logo
White South African ‘refugees'? The jokes write themselves

White South African ‘refugees'? The jokes write themselves

The Guardian21-05-2025
Hello and welcome to The Long Wave. On Wednesday, the South African president, Cyril Ramaphosa, will visit Donald Trump in the White House. I spoke to Jonathan Jansen, a professor of education in Stellenbosch, about the tense backdrop to the trip, and the reaction in South Africa to Trump granting white farmers refugee rights in the US.
Since the early days of his presidency, Donald Trump has made white farmers in South Africa one of his pet projects. It is an obsession that dates to his first term, where he amplified allegations by some Afrikaners that they are victims of 'mass killings' and suffer from violence and discrimination by vengeful Black South Africans. There is nothing to support this claim. And yet, in March, Trump expelled the South African ambassador to the US, cut off aid and extended an invitation for political asylum to white farmers, even as the US all but halts all refugee admissions to the country. The first of those white South African 'refugees' arrived in the US two weeks ago.
The source of this odd fixation is those around Trump, who 'doesn't have a sense of the world outside the United States' Jansen tells me, adding: 'To know about South Africa, let alone its politics, [the president] must have whisperers,' who are telling him that there is a 'white genocide'. Jansen suspects one of those is the South African-born Elon Musk, who has 'a grievance against the country'.
A defiant South African government
Jansen believes South Africa's hard line against Israel has fuelled animosity in Washington. Taking the Israeli government to the international court of justice 'is not cool in the world of Trump'. I suggest a provocative factor may also have been how uncompromising and measured the South African government has been on the issue of white farmers when goaded by Trump. 'This is true,' Jansen says. 'Ramaphosa, with all his faults – and they are many – is a man of restraint.'
Earlier this year, the South African government said it would not engage in 'counterproductive megaphone diplomacy' after social media posts by Trump alleged that Pretoria was seizing land from white farmers. South Africa passed a law in 2024 that states land 'expropriation may not be exercised unless the expropriating authority has without success attempted to reach an agreement with the owner or holder of a right in property for the acquisition thereof on reasonable terms'. Decades after the dismantling of apartheid, white people make up 7% of the South African population and own at least half of the land.
Small but stubborn residues of white supremacy
Despite the media focus on the issue, Jansen calls for some perspective. He says that some white South Africans who claim racial discrimination are a small group of people who nurse an inflated sense of resentment because they still cannot accept that apartheid is over. 'There are grievances with a Black government, which is very hard for some of my white brothers and sisters to accept, even after 30 years.'
Jansen says if one is to consider violent crime, 'more Black people die than white people, even as a proportion of the population. Make no mistake, these are white supremacists who are drawn to a white supremacist. Their capacity for reflection is not very high.' Jansen predicts the promise of life in the US will quickly sour. 'I'll make a bet with you that many of them will be back here in no time.'
'South Africans regard it as a joke'
Sign up to The Long Wave
Nesrine Malik and Jason Okundaye deliver your weekly dose of Black life and culture from around the world
after newsletter promotion
I ask him about the view from South Africa, and how the beliefs of those who claim white discrimination resonate. 'South Africans, Black and white, regard it as a joke. It's a huge joke here.' Does it not touch a nerve in a country that has such a heavy legacy of racism? 'Not really,' Jansen says. 'I did a straw poll on my X account, and the majority said: 'Ignore the bastards'. Forty-nine people took Trump up on his offer to find asylum in the US. 'It's not like a million people. It's a handful, many of whom are not actually farmers, taking advantage of a white racist calling them home. 'Don't pay attention to them.' That is the major response.'
But there is still a bitter irony to the whole affair, Jansen observes. If these were Black people, the apartheid government would have given them a one-way ticket to leave and not ever return. 'We don't do that. The very people who were repressing us under apartheid are using the freedom of a new democracy to be able to do things that were unthinkable, even as white people, under the apartheid government.'
'A slap in the face'
Despite the understanding in South Africa that the issue of white discrimination is a political stunt, Jansen notes the galling hypocrisy of it all, considering the effort that Black South Africans made to ensure peace after apartheid. 'What riles is that you're giving attention to people who for 350 years were oppressing us. My argument is: don't get into a tizzy. But I also regard it quite seriously as a slap in the face for Black South Africans.'
The narrative that Black people now hold power over whites is a fiction that obscures the enduring suffering of apartheid. 'Nothing has really changed for Black South Africans apart from the right to vote,' Jansen says. 'Many still live in shacks. They still suffer food insecurity. They still have the highest rates of unemployment. We made these enormous concessions during the negotiations to avert a war under Mandela. Whites here would be treated, as they always were, as fellow citizens as opposed to colonisers. And then, on top of all of that, [there was] a truth and reconciliation commission during which people got away with murder – literally.'
On a personal level, Jansen says he will not hide the fact that he feels hurt. But there is comfort in the fact that 'among ordinary Black South Africans, they don't think this is worth spending time on … and the overwhelming majority of white South Africans really just want to make this country work. One sees this moment for what it is. There is another reality out there.'
To receive the complete version of The Long Wave in your inbox every Wednesday, please subscribe here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's gift to Putin revealed as dossier found at Alaska hotel detailing lunch menu and how to pronounce Vlad's name
Trump's gift to Putin revealed as dossier found at Alaska hotel detailing lunch menu and how to pronounce Vlad's name

