logo
Medicaid Reform Proposals Explained

Medicaid Reform Proposals Explained

Epoch Times10-05-2025

A per capita cap on Medicaid
would limit the total amount the Federal government reimburses states for their Medicaid expenses based on the number of people they have enrolled.
The cap would be adjusted every year.
It would go up or down with enrollment. And it would increase by the rate of inflation, plus maybe 1 percent.
But there's no actual plan
on the table, so who knows?
Right now, states get reimbursed
for a certain percentage of their Medicaid spending. That percentage is based on the income level of the people in the state, and averages about 60 percent.
Except for the people
covered under the 2014 Medicaid expansion. States get back 95 percent of every dollar spent on that group.
The federal government paid
$614 for Medicaid in 2023. That's twice as much as 10 years earlier.
Related Story
5/7/2025
Meanwhile, the states' share
of Medicaid's total expenses decreased by 10 percent, and the federal share increased by 10 percent.
Some Republicans are looking
for a way to send some of that cost back to the states.
The Congressional Budget Office said
the plan would reduce federal spending by between 8 percent and 12 percent on the $7.5 trillion in
Medicaid spending through 2034.
Who would pick up the tab?
The states. They'd be responsible for all the spending above their cap amount, rather than just a portion of it.
But there probably will be no cap.
Speaker
Mike Johnson
told reporters on Monday that the idea was likely 'off the table.' He added, 'But stay tuned.' So, again, who knows?
That would be a win
for Republicans in battleground states and swing districts. Many of them are opposed to any change that would cause people to lose health coverage.
Between 600,000 and 3.9 million people
could wind up uninsured by 2034, depending on how Medicaid cuts were structured. That's according to the Congressional Budget Office.
Fiscal hardliners like Rep.
Chip Roy
(
R-Texas)
aren't giving up.
'Well—I haven't ruled it out,' he
on social media, responding to Johnson's comments.
With Republicans needing
every possible vote to pass the budget reconciliation bill, holdouts for and against the cap both have leverage.
So, once again,
who knows?

Lawrence Wilson
BOOKMARKS
The Federal Reserve declined to shift
after its policy meeting on May 7, citing future risks of higher unemployment and inflation, despite the economy remaining in good condition. 'We don't think we need to be in a hurry,' Fed Chair
Jerome Powell
told reporters on Wednesday.
No pope yet, as
rose from the Sistine Chapel following the first vote of cardinals in Vatican City on May 7. Four more votes are expected on Thursday, and onlookers will watch for the white smoke that indicates a new pope has been picked.
France and Germany will launch a
to address threats from Russia and shore up their defences independently of the United States. 'We will only be able to meet these challenges if France and Germany stand even more closely together than in the past,' German Chancellor
Friedrich Merz
said during a Paris press conference with French President
Emmanuel Macron.
The European Union is taking
to court because they have not fully implemented its Digital Services Act, which is meant to police online activity. EU officials say the nations have not appointed proper personnel with authority to enforce the law, and have not laid out any penalties for breaking it.
U.S. District
Judge John McConnell Jr.
has
an executive order by
Donald Trump
that would have dismantled three small federal agencies, including the Institute of Museum and Library Services. The judge said Trump was stepping beyond his executive power by trying to eliminate agencies that were created and funded by Congress.
—Stacy Robinson

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk's favorability among Republicans dropped 16 points since March, Quinnipiac says
Elon Musk's favorability among Republicans dropped 16 points since March, Quinnipiac says

CNBC

time14 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Elon Musk's favorability among Republicans dropped 16 points since March, Quinnipiac says

Elon Musk's official role in the Trump administration recently came to an end. Many Republicans won't be sad to see less of him, according to the results of Quinnipiac University's latest public opinion survey. While a majority of Republicans still hold a favorable view of Musk, the number fell to 62% in the poll out Wednesday, down from 78% in March, Quinnipiac said. Overall, the Quinnipiac poll found that 30% of self-identified voters surveyed in the U.S. hold a favorable opinion of Musk, according to polling from June 5 to June 9. Republican and Democratic voters remain deeply divided in their views of the world's richest man, who contributed nearly $300 million to propel President Donald Trump back to the White House. Only 3% of Democrats surveyed said they held a favorable of view of the Tesla CEO, who was once seen as an environmental leader appealing to liberal values. Musk didn't respond to a request for comment. Musk and Trump had a very public falling out last week that started with Musk's disapproval of the president's spending bill and escalated into an all-out war of words that played out on social media. Musk said on Wednesday that he regretted some of the posts he made about Trump last week, adding that "they went too far." Even with a slide in his favorability, Musk is still popular among Republicans after his time running the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), an effort to dramatically slash the size of the federal government. Among the Republican respondents to the early June poll, 80% rated Musk and DOGE's work as either excellent or good, while 13% said it was either not so good or poor. In the March poll, 82% of Republicans surveyed said they thought Musk and DOGE were helping the country. Read the full survey results here.

