however, described it as 'totally inadequate' that drivers aged over 70 'can self-certify that they can see' and highlighted that a coroner criticised the system earlier this year. He said: 'We'd be keen that [the government] goes further than the initial proposals, and also include showing evidence of an eyesight test at the driving test. 'At the moment, it's the same measure of how good your eyesight is as when the driving test was created in the 1930s, namely can you read a number plate at a certain distance.'
Scottish Sun
5 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Iconic carmaker recalls ANOTHER 70,000 cars over worrying fault after ‘chaotic' handling of ‘stop-drive' order
HIT REVERSE Iconic carmaker recalls ANOTHER 70,000 cars over worrying fault after 'chaotic' handling of 'stop-drive' order Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) ANOTHER 72,000 cars have been recalled over a worrying fault – just weeks after a 'chaotic' stop-drive order rocked the firm. The latest UK recall by Stellantis affects models from big-name brands including Peugeot, Citroen and Vauxhall. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Owners will be contacted directly and urged to contact their local dealer to book a fix Credit: Getty It follows 11 reports of vehicles catching fire in France, prompting fears the problem could hit British drivers. The car giant says 28 models from Alfa Romeo, Citroen, DS Automobiles, Fiat, Jeep, Peugeot and Vauxhall are affected. At the centre of the scare is a high-pressure fuel pipe with loose nuts, which can lead to leaks, and, in a worst-case scenario, an engine bay fire. A Stellantis spokesperson said: 'Having customer safety and satisfaction at the core of its values, Stellantis is voluntarily recalling an estimated 72,000 in the UK due to a potential issue with the high pressure fuel pipe. 'Some 2023-2025 Peugeot, Citroen, DS Automobiles, Vauxhall, Alfa Romeo, Jeep and Fiat vehicles may face fuel leakage at the high-pressure pipe between the high-pressure pump and the rail due to loosened nuts. "This can potentially lead to higher fuel leakage consumption and, in a worst-case scenario, to occurrences of fire in the engine.' Owners will be contacted directly and urged to contact their local dealer to book a fix. The repair involves retightening nuts and screws on the high-pressure pipe and rail, a job Stellantis says takes under 30 minutes and is free. Motorists can also check if their vehicle is affected through the brands' websites or by calling customer service lines. The latest recall piles more pressure on Stellantis, following its June stop-drive order for certain Citroën C3 and DS3 models fitted with potentially deadly airbags. That move caused chaos, with dealers under 'immense pressure.' All UK car dealerships will STOP selling 10,000s of iconic brand's used models impacted by lethal airbag flaw At the time, consumer group Which? criticised the company's handling of the crisis, saying drivers were left stranded and facing huge hire car and taxi bills. Some motorists, including those with sick family members or urgent transport needs, said they had no choice but to keep driving their cars despite the risks. This new issue means thousands more drivers will now face the hassle of arranging repairs—though Stellantis insists the process will be quick and painless. In some cases, drivers were told repairs could take until 2026, leaving many stranded or still using vehicles flagged as unsafe. Dealers were later ordered to stop selling affected used models, and in July owners were told to park up immediately. Safety officials warned the airbags could explode 'in an uncontrolled manner,' posing a serious risk of injury or death. The recall comes amid a wave of other major motoring alerts in recent months, including BMW's warning over potential engine fires, Ford's notice about faulty brake hoses, and Toyota's urgent fix for defective seatbelts—highlighting the growing number of drivers caught up in recall chaos. The Department for Transport says it is monitoring Stellantis's recall process to ensure safety remains the top priority. Your product recall rights Chief consumer reporter James Flanders reveals all you need to know. Product recalls are an important means of protecting consumers from dangerous goods. As a general rule, if a recall involves a branded product, the manufacturer would usually have lead responsibility for the recall action. But it's often left up to supermarkets to notify customers when products could put them at risk. If you are concerned about the safety of a product you own, always check the manufacturer's website to see if a safety notice has been issued. When it comes to appliances, rather than just food items, the onus is usually on you - the customer - to register the appliance with the manufacturer as if you don't there is no way of contacting you to tell you about a fault. If you become aware that an item you own has been recalled or has any safety noticed issued against it, make sure you follow the instructions given to you by the manufacturer. They should usually provide you with more information and a contact number on its safety notice. In some cases, the manufacturer might ask you to return the item for a full refund or arrange for the faulty product to be collected. You should not be charged for any recall work - such as a repair, replacement or collection of the recalled item