The Sun

time4 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Trump's gift to Putin revealed as dossier found at Alaska hotel detailing lunch menu and how to pronounce Vlad's name

DONALD Trump's gift to Vladimir Putin at their Alaska summit on Friday has been revealed after undisclosed details were left lying around. The eight-page printout, that was allegedly found at an Anchorage hotel printer, also showed the planned menu for a lunch that never happened. 5 Trump exchanged a warm handshake with the Russian tyrant when they met for the first time since 2018 on Friday. Despite three hours of talks, the pair did not reach a peace deal to bring the war in Ukraine to a close. But a dossier that was allegedly found by guests in a public printer at the Hotel Captain Cook has shed new light on other details of the meeting. No secretive or sensitive information appears to be included, but the document features insight into the White House's procedure. It includes a memo featuring the names, photos and participants attending the meeting. Also included is a guide on how to pronounce the Russian despot's name - which is outlined as "POO-tihn". But it further revealed the gift that Trump planned to hand over the Putin at the event. An American bald eagle desk statue was listed as the present that was to be gifted to the warmongering tyrant. Previously, Putin gifted Trump a portrait of himself back in March that depicted his now famous fist-pump after a failed attempt on his life on the 2024 campaign trail. Special envoy Steve Witkoff claimed this artwork had "clearly touched" Trump. Donald Trump vows full peace deal not 'mere ceasefire' after Alaska summit as Zelensky to head to White House The Alaska dossier also included details of an eventually scrapped working lunch between the two presidents. The menu would have featured a filet mignon with brandy peppercorn sauce and a salad with champagne vinaigrette. A seating plan had the two leaders facing each other at the middle of a long, rectangular table. However, most of the major details of the widely-watched summit had been published in advance of Trump and Putin's arrival in Alaska. The summit ended with no peace deal being reached, but Trump said "some great progress" had been made. The two leaders made statements to the media following their three hour negotiations. Trump told reporters: "There were many, many points that we agreed on, most of them, I would say. "A couple of big ones that we haven't quite gotten there, but we've made some headway." Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is due to meet Trump at the White House tomorrow for crunch talks. It will be Zelensky's first appearance in the Oval Office since his heated exchange with Trump and Vice President JD Vance in February. Putin has reportedly demanded that Ukraine fully ceded the regions of Donetsk and Luhansk in exchange for no further Russian advances in the south. However, Zelensky has so far ruled out handing over this territory to Moscow. 5 5

Trump hiked tariffs on US imports. Now he's looking at exports – sparking fears of ‘dangerous precedent'
Trump hiked tariffs on US imports. Now he's looking at exports – sparking fears of ‘dangerous precedent'

