Peter Lax, preeminent Cold War mathematician, dies at 99
In 2005, he was the first applied mathematician to win the Abel Prize — in mathematics, the closest equivalent to the Nobel Prize. Presented in a ceremony in Oslo, Norway, the prize recognized his contributions to the field of partial differential equations, the mathematics of things that move and flow. He 'has been described as the most versatile mathematician of his generation,' the prize citation said.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Mr. Lax's engagement with the new field of electronic computing grew out of his wartime weapons research. Working with the Manhattan Project in Los Alamos, New Mexico, in 1945-46, he had performed intricate calculations for the development of the atomic bomb.
His work at the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences at New York University rapidly altered the trajectory of the computing field, supporting new uses of computers in the analysis of complex systems.
Advertisement
He played a key role in formulating government policy that bridged civilian and military computing resources, leading to the establishment of large national computing centers, which expanded the reach of supercomputers in science and engineering, paving the way for today's era of big data. In a 1989 article, Mr. Lax compared the impact of computers on mathematics 'to the role of telescopes in astronomy and microscopes in biology.'
Peter David Lax was born in Budapest, Hungary, on May 1, 1926, to Henry and Klara (Kornfeld) Lax, both of whom were physicians. Fascinated by mathematics, Peter was tutored in the subject as a youth by renowned mathematician Rósza Péter, a founder of recursion theory, a branch of logic that investigates which mathematical problems can be resolved by computation. Péter connected him to her community of Hungarian Jewish mathematicians, many of whom made significant contributions to midcentury mathematics.
Mr. Lax was a young teenager when he demonstrated his early promise. At Péter's suggestion, he completed the problems that were being presented in Hungary's national math competition for high school graduates. He produced solutions that would have won the contest had he been old enough to enter.
In December 1941, in the face of rising antisemitism in Hungary, an ally of Nazi Germany, Mr. Lax and his family fled the country, obtaining passage to the United States with the help of the U.S. consul in Budapest, a patient and friend of Henry Lax's. The family arrived as refugees in New York, where Peter Lax, by then a 15-year-old prodigy, came under the wing of other Hungarian mathematicians, who connected him to German emigre mathematician Richard Courant. At the time, Courant was blazing a new direction for applied mathematics and laying the foundation for the institute at NYU that would later bear his name.
Advertisement
Mr. Lax's father became Courant's physician, while Courant mentored Mr. Lax in mathematics.
At 18, having already published his first math paper, Mr. Lax was drafted into the U.S. Army. He was assigned to the Manhattan Project at Los Alamos in the summer of 1945, just in time to participate in the final stages of the race to build an atomic bomb. He worked as a calculator, executing the kind of elaborate multistep computations that would later be performed by electronic computers. His group analyzed the shock waves that would enable a neutron chain reaction, creating the atomic bomb's enormously powerful explosion.
He became part of a community of Hungarian mathematicians at Los Alamos that included John von Neumann and John Kemeny, both of whom would later join him on the frontiers of postwar mathematics and computing.
After the war, he completed his undergraduate and doctoral degrees at NYU and was appointed assistant professor in 1949. He returned to Los Alamos in 1950 for a year and several subsequent summers to work on the next-generation hydrogen bombs. He became a full professor at NYU in 1958.
The connections that Mr. Lax made at Los Alamos — to the people there, the problems they worked on and the equipment they used -- would set the agenda for early postwar computing and guide the rest of his mathematical career.
In 1954, the Atomic Energy Commission put Mr. Lax and several of his NYU colleagues in charge of operating an early supercomputer to calculate the risk of flooding to a major nuclear reactor if a nearby dam were sabotaged; they showed that the reactor would be safe.
Advertisement
His work on computing dovetailed with his contributions to the theory of hyperbolic partial differential equations, an area of research essential to understanding shock waves from bombs, as well as a wide variety of physical phenomena, from weather prediction to aerodynamic design. Among mathematicians, he was most renowned for theoretical breakthroughs that others used to analyze specific phenomena.