Democrats react to Trump's push for Texas redistricting
Democrats react to Trump's push for Texas redistricting

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Democrats react to Trump's push for Texas redistricting

AUSTIN (Nexstar) — After reports of President Donald Trump convening a meeting Monday with members of the Texas congressional delegation, Texas Democrats say it shows the party is worried about potential losses in 2026. A report in the New York Times detailed a White House meeting in which the president pushed Texas congressmen to pursue a mid-decade redistricting effort. Republicans who spoke to both the Times and the Texas Tribune did not seem keen on the idea, which would require Gov. Greg Abbott to call a special session of the legislature. None of the 25 Republicans who represent Texas in the U.S. House responded to requests for comment, but a source close to the situation confirmed to KXAN that a meeting at the White House will take place Thursday. Changing the congressional map to advantage the GOP would likely require splitting up districts which currently lean heavily toward one party to create more competitive seats, a move that could backfire if Democrats have a good year in 2026. However, changes to the congressional districts in large metro areas like Houston or Dallas could net Republicans some seats without throwing any of their own into jeopardy. And even without redistricting, Republicans have clear pickup opportunities in Texas' 28th and 34th congressional districts — two south Texas districts which swung heavily to Trump in 2024. The current Texas congressional map is already overwhelmingly Republican, with 25 Republicans to 12 Democrats, though one heavily-Democratic seat is vacant. That leaves Republicans with nearly 66% of seats in a state in which Trump received 56% of the vote. Democrats say that the current map is already unfair, and a mid-decade redraw would be a sign of desperation for Republicans ahead of the 2026 midterms. State Rep. Gene Wu, D-Houston, said that Republicans' policies have been unpopular and that the GOP is trying to minimize losses in next year's House races. 'Donald Trump is desperate to cling on to the power that he's had, and he knows just how upset people are about what the Republicans have done in just a few months that they've been in office,' Wu said. 'People are pissed, and they know what's coming.' Wu cited policies passed out of the legislature in Texas, including a ban on all hemp-derived THC products as well as the school voucher program, championed by Abbott, as ways lawmakers have ignored voters. He attributed this to the safe districts which exist under the current maps. The congressional districts drawn in Texas currently do not favor competition — just two House races were decided by fewer than 14 points in the 2024 elections. The current maps — including for the state legislature — are undergoing litigation in El Paso over allegations that the maps were drawn to disadvantage Black and Latino voters. The Supreme Court has shown opposition to racial gerrymandering in recent years, striking down maps in Alabama and Louisiana for disadvantaging Black voters in those states. Wu described the current map as a 'racial gerrymander' and said that if Republicans want to draw an even more favorable map, they will likely succeed in doing so. This would not be the first time Republicans have attempted mid-decade redistricting in Texas. Back in 2003, as Texas was quickly changing from Democratic to Republican, the legislature redrew the maps to heavily advantage the GOP. Democrats lost five seats in the 2004 elections as a result. Democrats then walked out to try and prevent Republicans from meeting quorum and being able to vote on the maps. When asked what should be done about it in the event Republicans try it again, Wu did not give a clear answer, but accused Republicans of playing politics. 'Anytime you hear them talk about redistricting, especially if it's in the middle of the cycle, all this is about political games and trying to destroy our democracy,' Wu said. Congressman Lloyd Doggett, D-Austin, also did not give a clear strategy, but said he has faith in the Austin-area Democrats. 'I hope they will do everything they can to protect the interest of our neighbors in Central Texas and not let some radical gerrymandering occur just because President Trump is desperate to be protected,' Doggett said. Any attempt by Republicans to redraw the maps would need to happen soon, with the filing deadline for the 2026 primary elections coming up at the end of the year. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

David Hogg won't try to keep his DNC role amid dispute over Democratic primaries
David Hogg won't try to keep his DNC role amid dispute over Democratic primaries

San Francisco Chronicle​

time26 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

David Hogg won't try to keep his DNC role amid dispute over Democratic primaries

David Hogg said Wednesday he will not fight to hold onto his leadership role in the Democratic National Committee after igniting a firestorm over his push to target long-serving Democrats in safe congressional seats. Hogg announced his retreat hours after the DNC removed him and another officer, Pennsylvania state lawmaker Malcolm Kenyatta, from their vice chair roles, saying the February elections they won did not follow the party's rules. Hogg said he will not run in the redo elections to be held over the weekend. With dejected Democrats looking for a path back to relevance after a disastrous 2024 election, Hogg said earlier this year that he plans to raise millions of dollars through a political action committee unaffiliated with the DNC called Leaders We Deserve to support young progressives against party stalwarts. He says the party needs a shake-up to bring in leaders who will more aggressively confront Trump and connect with younger voters and offer an inspiring new vision for a party voters are rejecting. The push rankled many Democrats, who said DNC officers should be focused on defeating Republicans, not sowing division among Democrats. Hogg on Wednesday decried 'a serious lack of vision from Democratic leaders, too many of them asleep at the wheel,' noting three Democratic House members have died this year after being reelected in November, leaving the party shorthanded in Washington. The culture on Capitol Hill rewards seniority and protects complacency, he said in a statement announcing his decision to walk away from his DNC role. 'If there is anything activism or history teaches us it's that comfortable people, especially comfortable people with power, do not change,' Hogg said. 'In this moment of crisis, comfort is not an option.' In April, DNC Chair Ken Martin proposed bylaw changes to require party officers to remain neutral in all Democratic primaries. Party neutrality is crucial to maintaining the confidence of voters, he argued, pointing to the bitter feud that emerged after supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders' 2016 campaign believed he was stymied by party insiders putting their thumb on the scale in favor of Hillary Rodham Clinton, who won the nomination but went on to lose the general election to Donald Trump. ___

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store