The Guardian

time21 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Trump hiked tariffs on US imports. Now he's looking at exports – sparking fears of ‘dangerous precedent'

Apple CEO Tim Cook visited the White House bearing an unusual gift. 'This box was made in California,' Cook reassured his audience in the Oval Office this month, as he took off the lid. Inside was a glass plaque, engraved for its recipient, and a slab for the plaque to sit on. 'The base was made in Utah, and is 24-karat gold,' said Cook. Donald Trump appeared genuinely touched by the gift. But the plaque wasn't Cook's only offering: Apple announced that day it would invest another $100bn in US manufacturing. The timing appeared to work well for Apple. That day, Trump said Apple would be among the companies that would be exempt from a new US tariff on imported computer chips. The Art of the Deal looms large in the White House, where Trump is brokering agreements with powerful tech companies – in the midst of his trade war – that are reminiscent of the real estate transactions that launched him into fame. But in recent days, this dealmaking has entered uncharted waters. Two days after Cook and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang had a closed-door meeting with Trump at the White House. The president later announced Nvidia, along with its rival Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), will be allowed to sell certain artificial intelligence chips to Chinese companies – so long as they share 15% of their revenue with the US government. It was a dramatic about-face from Trump, who initially blocked the chips' exports in April. And it swiftly prompted suggestions that Nvidia was buying its way out of simmering tensions between Washington and Beijing. Trade experts say such a deal, where a company essentially pays the US government to export a good, could destabilize trading relations. Martin Chorzempa, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, said that it creates 'the perception that export controls are up for sale'. 'If you create the perception that licenses, which are supposed to be determined on pure national security grounds, are up for sale, you potentially open up room for there to be this wave of lobbying for all sorts of really, dangerous, sensitive technologies,' Chorzempa said. 'I think that's a very dangerous precedent to set.' Though the White House announced the deal, it technically hasn't been rolled out yet, likely because of legal complications. The White House is calling the deal a 'revenue-sharing' agreement, but critics point out that it could also be considered a tax on exports, which may not be legal under US laws or the constitution. The 'legality' of the deal was 'still being ironed out by the Department of Commerce', White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters this week. Nvidia and AMD's AI chips are at the heart of the technological arms race between the US and China. Nvidia, which became the first publicly traded company to reach a $4tn valuation last month, creates the essential processing chips that are used to run and develop AI. The US government has played a role in this arms race over the last several years, setting regulations on what AI chips and manufacturing equipment can be sent to China. If China has less computing power, the country will be slower to develop AI, giving a clear advantage to the US. But despite the restrictions, China has been catching up, raising questions on how US policy should move forward. 'They haven't held them back as far as the advocates had hoped. The US has an enormous computing advantage over China, but their best models are only a few months behind our best models,' Chorzempa said. For US policymakers, 'the question they've had to grapple with is: Where do you draw the line?' The AI chips Nvidia and AMD can now sell to China aren't considered high-end. While they can be used for inference on trained models, they aren't powerful enough to train new AI models. When announcing the deal with Nvidia and AMD, Trump said the chip is 'an old chip that China already possesses … under a different label'. This is where a major debate on AI policy comes in. Those who take a hardline stance on the US's relationship with China say that allowing Chinese companies to purchase even an 'old chip' could still help the country get an advantage over the US. Others would say a restriction on such chips wouldn't be meaningful, and could even be counterproductive. To balance these two sides, the Trump administration is asking companies to pay up in order to export to China – a solution that people on both sides of the AI debate say is a precarious one. 'Export controls are a frontline defense in protecting our national security, and we should not set a precedent that incentivizes the government to grant licenses to sell China technology that will enhance AI capabilities,' said John Moolenaar, a Republican US representative from Michigan, in a statement. But Trump's gut-reaction to dealmaking seems focused on the wallet. On Wednesday, US treasury secretary Scott Bessent praised the arrangement and suggested it could be extended to other industries over time. 'I think that right now this is unique, but now that we have the model and the beta test, why not expand it?' he told Bloomberg. Julia Powles, executive director of the Institute for Technology, Law and Policy at the University of California, Los Angeles, said the deal opens up questions of whether similar pressure can be applied to other tech companies. 'What other quid pro quo might be asked in the future? The quid pro quo that would be of great concern to the [tech] sector is anything that reduces their reputation for privacy and security,' Powles said. 'That's thinking of government like a transactional operator, not like an institution with rules about when, how and for what it can extract taxes, levies and subsidies.' But that seems to be how the White House runs now. When explaining to the press how he made the deal, Trump said he told Huang: 'I want 20% if I'm going to approve this for you'. 'For the country, for our country. I don't want it myself,' the president added. 'And he said, 'Would you make it 15?' So we negotiated a little deal.'