Again and again, Mr. Lax demonstrated the theoretical richness of applied mathematics, providing, in the words of his early doctoral student Reuben Hersh, 'a singular exception to the usual mutual disrespect between these two inseparable and incompatible twins, the pure and the applied.'
As Courant wrote in 1962, Mr. Lax embodied 'the unity of abstract mathematical analysis with the most concrete power in solving individual problems.'
Mr. Lax's impact is suggested by the number of concepts that bear his name. They include the Lax equivalence principle, which explains when numerical computer approximations will be reliable; the Lax-Milgram lemma, which relates the interior of a system to its boundary; and Lax pairs, a milestone in understanding the motion of solitons, a kind of traveling wave related to tsunamis.
With Ralph Phillips, Mr. Lax developed the Lax-Phillips semigroup in scattering theory, which explains how waves move around obstacles and shows how to use the pattern of frequencies in a wave to understand its motion. That theory yielded many uses, including the interpretation of radar signals.
In 1960, Mr. Lax made his first of eight scientific visits to the Soviet Union. His exchanges with Soviet mathematicians — in which 'vodka flowed like water,' he said — led to lasting friendships and represented a warmer side of his Cold War science.
Advertisement
Starting in 1963, Mr. Lax directed the Courant Institute's cutting-edge computing facilities, funded by the Atomic Energy Commission. He led the institute as director from 1972-80. He also increasingly represented the mathematics profession on the national stage, culminating in his presidency of the American Mathematical Society from 1977-80.
From 1980-86, Mr. Lax served on the National Science Board, which sets American research funding policies. In 1982, his 'Report of the Panel on Large Scale Computing in Science and Engineering,' commonly known as the Lax Report, set a lasting agenda for academic- and military-networked research with government supercomputers.
His personal life was as integrated with the Courant Institute as his professional life. His first marriage, in 1948, was to mathematician Anneli Cahn, a fellow doctoral student. After her death in 1999, he married Courant's daughter, Lori Berkowitz, the widow of another Courant Institute mathematician and principal violist for the American Symphony Orchestra. She died in 2015.
In addition to his son James, Mr. Lax is survived by his stepchildren, David and Susan Berkowitz; three grandchildren; and two great-grandchildren. Another son, John, was killed by a drunken driver in 1978.
Mr. Lax's work bridged worlds — military and civilian, pure and applied mathematics, abstract theory and computation — reflecting a belief that the underlying math was universal. In a 2005 interview with The New York Times, he cited the fact that geometry and algebra, 'which were so very different 100 years ago, are intricately connected today.'
'Mathematics is a very broad subject,' he said. 'It is true that nobody can know it all, or even nearly all. But it is also true that as mathematics develops, things are simplified and unusual connections appear.'
Advertisement
This article originally appeared in
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scientific American
20 hours ago
- Scientific American
How RNA Unseated DNA as the Most Important Molecule in Your Body
In 1957, just four years after Francis Crick and other scientists solved the riddle of DNA's structure—the now famous double helix—Crick laid out what he called the 'central dogma' of molecular biology, which his colleague James Watson later said implied that biological information flows inexorably from DNA to RNA to proteins. Although Watson was oversimplifying, the message was that the purpose of the double helix in our chromosomes is to hold, in encoded form, blueprints for the proteins that build and maintain our bodies. DNA's chemical cousin, RNA, was the messenger that carries DNA instructions from the double helix in the cell's nucleus to the protein-making machinery, called the ribosome, scattered around the cell. Molecular biology's mission, it seemed, was to decipher those genetic instructions. But in recent years researchers have discovered a dizzying array of 'noncoding' RNA (ncRNA) molecules that do something other than ferry DNA instructions for proteins. They perform a surprisingly wide range of biochemical functions. It now seems that our genome may be at least as much a repository of plans for vital, noncoding RNA as it is for proteins. This shift in thinking has been 'revolutionary,' says Thomas Cech, who shared the 1989 Nobel Prize in Chemistry with Sidney Altman for discovering RNA molecules, called ribozymes, that can catalyze biochemical reactions. 'DNA is old stuff, 20th-century stuff,' Cech says. 'It's a one-trick pony. All it does is store biological information, which it does exquisitely well. But it's inert—it can't do anything without its children, RNA and proteins.' RNA is created when an enzyme called RNA polymerase reads a DNA sequence and builds a corresponding RNA molecule—a process known as transcription. The discovery, over the past three decades, of thousands of previously unknown noncoding RNAs 'has been mind-blowing,' says Maite Huarte, a molecular biologist at the University of Navarra in Pamplona, Spain. Noncoding RNA plays many roles, often involving the regulation of other genes—for example, determining whether protein-coding genes get transcribed to messenger RNA (mRNA) and how (or if) that molecule is edited and then translated into a protein. In this case, RNA seems to control how cells use their DNA. These functions turn the popular central dogma, which was a one-way street from DNA to mRNA to proteins, into an open system with information flowing in all directions among DNA, proteins, cells and organism. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. Equally fascinating, Huarte says, is that ncRNAs don't belong to just one family of molecules. 'RNA is highly versatile, and nature exploits this versatility,' she says. Scientists have known since the 1950s that ribosomes contain ribosomal RNA and use transfer RNA to collect amino acids that are stitched together in proteins. But for a long time those seemed like anomalies. Then, in the 1980s, Cech and Altman discovered a new type of ncRNA: ribozymes that cleave and edit themselves and other RNAs. And in the 1990s researchers began to find human ncRNAs that had regulatory functions. A gene called XIST, involved in the 'silencing' of one of the two X chromosomes in the cells of chromosomal females, encoded not a protein but a long noncoding RNA that appears to wrap around the chromosome and prevent its transcription. 'Textbooks 25 years ago confidently stated that RNA consisted of [three types]. Now there are hundreds, likely many thousands, of other types.' —Thomas Cech University of Colorado Boulder Meanwhile molecular biologists Victor Ambros and Gary Ruvkun found short noncoding RNA molecules that interact with mRNA to silence a corresponding gene. This extra layer of gene regulation—controlling whether an mRNA is used to make a protein—seems to be an essential feature in the growth of complex organisms. Scientists have linked genetic mutations that hinder gene regulation by ncRNAs to a wide range of diseases, including cancers. 'We're getting closer to some really exciting biomedical applications,' Huarte says. 'From new diagnostic tools to innovative, targeted therapies, the potential of ncRNAs is huge.' Cech says it was a 'big surprise' RNA could perform such diverse roles. That surprise was apparent in 2012 when scientists working on an international project called ENCODE reported that as much as 80 percent of our DNA has biochemical function in some cells at some point, and much of that DNA is transcribed into RNA, challenging the long-held belief that most of our genome is 'junk' accumulated over the course of evolution. This is not a consensus view. Some researchers argue that, on the contrary, most of the RNA transcribed from DNA but not translated into protein is 'noise,' made because the transcription machinery is rather indiscriminate. Such noise will indeed be the end result for some transcription. It now appears that known noncoding genes outnumber genes encoding proteins by a factor of about three, according to some estimates. It's often hard, however, to figure out just what the RNA is doing. Some of these molecules might get transcribed only in particular types of cells or at a particular stage in embryonic development, so it would be easy to miss their moment of action. 'They are incredibly cell-type specific,' says molecular biologist Susan Carpenter of the University of California, Santa Cruz. But because of that, she says, 'the more we look, the more we find.' Ambiguities notwithstanding, the rise of RNA has transformed molecular biology. 'Textbooks 25 years ago confidently stated that RNA consisted of messenger RNA, transfer RNA and ribosomal RNA,' Cech says. 'Now there are hundreds, likely many thousands, of other types.' The 21st century, he says, 'is the age of noncoding RNA.' We have much more to learn. We don't know how much functional ncRNA there is, let alone what the many varieties do. And 'when we answer one question, it raises 10 new ones,' Carpenter says. As scientists discover more about the many types and roles of RNA, medical researchers may discover potential therapeutic applications, yet the more profound implications are about how life works. For complex organisms to be viable, it's simply not enough to have a 'genetic blueprint' that gets read. They need to be able to change, on the fly, how their genes get used. RNA seems to offer incredibly responsive and versatile ways of doing that.