Mark Hamill reveals he planned to leave the US when Donald Trump was re-elected
Mark Hamill reveals he planned to leave the US when Donald Trump was re-elected

The Independent

time34 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Mark Hamill reveals he planned to leave the US when Donald Trump was re-elected

Get the latest entertainment news, reviews and star-studded interviews with our Independent Culture email Get the latest entertainment news with our free Culture newsletter Get the latest entertainment news with our free Culture newsletter Email * SIGN UP I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our Privacy notice Star Wars actor Mark Hamill has revealed he planned to leave the United States when Donald Trump was re-elected as president in 2024. The 73-year-old, known for his role as Luke Skywalker in the iconic sci-fi franchise, gave his wife Marilou Tork – whom he married in 1978 – the choice between relocating to 'London or Ireland'. Hamill's wife, who worked as a dental hygienist and met Hamill while cleaning his teeth, ingeniously convinced her husband not to move countries by suggesting Trump was pushing them out of the US. 'She's very clever. She didn't respond right away but a week later she said, 'I'm surprised you would allow him to force you out of your own country,'' Hamill, a lifelong Democrat, told The Times. ''That son of a b****', I thought. I'm not leaving.' When asked about the political landscape in the United States, Hamill expressed exasperation over 'the bullying, the incompetence, the people in place' in the Trump administration. The actor added that the only way he could 'deal' with the his country's politics without becoming suicidal was to look at the situation 'like a thick, sprawling political novel' instead of reality. open image in gallery Actor Mark Hamill has revealed he planned to leave the United States after Donald Trump was re-elected in 2024 ( Getty ) Despite his horror, Hamill added that he 'still believes' there are 'more honest, decent people' in the country than there are those in a Maga crowd. 'If I didn't, I'd move back to England,' he said. Elsewhere in the interview, Hamill revealed his dislike of US gun culture is such that he almost didn't accept his role in a forthcoming adaptation of Stephen King's horror novel The Long Walk. Hamill will play The Major, a man who runs an annual walking contest in a dystopian version of America that sees 100 young men walk continuously at a pace of four miles an hour – or they'll be shot to death. 'Francis Lawrence, the director, understood what was troubling me,' he said of his initial reluctance to take on the role. open image in gallery Hamill as The Major in 'The Long Walk' ( Lionsgate/YouTube ) 'American society is gun violence and it's hard to get past that, but as I spoke to him I realised this is just the guy. He said he would have been surprised if I wasn't troubled by it.' The actor went on to compare the film to recent ICE [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] arrests in the country, saying agents wearing masks, with no identification, had been 'pulling people out of their cars'. 'They were just brutalising people, kneeling on their necks,' he said. 'When I made the movie I wasn't thinking in terms of it being timely but it's proven to be just that.' Hamill led the three original Star Wars movies – Star Wars (1977), The Empire Strikes Back (1980), and Return of the Jedi (1983) – as Luke Skywalker alongside Carrie Fisher as Princess Leira and Harrison Ford as Han Solo. He reprised the role in all three films of the sequel trilogy: The Force Awakens (2015), The Last Jedi (2017), and The Rise of Skywalker (2019), as well as in numerous TV spin offs, including The Clone Wars and The Mandalorian.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store