Skift
2 days ago
- Skift
Flying vs. Recycling: Travelers Get Climate Math Wrong
Skipping a long-haul flight does far more to reduce emissions than other choices, such as recycling – but most people don't realize it. That's the takeaway from a new paper from NYU researchers that included a survey of nearly 4,000 U.S. adults. Participants were asked to rank actions by climate impact, as well as suggest solutions to help reduce emissions. The results: Many participants overestimated the impact of low-impact behaviors such as recycling and underestimated high-emission behaviors such as avoiding long-haul flight
Forbes
2 days ago
- Forbes
Growing Almost Anything From Almost Anything
One of the most interesting applications of AI is the ability to use it to analyze and design materials in the 'real world.' And that's an understatement. It's one thing to create digital playgrounds or do deep research on some intangible concept. It's quite another thing to improve the design of molecular compounds, i.e. drugs or other chemical compositions. It's probably no coincidence that one of the most heralded innovations with AI is the Alphafold project which won a Nobel prize for science. The idea of inventing proteins through automated research led to enormous changes in how we approach both pharmaceutical research and clinical science in general. Notwithstanding all of the amazing progress we have done to date, we're not done yet. There's much more to come, and those involved in this kind of science are paying attention to what's happening as we game all of this out. Growing Things 2.0 In a recent TED Talk, David Kong shows us how some of this cutting-edge design works. He mentions a project where it's possible to 'nucleate' and edit DNA. When I looked this up, the idea of 'nucleating' just means forming something into a nucleus or cluster. He then refers to how scientists 'design and build genetic circuits,' which, he suggests, are large pieces of DNA. I was about to look this up, too, but then realized that Kong describes it himself: 'We put (DNA) inside cells, on cells who behave like circuits from electronics or computer science, (and) we learn all about cell-free systems, which can help us understand the origins of life on Earth, or they can be used in applied ways, and freeze dried, and used as sensors to detect pathogens and pollutants in fabrics and textiles.' He also mentions the ability to build completely synthetic genomes from bacteria or yeast, which speaks to a kind of modern alchemy that explores previously uncharted waters. And in a way, that's what all of this is about – alchemy. Kong goes over what's happening in a MIT Harvard global synthetic biology class. Students, he said, program a robot to dispense brightly colored E. coli bacteria in the shape of a design that they created. Psychedelic Results 'After growing on black agar plates for 24 hours, a living artwork flowed under UV light,' he said. The student base, he pointed out, is diverse. 'We have students that are computer scientists, mechanical engineers, urban planners, management students, artists, designers, almost any type of creative or technical background … in the course,' he said. 'And the course has really grown tremendously in recent years, more than doubling our number of accepted students to almost 1300 from MIT Harvard and all around the world. And some of our students are even high school students or even retirees that join us each and every year.' Working Wonders As more of this alchemy, Kong cited projects built to break down temperature-sensitive materials, or deploy nanosensors to surveil environments. One student, he related, used a bioreactor to study indigenous microorganisms. Research Anywhere And then there's the versatility and portability of these project goals. In older times, scientists needed a dedicated lab, because of equipment and mechanical tools. Now, it's different. '(This research) could be (done) anywhere in the world,' he said. 'It could be across the street, in their dorm rooms, Ghana, London in the U.K., wherever our students happen to be.' In fact, Kong adds another quasi-superlative to one that was already in his lexicon: instead of just 'how to grow almost anything from almost anything else,' the phrase becomes 'how to grow almost anything from almost anything else, almost anywhere.' Let's take that a step further, though, because in subsequent narration of other lab work, Kong describes how another student figured out that processes could also be untethered from hands-on access to source material. 'He started to realize that you could take … lab modules like biological production, where organisms are being engineered to produce molecules like lycopene and beta carotene, and they could be programmed totally remotely,' he said. There's a lot more in the video. But this is a good start to understanding the 'modern magic' that goes into learning systems on the cutting edge of today's AI world, and what one of our speakers called the 'secret sauce' enterprise parties can apply to push the envelope with innovation.
